{ "prompt_name": "user-feedback", "category": "comms", "date": "2026-02-27", "generated_text": "## User Feedback Analysis \u2014 2026-02-27 (based on aggregated feedback through 2026-02-26)\n\n### Data notes / quantification method\nFeedback signals were drawn from: Discord discussions (2026-02-24 to 2026-02-26) plus recurring GitHub issues/PR context visible in the monthly snapshot. Because Discord volume was low, percentages below are based on a small set of **~12 distinct feedback threads** (questions/issues/topics) observed in the provided data.\n\n---\n\n## 1) Pain Point Categorization (Top recurring friction areas)\n\n### 1. Integration \u2014 Social/Twitter input reliability & configuration (high severity)\n**What users reported**\n- Discord: Jamie reported **\u201cTwitter input functionality\u201d** not working; troubleshooting stalled due to missing version/product context (\ud83d\udcac-coders, 2026-02-26).\n- GitHub context: ongoing work in the Twitter plugin is significant this month, implying active churn and potential regressions; user report suggests the integration remains fragile for newcomers.\n\n**Frequency**\n- ~2/12 signals (~17%) directly reference Twitter/input provider issues, but severity is high because it blocks a common \u201cagent on social\u201d use case.\n\n**Who it affects most**\n- Newcomers building their first agent with social inputs, and devs trying to deploy agents into public channels.\n\n---\n\n### 2. Technical Functionality \u2014 Version/branch confusion and repo hygiene (high severity)\n**What users reported**\n- Discord: **develop branch contained 2.0.0 code** unexpectedly; Odilitime described it as not traceable via normal PR/commit history and effectively \u201cunfixable,\u201d requiring creation of a **v2-develop branch** to preserve 1.x (2026-02-25).\n- Discord: questions around a \u201cnew fork\u201d and uncertainty about automation/bot behavior in org contexts (xfn-framework, 2026-02-26).\n\n**Frequency**\n- ~2/12 signals (~17%) directly about version control and repo integrity; severity is high because it breaks upgrades, CI expectations, and user trust.\n\n**Who it affects most**\n- Anyone on 1.x attempting incremental upgrades, and contributors trying to understand which branch is canonical.\n\n---\n\n### 3. Integration \u2014 GitHub \u2194 Linear bidirectional sync causing issue-tracking \u201cmess\u201d (medium-high severity)\n**What users reported**\n- Discord: confirmation that GitHub and Linear were synced bidirectionally and required cleanup (Stan \u26a1, 2026-02-25).\n\n**Frequency**\n- ~1/12 signals (~8%), but impacts maintainers and contributors disproportionately by degrading triage quality.\n\n**Who it affects most**\n- Maintainers and frequent issue reporters (harder to know where to file, what\u2019s current, and what\u2019s duplicated).\n\n---\n\n### 4. Documentation / Onboarding \u2014 Beginner path unclear; missing required context for support (medium severity)\n**What users reported**\n- Discord: Jamie asked for help building an agent \u201cstill new,\u201d was told to install, read docs, then ask in help channel (\ud83d\udcac-discussion, 2026-02-26).\n- Discord: Twitter issue couldn\u2019t be debugged because the user didn\u2019t include version/product details (\ud83d\udcac-coders, 2026-02-26).\n\n**Frequency**\n- ~2/12 signals (~17%) show onboarding friction: \u201cwhat do I do first\u201d and \u201cwhat info do I include.\u201d\n\n**Who it affects most**\n- Newcomers and casual builders who are not yet comfortable with the project\u2019s moving parts (v1 vs v2, plugins, providers, cloud vs local).\n\n---\n\n### 5. Community / Communication \u2014 Roadmap & release timing uncertainty (medium severity)\n**What users reported**\n- Discord: repeated unanswered questions like **\u201cWhen does Babylon launch?\u201d** and \u201cmilady.ai?\u201d (2026-02-25, 2026-02-26).\n- Discord: token-price/viability anxiety (\u201cproject dead?\u201d) required reassurance (2026-02-24).\n\n**Frequency**\n- ~2/12 signals (~17%) indicate expectation-setting gaps about timelines and project status.\n\n**Who it affects most**\n- Newcomers evaluating whether to invest time; community members tracking releases.\n\n---\n\n### 6. Community / Admin UX \u2014 Discord role/room access friction (low-medium severity)\n**What users reported**\n- Discord: difficulty assigning \u201ccore dev\u201d role / labs access; manual channel addition required (2026-02-24).\n- Multiple requests for \u201cmilady room\u201d access (2026-02-25).\n\n**Frequency**\n- ~1\u20132/12 signals (~8\u201317%), low product severity but high community experience impact (gating collaboration).\n\n---\n\n### 7. Legal / Compliance (Community + Product Risk) \u2014 Unclear boundaries for derivative projects (medium severity, high risk)\n**What users reported**\n- Discord: Hyperscape (RuneScape-related) prompted concerns about whether **Jagex would shut it down**, and whether it\u2019s worth investing time; answer: Jagex hasn\u2019t responded; open source means many copies exist (2026-02-26).\n\n**Frequency**\n- ~1/12 signals (~8%), but notable risk: community energy may be diverted or contributors may churn if legal exposure is unclear.\n\n---\n\n## 2) Usage Pattern Analysis (actual vs intended usage)\n\n### Observed usage patterns\n1. **Agents as crypto/trading operators and market tooling**\n - Token analysis (\u201cclawd bot\u201d ranking ai16z), agentic trading platform testing (fomolt on Base), and multiple Web3 dev service offers (smart contracts/DeFi/NFTs).\n - This aligns with the ecosystem\u2019s plugin growth around exchanges and on-chain identity, but also creates higher expectations for reliability and safety.\n\n2. **Agents embedded into external workflows rather than \u201cchat-only\u201d**\n - Interest in automation platforms (e.g., n8n in weekly summary) and CLI-driven trading workflows (fomolt).\n - Users appear to want \u201cagent as an operator\u201d with reliable integrations, not just conversational behavior.\n\n3. **Beginner builders want a minimal \u201cfirst agent\u201d path**\n - Jamie\u2019s request shows demand for a guided build flow and a clearer \u201chello world agent\u201d experience that includes typical integrations (Twitter, messaging, etc.).\n\n4. **Unexpected / emerging: game-adjacent and community IP projects**\n - Hyperscape demonstrates emergent use for game worlds / derivative communities, bringing legal/compliance questions to the forefront.\n\n### Feature requests that best match actual usage\n- **Configurable provider endpoints** (e.g., OpenAI-compatible base URL) strongly matches real usage where builders mix hosted inference providers.\n- **Better integration diagnostics** (Twitter input, URL duplication in webapp, image handling) matches \u201cagents in production workflows\u201d needs.\n- **Branch/version clarity tooling** matches high churn between v1 and v2 development tracks.\n\n---\n\n## 3) Implementation Opportunities (solutions per major pain point)\n\n### Pain Point A: Twitter input/integration issues + slow troubleshooting due to missing context\n**Opportunities (prioritized)**\n1) **High impact / low effort:** Add a \u201cSupport bundle\u201d command and bug-report template \n - CLI: `elizaos doctor` (or `elizaos support`) outputs versions, enabled plugins, provider config (redacted), runtime target (cloud/local), and last 200 lines of logs. \n - Discord: auto-prompt users posting \u201cTwitter\u201d + \u201cerror\u201d to paste the support bundle.\n - Similar pattern: Docker\u2019s `docker system info`, Supabase \u201cSupport Debug\u201d bundles.\n\n2) **High impact / medium effort:** Add structured integration health checks \n - In plugin-twitter (and other providers), implement a `validate()` method: auth test, permissions scope check, and a \u201ccan read inputs\u201d probe. \n - Surface results in UI/CLI with actionable messages (\u201ctoken missing scope X\u201d, \u201crate limited\u201d, \u201cAPI v2 endpoint mismatch\u201d).\n\n3) **Medium impact / medium effort:** Create a canonical \u201cTwitter Quickstart\u201d matrix by version \n - Explicitly document: v1.x vs v2.x setup differences, required env vars, known limitations, and a minimal example agent.\n\n---\n\n### Pain Point B: Branch/version confusion (develop containing v2.0.0 code) and unclear canonical paths\n**Opportunities (prioritized)**\n1) **High impact / low-medium effort:** Publish a strict branching policy + \u201cWhat do I use?\u201d selector \n - A single doc page: \u201cStable (v1.x)\u201d, \u201cNext (v2.x)\u201d, and \u201cExperimental,\u201d with pointers to exact branches and npm tags.\n - Similar pattern: Kubernetes\u2019 version skew policy; Next.js \u201ccanary\u201d vs \u201cstable\u201d.\n\n2) **High impact / medium effort:** Enforce branch protection + CI assertions \n - Add a CI job that validates package major versions and/or repository invariants on `develop` (e.g., fails if v2-only package layout appears in v1 branch).\n - Prevents \u201csilent drift\u201d that users can\u2019t trace.