{ "prompt_name": "issue-triage", "category": "dev", "date": "2026-02-20", "generated_text": "# Issue Triage \u2014 2026-02-20\n\n## 1) [Bug] URL in message triggers duplicate LLM calls \u2014 processed as both text and attachment (webapp) \u2014 elizaos/eliza #6486\n**Current Status:** OPEN (reported; 1 comment)\n\n### Impact Assessment\n- **User Impact:** **High** (any webapp user pasting URLs; common behavior)\n- **Functional Impact:** **Partial** (chat still works, but produces duplicated output and extra cost)\n- **Brand Impact:** **High** (visible duplication + \u201cwasting tokens\u201d perception)\n\n### Technical Classification\n- **Issue Category:** Bug / Performance (cost amplification)\n- **Component Affected:** Webapp message ingestion + Server streaming/SSE aggregation (`/api/v1/chat/completions` pipeline likely adjacent)\n- **Complexity:** Moderate effort\n\n### Resource Requirements\n- **Required Expertise:** TypeScript; client message serialization; server chat pipeline; SSE/stream framing; attachment/url-metadata handling\n- **Dependencies:** None, but needs clarity on intended behavior for URL preview/metadata\n- **Estimated Effort (1\u20135):** **3**\n\n### Recommended Priority: **P0**\nThis directly doubles LLM calls (cost) and creates broken output for a common input pattern.\n\n### Specific Actionable Next Steps\n1. Reproduce with instrumentation: log when a single user message becomes multiple \u201ccontent items\u201d (text + attachment/preview).\n2. Identify the decision point: where URL detection turns into an \u201cattachment\u201d while preserving original text.\n3. Implement a single-source-of-truth rule:\n - Either (a) keep URL in text and **do not** create a preview attachment for LLM input, or\n - (b) move URL to attachment only and remove from text before LLM invocation.\n4. Add regression tests:\n - One message containing URL \u2192 exactly **one** model invocation and one streamed response.\n5. Add metrics guardrail: detect duplicate model calls for the same message id and warn.\n\n### Potential Assignees\n- **borisudovicic** (cloud/chat pipeline context)\n- **odilitime** (core/runtime + message flow changes)\n- **anchapin** (targeted bugfix PRs; defensive handling)\n\n\n## 2) [Bug/UX] `npx milady` installs an unrelated Alibaba tool instead of Milady (npm package confusion) \u2014 GitHub issue #324 (repo: milady-ai/milady)\n**Current Status:** OPEN (created from Discord; project is pre-release; workaround is GitHub release binaries)\n\n### Impact Assessment\n- **User Impact:** **High** (anyone trying the \u201cstandard install\u201d path)\n- **Functional Impact:** **Yes** (prevents intended installation and onboarding)\n- **Brand Impact:** **Critical** (supply-chain optics; users may assume compromise)\n\n### Technical Classification\n- **Issue Category:** Bug / UX (distribution), Security-adjacent (package name collision/typosquat risk)\n- **Component Affected:** CLI distribution (npm), release & install docs\n- **Complexity:** Moderate effort (may involve renaming, scoping, npm ownership, docs updates)\n\n### Resource Requirements\n- **Required Expertise:** npm publishing, package naming strategy, release engineering\n- **Dependencies:** npm package availability/ownership; decision on official package name & scope\n- **Estimated Effort (1\u20135):** **3**\n\n### Recommended Priority: **P0**\nThis is a front-door installation failure with strong reputational and security implications.\n\n### Specific Actionable Next Steps\n1. Decide canonical install command and package name (prefer scoped: `@elizaos/milady` or similar).\n2. Publish a protected scoped package and update all docs/readmes to the new command.\n3. Add a prominent warning banner in current docs and Discord pinned message until fixed.\n4. If feasible, coordinate with npm to address the conflicting/unrelated package (advisory/abuse report if misleading).\n5. Add CI to verify `npx ` resolves to expected package before releases.\n\n### Potential Assignees\n- **odilitime** (raised/confirmed from Discord; release direction)\n- **Kenk** (docs + developer guidance)\n- **jin** (site/news updates to broadcast correct install path)\n\n\n## 3) [Bug/DevEx] Spartan setup requires manual cloning of missing plugins; `bun install` hangs; Docker files exist but don\u2019t work \u2014 DISCORD-2026-02-17-SPARTAN-SETUP + spartan build/staging PR (2026-02-19)\n**Current Status:** Reported in Discord; acknowledged as \u201cnot polished\u201d; non-functional Docker; staging/build compatibility PR opened in `elizaos/spartan`\n\n### Impact Assessment\n- **User Impact:** **High** (developers attempting Spartan onboarding)\n- **Functional Impact:** **Partial \u2192 Yes** (blocks clean setup for many; \u201cworks if you know how\u201d)\n- **Brand Impact:** **High** (first-time contributor experience is poor)\n\n### Technical Classification\n- **Issue Category:** Bug / UX / Documentation (onboarding)\n- **Component Affected:** Plugin System (dependency resolution), Build tooling (bun), Docker, Spartan repo scaffolding\n- **Complexity:** Complex solution (cross-repo coordination + packaging decisions)\n\n### Resource Requirements\n- **Required Expertise:** Monorepo tooling, bun, Docker, plugin registry conventions, release packaging\n- **Dependencies:** Ongoing plugin upgrades; missing/renamed plugin packages; registry alignment\n- **Estimated Effort (1\u20135):** **5**\n\n### Recommended Priority: **P1**\nThis is a primary developer adoption blocker, especially ahead of beta/onboarding pushes.\n\n### Specific Actionable Next Steps\n1. Publish an authoritative \u201cSpartan Minimal Setup\u201d matrix:\n - Required vs optional plugins; exact repos/branches (`next` vs stable).\n2. Make Docker functional or remove it temporarily to avoid false promises:\n - Ensure Docker builds without manual cloning.\n3. Add a scripted bootstrap:\n - `bun run spartan:bootstrap` that fetches required plugins automatically (or uses registry).\n4. Add CI \u201cfresh machine\u201d install test:\n - Validate `bun install && bun run start` in a clean environment.\n5. Align the spartan staging PR (core-compat/service/build fixes) with a tagged milestone and changelog.\n\n### Potential Assignees\n- **odilitime** (acknowledged current state; core/build familiarity)\n- **lalalune** (next/v2 architecture + multi-language packaging implications)\n- **hanzlamateen** (large-scale dependency/build maintenance work)\n\n\n## 4) [Bug/Platform] Embedding failures on Linux environments \u2014 elizaos-plugins/plugin-ollama #17\n**Current Status:** OPEN (under investigation per weekly summary)\n\n### Impact Assessment\n- **User Impact:** **Medium\u2013High** (Linux is common for self-hosting; embeddings are core for retrieval)\n- **Functional Impact:** **Partial** (agents may run, but RAG/memory/search quality breaks)\n- **Brand Impact:** **Medium** (self-host reliability perception)\n\n### Technical Classification\n- **Issue Category:** Bug / Compatibility\n- **Component Affected:** Model Integration (Ollama), Embeddings pipeline\n- **Complexity:** Moderate effort (environment-specific; dependency / binary / runtime differences)\n\n### Resource Requirements\n- **Required Expertise:** Linux runtime debugging; Ollama API; embeddings formats; Node/Rust/Python interop depending on plugin implementation\n- **Dependencies:** Repro details (distro, ollama version, model, CPU/GPU)\n- **Estimated Effort (1\u20135):** **3**\n\n### Recommended Priority: **P1**\nEmbeddings are foundational for agent usefulness; Linux failures impede the most common hosting environment.\n\n### Specific Actionable Next Steps\n1. Collect a minimal reproducible case (exact command/config, ollama version, model name).\n2. Add diagnostic logging around request payload and response parsing.\n3. Validate platform-specific handling (file paths, HTTP chunking, UTF-8, numeric array parsing).\n4. Add a Linux CI job (or containerized integration test) to prevent regressions.\n\n### Potential Assignees\n- **odilitime** (model/provider integration familiarity)\n- **lalalune** (systems-level debugging across runtimes)\n- **community maintainer of plugin-ollama** (if identified; otherwise recruit from contributors)\n\n\n## 5) [Feature] Support custom OpenAI endpoint URL for OpenAI provider \u2014 elizaos/eliza #6490\n**Current Status:** OPEN\n\n### Impact Assessment\n- **User Impact:** **Medium** (users of OpenAI-compatible providers: SiliconFlow, etc.)\n- **Functional Impact:** **Partial** (core works for OpenAI; blocks compatible alternatives)\n- **Brand Impact:** **Medium** (integration flexibility expectations)\n\n### Technical Classification\n- **Issue Category:** Feature Request\n- **Component Affected:** Model Integration (OpenAI provider), Config system\n- **Complexity:** Simple fix \u2192 Moderate effort (depending on provider abstractions and validation)\n\n### Resource Requirements\n- **Required Expertise:** Provider abstraction; config parsing; security validation (SSRF considerations)\n- **Dependencies:** Ensure endpoint override doesn\u2019t break auth headers, streaming, or model listing\n- **Estimated Effort (1\u20135):** **2**\n\n### Recommended Priority: **P2**\nValuable for ecosystem compatibility, but not a system failure.\n\n### Specific Actionable Next Steps\n1. Add config field (env + config file) like `OPENAI_BASE_URL` / `openai.endpointUrl`.\n2. Enforce allowlist/validation guidance to mitigate SSRF risk in hosted contexts.\n3. Update docs with examples for common OpenAI-compatible providers.\n4. Add a small integration test against a mock OpenAI-compatible server.\n\n### Potential Assignees\n- **odilitime** (already active in provider work per monthly contributions)\n- **lalalune** (provider/routing architecture)\n- **anchapin** (small, safe config change + guards)\n\n\n## 6) [Security/Brand/Docs] Token migration confusion: ai16z vs elizaos are different contracts; users missed migration deadline; lack of clear support path \u2014 DISCORD-2026-02-19-TOKEN-MIGRATION\n**Current Status:** Active community confusion; multiple unanswered questions; no clear ticket/support workflow referenced\n\n### Impact Assessment\n- **User Impact:** **High** (many token holders; repeated questions)\n- **Functional Impact:** **No** (not core framework runtime), but impacts ecosystem participation\n- **Brand Impact:** **Critical** (trust, legitimacy, and professionalism concerns)\n\n### Technical Classification\n- **Issue Category:** Documentation / UX (support), Risk Management\n- **Component Affected:** Community ops, official docs/site, announcements, support workflow\n- **Complexity:** Moderate effort (process + documentation + possible tooling)\n\n### Resource Requirements\n- **Required Expertise:** Community operations, documentation, basic web/content updates; optionally lightweight support tooling\n- **Dependencies:** Final authoritative decisions from Ops on migration policy (late migration?) and official contract references\n- **Estimated Effort (1\u20135):** **3**\n\n### Recommended Priority: **P1**\nEven if not \u201ccode,\u201d this is a trust-and-clarity emergency that repeatedly drains community bandwidth.\n\n### Specific Actionable Next Steps\n1. Publish a single canonical \u201cToken FAQ\u201d pinned everywhere (Discord, website, GitHub discussions):\n - Are tokens the same? (No)\n - Official contract addresses\n - Migration status and whether late migration is possible\n - Rationale for contract design choices (in plain language)\n2. Create an official support intake path (even minimal):\n - A public GitHub Discussion category or a simple form + triage SOP\n3. Add an automated Discord bot response for common token keywords (ai16z, migration, contract).\n4. Ensure moderators have a copy-paste macro with the canonical answers and links.\n\n### Potential Assignees\n- **ElizaBAO** (community announcements/verification comms)\n- **MDMnvest** (already directing users; can help consolidate canonical links)\n- **Kenk** (documentation + developer-facing guidance)\n- **Odilitime** (technical clarifications; alignment with Ops)\n\n\n## 7) [Security/Brand] \u201cWhy is the token mintable?\u201d remains unanswered \u2014 DISCORD-2026-02-19-TOKEN-MINTABILITY\n**Current Status:** Unanswered in Discord summary; recurring concern\n\n### Impact Assessment\n- **User Impact:** **Medium\u2013High** (enough to repeatedly ask; affects investor/user trust)\n- **Functional Impact:** **No**\n- **Brand Impact:** **High** (mintability perceived as rug risk without explanation)\n\n### Technical Classification\n- **Issue Category:** Security (perception + governance) / Documentation\n- **Component Affected:** Token contract governance documentation; transparency reporting\n- **Complexity:** Simple fix (if just explanation) \u2192 Moderate (if contract changes required)\n\n### Resource Requirements\n- **Required Expertise:** Smart contract literacy; ability to explain mint authority, multisig, timelocks; comms\n- **Dependencies:** Confirm actual on-chain mint authority state; confirm governance controls\n- **Estimated Effort (1\u20135):** **2**\n\n### Recommended Priority: **P1**\nHigh-trust impact; resolution may simply be transparent explanation + proof.\n\n### Specific Actionable Next Steps\n1. Verify mint authority status on-chain and document it with links/screenshots and how to verify independently.\n2. If mint authority exists, explain:\n - Who controls it, via what multisig\n - Under what conditions it could be used\n - Any planned renouncement/timelock\n3. Publish a short \u201cToken Security Posture\u201d page and pin it.\n\n### Potential Assignees\n- **Ops team** (mint authority facts)\n- **Odilitime** (technical explanation coordination)\n- **ElizaBAO** (public comms)\n\n\n## 8) [Docs] Contract address information not easily accessible; repeated user requests \u2014 DISCORD-2026-02-19-CONTRACT-ADDR-DOCS\n**Current Status:** Reported as an action item; users redirected manually\n\n### Impact Assessment\n- **User Impact:** **High** (repeated questions)\n- **Functional Impact:** **No**\n- **Brand Impact:** **Medium\u2013High** (looks disorganized; scam risk if users search elsewhere)\n\n### Technical Classification\n- **Issue Category:** Documentation / UX\n- **Component Affected:** Discord channel pins, website/docs, \u201cofficial links\u201d page\n- **Complexity:** Simple fix\n\n### Resource Requirements\n- **Required Expertise:** Docs/content editing; Discord moderation\n- **Dependencies:** None (assuming contracts are already finalized)\n- **Estimated Effort (1\u20135):** **1**\n\n### Recommended Priority: **P2**\nFast win; reduces scam surface area.\n\n### Specific Actionable Next Steps\n1. Add a single pinned \u201cOfficial Contracts & Links\u201d message in the relevant Discord channels.\n2. Mirror the same info on an official website page with a stable URL.\n3. Add \u201chow to verify\u201d instructions (chain explorer steps).