# Council Briefing: 2025-10-02 ## Monthly Goal Current focus: Stabilize and attract new users to auto.fun by showcasing 24/7 agent activity (streaming, trading, shitposting), ship production ready elizaOS v2. ## Daily Focus - The elizaOS token migration from AI16Z to ElizaOS represents a strategic pivot to strengthen tokenomics and expand beyond web3 communities while accelerating development of core products. ## Key Points for Deliberation ### 1. Topic: Token Migration Strategy **Summary of Topic:** The planned migration from AI16Z to ElizaOS tokens via CCIP with Base blockchain seeding includes a 20% supply increase, establishing an economic flywheel to fuel development while broadening user accessibility beyond crypto-native audiences. #### Deliberation Items (Questions): **Question 1:** How should we balance token distribution between team incentives, liquidity provision, and existing holder value? **Context:** - `A 20% increase in token supply is planned (10% for team with vesting, 10% for liquidity provision and CEX listings) - Rabbidfly` **Multiple Choice Answers:** a) Maintain current 50/50 split between team and liquidity to ensure balanced incentives. *Implication:* Preserves alignment between team motivation and market liquidity but may limit flexibility for strategic partnerships. b) Shift to 40% team, 40% liquidity, 20% strategic partnership reserve. *Implication:* Creates bandwidth for key ecosystem partnerships but dilutes existing holders more than current plan. c) Reduce team allocation to 5%, increase liquidity to 15% to prioritize market stability. *Implication:* Maximizes short-term token holder value and market depth but potentially reduces team commitment. d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above. **Question 2:** What approach should we take for communicating the migration to ensure maximum token holder participation? **Context:** - `Community members expressed concerns about the migration process, particularly regarding tokens held on exchanges.` - `Kenk mentioned the migration portal will have a guide and be simple to use.` **Multiple Choice Answers:** a) Focus on comprehensive documentation with tutorials for self-guided migration. *Implication:* Empowers technically-savvy users but may leave less technical holders behind. b) Prioritize CEX partnerships for automatic migration support alongside detailed guides. *Implication:* Maximizes participation rate but requires significant resources for exchange coordination. c) Host multiple live migration assistance sessions with community moderators. *Implication:* Creates high-touch support environment but requires ongoing time commitment from core team. d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above. **Question 3:** How aggressively should we push web2 rails adoption to expand beyond crypto-native users? **Context:** - `Team aims to expand beyond web3 communities` - `Plans to enable agent usage via web2 stablecoin rails` - `Users will be able to interact with the platform without awareness of blockchain technology` **Multiple Choice Answers:** a) Full pivot to web2-first approach with blockchain as invisible infrastructure. *Implication:* Maximizes mainstream adoption potential but risks alienating crypto-native early adopters. b) Dual-track approach with separate web2 and web3 user journeys. *Implication:* Serves both audiences but increases development complexity and maintenance overhead. c) Maintain web3-primary focus with simplified onramps for web2 users. *Implication:* Preserves crypto-native identity while gradually expanding audience through education. d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above. --- ### 2. Topic: Product Development Roadmap **Summary of Topic:** ElizaOS is advancing on multiple product fronts including ElizaCloud, mobile apps, browser extensions, and enhanced agent capabilities, while technical improvements continue in core components to stabilize the platform. #### Deliberation Items (Questions): **Question 1:** Which agent deployment channel should receive priority development resources to accelerate user adoption? **Context:** - `ElizaOS will be available on Google Play as a standalone app as part of ElizaCloud` - `Mobile apps and browser extensions are in development` - `"Much more livestreaming" planned for DegenAI` **Multiple Choice Answers:** a) Prioritize mobile app development to capture mainstream users. *Implication:* Targets largest potential user base but faces intense competition from established mobile AI apps. b) Focus on browser extensions for seamless integration with existing web workflows. *Implication:* Lowers adoption friction for productivity-focused users but limits visibility compared to standalone offerings. c) Double down on livestreaming agents as our differentiated offering. *Implication:* Leverages our unique positioning but narrows initial target audience to streaming content consumers. d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above. **Question 2:** How should we balance fixing technical debt versus shipping new agent capabilities? **Context:** - `Stan is working on: Fixes to the Openrouter Plugin for tools handling after AI SDK5 updates, Phase 4 