\n\n3) **Medium impact / higher effort:** Ship an \u201cupgrade assistant\u201d that detects project generation version \n - `elizaos update` should detect whether a project is v1 or v2 and refuse cross-major upgrades without explicit flags and migration notes.\n\n---\n\n### Pain Point C: GitHub \u2194 Linear bidirectional sync noise\n**Opportunities (prioritized)**\n1) **High impact / low effort:** Define a single source of truth + auto-label mirroring \n - If Linear is internal: make GitHub read-only mirroring (one-way) or restrict which labels/states sync back.\n - Add \u201cLINEAR-MIRROR\u201d label and close-loop automation to prevent duplicates.\n\n2) **Medium impact / medium effort:** Add an issue intake form that routes correctly \n - GitHub forms: \u201cBug,\u201d \u201cIntegration bug,\u201d \u201cDocs,\u201d \u201cFeature.\u201d \n - Auto-apply labels and decide whether it should sync to Linear.\n\n3) **Medium impact / medium effort:** Weekly public triage digest \n - Summarize what moved states, what\u2019s accepted, and what\u2019s blocked\u2014reduces repeated questions and duplicate filings.\n\n---\n\n### Pain Point D: Onboarding friction (beginner agent building; unclear what details are needed)\n**Opportunities (prioritized)**\n1) **High impact / low effort:** \u201cFirst Agent in 15 minutes\u201d happy-path tutorial \n - One minimal local agent + one integration (choose a stable one). \n - Ends with: how to ask for help + what info to include (versions, logs, plugin list).\n\n2) **High impact / medium effort:** Scaffolded templates in `elizaos create` \n - Prompt: \u201cWhat kind of agent?\u201d (chat-only, workflow automation, social posting, trading simulator). \n - Generates the right plugin set + env var checklist.\n\n3) **Medium impact / low-medium effort:** Discord help-channel pinned \u201cminimum reproducible report\u201d \n - A pinned format that answers Odilitime\u2019s recurring question upfront: \u201cversion? which product? cloud/local? plugin version?\u201d\n\n---\n\n### Pain Point E: Roadmap/release timing uncertainty (Babylon, milady.ai) + project viability questions\n**Opportunities (prioritized)**\n1) **High impact / low effort:** Maintain a single \u201cRelease & Roadmap\u201d page updated weekly \n - Even if dates are unknown: provide status (\u201cspec\u2019ing\u201d, \u201cin dev\u201d, \u201cblocked\u201d, \u201cwaiting on partner\u201d).\n\n2) **Medium impact / low effort:** Add a bot command in Discord: `/roadmap` `/release babylon` \n - Returns the canonical answer and avoids repeated unanswered questions.\n\n3) **Medium impact / medium effort:** Align token/community messaging with dev milestones \n - Lightweight monthly \u201cWhat shipped / what\u2019s next\u201d tied to PRs/issues, not price.\n\n---\n\n### Pain Point F: Legal/compliance uncertainty for derivative/community IP projects (Hyperscape)\n**Opportunities (prioritized)**\n1) **High impact / low effort:** Publish a \u201cCommunity Project Legal Safety\u201d disclaimer + checklist \n - Clarify: maintainers do not provide legal advice; recommend naming/branding guidelines, asset sourcing rules, and takedown response expectations.\n\n2) **Medium impact / medium effort:** Add repository templates for IP-sensitive projects \n - Include \u201cRights & Attribution\u201d section, DMCA contact, and a \u201cno copyrighted assets included\u201d policy.\n\n3) **High impact / higher effort:** Create an \u201cIncubator\u201d program with gating \n - Projects that want amplification must fill a compliance/risk questionnaire.\n\n---\n\n## 4) Communication Gaps (expectations vs reality)\n\n### Gap 1: \u201cTwitter input is broken\u201d but no shared debugging contract\n- Evidence: Odilitime\u2019s first response was \u201cFor what version of which product?\u201d and it remained unanswered (2026-02-26).\n- Improvement: enforce a standard support payload (version/product/env) before threads can be triaged.\n\n### Gap 2: Users expect clear release dates (Babylon, milady.ai), but the project isn\u2019t publishing timing\n- Evidence: repeated unanswered questions on 2026-02-25 and 2026-02-26.\n- Improvement: publish \u201cstatus without dates\u201d and explain dependency-driven timelines.\n\n### Gap 3: Users conflate token price with dev activity / project health\n- Evidence: \u201cproject dead?\u201d concern on 2026-02-24; reassurance required.\n- Improvement: a recurring shipping digest that\u2019s easy to point to, reducing ad-hoc morale firefighting.\n\n### Gap 4: Open-source copying vs legal permissions is confusing\n- Evidence: Hyperscape discussion: open source implies many copies, but that doesn\u2019t resolve IP risk.\n- Improvement: clarify what open source does and does not protect (distribution \u2260 permission to use IP).\n\n---\n\n## 5) Community Engagement Insights\n\n### Power users / key helpers observed\n- **Odilitime**: primary technical responder + admin (branch strategy, permissions, integration questions, project comms).\n- **Omid Sa**: onboarding helper for beginners (directed Jamie to install/docs/help channels).\n- **Stan \u26a1**: clarified GitHub/Linear sync behavior (ops/process knowledge).\n- **Fido**: brought an external platform (fomolt) and explicitly requested feedback\u2014good candidate for structured partner testing.\n- **ElizaBAO**: shipping activity (hackathon submission) + community navigation.\n\n**Power-user needs**\n- Cleaner triage and fewer repeated questions (support templates, bot-assisted answers).\n- Clearer separation of v1/v2 work to reduce \u201cwhere should I contribute?\u201d friction.\n\n### Common newcomer questions indicating friction\n- \u201cCan someone help me build an agent? I\u2019m still new.\u201d (Jamie)\n- Missing context when reporting bugs (\u201cwhich version/product?\u201d)\n- \u201cWhen does X launch?\u201d (Babylon)\n\n### Converting passive users into contributors\n- Offer \u201cgood first issue: onboarding/docs\u201d tasks specifically around:\n - Twitter quickstart + troubleshooting matrix\n - Version selector page (v1 vs v2)\n - Discord pinned templates and bot FAQ commands \n- Invite service-offer posters (e.g., elgamer) into a defined contribution lane: \u201cintegration office hours\u201d or \u201cplugin clinic.\u201d\n\n---\n\n## 6) Feedback Collection Improvements\n\n### Channel effectiveness (current)\n- **Discord** is effective for rapid questions but produces incomplete bug reports (missing versions, reproduction steps).\n- **GitHub** captures detailed issues well (e.g., URL duplication bug includes steps + impact), but the GitHub\u2194Linear sync is creating noise for maintainers.\n\n### Improvements for more structured, actionable feedback\n1) **Discord \u2192 GitHub issue bridge with required fields**\n - A bot command `/report-bug` that asks: version, environment, plugin, steps, logs; then opens a prefilled GitHub issue.\n\n2) **Integration-specific feedback forms**\n - For high-churn/high-value plugins (Twitter, workflow automation, cloud chat): short form capturing auth mode, endpoints, provider, error codes.\n\n3) **Add lightweight \u201cwas this solved?\u201d closure loop in Discord**\n - After 48\u201372 hours, bot asks the reporter to confirm resolution; if unresolved, prompts to open an issue with the support bundle.\n\n### Underrepresented segments / missing feedback\n- **Non-crypto, non-trading** builders (productivity, customer support, knowledge bots) are not visible in this snapshot.\n- **Self-hosted enterprise/security** users (beyond basic auth) are not providing feedback here despite ongoing auth work.\n- **UI/webapp** users appear mostly via GitHub bug reports; more direct UX feedback loops for the client UI would help.\n\n---\n\n## Prioritized High-Impact Actions (next 1\u20132 weeks)\n1) **Ship a standardized \u201cSupport Bundle\u201d + Discord pinned bug-report template** (unblocks integration troubleshooting immediately; reduces repeated \u201cwhich version?\u201d stalls). \n2) **Publish a canonical \u201cWhich version/branch should I use?\u201d page + branching policy** (reduces user breakage during v1\u2192v2 transition and contributor confusion). \n3) **Stabilize issue intake by de-risking GitHub\u2194Linear bidirectional sync** (define source of truth + reduce duplicated/garbled tracking). \n4) **Create a \u201cFirst Agent in 15 minutes\u201d onboarding tutorial + scaffold presets in `elizaos create`** (converts \u201cI\u2019m new\u201d requests into self-serve success). \n5) **Add a minimal roadmap/status command or page for recurring launch questions (Babylon, etc.)** (reduces repeated unanswered questions and expectation drift).", "source_references": [ "2026-02-27\n---\n2026-02-26.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-26\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Technical Issues & Support\n\n**Twitter Integration Problems**\nIn the \ud83d\udcac-coders channel, Jamie reported encountering issues with Twitter input functionality. The problem remains unresolved as Odilitime requested clarification on which version and product was being used before troubleshooting could proceed.