\n\n### Potential Assignees\n- **MDMnvest** (already doing routing)\n- **Kenk** (docs)\n- **jin** (site/news publishing support)\n\n\n---\n\n# Conclusion\n\n## A) Top highest-priority issues to address immediately (next 5\u201310)\n1. **P0 \u2014 elizaos/eliza #6486:** URL messages trigger duplicate LLM calls (cost + broken output).\n2. **P0 \u2014 milady-ai/milady #324:** `npx milady` installs the wrong package (distribution/security optics).\n3. **P1 \u2014 Spartan setup & Docker broken (Discord + spartan build PR):** developer onboarding blocker.\n4. **P1 \u2014 plugin-ollama #17:** embeddings failing on Linux (core capability degraded for self-hosters).\n5. **P1 \u2014 Token migration confusion (Discord):** single-source-of-truth FAQ + support intake path.\n6. **P1 \u2014 Token mintability question (Discord):** publish verifiable explanation/proof.\n7. **P2 \u2014 Custom OpenAI endpoint (elizaos/eliza #6490):** compatibility improvement for OpenAI-like providers.\n8. **P2 \u2014 Contract address discoverability (Discord):** pinned canonical links + website mirror.\n\n## B) Patterns/themes suggesting deeper architectural problems\n- **Input normalization is leaky across modalities (text vs attachment):** The URL duplication bug indicates insufficient deduplication and unclear rules for multi-part message construction before model invocation.\n- **Onboarding friction from plugin sprawl and version drift:** Spartan requiring manual cloning + non-functional Docker points to missing \u201cgolden path\u201d packaging and CI validation of fresh installs.\n- **Platform compatibility gaps (Linux embeddings):** Suggests integration tests are not covering the most common self-host environment for model plugins.\n- **Support/documentation debt translating into trust risk:** Token-related confusion shows the project lacks a robust \u201csingle canonical answer\u201d system and a formal user-support intake pipeline.\n\n## C) Recommendations for process improvements\n1. **Add \u201cfresh install\u201d CI gates** for key repos (Spartan, core templates): clean machine/container install must pass before merges.\n2. **Introduce a message-ingestion contract** (schema + invariants): enforce \u201cone user message \u2192 one model invocation\u201d unless explicitly multi-call, with metric assertions.\n3. **Expand integration test matrix** to include Linux for model/embedding plugins (container-based is sufficient).\n4. **Create a lightweight public support workflow**:\n - GitHub Discussions category + triage labels + moderator macros\n - One pinned \u201cOfficial Links / Contracts / Migration FAQ\u201d maintained like release notes\n5. **Release/distribution hardening**:\n - Pre-release checklist includes verifying `npx`/install commands resolve correctly\n - Publish only scoped packages for critical CLIs to reduce namespace collision risk", "source_references": [ "2026-02-20\n---\n2026-02-19.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-19\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Token Clarification and Migration Issues\n\nA significant portion of discussion centered on confusion between $ai6z and $elizaos tokens. While initially confirmed as the same by community members, Odilitime clarified they are **different contracts** with ai16z worth significantly less than ElizaOS. Multiple users requested the ElizaOS contract address and were directed to the appropriate channel. Concerns were raised about:\n\n- Users who missed the migration deadline seeking options to still migrate\n- Token mintability questions remaining unanswered\n- The rebrand from ai16z to ElizaOS losing \"memetic value\" by switching to a \"non-memetic ticker\" (noted by DorianD)\n\n### Technical Positioning and Comparisons\n\n**ElizaOS vs OpenClaw:** When asked about differences, Odilitime provided concrete technical advantages:\n- ElizaOS performs better on benchmarks\n- Has more connectors available\n- More reliable due to not being self-configuring\n\nThis represents an important technical positioning statement for the project.\n\n### Community Engagement and Demonstrations\n\n- **Babylon Discord Demo:** Odilitime promoted \"the hanging plaza\" as the best current demonstration of agents in action, directing new users interested in learning about agents in human digital spaces\n- **Verification Milestone:** ElizaBAO announced ElizaOS received a golden checkmark verification\n- **Hackathon Entry:** The Milady team submitted an entry on BSC that was shared for community voting\n\n### Market Context and Community Concerns\n\nDiscussion acknowledged the broader crypto winter context, with most assets down 99%. Community members expressed concerns about:\n- Perceived lack of marketing follow-through after autofun issues\n- Questions about ElizaCloud status\n- General market performance of the token\n\n### Project Updates\n\n- **Cultanime Team:** Confirmed to be doing very well when asked about their status\n- **Building Interest:** intrepid expressed interest in building, though no specific project details were discussed\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Is $ai6z and $elizaos the same token?**\nA: No, they are different contracts with ai16z worth significantly less (Odilitime)\n\n**Q: How is this different from OpenClaw?**\nA: ElizaOS performs better on benchmarks, has more connectors, and is more reliable since it's not self-configuring (Odilitime)\n\n**Q: Can I have the contract address of ElizaOS?**\nA: Users were directed to check the appropriate channel for contract information (MDMnvest)\n\n**Q: Is the Cultanime team doing well?**\nA: They're doing very well (Odilitime)\n\n### Unanswered Questions\n\n- Why is Ai16z coin pumping if the new migrated coin is ElizaOS?\n- Why is the token mintable?\n- Is there any way to migrate ai16z after missing the deadline?\n- What happened to the promised marketing and ElizaCloud after autofun issues?\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**Token Information Assistance:**\n- MDMnvest helped multiple users (Yoree, NintyNine) by directing them to appropriate channels for contract addresses and official social media handles\n- Maxx Truant and Farzeen arif initially attempted to help Drizello with token confusion (later corrected by Odilitime)\n\n**Technical Guidance:**\n- Odilitime provided comprehensive help to C0rrupt1 on technical differences between ElizaOS and OpenClaw\n- Odilitime welcomed AIKO444 (new user) and directed them to the Babylon Discord demo for learning about agents\n\n**Resource Sharing:**\n- Odilitime helped Quaser M find Shaw's statement by providing links to relevant channels and fixupx posts\n- dEXploarer shared Twitter/X content, with Wes requesting permission to use it as background imagery\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n- Building interest expressed but needs clarification on specific project or scope (intrepid)\n- Address token migration process for users who missed the deadline (J\u00fcju)\n- Clarify token mintability concerns for ElizaOS (Yoree)\n\n### Documentation\n- Update contract address information in the designated channel for easier access (MDMnvest)\n\n### Feature\n- Address marketing and ElizaCloud roadmap questions raised by community (Thanos\ud83d\udca8)\n\n---\n\n*Note: This summary reflects discussions from the \ud83d\udcac-coders and \ud83d\udcac-discussion channels on February 19, 2026.*\n---\n2026-02-18.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-18\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Development & Technical Integration\n\n**AI Workflow and Plugin Architecture**\nThe development community focused on expanding ElizaOS capabilities through plugin integration and workflow automation. **aicodeflow** initiated discussions around MVP development for Agentic AI-to-workflow integration, seeking collaborators for this development stage. **DigitalDiva** explored plugin compatibility for the milady personal AI assistant project, with **Odilitime** confirming that elizaos plugins can be integrated if they have a next branch available. **Kenk** directed developers to the official plugin creation guide at docs.elizaos.ai/guides/create-a-plugin for those wanting to build services for the ElizaOS ecosystem.\n\n**Mobile and Documentation Tools**\n**jin** announced improvements to mobile support for elizaos.news, enhancing accessibility for the community. **Stan** proposed adopting the HackMD MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration tool for team-wide collaborative note-taking and documentation, aiming to eliminate copy-pasting and facilitate easier sharing among team members.\n\n### Security & Risk Detection\n\n**Solana Rugpull Detection System**\n**Vlt9** reported significant success with their latest live testing system, which successfully identified two major Solana rugpulls approximately 2 hours before their crashes. The system flagged DARKTRUMP as High-Risk while still trading at peak value, and also detected the NVIDIA token rugpull. Full documentation of these test results has been added to their docs, with test keys offered to interested community members.\n\n### Business Development & Partnerships\n\n**Grant Applications and Event Participation**\n**ElizaBAO** shared important business updates, including meetings with Solana Foundation and SuperteamMYR, and announced that Clawlana submitted a Solana Grant application. Regarding EthDenver attendance, **Odilitime** and **ElizaBAO** confirmed that Shaw is participating in ETHBuilder talks at the event. **JP | ChainPatrol** offered to connect via Telegram for coordination.\n\n### Community Projects\n\n**Silverizer23** discussed a Pumpfun Hackathon project's potential impact on the Eliza ecosystem on Solana, while **ElizaBAO** shared promotional links for BSC-related projects.\n\n### User Support Issues\n\n**shepa777** raised concerns about losing coins during a token migration process and sought help finding proper support channels. **Kenk** redirected the inquiry to be posted publicly in the channel rather than through DMs, though the specific migration issue remained unresolved, highlighting a potential gap in support infrastructure.\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: For the milady personal AI assistant, can I use elizaos plugins with that?** \nA: If they have a next branch, yes (answered by **Odilitime**)\n\n**Q: Is your team attending EthDenver this week?** \nA: Shaw is attending and joined the ETHBuilder talk (answered by **Odilitime** and **ElizaBAO**)\n\n**Q: Where to open the collab proposal ticket?** \nA: There is no ticket system for this; if it's a service, build a plugin instead (answered by **Kenk**)\n\n### Unanswered Questions\n\n- Is anyone interested in MVP development or preparing for the Agentic AI-to-workflow integration stage? (asked by **aicodeflow**)\n- Which person should I approach for an AMA collab proposal? (asked by **YoungOldman**)\n- Is there any way to help me with coin migration? I don't want to lose my coins. (asked by **shepa777**)\n- Still interested in a test key for rugpull detection system? (asked by **Vlt9**)\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**Plugin Compatibility Guidance** \n**Odilitime** helped **DigitalDiva** understand plugin compatibility requirements for the milady personal AI assistant project, confirming that elizaos plugins can be used if they have a next branch available.\n\n**Plugin Development Direction** \n**Kenk** assisted **YoungOldman** by clarifying the process for collaboration proposals, explaining that there is no formal ticket system and directing service-related integrations to the plugin development pathway, though this didn't fully address the AMA collaboration request.\n\n**Support Channel Redirection** \n**Kenk** guided **shepa777** to post migration concerns publicly in the channel rather than through DMs, though the specific technical issue remained unresolved.\n\n**Test Key Offers** \n**Vlt9** offered test keys for their rugpull detection system to interested community members, promoting collaborative testing and validation.\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n\n- **MVP development for Agentic AI-to-workflow integration** - Mentioned by **aicodeflow**\n- **Mobile support improvements implemented for elizaos.news** - Mentioned by **jin**\n- **Test key distribution for rugpull detection system** - Mentioned by **Vlt9**\n\n### Documentation\n\n- **Full report added to docs for Solana rugpull detection test results (DARKTRUMP and NVIDIA)** - Mentioned by **Vlt9**\n- **Plugin creation guide available at docs.elizaos.ai/guides/create-a-plugin for service integrations** - Mentioned by **Kenk**\n\n### Feature\n\n- **Evaluate and potentially adopt HackMD MCP tool for team-wide collaborative note-taking and documentation** - Mentioned by **Stan**\n- **Need proper support ticket system for coin migration and user issues** - Mentioned by **shepa777**\n---\n2026-02-17.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-17\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### ElizaOS News Platform Development\n\nJin made significant progress on the elizaos.news platform, experimenting with various design approaches before settling on a \"spread\" design that offers better visual appeal and readability. The platform features 100% automated video generation using PlayCanvas (not AI rendering), with automated subtitles and agent narration. A notable upcoming feature is 1-1 interview functionality where users interact with a chatbot, and conversations are transformed into generated interview shows that combine human and AI elements.\n\n### Spartan Setup & Plugin Architecture Challenges\n\nEinav Livne encountered significant installation issues with Spartan, experiencing hanging during `bun install` due to missing plugins (@elizaos/plugin-evm, plugin-farcaster, plugin-jupiter, plugin-knowledge, plugin-mysql, plugin-solana) that required manual cloning. Odilitime acknowledged that Spartan setup remains challenging and hasn't been polished yet due to ongoing plugin upgrades. While Docker files exist, they are currently non-functional. The good news is that plugin installation order doesn't matter, providing some flexibility during setup.\n\n### Milady.ai Project Status & Distribution Issues\n\nThe milady-ai/milady project encountered a distribution problem where `npx milady` installed an unrelated, unmaintained Alibaba tool instead of the intended project. Odilitime confirmed the project is in pre-release status and recommended using binaries from GitHub releases instead. Issue #324 was opened to address the npm package confusion.