# Council Briefing: 2026-03-29

## Monthly Goal

December 2025: Execution excellence—complete token migration with high success rate, launch ElizaOS Cloud, stabilize flagship agents, and build developer trust through reliability and clear documentation.

## Daily Focus

- The emergence of an autonomous agent-to-agent economy via TaskBounty and Orbis marks a shift from framework development to self-sustaining ecosystem utility.

## Key Points for Deliberation

### 1. Topic: Agent-to-Agent Economy & Tasking

**Summary of Topic:** The integration of TaskBounty allows Eliza agents to autonomously earn crypto (USDC, ETH, SOL) and delegate sub-tasks to other agents, creating a circular machine economy.

#### Deliberation Items (Questions):

**Question 1:** How should the Council prioritize support for agent-to-agent (A2A) economic protocols vs. human-to-agent (H2A) tools?

  **Context:**
  - `eliottre: Agents can both complete bounties and delegate sub-tasks to other specialized agents.`
  - `TaskBounty: Supports USDC, ETH, and SOL payments directly to agent wallets.`

  **Multiple Choice Answers:**
    a) Direct focus toward A2A protocol standardization.
        *Implication:* Accelerates the decentralized AI economy but may alienate human developers seeking simpler H2A tools.
    b) Maintain a balanced hybrid approach.
        *Implication:* Ensures framework versatility at the cost of slower vertical progress in autonomous finance.
    c) Focus strictly on H2A usability for the beta launch.
        *Implication:* Maximizes immediate user adoption while delaying the long-term vision of an autonomous agent internet.
    d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above.

**Question 2:** Does the emergence of tools like Orbis for autonomous API discovery necessitate a formal 'Agent Permissions' standard?

  **Context:**
  - `theredwizarddev: Orbis allows Eliza agents to self-subscribe to external APIs without browser or OAuth.`

  **Multiple Choice Answers:**
    a) Enforce strict Council-mandated security permissions.
        *Implication:* Protects ecosystem reputation but introduces centralization bottlenecks for developers.
    b) Adopt a community-led 'Permissiveness by Default' stance.
        *Implication:* Encourages rapid innovation while increasing the risk of malicious agent actions.
    c) Develop a 'Trust-Score' system for 3rd party API providers.
        *Implication:* Provides a decentralized way to filter safe integrations without stopping individual agent autonomony.
    d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above.

---


### 2. Topic: Operational Verification & Trust

**Summary of Topic:** New infrastructure for on-chain decision provenance and hosting consolidation aims to address trust and reliability issues in the ecosystem.

#### Deliberation Items (Questions):

**Question 1:** Should xProof's on-chain decision provenance become a mandatory core feature for 'Official' ElizaOS agents?

  **Context:**
  - `jasonxkensei: xProof plugin anchors agent decisions on MultiversX blockchain before execution for immutable tracking.`

  **Multiple Choice Answers:**
    a) Mandate for all core/flagship agents.
        *Implication:* Establishes ElizaOS as the industry gold standard for verifiable AI.
    b) Keep as an optional 'Pro' plugin.
        *Implication:* Prevents imposing gas costs on casual developers while offering enterprise-grade utility.
    c) Subsidize provenance costs through the Eliza Labs treasury.
        *Implication:* Drives massive adoption of verifiable agents but creates a long-term burn on ecosystem resources.
    d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above.