\n\n**Agent Development for Beginners**\nA beginner-friendly discussion emerged in \ud83d\udcac-discussion where Jamie sought help building an agent. Omid Sa provided initial guidance, directing them to install ElizaOS, review documentation, and utilize the dedicated help channel for specific questions.\n\n### Repository & Bot Management\n\n**Code Bot Organizational Behavior**\nIn the xfn-framework channel, Odilitime raised questions about code bot behavior when working with organizational repositories, specifically whether the bot follows organizational accounts when used. This technical question regarding bot configuration and repository management remains unanswered.\n\n### AI & Token Discussion\n\n**AI16z Token Analysis**\nA brief exchange in \ud83d\udcac-discussion featured digitalalchemy's \"clawd bot\" identifying ai16z as the most interesting token in the AI sector. However, Odilitime noted that the models being referenced are outdated, suggesting the analysis may not reflect current market conditions.\n\n### Legal & Compliance Concerns\n\n**Hyperscape Project Legal Risks**\nA significant discussion emerged regarding the Hyperscape project (RuneScape-related) and potential legal challenges from Jagex, the owner of RuneScape. Error P015-A expressed concerns about investing time in the project if Jagex might shut it down. Odilitime acknowledged that Jagex has not yet responded to the project and highlighted the complexity created by the open-source nature of the project, which will result in multiple copies existing. Boj/acc downplayed concerns, stating that nobody is attempting to take over RuneScape itself.\n\n### Community Engagement\n\n**Developer Services Offered**\nUser elgamer posted their technical credentials offering development services, listing expertise in:\n- Smart contracts, DeFi, and NFTs\n- Tech stack: React, Next.js, Python, TypeScript, Solidity, Rust, and Web3.js\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Can someone help me build an agent? I'm still new to this.**\n- **Asked by:** Jamie (\ud83d\udcac-discussion)\n- **Answered by:** Omid Sa\n- **Answer:** Start by installing ElizaOS and reading documentation, then ask questions in the development help channel.\n\n**Q: Do you think Runescape would let Hyperscape happen? What are the rules on that?**\n- **Asked by:** Error P015-A (\ud83d\udcac-discussion)\n- **Answered by:** Odilitime\n- **Answer:** Jagex hasn't said anything yet, but it's a problem because it's open source and there will be several copies.\n\n### Unanswered Questions\n\n- **For what version of which product?** (Odilitime in \ud83d\udcac-coders, regarding Twitter input issue)\n- **Does the code bot follow your org if you use it?** (Odilitime in xfn-framework)\n- **When does Babylon launch, and milady.ai?** (g in \ud83d\udcac-discussion)\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**Omid Sa \u2192 Jamie**\n- **Context:** Jamie needed help building an agent as a beginner\n- **Resolution:** Directed to install ElizaOS, read documentation, and use the dedicated help channel for questions\n- **Channel:** \ud83d\udcac-discussion\n\n**Odilitime \u2192 Error P015-A**\n- **Context:** Concerns about Jagex potentially shutting down Hyperscape project\n- **Resolution:** Provided information that Jagex hasn't responded and explained open-source distribution challenges\n- **Channel:** \ud83d\udcac-discussion\n\n**Odilitime \u2192 Jamie**\n- **Context:** Twitter input issue troubleshooting\n- **Resolution:** Requested clarification on version and product details; issue not yet resolved\n- **Channel:** \ud83d\udcac-coders\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n\n- **Investigate and resolve Twitter input issue** once version and product details are provided\n - **Mentioned by:** Jamie (\ud83d\udcac-coders)\n\n- **Investigate code bot behavior** regarding organizational repository following\n - **Mentioned by:** Odilitime (xfn-framework)\n\n- **Investigate Jagex's position** on Hyperscape project to assess legal risks\n - **Mentioned by:** Error P015-A (\ud83d\udcac-discussion)\n\n### Feature\n\n- **Build an agent** (beginner seeking collaboration and learning)\n - **Mentioned by:** Jamie (\ud83d\udcac-discussion)\n\n---\n\n**Summary Statistics:**\n- **Total Channels Analyzed:** 3\n- **Active Technical Discussions:** 5\n- **Help Interactions:** 3\n- **Unanswered Questions:** 3\n- **Total Action Items:** 4\n---\n2026-02-25.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-25\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Framework Analysis & Competition\n\nThe team analyzed Nous Research's newly released **Hermes Agent framework**, which appears to be primarily Python-based (75%) and combines \"zoey and openclaw\" components. The only feature of interest identified was **trajectory compression for fitting training data into token budgets**. Contrary to initial speculation, the framework was developed primarily by Teknium without contributions from Roperito's Life Engine.\n\nIn the partners channel, discussions touched on other frameworks experiencing price increases, with Odilitime suggesting that long-term performance (one year) is a better indicator of value than short-term price movements.\n\n### Critical Version Control Issues\n\nA significant **version control problem** emerged in the main repository where the develop branch unexpectedly contained 2.0.0 code instead of 1.x code. After investigation, Odilitime determined the issue couldn't be traced through normal PR or commit history and was \"unfixable\" through conventional means. The solution was to create a **v2-develop branch** to preserve 1.x code for users still in transition.\n\nAn additional complication arose from **GitHub-Linear bidirectional synchronization** creating a \"mess\" in issue tracking that required cleanup.\n\n### AI/LLM Applications in Hardware\n\nA brief but interesting technical discussion explored the use of **LLMs for hardware development**. Odilitime shared practical experience using LLMs for FPGA development and noted their application in 3D printing workflows, responding to speculation about using AI for custom CPU design and hardware fabrication.\n\n### Community Access & Administrative\n\nMultiple users requested and received access to the \"milady room\" channel, with Odilitime handling these administrative requests. There were also inquiries about Babylon-related opportunities, with 100 spaces available for submission.\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Anyone know about zERC20.io?** \nA: Identified as an old protocol (answered by Futilitarianism)\n\n**Q: Do you think people will use LLMs to fabricate custom hardware like CPUs?** \nA: Odilitime confirmed using LLMs for FPGAs and seeing them used for 3D printers (answered by Odilitime)\n\n**Q: Was Linear synced with GitHub for issues?** \nA: Yes, both sides were synced bidirectionally (answered by Stan \u26a1)\n\n**Q: Can I get access to milady room?** \nA: Access granted (answered by Odilitime to multiple users)\n\n### Unanswered Questions\n\n- How much of Roperito's life engine is in the Hermes agent framework?\n- Was putting 2.0.0 code in develop intentional?\n- When will new AI news be released?\n- When is the Babylon release?\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**Access Management**\n- **Odilitime** provided milady room access to both **Bill Ding** and **ElizaBAO**, handling administrative requests efficiently\n\n**Protocol Identification**\n- **Futilitarianism** helped **ElizaBAO** identify zERC20.io as an old protocol\n\n**GitHub/Linear Sync Clarification**\n- **Stan \u26a1** assisted **Odilitime** by confirming the bidirectional sync status between GitHub issues and Linear, acknowledging the cleanup needed\n\n**Babylon Participation**\n- **ElizaBAO** directed **Borderless** to the appropriate channel where 100 spaces were available for Babylon-related submissions\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n\n- **Create v2-develop branch** for 1.x code to support users in transition | Mentioned by: Odilitime\n- **Clean up GitHub/Linear issues synchronization mess** caused by bidirectional sync | Mentioned by: Stan \u26a1\n- **Investigate trajectory compression feature** from Hermes Agent framework | Mentioned by: Odilitime\n- **Add comment to GitHub issue** elizaOS/eliza/issues/6443 | Mentioned by: Odilitime\n\n### Documentation\n\n- **Provide information about new AI news release schedule** | Mentioned by: ElizaBAO\n\n### Feature\n\n- **Babylon release timing needs clarification** | Mentioned by: Biazs\n\n---\n\n**Note:** This summary reflects a relatively quiet day in the Discord channels with limited deep technical discussions. The most significant activities centered around version control issues and framework analysis, with administrative tasks and brief technical exchanges comprising the remainder of the day's activity.\n---\n2026-02-24.