\n\n### MoltBridge Integration Exploration\n\nVlt9 discussed potential integration between MoltBridge and the Agentic Web system. Their current Beta phase implementation uses header-based API keys for developer integration and stress-testing of scoring logic. They acknowledged the need to transition to cryptographic identity (request signing) for a truly decentralized agent-to-agent (A2A) economy. The discussion centered on mapping security signals into a trust graph and exploring identity standards for oracle accessibility within MoltBridge-native agents.\n\n### Team Changes & Token Economics\n\nImportant organizational updates were shared: CJ was replaced by Hanzla, who had been contributing to Shaw's projects. Sayo transitioned from team member to partner status but continues to work daily with the project. Regarding recruitment, the team is not actively hiring but developers can get noticed by contributing to Shaw's periodic project callouts (every 1-2 months). On the token front, the team confirmed that $elizaos is the main token and that buybacks are conducted using revenue, with Odilitime committing to clarify timing and public disclosure processes with the Ops team.\n\n### AI Model Updates\n\nOdilitime announced the release of Sonnet 4.6 (likely referring to Claude Sonnet 4.6), though no implementation details were discussed.\n\n### Security & Infrastructure\n\nA brief security concern arose when Odilitime discovered an \"API Explorer Key\" in their cloud account without their knowledge. However, this was quickly self-resolved after confirming that the API Explorer automatically creates this key as part of its normal operation.\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Is $milady.ai the token?** \nA: Yes, confirmed by MDMnvest who added the contract address to the appropriate channel.\n\n**Q: Why does bun install hang after cloning plugins manually?** \nA: Einav fixed the bug themselves; Odilitime confirmed Spartan is difficult to set up and hasn't been polished yet.\n\n**Q: Is there an order to clone and install plugins to prevent breaking?** \nA: Order doesn't matter (Odilitime).\n\n**Q: What's the use of $elizaos coins now?** \nA: It's the main token, team does buybacks with revenue (Odilitime).\n\n**Q: When will the team buy back and will it be made public?** \nA: Odilitime will ask Ops team during sync later this week.\n\n**Q: Have several people left the team and are new people joining?** \nA: After CJ left, replaced with Hanzla; Sayo is now a partner working daily with the team (Odilitime).\n\n**Q: Are you guys recruiting?** \nA: Not hiring currently; best way is to work on Shaw's projects when he calls for devs every 1-2 months (Odilitime).\n\n**Q: Can the milady-ai/milady project be tested?** \nA: Yes, but it's not on npm yet, use binaries from GitHub releases (Odilitime).\n\n**Q: Is milady officially released yet?** \nA: It's pre-release (Odilitime).\n\n**Q: Is the video AI generated or manually edited?** \nA: 100% automated, using PlayCanvas not AI rendering (jin).\n\n**Q: Are you open to a quick DM or a technical chat to discuss a potential integration?** \nA: Unanswered (asked by Vlt9 regarding MoltBridge integration).\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**MDMnvest \u2192 jin** \nProvided design feedback for the news site, confirming the \"spread\" design was more visually appealing with better readability.\n\n**Odilitime \u2192 Einav Livne** \nAddressed multiple concerns about Spartan setup, confirming that plugin installation order doesn't matter and acknowledging the setup difficulties. Also provided clear guidance on how to join the team through contributing to Shaw's projects.\n\n**Odilitime \u2192 work** \nExplained the $elizaos token buyback mechanism and committed to getting timeline information from the Ops team. Also clarified recent team changes.\n\n**Odilitime \u2192 davidhq** \nResolved the milady-ai/milady testing issue by directing to GitHub release binaries instead of npm, and opened issue #324 to address the package confusion.\n\n**jin \u2192 ElizaBAO** \nExplained the 100% automated PlayCanvas video generation system and described the upcoming interview feature functionality.\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n\n- **Fix npx milady command installing wrong package** (GitHub issue #324) - Mentioned by Odilitime\n- **Complete plugin upgrades that are blocking Spartan polish work** - Mentioned by Odilitime\n- **Fix Docker files for Spartan that currently don't work** - Mentioned by Odilitime\n- **Explore integration between MoltBridge's graph-based trust system and Agentic Web security signals** - Mentioned by Vlt9\n- **Transition from header-based API keys to cryptographic identity (request signing) for decentralized A2A economy** - Mentioned by Vlt9\n- **Map security signals into trust graph for MoltBridge integration** - Mentioned by Vlt9\n\n### Documentation\n\n- **Create better instructions for Spartan setup including required vs optional plugins list** - Mentioned by Odilitime\n- **Define identity standards for oracle accessibility to MoltBridge-native agents** - Mentioned by Vlt9\n- **Clarify timing and public disclosure process for $elizaos token buybacks** - Mentioned by work\n\n### Feature\n\n- **Implement 1-1 interview functionality with chatbot for elizaos.news** - Mentioned by jin\n- **Concept and storyboard the look for new interview feature** - Mentioned by jin\n---\n2026-02-19.json\n---\nelizaosDailySummary\n---\nDaily Report - 2026-02-19\n---\nElizaOS Community Updates and Token Discussion\n---\nCommunity members shared creative content related to ElizaOS, with dEXploarer posting artwork titled 'THE RENAISSANCE OF THE DREAMERS' that received positive reactions. Another user requested to use the image as their X background, and dEXploarer responded by sharing a custom 'milaidydex' image. The creative exchange highlighted the community's artistic engagement with the project.\n---\nhttps://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1300025221834739744\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/elizaos-media/embed-image-1473859794044452886_0da22e21.jpg\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/elizaos-media/milaidydex_ab421d9a.png\n---\nSignificant confusion exists in the community regarding the relationship between ai16z and elizaos tokens. Multiple users asked if they are the same token, with conflicting responses. While some community members initially said yes, Odilitime clarified they are different contracts and that ai16z is worth way less. Users expressed concern about missing the migration deadline and the ongoing price decline of over 70 percent. DorianD explained the token has no use case and attributed the decline to crypto winter and the loss of memetic appeal from the ai16z rebrand to the less memorable elizaos ticker.\n---\nhttps://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1253563209462448241\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/posters/1771549483277-bdfy2o.png\n---\nCommunity members discussed ElizaOS technical advantages and developments. Odilitime stated that ElizaOS performs better on benchmarks, has more connectors, and is more reliable than alternatives since it is not self-configuring. The project received a golden checkmark verification, which was celebrated by community members. Shaw shared a thread clarifying his current role as CTO at Eliza Labs. The best demo was noted to be running on the Babylon discord in 'the hanging plaza' with multiple agents deployed. ElizaOS was also submitted to participate in the BNB Chain hackathon 'Good Vibes Only: OpenClaw Edition' with community members encouraged to vote.\n---\nhttps://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1253563209462448241\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/elizaos-media/embed-image-1473926558841569361_69af379d.jpg\n---\nSome community members expressed frustration about the project's direction and marketing efforts. One user complained that previous supporters are no longer focusing on ElizaOS or have removed it from their bios, questioning what happened to promised promotion and marketing after autofun flopped and asking about the status of Elizacloud. However, other community members remained supportive, with one posting that ElizaOS will win because of Shaw's vision and understanding of the technology, emphasizing the importance of understanding a leader's perspective to know where the company is heading.\n---\nhttps://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1253563209462448241\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/posters/1771549505373-ete3h7.png\n---\ndiscordrawdata\n---\nElizaOS Project Development Update - February 19, 2026\n---\nOn February 19, 2026, the ElizaOS project concentrated on foundational compatibility and staging fixes. A significant pull request was opened in the elizaos/spartan repository to address core-compat layers and service/build issues. This work indicates the project is preparing for future integrations by resolving compatibility and build-related challenges.\n---\nhttps://elizaos.github.io/api/summaries/overall/day/2026-02-19.json\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/posters/1771549528760-z38iyh.png\n---\nmiscellaneous\n---\n2026-02-19.md\n---\n## ElizaOS Community Updates and Token Discussion\n\n### Community Creative Engagement\n\n- dEXploarer shared artwork titled 'THE RENAISSANCE OF THE DREAMERS' which received positive community reactions\n- A custom 'milaidydex' image was created and shared upon request for use as an X background\n- The creative exchange demonstrated active artistic engagement within the community\n\n### Token Clarification\n\n- Odilitime clarified that ai16z and elizaos are different contracts\n- ai16z token was confirmed to be worth significantly less than elizaos\n- DorianD explained the token decline was attributed to crypto winter and loss of memetic appeal from the ai16z rebrand to elizaos ticker\n\n### Technical Developments and Recognition\n\n- Odilitime reported that ElizaOS performs better on benchmarks than alternatives\n- The platform has more connectors and greater reliability due to its non-self-configuring architecture\n- The project received golden checkmark verification\n- Shaw shared a thread clarifying his current role as CTO at Eliza Labs\n- A demo was deployed and running on the Babylon discord in 'the hanging plaza' with multiple agents\n- ElizaOS was submitted to participate in the BNB Chain hackathon 'Good Vibes Only: OpenClaw Edition'\n\n### Community Support\n\n- Community members expressed support for the project, citing Shaw's vision and understanding of the technology\n- Members emphasized the importance of understanding leadership perspective for the company's direction\n\n## ElizaOS Project Development Update\n\n### Repository Development\n\n- A pull request was opened in the elizaos/spartan repository on February 19, 2026\n- The work addressed core-compat layers and service/build issues\n- Development focused on resolving compatibility and build-related challenges for future integrations\n---\n2026-02-19.json\n---\nelizaOS\n---\nelizaOS Discord - 2026-02-19\n---\n1300025221834739744\n---\n\ud83d\udcac-coders\n---\n# Discord Channel Analysis: \ud83d\udcac-coders\n\n## 1. Summary\n\nThis chat segment contains minimal technical discussion. The conversation primarily consists of social interactions between community members. dEXploarer shared a link to a Twitter/X post, followed by Wes requesting permission to use something as a background image. dEXploarer responded with a self-deprecating comment about the content. The only potentially relevant technical mention was from intrepid expressing interest in building, though no specific context, project details, or technical discussion followed this statement. No concrete technical problems were solved, no implementations were discussed, and no technical decisions were made during this brief exchange.\n\n## 2. FAQ\n\nNo significant technical questions with meaningful responses were present in this chat segment.\n\n## 3. Help Interactions\n\nNo significant help interactions occurred in this chat segment.\n\n## 4. Action Items\n\nType: Technical | Description: Building interest expressed but needs clarification on specific project or scope | Mentioned By: intrepid\n---\n1253563209462448241\n---\n\ud83d\udcac-discussion\n---\n# Discord Channel Analysis: \ud83d\udcac-discussion\n\n## 1. Summary\n\nThe discussion primarily focused on token-related confusion and technical comparisons. The main technical clarification involved the distinction between $ai6z and $elizaos tokens - initially users confirmed they were the same, but Odilitime corrected that they are different contracts with ai16z worth significantly less. Multiple users requested the ElizaOS contract address, with MDMnvest directing them to the appropriate channel.\n\nA key technical comparison emerged when C0rrupt1 asked about differences from OpenClaw. Odilitime provided specific technical advantages: ElizaOS performs better on benchmarks, has more connectors, and is more reliable due to not being self-configuring. This represents a concrete technical positioning statement.\n\nCommunity concerns centered on token migration deadlines, the rebrand from ai16z to ElizaOS, and perceived lack of marketing follow-through. DorianD noted the rebrand lost memetic value by switching to a \"non-memetic ticker.\" Market performance discussions highlighted the broader crypto winter context, with most assets down 99%.\n\nOdilitime promoted their Babylon Discord demo called \"the hanging plaza\" as the best current demonstration of agents in action. ElizaBAO announced ElizaOS received a golden checkmark verification. The Milady team submitted a hackathon entry on BSC that was shared for voting.