# Council Briefing: 2026-03-18

## Monthly Goal

December 2025: Execution excellence—complete token migration with high success rate, launch ElizaOS Cloud, stabilize flagship agents, and build developer trust through reliability and clear documentation.

## Daily Focus

- The Council must address a critical divergence between technical infrastructure progress and community trust regarding token transparency and marketing strategy.

## Key Points for Deliberation

### 1. Topic: Token Transparency and Migration Trust

**Summary of Topic:** Urgent community concerns have surfaced regarding the ai16z to elizaOS token migration stats, with reports suggesting only a 5-10% migration rate and unallocated supply questions.

#### Deliberation Items (Questions):

**Question 1:** How should the Council address the 54% of unaccounted token supply to restore market confidence?

  **Context:**
  - `otse finam: estimated migration rate may be only 5-10%, leaving 54% of supply unaccounted for.`
  - `Community members expressed significant concerns about ElizaOS token performance versus broader AI market.`

  **Multiple Choice Answers:**
    a) Immediate Transparency Report
        *Implication:* Releasing precise on-chain data and the planned use for unmigrated tokens to quell speculation.
    b) Token Burn of Unclaimed Supply
        *Implication:* Deflationary action to reward early migrators and align supply with actual circulating demand.
    c) Community Treasury Allocation
        *Implication:* Moving unmigrated tokens into a DAO-governed fund for ecosystem rewards and developer grants.
    d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above.

**Question 2:** Is the current 'flywheel' marketing strategy too reliant on external projects like Milady?

  **Context:**
  - `Odilitime: Shaw promoting Milady creates distribution for elizacloud to power the ElizaOS flywheel.`
  - `Users questioned the focus on promoting other projects while elizaOS token declines.`

  **Multiple Choice Answers:**
    a) Pivot to Eliza-First Marketing
        *Implication:* Shifting core focus away from cross-promotion to direct framework and cloud utility announcements.
    b) Double Down on Distribution Channels
        *Implication:* Accept short-term sentiment pain to build long-term enterprise user funnels through established brands.
    c) Introduce Direct Token Utility
        *Implication:* Integrating token burns or access tiers within ElizaOS Cloud to create immediate value drivers.
    d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above.

---


### 2. Topic: V2 Architecture and External Extensibility

**Summary of Topic:** Architectural decisions for v2.0.0 involve a lean-core philosophy with decentralized skill hosting to prevent repository bloat and improve framework performance.

#### Deliberation Items (Questions):

**Question 1:** Should v2.0.0 ship with zero default skills to enforce a decentralized discovery model?

  **Context:**
  - `Odilitime: Proposed shipping v2.0.0 with 0 skills to avoid uncontrolled submissions that plagued 0.x.`
  - `SYMBiEX: Proposed a centralized directory similar to Clawhub for housing skills and plugins.`

  **Multiple Choice Answers:**
    a) Lean Zero-Skill Core
        *Implication:* Maximizes performance and decentralization but increases friction for first-time builders.
    b) Curated Standard Library
        *Implication:* Bundles top 5 stable skills to ensure 'Plug and Play' experience while outsourcing the rest.
    c) Integrated Registry Browser
        *Implication:* Ships an empty core but includes a CLI-based installer to fetch skills from external registries on-demand.
    d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above.