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-24\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Project Status and Community Concerns\n\nThe community expressed concerns about ELIZAOS token price performance and project viability. Amit gupta questioned whether the project had stalled due to stagnant price action and lack of buyer growth. **Odilitime** clarified that the project remains actively developed, attributing current price performance to broader bear market conditions affecting the entire crypto space. This reassurance was important for community morale, though concerns about price-to-activity disconnect persisted.\n\n### Development Activity\n\n**ElizaBAO** announced a submission to the **PumpFun hackathon**, representing tangible development progress. When questioned about similarities to Babylon, ElizaBAO clarified that the project is distinct and separate.\n\n### New Tools and Platforms\n\n**Fido** introduced **fomolt**, an agentic trading platform specifically designed for testing with Eliza agents. The platform features:\n- **CLI tool** for instant token trading on Base blockchain\n- **USDC for gas** with paymaster support for simplified transactions\n- **API key authentication** instead of traditional seedphrase management\n- Focus on streamlining the agent development and testing workflow\n\nFido actively solicited community feedback to improve the platform's utility for agent developers.\n\n### Administrative and Access Management\n\n**Odilitime** performed administrative work upgrading **shad0w's** Discord roles and permissions. The process encountered technical limitations when attempting to assign the \"core dev\" role and add labs access to specific rooms. After troubleshooting, shad0w was successfully granted access to the xfn room and the milady room (channel ID 1475913823243210784), though manual channel addition was initially required.\n\n### Community Engagement\n\nThe channels saw various service offerings including co-marketing proposals, NFT/design services, and fullstack development services. **The Void** hinted at upcoming developments with a cryptic message suggesting \"Its gonna get spicy soon,\" though no technical details were provided.\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Will ELIZAOS not be able to recover its price? Has the project become dead?** \nA: Project is not dead and remains actively developed; current price performance is attributed to broader bear market conditions (answered by Odilitime)\n\n**Q: Can you see the xfn & milday rooms?** \nA: I can see xfn but not milady (answered by shad0w, leading to Odilitime resolving the access issue)\n\n**Q: Is this project similar to Babylon?** \nA: No, the project is distinct (answered by ElizaBAO)\n\n**Q: How to fix the role assignment issue?** \nA: Resolved by adjusting permissions and manually granting room access (answered by Odilitime)\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**Helper:** Odilitime \n**Helpee:** shad0w \n**Context:** Role upgrade and room access permissions not working properly during administrative setup \n**Resolution:** Successfully granted access to xfn and milady rooms after troubleshooting permission limits and adjusting Discord server settings\n\n**Helper:** Odilitime \n**Helpee:** Amit gupta \n**Context:** Community member concerned about project viability and token price stagnation \n**Resolution:** Clarified project remains active with ongoing development, provided context about bear market conditions affecting price\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n- **PumpFun hackathon submission completed** - Mentioned by ElizaBAO\n\n### Feature\n- **Test fomolt agentic trading platform CLI with Eliza agents** for token trading on Base blockchain - Mentioned by fido\n- **Provide feedback on fomolt platform** to improve utility for agent developers - Mentioned by fido\n- **Joint co-marketing opportunity** with degen and trader community - Mentioned by am\n\n---\n\n*Note: Activity levels were relatively low on February 24, 2026, with limited technical discussions. The primary focus was on community reassurance, administrative tasks, and introduction of new development tools.*\n---\n2026-02-26.json\n---\nelizaosDailySummary\n---\nDaily Report - 2026-02-26\n---\nElizaOS Development Discussions and Community Support\n---\nIn the coders channel, a developer named Jamie reported encountering issues with Twitter input functionality. Odilitime responded by asking for clarification about which version and product was being referenced. The conversation remained brief with morning greetings exchanged between community members.\n---\nhttps://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1300025221834739744\n---\nIn the xfn-framework channel, developers discussed technical implementation details. Shawmakesmagic clarified that something was not intentional in response to a previous query. Odilitime later shared a screenshot showing a new fork and expressed surprise, questioning whether the code bot automatically follows organizations when used.\n---\nhttps://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1377726087789940836\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/elizaos-media/screenshot_2026-02-26_at_12-08-53_pm_99cf005a.png\n---\nIn the general discussion channel, Jamie sought help building an agent as a newcomer to the platform, expressing interest in learning and meeting new community members. Omid Sa directed Jamie to install ElizaOS and read documentation, then ask questions in the coders channel. A developer named elgamer offered extensive expertise in smart contract integration, API architecture, and blockchain systems, listing their technology stack including React, Next.js, Python, TypeScript, Solidity, and other tools. Separately, community members discussed concerns about a RuneScape-related project called Hyperscape, questioning whether Jagex would allow it. Odilitime noted that Jagex had not commented yet and pointed out that the open source nature means multiple copies would exist regardless.\n---\nhttps://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1253563209462448241\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/elizaos-media/embed-thumbnail-1476578339610431498_d5224f51.png\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/elizaos-media/embed-video-1476578339610431498_15c96fd3.mp4\n---\ndiscordrawdata\n---\n2026-02-26.md\n---\n## ElizaOS Development Discussions and Community Support\n\n### Technical Support and Issue Resolution\n\n- Jamie reported encountering issues with Twitter input functionality in the coders channel\n- Odilitime responded by requesting clarification about the version and product being referenced\n\n### Framework Development\n\n- Shawmakesmagic clarified that a particular implementation detail was not intentional\n- Odilitime shared a screenshot showing a new fork in the xfn-framework channel\n- Discussion occurred about whether the code bot automatically follows organizations when used\n\n### Community Onboarding\n\n- Jamie, as a newcomer, sought help building an agent\n- Omid Sa provided guidance directing Jamie to install ElizaOS and read documentation before asking questions in the coders channel\n- Elgamer offered expertise in smart contract integration, API architecture, and blockchain systems with a technology stack including React, Next.js, Python, TypeScript, and Solidity\n\n### Project Discussions\n\n- Community members discussed a RuneScape-related project called Hyperscape\n- Odilitime noted that Jagex had not yet commented on the project\n- Odilitime pointed out that the open source nature means multiple copies would exist regardless of permissions\n---\n2026-02-26.json\n---\nelizaOS\n---\nelizaOS Discord - 2026-02-26\n---\n1300025221834739744\n---\n\ud83d\udcac-coders\n---\n# Discord Channel Analysis: \ud83d\udcac-coders\n\n## 1. Summary\n\nThe chat segment shows minimal technical discussion. Jamie reported encountering an issue with Twitter input functionality but did not provide specific details about the error, implementation context, or what they had already tried. Odilitime responded seeking clarification about which version and product Jamie was referring to, indicating the need for more context to diagnose the problem. Futilitarianism provided a casual greeting but did not contribute to the technical discussion. No solutions were implemented or decisions made during this brief exchange, as the conversation appears to be in the initial problem-reporting phase without sufficient detail for troubleshooting.