\n\n## 2. FAQ\n\nQ: Is $ai6z are $elizaos the same token? (asked by Drizello) A: Initially confirmed yes by Maxx Truant and Farzeen arif, but Odilitime corrected that they are different contracts with ai16z worth way less (answered by Odilitime)\n\nQ: Why Ai16z coin is pumping? I thought the new migrated coin is ElizaOs now (asked by EnC) A: Unanswered\n\nQ: Can i have contract adress of elizaos (asked by Yoree) A: Directed to check the appropriate channel (answered by MDMnvest)\n\nQ: Why the token is mintable (asked by Yoree) A: Unanswered\n\nQ: I missed the migration date for my ai16z, is there anyway to still do this? (asked by J\u00fcju) A: Unanswered\n\nQ: What happened to all the promo and marketing promised after autofun flopped? Where's Elizacloud? (asked by Thanos\ud83d\udca8) A: Unanswered\n\nQ: How is this different from openclaw? (asked by C0rrupt1) A: ElizaOS performs better on benchmarks, has more connectors and is more reliable since it's not self-configuring (answered by Odilitime)\n\nQ: Is the Cultanime team doing well? (asked by Odung) A: They're doing very well (answered by Odilitime)\n\n## 3. Help Interactions\n\nHelper: Maxx Truant, Farzeen arif | Helpee: Drizello | Context: Confusion about whether $ai6z and $elizaos are the same token | Resolution: Initially confirmed they were the same (later corrected by Odilitime)\n\nHelper: Odilitime | Helpee: Drizello, EnC | Context: Clarifying token contract differences | Resolution: Explained ai16z and elizaos are different contracts with different values\n\nHelper: MDMnvest | Helpee: Yoree | Context: Requesting ElizaOS contract address | Resolution: Directed to check the appropriate channel for contract information\n\nHelper: Odilitime | Helpee: Quaser M | Context: Looking for information about Shaw's statement | Resolution: Provided link to the relevant channel and fixupx post\n\nHelper: Odilitime | Helpee: AIKO444 | Context: New user wanting to learn about agents in human digital spaces | Resolution: Welcomed and directed to Babylon discord demo \"the hanging plaza\"\n\nHelper: MDMnvest | Helpee: NintyNine | Context: Looking for Twitter handles for ElizaOK and Milaidi | Resolution: Added both to the appropriate channel with instructions to find official socials via dexscreener\n\nHelper: Odilitime | Helpee: C0rrupt1 | Context: Understanding differences between ElizaOS and OpenClaw | Resolution: Explained technical advantages including better benchmarks, more connectors, and reliability\n\nHelper: Odilitime | Helpee: Odung | Context: Concerned about Cultanime team status | Resolution: Confirmed they're doing very well\n\n## 4. Action Items\n\nType: Documentation | Description: Update contract address information in the designated channel for easier access | Mentioned By: MDMnvest\n\nType: Feature | Description: Address token migration process for users who missed the deadline | Mentioned By: J\u00fcju\n\nType: Technical | Description: Clarify token mintability concerns for ElizaOS | Mentioned By: Yoree\n---\n2026-02-19.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-19\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Token Clarification and Migration Issues\n\nA significant portion of discussion centered on confusion between $ai6z and $elizaos tokens. While initially confirmed as the same by community members, Odilitime clarified they are **different contracts** with ai16z worth significantly less than ElizaOS. Multiple users requested the ElizaOS contract address and were directed to the appropriate channel. Concerns were raised about:\n\n- Users who missed the migration deadline seeking options to still migrate\n- Token mintability questions remaining unanswered\n- The rebrand from ai16z to ElizaOS losing \"memetic value\" by switching to a \"non-memetic ticker\" (noted by DorianD)\n\n### Technical Positioning and Comparisons\n\n**ElizaOS vs OpenClaw:** When asked about differences, Odilitime provided concrete technical advantages:\n- ElizaOS performs better on benchmarks\n- Has more connectors available\n- More reliable due to not being self-configuring\n\nThis represents an important technical positioning statement for the project.\n\n### Community Engagement and Demonstrations\n\n- **Babylon Discord Demo:** Odilitime promoted \"the hanging plaza\" as the best current demonstration of agents in action, directing new users interested in learning about agents in human digital spaces\n- **Verification Milestone:** ElizaBAO announced ElizaOS received a golden checkmark verification\n- **Hackathon Entry:** The Milady team submitted an entry on BSC that was shared for community voting\n\n### Market Context and Community Concerns\n\nDiscussion acknowledged the broader crypto winter context, with most assets down 99%. Community members expressed concerns about:\n- Perceived lack of marketing follow-through after autofun issues\n- Questions about ElizaCloud status\n- General market performance of the token\n\n### Project Updates\n\n- **Cultanime Team:** Confirmed to be doing very well when asked about their status\n- **Building Interest:** intrepid expressed interest in building, though no specific project details were discussed\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Is $ai6z and $elizaos the same token?**\nA: No, they are different contracts with ai16z worth significantly less (Odilitime)\n\n**Q: How is this different from OpenClaw?**\nA: ElizaOS performs better on benchmarks, has more connectors, and is more reliable since it's not self-configuring (Odilitime)\n\n**Q: Can I have the contract address of ElizaOS?**\nA: Users were directed to check the appropriate channel for contract information (MDMnvest)\n\n**Q: Is the Cultanime team doing well?**\nA: They're doing very well (Odilitime)\n\n### Unanswered Questions\n\n- Why is Ai16z coin pumping if the new migrated coin is ElizaOS?\n- Why is the token mintable?\n- Is there any way to migrate ai16z after missing the deadline?\n- What happened to the promised marketing and ElizaCloud after autofun issues?\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**Token Information Assistance:**\n- MDMnvest helped multiple users (Yoree, NintyNine) by directing them to appropriate channels for contract addresses and official social media handles\n- Maxx Truant and Farzeen arif initially attempted to help Drizello with token confusion (later corrected by Odilitime)\n\n**Technical Guidance:**\n- Odilitime provided comprehensive help to C0rrupt1 on technical differences between ElizaOS and OpenClaw\n- Odilitime welcomed AIKO444 (new user) and directed them to the Babylon Discord demo for learning about agents\n\n**Resource Sharing:**\n- Odilitime helped Quaser M find Shaw's statement by providing links to relevant channels and fixupx posts\n- dEXploarer shared Twitter/X content, with Wes requesting permission to use it as background imagery\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n- Building interest expressed but needs clarification on specific project or scope (intrepid)\n- Address token migration process for users who missed the deadline (J\u00fcju)\n- Clarify token mintability concerns for ElizaOS (Yoree)\n\n### Documentation\n- Update contract address information in the designated channel for easier access (MDMnvest)\n\n### Feature\n- Address marketing and ElizaCloud roadmap questions raised by community (Thanos\ud83d\udca8)\n\n---\n\n*Note: This summary reflects discussions from the \ud83d\udcac-coders and \ud83d\udcac-discussion channels on February 19, 2026.*\n---\n2026-02-20.md\n---\nFile not found\n---\n2026-02-15.md\n---\n# Overall Project Weekly Summary (Feb 15 - 21, 2026)\n\nThis week, ElizaOS entered a high-velocity phase as it prepared for its official beta launch. The team successfully cleared a massive backlog of technical hurdles while simultaneously expanding the framework's reach into everyday communication tools like WhatsApp and Gmail. By combining core infrastructure upgrades with new decentralized identity features, the project is positioning itself as a robust, secure, and highly adaptable home for the next generation of AI agents.\n\n## Executive Summary\nElizaOS shifted its focus toward a major beta release, prioritizing user onboarding and platform stability. The project achieved significant milestones by integrating popular messaging and productivity apps and launching new on-chain identity tools for agents on the Solana blockchain.\n\n### Key Strategic Initiatives & Outcomes\n\n**Preparing for the Beta Launch and Beyond**\n*Goal: To ensure the platform is stable, user-friendly, and ready for its first 100 official testers.*\n* The team cleared dozens of functional blockers in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), including fixing dashboard bugs and removing restrictive text limits to improve the user experience.\n* A new \"Profile Plugin\" was proposed in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) to automatically build user profiles from social media, making it easier for new users to get started immediately.\n* Efforts are underway in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) to refine the AI's personality, aiming for a more direct and engaging conversational style for the launch.\n\n**Expanding Agent Reach and Utility**\n*Goal: To allow AI agents to work across more platforms and handle more complex tasks.*\n* Major integrations were finalized for WhatsApp, Gmail, and the N8N workflow engine in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), allowing agents to communicate and automate tasks where users already work.\n* The [elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow) repository added a new \"control panel\" (REST API), giving developers a way to manage complex workflows directly without needing to use natural language.\n* The plugin registry in [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry) saw a surge in new tools, particularly for Web3 and financial data exchanges.\n\n**Strengthening Security and Decentralization**\n*Goal: To give agents a verifiable identity and ensure the system remains secure as it grows.*\n* The project introduced the SAID Protocol in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) and [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry), which gives agents a \"digital passport\" on the Solana blockchain for secure, verifiable actions.\n* A security audit was completed for the Model Context Protocol in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), ensuring that as agents share information, they do so safely.\n\n**Improving System Health and Maintenance**\n*Goal: To keep the project's \"engine\" running smoothly and make it easier for community members to contribute.*\n* A major database overhaul was started in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) to make the system faster and more reliable for the long term.\n* Critical fixes to the automated review system in [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry) ensured that outside contributors can have their work checked and merged more quickly.\n* Routine but essential security updates were performed across the documentation site in [elizaos/elizaos.github.io](https://github.com/elizaos/elizaos.github.io) to keep the project's public face secure.\n\n### Cross-Repository Coordination\n* **Unified Identity Standards**: The implementation of the SAID Protocol required synchronized work between the core framework [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) and the [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry) to ensure agents can use their new on-chain identities across all plugins.\n* **Workflow Automation**: The N8N workflow integration involved coordinated updates in the core repository [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) and the specific [elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow) repo to provide a seamless experience for managing complex AI tasks.\n* **Automated Maintenance**: The team successfully fixed \"Renovate\" (an automated update tool) in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), which now helps keep dependencies across the entire ecosystem up to date automatically.\n\n## Repository Spotlights\n\n### elizaos/eliza\n* Initiated a major database refactor ([#6509](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6509)) to improve long-term system architecture.\n* Integrated the SAID Protocol for on-chain Solana identity ([#6510](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6510)), enabling verifiable agent signatures.\n* Finalized major integrations for WhatsApp ([#6401](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6401)), Gmail ([#6404](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6404)), and N8N ([#6429](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6429)).\n* Resolved critical automated update issues ([#6488](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6488)) and enabled multi-language dependency management ([#6506](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6506), [#6507](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6507)).\n* Added support for the Opus 4.5 model ([#6368](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6368)) and Chain-of-Thought reasoning ([#6294](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6294)).\n\n### elizaos-plugins/registry\n* Expanded the ecosystem with new plugins including `@elizaos/plugin-said` ([#264](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/264)) and several exchange-related tools ([#261](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/261), [#262](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/262)).\n* Fixed a high-priority issue where the automated review system was blocking new contributions ([#259](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/issues/259)).\n* Improved support for external contributors by fixing the review process for forked repositories ([#260](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/260)).\n\n### elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow\n* Launched a comprehensive REST API for direct workflow management and monitoring ([#16](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow/pull/16)).\n* Fixed a critical bug in how the AI handles workflow properties, ensuring stability even when the AI provides incomplete data ([#18](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow/pull/18)).\n\n### elizaos-plugins/plugin-ollama\n* Identified and began investigating a community-reported issue regarding embedding failures on Linux environments ([#17](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-ollama/issues/17)).\n\n### elizaos/elizaos.github.io\n* Maintained project health through routine dependency synchronization and version updates ([#242](https://github.com/elizaos/elizaos.github.io/pull/242)).\n---\n2026-02-01.md\n---\nNo activity recorded for 2026-02-01.\n---\n{\n \"interval\": {\n \"intervalStart\": \"2026-02-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"intervalEnd\": \"2026-03-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"intervalType\": \"month\"\n },\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"overview\": \"From 2026-02-01 to 2026-03-01, elizaos/eliza had 32 new PRs (18 merged), 38 new issues, and 30 active contributors.\",\n \"topIssues\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7FcGAc\",\n \"title\": \"feat(scenarios): Add Cost Evaluator\",\n \"author\": \"monilpat\",\n \"number\": 5759,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"# feat(scenarios): Add Cost Evaluator\\n\\nLinks: [Issue #5726](https://github.com/elizaOS/eliza/issues/5726)\\n\\n## Summary\\nIntroduce an evaluator that asserts the estimated dollar cost of LLM usage per step. Cost is derived from token counts and a model price table.