# Council Briefing: 2026-04-25

## Monthly Goal

December 2025: Execution excellence—complete token migration with high success rate, launch ElizaOS Cloud, stabilize flagship agents, and build developer trust through reliability and clear documentation.

## Daily Focus

- Transitioning the ecosystem toward a decentralized M2M economy while stabilizing core framework infrastructure for the v2/v3 migration.

## Key Points for Deliberation

### 1. Topic: Agent Monetization & Decentralized Marketplace

**Summary of Topic:** The successful demonstration of the @elisym/plugin-elizaos-elisym marks a shift toward autonomous agent-to-agent (M2M) transactions and decentralized capability discovery.

#### Deliberation Items (Questions):

**Question 1:** How should the Council prioritize the adoption of Nostr for agent discovery versus centralized registries?

  **Context:**
  - `igor.peregudov demonstrated @elisym/plugin-elizaos-elisym using Nostr for discovery and Solana for payment.`
  - `Architecturally eliminates intermediate platforms for agent service delivery.`

  **Multiple Choice Answers:**
    a) Aggressive Nostr Integration
        *Implication:* Maximizes decentralization but requires high technical maturity from builders.
    b) Hybrid Registry Model
        *Implication:* Maintains a central curated registry while indexing Nostr for discovery.
    c) Solana-Native Discovery
        *Implication:* Focuses discovery on-chain to leverage existing payment settlement speed.
    d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above.

**Question 2:** Should the framework enforce spend-capped JWTs for all agent transactions to mitigate treasury risks?

  **Context:**
  - `Lemoncake03027 promoted payment infrastructure featuring spend-capped JWTs and kill switches.`
  - `igor.peregudov reported a 100k token loss to a wallet drainer.`

  **Multiple Choice Answers:**
    a) Mandatory Spend Caps
        *Implication:* Greatly enhances user security but may limit complex autonomous arbitrage.
    b) Optional Safety Middle-ware
        *Implication:* Preserves developer flexibility but leaves inexperienced users exposed to drainers.
    c) Hardware-Locked Permissions
        *Implication:* Moves security to the enclave layer, prioritizing trust over UX speed.
    d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above.

---


### 2. Topic: Token Utility & Governance Reorganization

**Summary of Topic:** Proposed updates to ELIZAOS tokenomics seek to integrate protocol fees and buyback mechanisms to align the token with framework infrastructure.

#### Deliberation Items (Questions):

**Question 1:** Is the 'Buyback and Burn' model for USDC protocol fees the most effective way to drive long-term token value?

  **Context:**
  - `quanteliza proposed v3 protocol fees in USDC or ELIZAOS with buyback and burn mechanisms.`
  - `odilitime identified x402 payment support for ELIZAOS as high-priority low-hanging fruit.`

  **Multiple Choice Answers:**
    a) Strict Buyback & Burn
        *Implication:* Creates deflationary pressure but reduces the Foundation's USDC treasury.
    b) Staking-Gated Discounts
        *Implication:* Encourages long-term holding while maintaining protocol fee liquidity.
    c) Infrastructure Credit Model
        *Implication:* Converts tokens directly into ElizaOS Cloud compute credits.
    d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above.

**Question 2:** How can the Council stabilize developer trust given current communications limitations due to external legal risks?

  **Context:**
  - `Community frustration expressed regarding lack of updates on lawsuits (hide.o.n).`
  - `odilitime explained limited access to official accounts and legal counsel advice for silence.`

  **Multiple Choice Answers:**
    a) Developer-Only Transparency Channel
        *Implication:* Secures builders through private info-sharing while maintaining public legal silence.
    b) Decentralized Brand Rotation
        *Implication:* Shifts focus to community-led social accounts to bypass official silence.
    c) Proof of Code (GitHub Focus)
        *Implication:* Doubles down on code commits as the primary source of truth for project health.
    d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above.