\n\n## 2. FAQ\n\nQ: For what version of which product? (asked by Odilitime) A: Unanswered\n\n## 3. Help Interactions\n\nHelper: Odilitime | Helpee: Jamie | Context: Twitter input issue | Resolution: Requested clarification on version and product details; issue not yet resolved\n\n## 4. Action Items\n\nType: Technical | Description: Investigate and resolve Twitter input issue once version and product details are provided | Mentioned By: Jamie\n---\n1377726087789940836\n---\nxfn-framework\n---\n# Analysis of #xfn-framework Discord Chat\n\n## 1. Summary\n\nThis chat segment contains minimal technical discussion. The conversation consists of brief, fragmented exchanges that lack substantial technical content. Odilitime mentions a \"new fork\" and questions whether \"the code bot follow your org if you use it,\" suggesting a potential discussion about repository forking and bot behavior in organizational contexts. However, no concrete answers, solutions, or implementations are provided in this segment. The other messages are acknowledgments or brief statements without technical context. This appears to be either casual conversation or the beginning of a discussion that may have continued elsewhere or at a later time.\n\n## 2. FAQ\n\nQ: Does the code bot follow your org if you use it? (asked by Odilitime) A: Unanswered\n\n## 3. Help Interactions\n\nNone identified in this chat segment.\n\n## 4. Action Items\n\nType: Technical | Description: Investigate code bot behavior regarding organizational repository following | Mentioned By: Odilitime\n---\n1253563209462448241\n---\n\ud83d\udcac-discussion\n---\n# Discord Channel Analysis: \ud83d\udcac-discussion\n\n## 1. Summary\n\nThe discussion channel featured minimal technical content, primarily consisting of general community interactions and greetings. The most substantive technical exchange involved Jamie seeking help to build an agent while acknowledging being a beginner. Omid Sa provided guidance by directing Jamie to install ElizaOS and read documentation, then ask questions in a dedicated help channel.\n\nA brief discussion emerged about ai16z token, with digitalalchemy mentioning their \"clawd bot\" identifies ai16z as the most interesting token in the AI sector, though Odilitime noted models are outdated.\n\nThe most extended conversation centered on Hyperscape (apparently a RuneScape-related project) and potential legal concerns. Error P015-A raised questions about whether Jagex (RuneScape's owner) would allow Hyperscape to proceed, expressing concern about time investment if the company shuts it down. Odilitime acknowledged Jagex hasn't responded yet and noted the open-source nature creates challenges since multiple copies will exist. Boj/acc dismissed concerns, stating nobody is taking over RuneScape.\n\nOne user (elgamer) posted their technical credentials offering development services, listing expertise in smart contracts, DeFi, NFTs, and a tech stack including React, Next.js, Python, TypeScript, Solidity, Rust, and Web3.js.\n\nOverall, the channel showed limited technical problem-solving, with most messages being introductions, greetings, or off-topic commentary.\n\n## 2. FAQ\n\nQ: Can someone help me build an agent? I'm still new to this. (asked by Jamie) A: Start by installing ElizaOS and reading documentation, then ask questions in the development help channel. (answered by Omid Sa)\n\nQ: When does Babylon launch, and milady.ai? (asked by g) A: Unanswered\n\nQ: Do you think Runescape would let Hyperscape happen? What are the rules on that? (asked by Error P015-A) A: Jagex hasn't said anything yet, but it's a problem because it's open source and there will be several copies. (answered by Odilitime)\n\n## 3. Help Interactions\n\nHelper: Omid Sa | Helpee: Jamie | Context: Jamie needed help building an agent as a beginner | Resolution: Directed to install ElizaOS, read documentation, and use the dedicated help channel for questions\n\nHelper: Odilitime | Helpee: Error P015-A | Context: Concerns about Jagex potentially shutting down Hyperscape project | Resolution: Provided information that Jagex hasn't responded and explained open-source distribution challenges\n\n## 4. Action Items\n\nType: Feature | Description: Build an agent (beginner seeking collaboration and learning) | Mentioned By: Jamie\n\nType: Technical | Description: Investigate Jagex's position on Hyperscape project to assess legal risks | Mentioned By: Error P015-A\n---\n2026-02-26.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-26\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Technical Issues & Support\n\n**Twitter Integration Problems**\nIn the \ud83d\udcac-coders channel, Jamie reported encountering issues with Twitter input functionality. The problem remains unresolved as Odilitime requested clarification on which version and product was being used before troubleshooting could proceed.\n\n**Agent Development for Beginners**\nA beginner-friendly discussion emerged in \ud83d\udcac-discussion where Jamie sought help building an agent. Omid Sa provided initial guidance, directing them to install ElizaOS, review documentation, and utilize the dedicated help channel for specific questions.\n\n### Repository & Bot Management\n\n**Code Bot Organizational Behavior**\nIn the xfn-framework channel, Odilitime raised questions about code bot behavior when working with organizational repositories, specifically whether the bot follows organizational accounts when used. This technical question regarding bot configuration and repository management remains unanswered.\n\n### AI & Token Discussion\n\n**AI16z Token Analysis**\nA brief exchange in \ud83d\udcac-discussion featured digitalalchemy's \"clawd bot\" identifying ai16z as the most interesting token in the AI sector. However, Odilitime noted that the models being referenced are outdated, suggesting the analysis may not reflect current market conditions.\n\n### Legal & Compliance Concerns\n\n**Hyperscape Project Legal Risks**\nA significant discussion emerged regarding the Hyperscape project (RuneScape-related) and potential legal challenges from Jagex, the owner of RuneScape. Error P015-A expressed concerns about investing time in the project if Jagex might shut it down. Odilitime acknowledged that Jagex has not yet responded to the project and highlighted the complexity created by the open-source nature of the project, which will result in multiple copies existing. Boj/acc downplayed concerns, stating that nobody is attempting to take over RuneScape itself.\n\n### Community Engagement\n\n**Developer Services Offered**\nUser elgamer posted their technical credentials offering development services, listing expertise in:\n- Smart contracts, DeFi, and NFTs\n- Tech stack: React, Next.js, Python, TypeScript, Solidity, Rust, and Web3.js\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Can someone help me build an agent? I'm still new to this.**\n- **Asked by:** Jamie (\ud83d\udcac-discussion)\n- **Answered by:** Omid Sa\n- **Answer:** Start by installing ElizaOS and reading documentation, then ask questions in the development help channel.\n\n**Q: Do you think Runescape would let Hyperscape happen? What are the rules on that?**\n- **Asked by:** Error P015-A (\ud83d\udcac-discussion)\n- **Answered by:** Odilitime\n- **Answer:** Jagex hasn't said anything yet, but it's a problem because it's open source and there will be several copies.\n\n### Unanswered Questions\n\n- **For what version of which product?** (Odilitime in \ud83d\udcac-coders, regarding Twitter input issue)\n- **Does the code bot follow your org if you use it?** (Odilitime in xfn-framework)\n- **When does Babylon launch, and milady.ai?** (g in \ud83d\udcac-discussion)\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**Omid Sa \u2192 Jamie**\n- **Context:** Jamie needed help building an agent as a beginner\n- **Resolution:** Directed to install ElizaOS, read documentation, and use the dedicated help channel for questions\n- **Channel:** \ud83d\udcac-discussion\n\n**Odilitime \u2192 Error P015-A**\n- **Context:** Concerns about Jagex potentially shutting down Hyperscape project\n- **Resolution:** Provided information that Jagex hasn't responded and explained open-source distribution challenges\n- **Channel:** \ud83d\udcac-discussion\n\n**Odilitime \u2192 Jamie**\n- **Context:** Twitter input issue troubleshooting\n- **Resolution:** Requested clarification on version and product details; issue not yet resolved\n- **Channel:** \ud83d\udcac-coders\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n\n- **Investigate and resolve Twitter input issue** once version and product details are provided\n - **Mentioned by:** Jamie (\ud83d\udcac-coders)\n\n- **Investigate code bot behavior** regarding organizational repository following\n - **Mentioned by:** Odilitime (xfn-framework)\n\n- **Investigate Jagex's position** on Hyperscape project to assess legal risks\n - **Mentioned by:** Error P015-A (\ud83d\udcac-discussion)\n\n### Feature\n\n- **Build an agent** (beginner seeking collaboration and learning)\n - **Mentioned by:** Jamie (\ud83d\udcac-discussion)\n\n---\n\n**Summary Statistics:**\n- **Total Channels Analyzed:** 3\n- **Active Technical Discussions:** 5\n- **Help Interactions:** 3\n- **Unanswered Questions:** 3\n- **Total Action Items:** 4\n---\n2026-02-27.md\n---\nFile not found\n---\n2026-02-15.md\n---\n# Overall Project Weekly Summary (Feb 15 - 21, 2026)\n\nThis week, ElizaOS entered a high-velocity phase as it prepared for its official beta launch. The team successfully cleared a massive backlog of technical hurdles while simultaneously expanding the framework's reach into everyday communication tools like WhatsApp and Gmail. By combining core infrastructure upgrades with new decentralized identity features, the project is positioning itself as a robust, secure, and highly adaptable home for the next generation of AI agents.