\\n\\n## Goals\\n- Estimate cost (USD) for each step from recorded token metrics\\n- Allow thresholds (`max_cost_usd`) to fail expensive runs\\n- Support multiple models within a single step\\n\\n## Acceptance Criteria\\n1. New evaluator type `llm_cost`\\n2. Price table configurable via env or default map\\n3. Evaluator passes if total step cost <= `max_cost_usd`\\n4. Detailed message with model breakdown and total\\n\\n## Schema Changes\\nEdit `packages/cli/src/commands/scenario/src/schema.ts`:\\n\\n```ts\\nconst LlmCostEvaluationSchema = BaseEvaluationSchema.extend({\\n type: z.literal('llm_cost'),\\n max_cost_usd: z.number(),\\n});\\n```\\n\\n## Pricing Source\\nAdd a small utility `packages/cli/src/commands/scenario/src/pricing.ts`:\\n\\n```ts\\nexport type ModelPricing = {\\n inputPer1K: number; // USD per 1000 input tokens\\n outputPer1K: number; // USD per 1000 output tokens\\n};\\n\\nexport const DEFAULT_MODEL_PRICING: Record = {\\n TEXT_SMALL: { inputPer1K: 0.15, outputPer1K: 0.60 },\\n TEXT_LARGE: { inputPer1K: 0.50, outputPer1K: 1.50 },\\n OBJECT_SMALL: { inputPer1K: 0.50, outputPer1K: 1.50 },\\n};\\n\\nexport function getPricing(modelType: string, overrides?: Record): ModelPricing | null {\\n const table = overrides ?? DEFAULT_MODEL_PRICING;\\n return table[modelType] ?? null;\\n}\\n```\\n\\nAllow overrides via `SCENARIO_MODEL_PRICING` env (JSON string) in a follow-up.\\n\\n## Evaluation Implementation\\nAdd to `EvaluationEngine`:\\n\\n```ts\\nclass LlmCostEvaluator implements Evaluator {\\n async evaluate(params: EvaluationSchema, runResult: ExecutionResult): Promise {\\n if (params.type !== 'llm_cost') throw new Error('Mismatched evaluator');\\n const llm = runResult.metrics?.llm ?? [];\\n if (!llm.length) return { success: false, message: 'No LLM metrics found for cost calculation' };\\n\\n const pricingOverrides = process.env.SCENARIO_MODEL_PRICING ? JSON.parse(process.env.SCENARIO_MODEL_PRICING) : undefined;\\n let total = 0;\\n for (const m of llm) {\\n const pricing = getPricing(m.modelType, pricingOverrides);\\n if (!pricing) continue;\\n const inTok = m.promptTokens ?? 0;\\n const outTok = m.completionTokens ?? 0;\\n total += (inTok / 1000) * pricing.inputPer1K + (outTok / 1000) * pricing.outputPer1K;\\n }\\n\\n const success = total <= params.max_cost_usd;\\n return { success, message: `Estimated cost: $${total.toFixed(4)} (limit $${params.max_cost_usd.toFixed(4)})` };\\n }\\n}\\n```\\n\\nRegister:\\n\\n```ts\\nthis.register('llm_cost', new LlmCostEvaluator());\\n```\\n\\n## Example Usage\\n\\n```yaml\\nevaluations:\\n - type: llm_cost\\n max_cost_usd: 0.05\\n```\\n\\n## Tests\\n- Unit: price math with multiple model records\\n- Integration: with token_count metrics present and absent\\n\\n## Notes\\nThis builds on the Token Count evaluator and shared metrics capture. It complements mocking enhancements described in [Issue #5726](https://github.com/elizaOS/eliza/issues/5726).\\n\\n\\n\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2025-08-12T04:27:23Z\",\n \"closedAt\": \"2026-02-12T22:43:04Z\",\n \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7nsf3_\",\n \"title\": \"[Agent] Eliza Character File & Prompt Engineering\",\n \"author\": \"borisudovicic\",\n \"number\": 6447,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"## Description\\n\\nImprove Eliza's character file and prompts based on initial testing feedback.\\n\\n## Background\\n\\nBoris (Feb 2): \\\"I've talked to Eliza only a little bit, just to test her out. I think she'll definitely need some edits in her character file, some more prompt engineering. She's a good start so far, but there's definitely stuff we're gonna have to work on. It'll be iterative.\\\"\\n\\n## Acceptance Criteria\\n\\n- [ ] Review current character file responses\\n- [ ] Identify areas needing improvement\\n- [ ] Update character file with better prompts\\n- [ ] Add message examples (Ben has PRs for this)\\n- [ ] Test with Sonnet model\\n- [ ] Iterate based on user feedback\\n\\n## Technical Notes\\n\\nBen mentioned:\\n\\n* Currently using a different model, switching to Sonnet\\n* Two PRs coming that add message examples and change model to Sonnet\\n* \\\"Huge difference in price between Sonnet and \\\\[current model\\\\]\\\"\\n\\nBoris mentioned Sonnet 5 coming out soon - good timing to test on Eliza if cheaper.\\n\\n## Priority\\n\\n**P2 - Iterative improvement**\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-02T17:48:44Z\",\n \"closedAt\": \"2026-02-16T21:52:18Z\",\n \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7pWP6K\",\n \"title\": \"[Bug] URL in message triggers duplicate LLM calls - processed as both text and attachment (webapp)\",\n \"author\": \"thewoweffect\",\n \"number\": 6486,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"## Description\\nWhen a user sends a message containing a URL, ElizaOS processes it twice:\\n1. As text content \u2192 generates response\\n2. As attachment (metadata/preview) \u2192 generates second response\\n\\nBoth responses are sent through the same SSE stream before the `done` event, resulting in duplicated text in the final response.\\n\\n## Steps to Reproduce\\n1. Start ElizaOS with webapp\\n2. Send a message containing a URL (e.g., \\\"Check this: https://example.com\\\")\\n3. Observe the response\\n\\n## Expected Behavior\\nURL should be processed once, generating a single response.\\n\\n## Actual Behavior\\nTwo identical (or near-identical) responses are generated and streamed as one message, doubling token usage and producing duplicated output.\\n\\n## Impact\\n- 2x LLM API calls per message with URL\\n- Doubled token costs\\n- Poor UX with duplicated responses\\n- Forces workarounds on client side\\n\\n## Environment\\n- ElizaOS version: [your version]\\n- Client: webapp\\n\\n## Suggested Fix\\nEnsure URL is processed either as text OR as attachment, not both. The decision should happen in the message processing flow before LLM calls.\\n\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-09T07:36:55Z\",\n \"closedAt\": null,\n \"state\": \"OPEN\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7plYW-\",\n \"title\": \"Feature Request: Support custom OpenAI endpoint URL for OpenAI provider\",\n \"author\": \"coolRoger\",\n \"number\": 6490,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"## Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.\\nThe current OpenAI provider does **not support configuring a custom OpenAI endpoint URL**, which makes it impossible to use OpenAI-compatible third-party services (e.g., SiliconFlow). These services follow the OpenAI API format but require pointing to their own endpoint URLs instead of the official OpenAI endpoint.\\n\\n## Describe the solution you'd like\\nAdd a **configurable `openai endpoint url` field/parameter** to the OpenAI provider, so users can manually specify the API endpoint URL when using OpenAI-compatible services.\\n\\n## Describe alternatives you've considered\\n- Switching to a dedicated provider for SiliconFlow: Not ideal, as it breaks the unified OpenAI-compatible usage pattern.\\n- Hardcoding the endpoint: Not flexible for different OpenAI-compatible providers.\\n\\n## Additional context\\nMany cloud / inference providers (SiliconFlow, etc.) provide OpenAI-compatible APIs, only differing in the endpoint URL. Supporting custom endpoints will greatly improve the compatibility and flexibility of the OpenAI provider.\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-10T00:57:25Z\",\n \"closedAt\": null,\n \"state\": \"OPEN\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7qLiWA\",\n \"title\": \"Image content stripped from LLM requests in cloud chat\",\n \"author\": \"borisudovicic\",\n \"number\": 6494,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"## Issue is inside: `/api/v1/chat/completions`. `convertToUIMessages`\\n\\n\\\"Screenshot\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-11T22:08:25Z\",\n \"closedAt\": \"2026-02-16T21:51:50Z\",\n \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n }\n ],\n \"topPRs\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs68XpPS\",\n \"title\": \"V2.0.0\",\n \"author\": \"lalalune\",\n \"number\": 6351,\n \"body\": \"This is a working branch of elizaOS v2.0.0\\r\\n\\r\\nCritically, this removes app, server, CLI and all non-essentials. Instead, we focus on runtime in Rust, Typescript, with critical plugins ported as well\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-01-09T17:06:10Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 2384715,\n \"deletions\": 298813\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7CUyZi\",\n \"title\": \"feat: next generation multi-language Eliza with Rust, Python and TypeScript support\",\n \"author\": \"lalalune\",\n \"number\": 6485,\n \"body\": \"This is the next version of eliza\\r\\n\\r\\nRust, python and typescript\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\n# Major Updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Add complete Python and Rust core packages, extending Eliza to these languages\\r\\n- Add Python and Rust native versions of popular plugins\\r\\n- Remove default application, client and server infrastructure\\r\\n- Add examples for all major frameworks\\r\\n- Bootstrap is integrated into core, enabled with basicCapabilities by default and optionally extendedCapabiltiies\\r\\n- Core plugins are also rust, python and typescript\\r\\n- Comes with a WIP code agent\\r\\n\\r\\n# Minor updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Agents can now respond without needing a roomId or worldId\\r\\n- Initial message memory is created inside the message handler service (was confusing and not that way)\\r\\n- Can running planningMode true or false, on false skips planning and calls single action (good for games and simple agents)\\r\\n- Actions can have arguments, and can be called with arguments. This way they can be called like tools without needing a separate step\\r\\n\\r\\nTODO\\r\\n- LLM mode -- can be SMALL, LARGE or DEFAULT -- SMALL and LARGE override the LLM small or large so all use the small or all use the large\\r\\n- checkShouldRespond defaults to true but can be turned off for ChatGPT mode\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-08T18:44:21Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 649890,\n \"deletions\": 303180\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7EjIkM\",\n \"title\": \"feat: add SAID Protocol on-chain Solana identity for ElizaOS agents\",\n \"author\": \"kaiclawd\",\n \"number\": 6510,\n \"body\": \"## What this does\\n\\nEvery new agent created via `elizaos create` now automatically gets a free on-chain identity on [SAID Protocol](https://saidprotocol.com) \u2014 Solana AI Identity.\\n\\n## Changes\\n\\n- `packages/elizaos/src/utils/said.ts` \u2014 new module: Ed25519 keypair generation (pure Node `crypto`, zero new dependencies) + SAID registration via REST API\\n- `packages/elizaos/src/commands/create.ts` \u2014 registers agent with SAID after project creation, saves wallet, displays profile URL\\n\\n## What happens on `elizaos create`\\n\\n```\\n\u2728 Project created successfully!\\n\\n\u26a1 SAID Protocol identity created\\n Wallet: 7xKXtg2CW87d97TXJSDpbD5jBkheTqA83TZRuJosgAs\\n Profile: https://saidprotocol.com/agents/7xKXtg2CW87d97TXJSDpbD5jBkheTqA83TZRuJosgAs\\n\\n Key saved to .said-wallet.json (add to .gitignore!)\\n```\\n\\n## Why\\n\\n- **Free** \u2014 off-chain pending registration, no SOL required\\n- **Zero new dependencies** \u2014 uses Node's built-in `crypto` module for Ed25519 keypair generation\\n- **Non-breaking** \u2014 fully opt-out, errors are silently caught, never crashes\\n- **Discoverable** \u2014 agent appears in the public SAID agent directory at [saidprotocol.com/agents](https://saidprotocol.com/agents)\\n- **On-chain upgrade available** \u2014 ~0.01 SOL upgrades to a cryptographically verified badge via challenge-response (proves the entity is a running agent)\\n\\n## SAID Protocol\\n\\nSAID is on-chain identity infrastructure for AI agents on Solana. Think of it as a universal agent passport \u2014 verifiable identity, reputation scores, skill listings, and agent-to-agent discovery.\\n\\n[saidprotocol.com](https://saidprotocol.com) | [Docs](https://saidprotocol.com/docs.html)\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-18T08:01:49Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 648299,\n \"deletions\": 302354\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7CJoKo\",\n \"title\": \"next\",\n \"author\": \"lalalune\",\n \"number\": 6474,\n \"body\": \"This is the next version of eliza\\r\\n\\r\\nRust, python and typescript\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\n# Major Updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Add complete Python and Rust core packages, extending Eliza to these languages\\r\\n- Add Python and Rust native versions of popular plugins\\r\\n- Remove default application, client and server infrastructure\\r\\n- Add examples for all major frameworks\\r\\n- Bootstrap is integrated into core, enabled with basicCapabilities by default and optionally extendedCapabiltiies\\r\\n- Core plugins are also rust, python and typescript\\r\\n- Comes with a WIP code agent\\r\\n\\r\\n# Minor updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Agents can now respond without needing a roomId or worldId\\r\\n- Initial message memory is created inside the message handler service (was confusing and not that way)\\r\\n- Can running planningMode true or false, on false skips planning and calls single action (good for games and simple agents)\\r\\n- Actions can have arguments, and can be called with arguments. This way they can be called like tools without needing a separate step\\r\\n\\r\\nTODO\\r\\n- LLM mode -- can be SMALL, LARGE or DEFAULT -- SMALL and LARGE override the LLM small or large so all use the small or all use the large\\r\\n- checkShouldRespond defaults to true but can be turned off for ChatGPT mode\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-07T08:00:35Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 591239,\n \"deletions\": 282388\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7ESCAW\",\n \"title\": \"chore: the great database refactor\",\n \"author\": \"odilitime\",\n \"number\": 6509,\n \"body\": \"built on #6496\\r\\n\\r\\ndb go zoom zoom\\r\\n\\r\\n- move out anything drizzle out of core (separation of concerns)\\r\\n- make plugin-sql actual plugin-drizzle (merge plugin-mysql into plugin-sql)\\r\\n- generic non-pgTable/non-MysqlTable schema definitions for core & plugins\\r\\n- finish db api rework that started in 1.x (general 14x speed improvements when more than one item)\\r\\n- audit 60 plugins and assess what functionality is missing and add it\\r\\n\\r\\nnot done\\r\\n- rust/python checks\\r\\n- plugin checks\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\n## Summary by CodeRabbit\\r\\n\\r\\n* **New Features**\\r\\n * Database upsert operations for agents, entities, rooms, and worlds.\\r\\n * Pagination support in query methods (limit/offset parameters).\\r\\n * Plugin storage system for custom data without Drizzle coupling.\\r\\n * Messaging adapter interface for decoupled messaging concerns.\\r\\n\\r\\n* **Bug Fixes**\\r\\n * Improved leaderboard numbering in BFCL benchmark when inserting results mid-table.