implementation of "epic 6" (consolidating server components)` - `Some users reported issues with elizaOS where agents disconnect immediately after starting` **Multiple Choice Answers:** a) Institute a freeze on new features until core stability reaches defined metrics. *Implication:* Creates solid foundation but delays competitive feature releases and potentially user growth. b) Maintain parallel workstreams with dedicated resources for stability and new capabilities. *Implication:* Balances progress on both fronts but dilutes focus and may slow overall velocity. c) Prioritize user-visible features while addressing only critical stability issues. *Implication:* Accelerates growth metrics but risks accumulating technical debt that could cause major issues later. d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above. **Question 3:** What revenue model should we prioritize for ElizaCloud to establish sustainable economics? **Context:** - `ElizaCloud is nearly completed and expected to generate revenue` - `Plans to implement an economic flywheel where revenue will be used to buy back $elizaos tokens` **Multiple Choice Answers:** a) Usage-based pricing with tiered subscription levels and freemium entry point. *Implication:* Creates predictable revenue and clear upgrade path but requires significant value demonstration for conversion. b) Token-based access model where elizaOS tokens unlock premium features. *Implication:* Directly drives token utility and demand but limits adoption to crypto-aware users. c) Enterprise licensing model with custom deployments and support packages. *Implication:* Generates larger revenue per customer but introduces complex sales cycles and customization requirements. d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above. --- ### 3. Topic: Technical Architecture Evolution **Summary of Topic:** elizaOS is evolving its technical architecture through L2/L3 chain development with on-chain agent primitives, while simultaneously improving core components and resolving issues that impact user experience. #### Deliberation Items (Questions): **Question 1:** What approach should we take for the planned L2/L3 chain with productive asset tokenomics? **Context:** - `Develop L2/L3 chain with issuance/burn mechanics for agent building/usage (Mentioned by Rabbidfly)` - `Create primitives for agents with on-chain contracts using $elizaos as fuel (Mentioned by DorianD)` **Multiple Choice Answers:** a) Build on Ethereum L2 ecosystem for maximum developer accessibility and token liquidity. *Implication:* Leverages existing infrastructure and community but competes in crowded L2 space with higher fees. b) Develop custom L3 optimized specifically for agent interactions and micro-transactions. *Implication:* Creates purpose-built infrastructure for our use case but requires significant custom development and security auditing. c) Implement as application-specific chain on modular blockchain framework like Cosmos. *Implication:* Balances customization with established security and interoperability but fragments liquidity across ecosystems. d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above. **Question 2:** How should we approach persistent agent memory implementation to improve user experience? **Context:** - `Implement persistent memory across users without mixing records (Mentioned by realist)` - `Some users reported issues with elizaOS where agents disconnect immediately after starting` **Multiple Choice Answers:** a) Build platform-native memory solution with privacy controls and cross-agent memory sharing. *Implication:* Creates differentiated capability but requires significant custom development and database optimization. b) Integrate with existing vector database providers like Pinecone or Weaviate. *Implication:* Accelerates implementation timeline but introduces external dependencies and potential vendor lock-in. c) Implement lightweight memory solution focusing on reliability over advanced features. *Implication:* Addresses immediate stability issues but limits agent intelligence and contextual awareness. d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above. **Question 3:** What integration strategy should we prioritize to expand elizaOS ecosystem reach? **Context:** - `Upcoming CCIP project with Chainlink co-branding (Mentioned by Rabbidfly)` - `OpenRouter announced two updates: New Stripe integration feature for LLM accounting and billing, Free tier of 1M BYOK requests per month for all users` **Multiple Choice Answers:** a) Focus on deep integrations with major AI infrastructure providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.). *Implication:* Leverages established AI ecosystems but positions elizaOS primarily as middleware rather than platform. b) Prioritize blockchain ecosystem integrations across multiple chains. *Implication:* Strengthens crypto-native positioning but narrows immediate addressable market to web3 users. c) Develop consumer platform integrations (Discord, Twitter, Slack, etc.) to reach users where they are. *Implication:* Maximizes potential touchpoints with mainstream users but increases platform dependency risks. d) Other / More discussion needed / None of the above.