\n\n## Executive Summary\nElizaOS shifted its focus toward a major beta release, prioritizing user onboarding and platform stability. The project achieved significant milestones by integrating popular messaging and productivity apps and launching new on-chain identity tools for agents on the Solana blockchain.\n\n### Key Strategic Initiatives & Outcomes\n\n**Preparing for the Beta Launch and Beyond**\n*Goal: To ensure the platform is stable, user-friendly, and ready for its first 100 official testers.*\n* The team cleared dozens of functional blockers in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), including fixing dashboard bugs and removing restrictive text limits to improve the user experience.\n* A new \"Profile Plugin\" was proposed in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) to automatically build user profiles from social media, making it easier for new users to get started immediately.\n* Efforts are underway in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) to refine the AI's personality, aiming for a more direct and engaging conversational style for the launch.\n\n**Expanding Agent Reach and Utility**\n*Goal: To allow AI agents to work across more platforms and handle more complex tasks.*\n* Major integrations were finalized for WhatsApp, Gmail, and the N8N workflow engine in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), allowing agents to communicate and automate tasks where users already work.\n* The [elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow) repository added a new \"control panel\" (REST API), giving developers a way to manage complex workflows directly without needing to use natural language.\n* The plugin registry in [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry) saw a surge in new tools, particularly for Web3 and financial data exchanges.\n\n**Strengthening Security and Decentralization**\n*Goal: To give agents a verifiable identity and ensure the system remains secure as it grows.*\n* The project introduced the SAID Protocol in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) and [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry), which gives agents a \"digital passport\" on the Solana blockchain for secure, verifiable actions.\n* A security audit was completed for the Model Context Protocol in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), ensuring that as agents share information, they do so safely.\n\n**Improving System Health and Maintenance**\n*Goal: To keep the project's \"engine\" running smoothly and make it easier for community members to contribute.*\n* A major database overhaul was started in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) to make the system faster and more reliable for the long term.\n* Critical fixes to the automated review system in [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry) ensured that outside contributors can have their work checked and merged more quickly.\n* Routine but essential security updates were performed across the documentation site in [elizaos/elizaos.github.io](https://github.com/elizaos/elizaos.github.io) to keep the project's public face secure.\n\n### Cross-Repository Coordination\n* **Unified Identity Standards**: The implementation of the SAID Protocol required synchronized work between the core framework [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) and the [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry) to ensure agents can use their new on-chain identities across all plugins.\n* **Workflow Automation**: The N8N workflow integration involved coordinated updates in the core repository [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) and the specific [elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow) repo to provide a seamless experience for managing complex AI tasks.\n* **Automated Maintenance**: The team successfully fixed \"Renovate\" (an automated update tool) in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), which now helps keep dependencies across the entire ecosystem up to date automatically.\n\n## Repository Spotlights\n\n### elizaos/eliza\n* Initiated a major database refactor ([#6509](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6509)) to improve long-term system architecture.\n* Integrated the SAID Protocol for on-chain Solana identity ([#6510](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6510)), enabling verifiable agent signatures.\n* Finalized major integrations for WhatsApp ([#6401](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6401)), Gmail ([#6404](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6404)), and N8N ([#6429](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6429)).\n* Resolved critical automated update issues ([#6488](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6488)) and enabled multi-language dependency management ([#6506](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6506), [#6507](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6507)).\n* Added support for the Opus 4.5 model ([#6368](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6368)) and Chain-of-Thought reasoning ([#6294](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6294)).\n\n### elizaos-plugins/registry\n* Expanded the ecosystem with new plugins including `@elizaos/plugin-said` ([#264](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/264)) and several exchange-related tools ([#261](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/261), [#262](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/262)).\n* Fixed a high-priority issue where the automated review system was blocking new contributions ([#259](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/issues/259)).\n* Improved support for external contributors by fixing the review process for forked repositories ([#260](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/260)).\n\n### elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow\n* Launched a comprehensive REST API for direct workflow management and monitoring ([#16](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow/pull/16)).\n* Fixed a critical bug in how the AI handles workflow properties, ensuring stability even when the AI provides incomplete data ([#18](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow/pull/18)).\n\n### elizaos-plugins/plugin-ollama\n* Identified and began investigating a community-reported issue regarding embedding failures on Linux environments ([#17](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-ollama/issues/17)).\n\n### elizaos/elizaos.github.io\n* Maintained project health through routine dependency synchronization and version updates ([#242](https://github.com/elizaos/elizaos.github.io/pull/242)).\n---\n2026-02-01.md\n---\nNo activity recorded for 2026-02-01.\n---\n{\n \"interval\": {\n \"intervalStart\": \"2026-02-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"intervalEnd\": \"2026-03-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"intervalType\": \"month\"\n },\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"overview\": \"From 2026-02-01 to 2026-03-01, elizaos/eliza had 38 new PRs (18 merged), 41 new issues, and 35 active contributors.\",\n \"topIssues\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7FcGAc\",\n \"title\": \"feat(scenarios): Add Cost Evaluator\",\n \"author\": \"monilpat\",\n \"number\": 5759,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"# feat(scenarios): Add Cost Evaluator\\n\\nLinks: [Issue #5726](https://github.com/elizaOS/eliza/issues/5726)\\n\\n## Summary\\nIntroduce an evaluator that asserts the estimated dollar cost of LLM usage per step. Cost is derived from token counts and a model price table.\\n\\n## Goals\\n- Estimate cost (USD) for each step from recorded token metrics\\n- Allow thresholds (`max_cost_usd`) to fail expensive runs\\n- Support multiple models within a single step\\n\\n## Acceptance Criteria\\n1. New evaluator type `llm_cost`\\n2. Price table configurable via env or default map\\n3. Evaluator passes if total step cost <= `max_cost_usd`\\n4. Detailed message with model breakdown and total\\n\\n## Schema Changes\\nEdit `packages/cli/src/commands/scenario/src/schema.ts`:\\n\\n```ts\\nconst LlmCostEvaluationSchema = BaseEvaluationSchema.extend({\\n type: z.literal('llm_cost'),\\n max_cost_usd: z.number(),\\n});\\n```\\n\\n## Pricing Source\\nAdd a small utility `packages/cli/src/commands/scenario/src/pricing.ts`:\\n\\n```ts\\nexport type ModelPricing = {\\n inputPer1K: number; // USD per 1000 input tokens\\n outputPer1K: number; // USD per 1000 output tokens\\n};\\n\\nexport const DEFAULT_MODEL_PRICING: Record = {\\n TEXT_SMALL: { inputPer1K: 0.15, outputPer1K: 0.60 },\\n TEXT_LARGE: { inputPer1K: 0.50, outputPer1K: 1.50 },\\n OBJECT_SMALL: { inputPer1K: 0.50, outputPer1K: 1.50 },\\n};\\n\\nexport function getPricing(modelType: string, overrides?: Record): ModelPricing | null {\\n const table = overrides ?? DEFAULT_MODEL_PRICING;\\n return table[modelType] ?? null;\\n}\\n```\\n\\nAllow overrides via `SCENARIO_MODEL_PRICING` env (JSON string) in a follow-up.