\\r\\n\\r\\n* **Documentation**\\r\\n * Benchmark results documentation with performance analysis.\\r\\n\\r\\n* **Refactor**\\r\\n * Batch-first CRUD API redesign with improved return types.\\r\\n * Single-item method wrappers moved to AgentRuntime for consistency.\\r\\n * Plugin system modernization with unified SQL interface across databases.\\r\\n\\r\\n* **Chores**\\r\\n * Brand standardization across codebase (ElizaOS \u2192 elizaOS).\\r\\n\\r\\n\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-17T07:27:26Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 42375,\n \"deletions\": 9609\n }\n ],\n \"codeChanges\": {\n \"additions\": 18576,\n \"deletions\": 3807,\n \"files\": 160,\n \"commitCount\": 127\n },\n \"completedItems\": [\n {\n \"title\": \"feat(auth): implement JWT authentication and user management\",\n \"prNumber\": 6200,\n \"type\": \"feature\",\n \"body\": \"## Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\n- Data isolation / multi-entity support\\r\\n- External JWT provider integration (Privy, Auth0, Clerk, Supabase, Google, Embbeded)\\r\\n\\r\\n## Risks\\r\\n\\r\\n**Low**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Requires `ENABLE_DATA_ISOLATION=true` to activate JWT auth mode\\r\\n\\r\\n#\",\n \"files\": [\n \".github/workflows/client-cypress-tests.yml\",\n \"packages/client/cypress/e2e/auth/01-auth-flow.cy.ts\",\n \"packages/client/cypress/e2e/auth/02-protected-features.cy.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/App.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/ProtectedRoute.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/ai-elements/response.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/app-sidebar.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/auth-dialog.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/connection-error-banner.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/connection-status.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/group-card.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/group-panel.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/context/AuthContext.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/context/ConnectionContext.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/context/ServerConfigContext.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/hooks/use-query-hooks.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/hooks/use-socket-chat.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/index.css\",\n \"packages/client/src/lib/api-client-config.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/lib/auth-utils.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/lib/socketio-manager.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/routes/chat.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/routes/group.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/routes/home.tsx\",\n \"packages/config/src/eslint/eslint.config.base.js\",\n \"packages/core/src/database.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/runtime.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/types/database.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/types/index.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/types/user.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/src/base.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/src/schema/index.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/src/schema/user.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/integration/jwt-workflow.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/test-utils/jwt-helper.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/api/auth/credentials.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/middleware/auth-middleware-chain.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/middleware/auth-middleware.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/middleware/jwtMiddleware.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/ed25519-verifier.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/factory.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/jwks-verifier.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/secret-verifier.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/socketio/authentication.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/agents/logs.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/agents/runs.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/auth/credentials.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/auth/index.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/index.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/memory/agents.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/index.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"docs: core documentation guides\",\n \"prNumber\": 6356,\n \"type\": \"docs\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n- Adds core documentation pages: architecture, core concepts, plugin development, interop, deployment, and API reference.\\n\\n## Test plan\\n- [ ] Review rendered markdown formatting and links.\\n\\n\\n---\\n\\n> [!NOTE]\\n\",\n \"files\": [\n \"docs/API_REFERENCE.md\",\n \"docs/ARCHITECTURE.md\",\n \"docs/CORE_CONCEPTS.md\",\n \"docs/DEPLOYMENT_GUIDE.md\",\n \"docs/INTEROP_GUIDE.md\",\n \"docs/PLUGIN_DEVELOPMENT.md\",\n \"packages/interop/README.md\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(cli): always use 'latest' for @elizaos deps in created projects\",\n \"prNumber\": 6362,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\n- Fixes issue where `elizaos create` fails when CLI is linked from monorepo because packages with version like `1.7.2-alpha.0` couldn't be found on npm\\n- Both build-time and runtime scripts now use `'latest'` for `@elizaos/*` de\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/cli/src/scripts/copy-templates.ts\",\n \"packages/cli/src/utils/copy-template.ts\",\n \"packages/cli/tests/integration/local-development.test.ts\",\n \"packages/cli/tests/utils/copy-template.test.ts\",\n \".github/workflows/cli-tests.yml\",\n \"packages/cli/bunfig.toml\",\n \"packages/cli/tests/commands/update.test.ts\",\n \"packages/cli/tests/test-timeouts.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(cli): validate directory path in ensureDir to prevent ENOENT error\",\n \"prNumber\": 6379,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"This PR adds validation to the `ensureDir` function to prevent unclear ENOENT errors when an empty directory path is provided.\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nWhen `ensureDir` was called with an empty string or whitespace-only path, it would attempt to execut\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/cli/src/utils/get-config.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(server): emit MESSAGE_SENT event after sending to central server\",\n \"prNumber\": 6378,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"This PR fixes #5216 - EventType.MESSAGE_SENT event not being emitted when agent responses are sent to the central server API.\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nThe `sendAgentResponseToBus` function in `packages/server/src/services/message.ts` sends agent respon\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/server/src/services/message.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"docs: add environment variables documentation\",\n \"prNumber\": 6377,\n \"type\": \"docs\",\n \"body\": \"This PR adds comprehensive documentation for server environment variables, addressing #5716.\\n\\n## Summary\\n\\nAdded `docs/environment-variables.md` with detailed documentation for:\\n- `ELIZA_SERVER_AUTH_TOKEN` - API authentication for securing e\",\n \"files\": [\n \"docs/environment-variables.md\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(cli): load .env files in agent commands for authentication\",\n \"prNumber\": 6376,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"This PR fixes #5707 - an issue where `elizaos agent` commands would fail when connecting to a remote server that uses `ELIZA_SERVER_AUTH_TOKEN`.\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nWhen running `elizaos agent list` (or other agent commands) against a remote serve\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/cli/src/commands/agent/utils/validation.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"V2.0.0: dynamic execution engine (test if context is going to blown)\",\n \"prNumber\": 6384,\n \"type\": \"tests\",\n \"body\": \"Redo #6113 for 2.0.0, first pass\\n\\n\\n---\\n\\n> [!NOTE]\\n> Introduces a validation-aware, schema-driven prompt execution path and applies it across runtimes and message flows.\\n> \\n> - Adds `dynamic_prompt_exec_from_state`/`dy\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/python/elizaos/runtime.py\",\n \"packages/python/elizaos/services/message_service.py\",\n \"packages/python/elizaos/types/__init__.py\",\n \"packages/python/elizaos/types/state.py\",\n \"packages/rust/src/runtime.rs\",\n \"packages/rust/src/services/message_service.rs\",\n \"packages/rust/src/types/mod.rs\",\n \"packages/rust/src/types/state.rs\",\n \"packages/rust/src/types/streaming.rs\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/runtime.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/services/message.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/types/runtime.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/types/state.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/types/streaming.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/utils/streaming.ts\",\n \"bun.lock\",\n \"package.json\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"V2.0.0: fixed avatar example and elevenlabs plugin\",\n \"prNumber\": 6387,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"# Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\nFixes ElevenLabs API integration issues in `examples/avatar` (formerly `vrm` example) and consolidates the project structure.\\r\\n\\r\\n# Risks\\r\\n\\r\\nLow. Changes are isolated to the `examples/avatar` directory and the `plugin-elevenl\",\n \"files\": [\n \"examples/avatar/README.md\",\n \"examples/avatar/index.html\",\n \"examples/avatar/src/App.tsx\",\n \"examples/vrm/src/App.tsx\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/README.md\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/README.md\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/src/eliza_plugin_elevenlabs/types.py\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/tests/conftest.py\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/tests/test_types.py\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/README.md\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/src/services/elevenlabs_service.rs\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/src/types.rs\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/tests/integration_tests.rs\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/tests/tts_integration.rs\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/README.md\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/package.json\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/src/index.browser.ts\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/src/index.ts\",\n \"plugins/plugin-s3-storage/README.md\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(plugin-bootstrap): add null check for runtime.providers\",\n \"prNumber\": 6473,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\n- **Fix**: Add null check for `runtime.providers` in `providersProvider`\\n- **Impact**: Prevents `TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'filter')`\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nWhen `runtime.providers` is `null` or `undefined`, the c\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/providers.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix: add null checks to Object.entries calls in settings utilities\",\n \"prNumber\": 6471,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\nThis PR adds defensive null/undefined checks before Object.entries() calls in the @elizaos/core package's settings utilities to prevent runtime errors.\\n\\n## Changes\\n\\n### packages/core/src/settings.ts\\n\\nAdded null/undefined guards \",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/core/src/settings.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"chore(examples-art): v2 update dependencies, training pipeline, and tests for 2048 game\",\n \"prNumber\": 6461,\n \"type\": \"tests\",\n \"body\": \"# Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\nRelated to ART (Agentic Reinforcement Training) example improvements for v2.0.0\\r\\n\\r\\n# Risks\\r\\n\\r\\nLow. Changes are isolated to the `examples/art` directory and root `.gitignore`. Only adds new dependencies, enhances existing fun\",\n \"files\": [\n \".gitignore\",\n \"examples/art/.gitignore\",\n \"examples/art/README.md\",\n \"examples/art/elizaos_art/games/game_2048/__init__.py\",\n \"examples/art/elizaos_art/games/game_2048/cli.py\",\n \"examples/art/elizaos_art/trainer.py\",\n \"examples/art/pyproject.toml\",\n \"examples/art/tests/test_games.py\",\n \"examples/art/tests/test_integration.py\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"feat(core): add request context for per-user entity settings\",\n \"prNumber\": 6457,\n \"type\": \"feature\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n- Adds `RequestContext` using AsyncLocalStorage to propagate per-request entity settings\\n- Enables runtime methods to access the originating entity context without explicit parameter passing\\n- Includes helper methods: `withEntity\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/core/src/__tests__/request-context.test.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/__tests__/runtime-request-context.test.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/index.node.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/index.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/request-context.node.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/request-context.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/runtime.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"chore(deps): bump the cargo group across 3 directories with 3 updates\",\n \"prNumber\": 6479,\n \"type\": \"other\",\n \"body\": \"Bumps the cargo group with 1 update in the /packages/computeruse directory: [bytes](https://github.com/tokio-rs/bytes).\\nBumps the cargo group with 1 update in the /packages/rust directory: [bytes](https://github.com/tokio-rs/bytes).