\\n\\n## Evaluation Implementation\\nAdd to `EvaluationEngine`:\\n\\n```ts\\nclass LlmCostEvaluator implements Evaluator {\\n async evaluate(params: EvaluationSchema, runResult: ExecutionResult): Promise {\\n if (params.type !== 'llm_cost') throw new Error('Mismatched evaluator');\\n const llm = runResult.metrics?.llm ?? [];\\n if (!llm.length) return { success: false, message: 'No LLM metrics found for cost calculation' };\\n\\n const pricingOverrides = process.env.SCENARIO_MODEL_PRICING ? JSON.parse(process.env.SCENARIO_MODEL_PRICING) : undefined;\\n let total = 0;\\n for (const m of llm) {\\n const pricing = getPricing(m.modelType, pricingOverrides);\\n if (!pricing) continue;\\n const inTok = m.promptTokens ?? 0;\\n const outTok = m.completionTokens ?? 0;\\n total += (inTok / 1000) * pricing.inputPer1K + (outTok / 1000) * pricing.outputPer1K;\\n }\\n\\n const success = total <= params.max_cost_usd;\\n return { success, message: `Estimated cost: $${total.toFixed(4)} (limit $${params.max_cost_usd.toFixed(4)})` };\\n }\\n}\\n```\\n\\nRegister:\\n\\n```ts\\nthis.register('llm_cost', new LlmCostEvaluator());\\n```\\n\\n## Example Usage\\n\\n```yaml\\nevaluations:\\n - type: llm_cost\\n max_cost_usd: 0.05\\n```\\n\\n## Tests\\n- Unit: price math with multiple model records\\n- Integration: with token_count metrics present and absent\\n\\n## Notes\\nThis builds on the Token Count evaluator and shared metrics capture. It complements mocking enhancements described in [Issue #5726](https://github.com/elizaOS/eliza/issues/5726).\\n\\n\\n\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2025-08-12T04:27:23Z\",\n \"closedAt\": \"2026-02-12T22:43:04Z\",\n \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7nsf3_\",\n \"title\": \"[Agent] Eliza Character File & Prompt Engineering\",\n \"author\": \"borisudovicic\",\n \"number\": 6447,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"## Description\\n\\nImprove Eliza's character file and prompts based on initial testing feedback.\\n\\n## Background\\n\\nBoris (Feb 2): \\\"I've talked to Eliza only a little bit, just to test her out. I think she'll definitely need some edits in her character file, some more prompt engineering. She's a good start so far, but there's definitely stuff we're gonna have to work on. It'll be iterative.\\\"\\n\\n## Acceptance Criteria\\n\\n- [ ] Review current character file responses\\n- [ ] Identify areas needing improvement\\n- [ ] Update character file with better prompts\\n- [ ] Add message examples (Ben has PRs for this)\\n- [ ] Test with Sonnet model\\n- [ ] Iterate based on user feedback\\n\\n## Technical Notes\\n\\nBen mentioned:\\n\\n* Currently using a different model, switching to Sonnet\\n* Two PRs coming that add message examples and change model to Sonnet\\n* \\\"Huge difference in price between Sonnet and \\\\[current model\\\\]\\\"\\n\\nBoris mentioned Sonnet 5 coming out soon - good timing to test on Eliza if cheaper.\\n\\n## Priority\\n\\n**P2 - Iterative improvement**\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-02T17:48:44Z\",\n \"closedAt\": \"2026-02-16T21:52:18Z\",\n \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7pWP6K\",\n \"title\": \"[Bug] URL in message triggers duplicate LLM calls - processed as both text and attachment (webapp)\",\n \"author\": \"thewoweffect\",\n \"number\": 6486,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"## Description\\nWhen a user sends a message containing a URL, ElizaOS processes it twice:\\n1. As text content \u2192 generates response\\n2. As attachment (metadata/preview) \u2192 generates second response\\n\\nBoth responses are sent through the same SSE stream before the `done` event, resulting in duplicated text in the final response.\\n\\n## Steps to Reproduce\\n1. Start ElizaOS with webapp\\n2. Send a message containing a URL (e.g., \\\"Check this: https://example.com\\\")\\n3. Observe the response\\n\\n## Expected Behavior\\nURL should be processed once, generating a single response.\\n\\n## Actual Behavior\\nTwo identical (or near-identical) responses are generated and streamed as one message, doubling token usage and producing duplicated output.\\n\\n## Impact\\n- 2x LLM API calls per message with URL\\n- Doubled token costs\\n- Poor UX with duplicated responses\\n- Forces workarounds on client side\\n\\n## Environment\\n- ElizaOS version: [your version]\\n- Client: webapp\\n\\n## Suggested Fix\\nEnsure URL is processed either as text OR as attachment, not both. The decision should happen in the message processing flow before LLM calls.\\n\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-09T07:36:55Z\",\n \"closedAt\": null,\n \"state\": \"OPEN\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7plYW-\",\n \"title\": \"Feature Request: Support custom OpenAI endpoint URL for OpenAI provider\",\n \"author\": \"coolRoger\",\n \"number\": 6490,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"## Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.\\nThe current OpenAI provider does **not support configuring a custom OpenAI endpoint URL**, which makes it impossible to use OpenAI-compatible third-party services (e.g., SiliconFlow). These services follow the OpenAI API format but require pointing to their own endpoint URLs instead of the official OpenAI endpoint.\\n\\n## Describe the solution you'd like\\nAdd a **configurable `openai endpoint url` field/parameter** to the OpenAI provider, so users can manually specify the API endpoint URL when using OpenAI-compatible services.\\n\\n## Describe alternatives you've considered\\n- Switching to a dedicated provider for SiliconFlow: Not ideal, as it breaks the unified OpenAI-compatible usage pattern.\\n- Hardcoding the endpoint: Not flexible for different OpenAI-compatible providers.\\n\\n## Additional context\\nMany cloud / inference providers (SiliconFlow, etc.) provide OpenAI-compatible APIs, only differing in the endpoint URL. Supporting custom endpoints will greatly improve the compatibility and flexibility of the OpenAI provider.\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-10T00:57:25Z\",\n \"closedAt\": null,\n \"state\": \"OPEN\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7qLiWA\",\n \"title\": \"Image content stripped from LLM requests in cloud chat\",\n \"author\": \"borisudovicic\",\n \"number\": 6494,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"## Issue is inside: `/api/v1/chat/completions`. `convertToUIMessages`\\n\\n\\\"Screenshot\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-11T22:08:25Z\",\n \"closedAt\": \"2026-02-16T21:51:50Z\",\n \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n }\n ],\n \"topPRs\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs68XpPS\",\n \"title\": \"V2.0.0\",\n \"author\": \"lalalune\",\n \"number\": 6351,\n \"body\": \"This is a working branch of elizaOS v2.0.0\\r\\n\\r\\nCritically, this removes app, server, CLI and all non-essentials. Instead, we focus on runtime in Rust, Typescript, with critical plugins ported as well\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-01-09T17:06:10Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 2384715,\n \"deletions\": 298813\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7CUyZi\",\n \"title\": \"feat: next generation multi-language Eliza with Rust, Python and TypeScript support\",\n \"author\": \"lalalune\",\n \"number\": 6485,\n \"body\": \"This is the next version of eliza\\r\\n\\r\\nRust, python and typescript\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\n# Major Updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Add complete Python and Rust core packages, extending Eliza to these languages\\r\\n- Add Python and Rust native versions of popular plugins\\r\\n- Remove default application, client and server infrastructure\\r\\n- Add examples for all major frameworks\\r\\n- Bootstrap is integrated into core, enabled with basicCapabilities by default and optionally extendedCapabiltiies\\r\\n- Core plugins are also rust, python and typescript\\r\\n- Comes with a WIP code agent\\r\\n\\r\\n# Minor updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Agents can now respond without needing a roomId or worldId\\r\\n- Initial message memory is created inside the message handler service (was confusing and not that way)\\r\\n- Can running planningMode true or false, on false skips planning and calls single action (good for games and simple agents)\\r\\n- Actions can have arguments, and can be called with arguments. This way they can be called like tools without needing a separate step\\r\\n\\r\\nTODO\\r\\n- LLM mode -- can be SMALL, LARGE or DEFAULT -- SMALL and LARGE override the LLM small or large so all use the small or all use the large\\r\\n- checkShouldRespond defaults to true but can be turned off for ChatGPT mode\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-08T18:44:21Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 649890,\n \"deletions\": 303180\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7EjIkM\",\n \"title\": \"feat: add SAID Protocol on-chain Solana identity for ElizaOS agents\",\n \"author\": \"kaiclawd\",\n \"number\": 6510,\n \"body\": \"## What this does\\n\\nEvery new agent created via `elizaos create` now automatically gets a free on-chain identity on [SAID Protocol](https://saidprotocol.com) \u2014 Solana AI Identity.