\\nBumps t\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/computeruse/Cargo.lock\",\n \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-cli/Cargo.toml\",\n \"packages/rust/Cargo.lock\",\n \"packages/sweagent/rust/Cargo.lock\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"chore(deps): bump the npm_and_yarn group across 3 directories with 3 updates\",\n \"prNumber\": 6478,\n \"type\": \"other\",\n \"body\": \"Bumps the npm_and_yarn group with 1 update in the /packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent directory: [@modelcontextprotocol/sdk](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk).\\nBumps the npm_and_yarn group with 1 update \",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/package-lock.json\",\n \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/package.json\",\n \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/tests/integration/package-lock.json\",\n \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/tests/integration/package.json\",\n \"packages/computeruse/examples/mcp-client-elicitation/package-lock.json\",\n \"packages/computeruse/examples/mcp-client-elicitation/package.json\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"feat(plugin-bootstrap): comprehensive optimization and robustness imp\u2026\",\n \"prNumber\": 6476,\n \"type\": \"feature\",\n \"body\": \"\u2026rovements\\r\\n\\r\\nThis commit merges critical performance optimizations, caching improvements, and robustness enhancements while preserving type safety improvements from upstream.\\r\\n\\r\\n## New Features\\r\\n- Added plugin initialization banner with co\",\n \"files\": [\n \"bun.lock\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/banner.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/evaluators/reflection.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/index.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/actionState.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/actions.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/anxiety.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/attachments.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/character.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/choice.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/entities.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/evaluators.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/index.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/plugin-info.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/recentMessages.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/relationships.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/roles.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/settings.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/shared-cache.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/world.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"feat: ActionFilterService \u2014 vector search + BM25 reranking for action/provider filtering\",\n \"prNumber\": 6475,\n \"type\": \"feature\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\n- Adds `ActionFilterService` that dynamically filters which actions are shown to the LLM based on relevance, reducing prompt bloat from 200+ actions to ~15 relevant ones\\n- Two-tier ranking: vector search (cosine similarity on em\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/typescript/src/__tests__/action-filter.test.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/bootstrap/index.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/bootstrap/providers/actions.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/runtime.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/services/action-filter.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/services/bm25.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/services/cosine-similarity.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/types/plugin.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"chore(changelog): remove references\",\n \"prNumber\": 6495,\n \"type\": \"other\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\r\\n- remove all references from `CHANGELOG.md`\\r\\n\\r\\n## Testing\\r\\n- not run (content-only change)\\r\\n\",\n \"files\": [\n \"CHANGELOG.md\"\n ]\n }\n ],\n \"topContributors\": [\n {\n \"username\": \"standujar\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16385918?u=718bdcd1585be8447bdfffb8c11ce249baa7532d&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 395.83507627540456,\n \"prScore\": 390.4350762754045,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 5,\n \"commentScore\": 0.4,\n \"summary\": \"standujar: Focused on enhancing the stability and functionality of the n8n-workflow plugin, notably improving multi-step loop control by introducing the awaitingUserInput flag in PR #13. They addressed critical integration issues by ensuring cloud compatibility through state management updates in PR #12 and standardizing success status reporting across all action callbacks in PR #11 (+388/-40 lines). Additionally, they streamlined the development lifecycle by automating node crawling in the publish workflow (PR #10) and integrating the plugin into the project's tracked repositories. Their work this month primarily centered on bug fixes and feature development for workflow automation, with a strong emphasis on code reliability and CI/CD improvements.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"odilitime\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16395496?u=c9bac48e632aae594a0d85aaf9e9c9c69b674d8b&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 348.29516101795406,\n \"prScore\": 348.29516101795406,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"odilitime: Focused on enhancing core system stability and performance within the elizaos/eliza repository, most notably through a comprehensive optimization of the bootstrap plugin in PR #6476 (+2,119/-823 lines). This significant contribution involved modifying 30 files to implement robust architectural improvements and feature enhancements. Additionally, they addressed critical resource management by submitting a fix for a memory leak in the bootstrap cache via PR #6477. Their work this month demonstrates a balanced focus on large-scale feature optimization and essential bug fixing to ensure long-term system reliability.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"lalalune\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/18633264?u=e2e906c3712c2506ebfa98df01c2cfdc50050b30&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 326.03058181605707,\n \"prScore\": 325.25258181605705,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.7779999999999999,\n \"summary\": \"lalalune: Focused on expanding core infrastructure and cross-chain capabilities, notably implementing a multi-provider RPC system in elizaos-plugins/plugin-evm (#25) and cloud proxy routing for Solana services (#26). They delivered a significant architectural enhancement with the ActionFilterService in elizaos/eliza (#6475), which introduced vector search and BM25 reranking to improve action selection. Their work involved a massive scale of code modifications across over 4,500 files, signaling a deep involvement in systemic refactors and next-generation multi-language support. Overall, their contributions centered on infrastructure scalability, authentication frameworks, and enhancing the developer experience through CLI and documentation improvements.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"greptile-apps\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 213.64,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 211.5,\n \"commentScore\": 2.14,\n \"summary\": \"greptile-apps: Focused exclusively on providing feedback and technical oversight through 28 reviews and 5 pull request comments. Despite no direct code changes or merged pull requests this month, they maintained a high level of engagement in the review process to ensure code quality across the codebase. Their primary impact was centered on collaborative peer review and providing detailed commentary on open contributions.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"0xbbjoker\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54844437?u=90fe1762420de6ad493a1c1582f1f70c0d87d8e2&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 157.03108022381605,\n \"prScore\": 155.03108022381605,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"0xbbjoker: Focused on maintenance and stability by addressing technical debt through targeted bugfix work. They contributed a single commit that modified three files, resulting in a balanced set of nine additions and eight deletions. This activity reflects a precise approach to resolving existing issues within the codebase. Their primary focus for the month was dedicated entirely to bugfix efforts across various file types.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"h1-hunt\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/260165794?u=73efc04d5c05a1af9903686d9bb90265cc06ab45&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 135.1498814312321,\n \"prScore\": 121.2118814312321,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 13.5,\n \"commentScore\": 0.43799999999999994,\n \"summary\": \"h1-hunt: Focused on expanding ecosystem capabilities through the development of new integrations, contributing over 1,400 lines of code across several open feature pull requests. Their primary impact involved introducing the Signet plugin for onchain advertising (#6491) and the Mint Club V2 plugin for bonding curve token trading (#6497, #6498). Additionally, they supported the development cycle by providing three technical reviews on active pull requests. Their work this month centered on a balanced mix of feature implementation and bugfixes, with a heavy emphasis on configuration and core code for decentralized finance and advertising plugins.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"anchapin\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6326294?u=2864a5f885294da5b54b95865b6bf6b82781e688&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 72.99868671293827,\n \"prScore\": 72.99868671293827,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"anchapin: Focused on enhancing system stability by implementing defensive programming patterns across the elizaos/eliza codebase. They successfully merged two key bugfix PRs, including #6471 and #6473, which introduced critical null and undefined checks to prevent runtime errors in the settings utility and bootstrap plugin. Their work this month was primarily dedicated to bugfix activities, with a significant portion of their technical contributions involving configuration and code refinements to ensure more robust data handling.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"kaiclawd\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/257877415?u=2c8763bb75f5fd07b37a1939903a8b557dd7a46f&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 59.475878208526346,\n \"prScore\": 59.475878208526346,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"borisudovicic\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/31806472?u=8935f4d43fd7e4eb9bf5ff92d54d4d2f8ac8a786&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 56,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 56,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"borisudovicic: Focused on driving the architectural roadmap and infrastructure readiness for the Eliza App MVP launch, creating 31 issues to coordinate critical tasks across cloud integrations and user experience. They played a key role in defining infrastructure requirements for Telegram and Discord deployments (#6425, #6424), secrets management (#6410), and the implementation of a multi-tenant serverless architecture (#6415). Their contributions also spanned essential product milestones, including the rollout of OAuth providers (#6437), billing system integration (#6445), and performance optimizations to address cold start latency (#6450). Overall, their activity centered on high-level project management, infrastructure provisioning, and security auditing to ensure a stable pre-launch environment.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"buzzbysolcex\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/259807261?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 51.22425149251019,\n \"prScore\": 50.78625149251019,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.43799999999999994,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"yaooooooooooooooo\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/62118705?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 43.5437738965761,\n \"prScore\": 43.5437738965761,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"2-A-M\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/96268540?u=b7d92c0e2a91af580d09eeae862eef576955ab8a&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 36.63501911726088,\n \"prScore\": 36.63501911726088,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"2-A-M: Focused on critical bug fixes and feature enhancements within the Twitter plugin, notably resolving an authentication retry loop and implementing media upload capabilities via PR #48. This substantial contribution involved modifying 12 files and adding over 5,200 lines of code, demonstrating a high level of effort in stabilizing and expanding the plugin's core functionality. The work was completed efficiently with a 10-hour turnaround time to merge, ensuring immediate impact on the repository's reliability. Their primary focus this month was entirely dedicated to bugfix work and technical improvements within the elizaos-plugins/plugin-twitter codebase.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"hanzlamateen\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10975502?u=53f23921078d9a27d96751373bb44f4bd2d58bf4&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 34.39669771918965,\n \"prScore\": 34.39669771918965,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"hanzlamateen: Focused on infrastructure and dependency management within the elizaos/eliza repository, notably executing a significant update to the v2 dependencies and training pipeline in PR #6461. This extensive effort involved modifying over 7,000 files, signaling a major synchronization of the project's codebase and build environment. Their work demonstrated a balanced technical approach, incorporating bug fixes, refactoring, and test updates to ensure system stability. Overall, their contributions this month centered on large-scale maintenance and foundational improvements to the project's examples and training architecture.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"bytes0xcr6\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/102038261?u=45bcd82b0f6cc2f6c6f8db5bdc01949b3afe7560&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 23.546573590279973,\n \"prScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 9,\n \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n \"summary\": \"bytes0xcr6: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's capabilities by integrating transaction validation services through the addition of the @proofgate/eliza-plugin to the registry via PR #254. In addition to this feature work, they contributed to the development process by providing two code reviews and engaging in technical discussions on pull requests. Their activity this month was centered on configuration management and enhancing plugin availability within the elizaos-plugins repository.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"erdGeclaw\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258411179?u=4607f14fd9d7eb4b4e6d2c26964d37b47937a49c&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 22.034212794122055,\n \"prScore\": 22.034212794122055,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"erdGeclaw: Focused on expanding ecosystem integrations by initiating the addition of the Base L2 smart money signals plugin to the registry. This contribution, currently tracked in open PR #253, aims to integrate @erdgecrawl/plugin-base-signals into the elizaos-plugins repository. Their primary focus this month has been on enhancing signal-based functionality within the Base L2 environment.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"mcp97\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/15067321?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 21.901026915173976,\n \"prScore\": 21.901026915173976,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"mcp97: Focused on documentation maintenance and repository cleanup within the elizaos/eliza codebase. Their primary contribution involved streamlining the project's history by removing unnecessary references in the changelog via PR #6495. This work resulted in the modification of four files, demonstrating a clear focus on documentation accuracy and administrative consistency.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"kamiyo-ai\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/197570892?u=0d1ee66bdde083d3cfa339f7b2dfc1c2e8fee2fd&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 21.18304826901074,\n \"prScore\": 20.64304826901074,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.54,\n \"summary\": \"kamiyo-ai: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's capabilities by initiating the integration of a new plugin into the registry. They submitted a configuration update to add the kamiyo-trust plugin via PR #258 in the elizaos-plugins/registry repository. Their primary focus this month was on ecosystem expansion and plugin registration.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"arthur-orderly\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258538952?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n \"prScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"arthur-orderly: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's trading capabilities by integrating the Arthur DEX plugin into the registry. They successfully merged PR #256 in elizaos-plugins/registry, which enables Orderly Network perpetual trading functionality. This contribution highlights a primary focus on ecosystem configuration and the integration of decentralized exchange services.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"0xKairo\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258482051?u=1b8329700a063d57382def591660e68809952a16&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n \"prScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"0xKairo: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's integration capabilities by successfully registering a new plugin for AI agent transaction guarantees. They facilitated the addition of the @proofgate/eliza-plugin via PR #257 in the elizaos-plugins/registry repository. This contribution highlights a primary focus on feature work and configuration management to enhance the platform's utility.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"ATHLSolutions\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6761719?u=3517709343c7ed9e4e80cd95304fff0c357e58e0&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 14,\n \"prScore\": 14,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"ATHLSolutions: No activity this month.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"10inchdev\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/226776904?u=f8556423cfa0bd4464d64395c6c0d526050ba553&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 12.874147180559946,\n \"prScore\": 12.874147180559946,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"10inchdev: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's service offerings by integrating the MoltBazaar plugin into the registry. They successfully merged PR #255, which adds the AI Agent Job Marketplace on Base to the elizaos-plugins/registry. This contribution involved precise configuration updates to ensure the new marketplace is properly indexed and accessible. Their primary focus this month was on ecosystem expansion through configuration management.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"a692570\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/182830946?u=fbc711137880cd843fea4b3b9f00013d07d40fd6&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 10.997573590279972,\n \"prScore\": 10.997573590279972,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"a692570: Focused on expanding the project's documentation by initiating a new integration guide for ClawdTalk voice calling. This work is currently captured in open PR #6489 within the elizaos/eliza repository. Their primary focus this month has been on enhancing developer resources and supporting third-party voice service integrations.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"lawyered0\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4802498?u=f45773fb7440d77e5c12ea1560122dd6d26632eb&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 10.40435169073515,\n \"prScore\": 10.40435169073515,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"lawyered0: Focused on improving the robustness of trust evaluation processing by addressing a bug in the elizaos-plugins/plugin-trust repository. They authored PR #1 to handle plain-text trust evaluation requests, contributing 46 lines of code and associated tests to ensure reliable input parsing. This work demonstrates a clear focus on bugfix stability and test coverage within the plugin's core logic.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"puncar-dev\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/72890404?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 8,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 8,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"puncar-dev: Focused on architectural planning and feature proposals for the elizaos/eliza repository by opening four strategic issues. They outlined a comprehensive whitelisting and leaderboard system (#6469), a community-driven news injection system (#6466), and a feedback mechanism for NPC prompts (#6465). Additionally, they proposed optimizations for AI model usage during the coding process (#6467), demonstrating a primary focus on system design and community engagement features.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"aite550659-max\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258900948?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 4,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 4,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"aite550659-max: Focused on proposing architectural enhancements for the elizaos/eliza repository by initiating the integration of a Verifiable Audit Trail Plugin (VAL). They documented this new feature through the creation of two open issues (#6499, #6500) to outline the plugin's implementation. Their primary focus this month was on defining the requirements for verifiable auditing within the ecosystem.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"thewoweffect\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/113222443?u=cb21d15b0ce815d0f68167f2eca236aad6c64598&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2.3000000000000003,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2.1,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n \"summary\": \"thewoweffect: Focused on identifying and documenting system inefficiencies within the elizaos/eliza repository. They notably reported a bug regarding duplicate LLM calls triggered by URLs in messages (#6486) and engaged in the subsequent discussion to help resolve the issue. Their primary focus this month was on improving application reliability through bug reporting and issue triage.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"saoirse102345-blip\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258542122?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"saoirse102345-blip: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's capabilities by proposing a new architectural direction for financial transactions. They initiated a feature request for a Payment Infrastructure Plugin to enable agent-to-agent and agent-to-user payments within the elizaos/eliza repository (#6443). This contribution highlights a strategic focus on developing core utility and financial interoperability for the platform.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"mbatini\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/34915878?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"fiv3fingers\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/59544796?u=58c2849a3bd9087a4d2e0a5d31ba3cba75babfd6&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"fiv3fingers: Focused on expanding the security capabilities of the platform by proposing the integration of a new audit module. They initiated this effort by opening issue #6468 in elizaos/eliza to advocate for the addition of an EVM audit module. Their primary focus this month was on architectural planning and security enhancements within the EVM ecosystem.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"coolRoger\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/33861624?u=ae40d02de875befc512751127f1082a22b464264&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"coolRoger: Focused on expanding integration flexibility by identifying a need for custom OpenAI endpoint support. They initiated a feature request in elizaos/eliza (#6490) to allow for greater configuration options within the OpenAI provider. Their primary focus this month was on architectural feedback and enhancing the extensibility of the platform's API connections.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"basedmereum\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/223933470?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"basedmereum: Focused on expanding ecosystem capabilities by proposing the integration of the SOLPRISM plugin for verifiable AI reasoning on Solana. This contribution was initiated through the creation of issue #6454 in the elizaos/eliza repository. Their primary focus this month was on architectural planning for blockchain-based AI verification.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"JKHeadley\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12631935?u=e1a3e2005973fbf5526f5dccd04b6310e2476946&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"JKHeadley: Focused on ecosystem expansion and strategic integration by proposing the MoltBridge Trust & Discovery Layer as an enhancement for the Eliza framework. This contribution, detailed in issue elizaos/eliza#6501, outlines a path for improving discovery and trust mechanisms within the project. Their primary focus this month was on architectural planning and integration proposals.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"tdnupe3\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/25161668?u=94680b6bcbcfce954c7a9dd09d667a3919953041&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 0.2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n \"summary\": null\n }\n ],\n \"newPRs\": 32,\n \"mergedPRs\": 18,\n \"newIssues\": 38,\n \"closedIssues\": 63,\n \"activeContributors\": 30\n}\n---\n[\"greptile-apps_day_2026-02-14\", \"greptile-apps\", \"day\", \"2026-02-14\", \"greptile-apps: No activity today.\", \"2026-02-15T23:19:56.460Z\"]\n[\"aite550659-max_day_2026-02-14\", \"aite550659-max\", \"day\", \"2026-02-14\", \"aite550659-max: Focused on initiating new feature development by creating two issues, elizaos/eliza#6500 and elizaos/eliza#6499, both aimed at adding a \\\"Verifiable Audit Trail Plugin (VAL)\\\".\", \"2026-02-15T23:19:56.634Z\"]\n[\"lawyered0_day_2026-02-14\", \"lawyered0\", \"day\", \"2026-02-14\", \"lawyered0: Focused on bugfix work, opening PR elizaos-plugins/plugin-trust#1 to address plain-text trust evaluation requests, which involved modifying 2 files with a balanced contribution to both code and tests.\", \"2026-02-15T23:19:56.819Z\"]\n[\"lalalune_day_2026-02-14\", \"lalalune\", \"day\", \"2026-02-14\", \"lalalune: Focused on both feature work and bug fixes, modifying 39 files with a net addition of 919 lines of code across two commits.\", \"2026-02-15T23:19:56.582Z\"]\n[\"odilitime_day_2026-02-14\", \"odilitime\", \"day\", \"2026-02-14\", \"odilitime: Focused on significant feature development, contributing to the open PR elizaos-plugins/plugin-openai#24, which involved substantial code changes across 14 files (+1360/-422 lines) primarily in feature work and documentation.\", \"2026-02-15T23:19:56.825Z\"]\n[\"lalalune_day_2026-02-15\", \"lalalune\", \"day\", \"2026-02-15\", \"lalalune: Focused on feature work, making a single commit that modified 10 files with a net addition of 630 lines, indicating significant development.\", \"2026-02-15T23:19:57.297Z\"]\n[\"kamiyo-ai_day_2026-02-15\", \"kamiyo-ai\", \"day\", \"2026-02-15\", \"kamiyo-ai: Initiated work on a new plugin, opening PR elizaos-plugins/registry#258 to add \\\"plugin-kamiyo-trust\\\" and making a small configuration change.\", \"2026-02-15T23:19:57.083Z\"]\n[\"JKHeadley_day_2026-02-15\", \"JKHeadley\", \"day\", \"2026-02-15\", \"JKHeadley: Today, JKHeadley focused on strategic planning and integration, creating an issue in elizaos/eliza (#6501) to propose an \\\"Integration Proposal: MoltBridge Trust & Discovery Layer as E...\\\".\", \"2026-02-15T23:19:56.636Z\"]\n---\n2026-02-20T08:48:50.955478+00:00Z\n---\n2026-02-20\n---\nelizaOS/knowledge\n---\nelizaOS\n---\nknowledge\n---\nai_news_elizaos_discord_md_2026-02-19\n---\nai_news_elizaos_discord_md_2026-02-18\n---\nai_news_elizaos_discord_md_2026-02-17\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_json_2026-02-19\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_md_2026-02-19\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_discord_json_2026-02-19\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_discord_md_2026-02-19\n---\ngithub_summaries_week_latest_2026-02-15.md\n---\ngithub_summaries_month_latest_2026-02-01.md\n---\ngithub_summaries_daily_2026-02-20" ] }