\\n\\n## Changes\\n\\n- `packages/elizaos/src/utils/said.ts` \u2014 new module: Ed25519 keypair generation (pure Node `crypto`, zero new dependencies) + SAID registration via REST API\\n- `packages/elizaos/src/commands/create.ts` \u2014 registers agent with SAID after project creation, saves wallet, displays profile URL\\n\\n## What happens on `elizaos create`\\n\\n```\\n\u2728 Project created successfully!\\n\\n\u26a1 SAID Protocol identity created\\n Wallet: 7xKXtg2CW87d97TXJSDpbD5jBkheTqA83TZRuJosgAs\\n Profile: https://saidprotocol.com/agents/7xKXtg2CW87d97TXJSDpbD5jBkheTqA83TZRuJosgAs\\n\\n Key saved to .said-wallet.json (add to .gitignore!)\\n```\\n\\n## Why\\n\\n- **Free** \u2014 off-chain pending registration, no SOL required\\n- **Zero new dependencies** \u2014 uses Node's built-in `crypto` module for Ed25519 keypair generation\\n- **Non-breaking** \u2014 fully opt-out, errors are silently caught, never crashes\\n- **Discoverable** \u2014 agent appears in the public SAID agent directory at [saidprotocol.com/agents](https://saidprotocol.com/agents)\\n- **On-chain upgrade available** \u2014 ~0.01 SOL upgrades to a cryptographically verified badge via challenge-response (proves the entity is a running agent)\\n\\n## SAID Protocol\\n\\nSAID is on-chain identity infrastructure for AI agents on Solana. Think of it as a universal agent passport \u2014 verifiable identity, reputation scores, skill listings, and agent-to-agent discovery.\\n\\n[saidprotocol.com](https://saidprotocol.com) | [Docs](https://saidprotocol.com/docs.html)\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-18T08:01:49Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 648299,\n \"deletions\": 302354\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7FPjL6\",\n \"title\": \"refactor(core): strict typing for logger runtime\",\n \"author\": \"Fankouzu\",\n \"number\": 6519,\n \"body\": \"This PR improves code quality by replacing type usage in the logger module with proper typing. This helps in maintaining type safety across the core package.\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-20T19:25:50Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 648170,\n \"deletions\": 302354\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7CJoKo\",\n \"title\": \"next\",\n \"author\": \"lalalune\",\n \"number\": 6474,\n \"body\": \"This is the next version of eliza\\r\\n\\r\\nRust, python and typescript\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\n# Major Updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Add complete Python and Rust core packages, extending Eliza to these languages\\r\\n- Add Python and Rust native versions of popular plugins\\r\\n- Remove default application, client and server infrastructure\\r\\n- Add examples for all major frameworks\\r\\n- Bootstrap is integrated into core, enabled with basicCapabilities by default and optionally extendedCapabiltiies\\r\\n- Core plugins are also rust, python and typescript\\r\\n- Comes with a WIP code agent\\r\\n\\r\\n# Minor updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Agents can now respond without needing a roomId or worldId\\r\\n- Initial message memory is created inside the message handler service (was confusing and not that way)\\r\\n- Can running planningMode true or false, on false skips planning and calls single action (good for games and simple agents)\\r\\n- Actions can have arguments, and can be called with arguments. This way they can be called like tools without needing a separate step\\r\\n\\r\\nTODO\\r\\n- LLM mode -- can be SMALL, LARGE or DEFAULT -- SMALL and LARGE override the LLM small or large so all use the small or all use the large\\r\\n- checkShouldRespond defaults to true but can be turned off for ChatGPT mode\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-07T08:00:35Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 591239,\n \"deletions\": 282388\n }\n ],\n \"codeChanges\": {\n \"additions\": 18576,\n \"deletions\": 3807,\n \"files\": 160,\n \"commitCount\": 140\n },\n \"completedItems\": [\n {\n \"title\": \"feat(auth): implement JWT authentication and user management\",\n \"prNumber\": 6200,\n \"type\": \"feature\",\n \"body\": \"## Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\n- Data isolation / multi-entity support\\r\\n- External JWT provider integration (Privy, Auth0, Clerk, Supabase, Google, Embbeded)\\r\\n\\r\\n## Risks\\r\\n\\r\\n**Low**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Requires `ENABLE_DATA_ISOLATION=true` to activate JWT auth mode\\r\\n\\r\\n#\",\n \"files\": [\n \".github/workflows/client-cypress-tests.yml\",\n \"packages/client/cypress/e2e/auth/01-auth-flow.cy.ts\",\n \"packages/client/cypress/e2e/auth/02-protected-features.cy.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/App.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/ProtectedRoute.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/ai-elements/response.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/app-sidebar.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/auth-dialog.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/connection-error-banner.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/connection-status.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/group-card.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/group-panel.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/context/AuthContext.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/context/ConnectionContext.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/context/ServerConfigContext.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/hooks/use-query-hooks.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/hooks/use-socket-chat.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/index.css\",\n \"packages/client/src/lib/api-client-config.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/lib/auth-utils.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/lib/socketio-manager.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/routes/chat.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/routes/group.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/routes/home.tsx\",\n \"packages/config/src/eslint/eslint.config.base.js\",\n \"packages/core/src/database.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/runtime.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/types/database.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/types/index.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/types/user.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/src/base.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/src/schema/index.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/src/schema/user.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/integration/jwt-workflow.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/test-utils/jwt-helper.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/api/auth/credentials.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/middleware/auth-middleware-chain.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/middleware/auth-middleware.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/middleware/jwtMiddleware.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/ed25519-verifier.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/factory.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/jwks-verifier.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/secret-verifier.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/socketio/authentication.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/agents/logs.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/agents/runs.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/auth/credentials.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/auth/index.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/index.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/memory/agents.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/index.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"docs: core documentation guides\",\n \"prNumber\": 6356,\n \"type\": \"docs\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n- Adds core documentation pages: architecture, core concepts, plugin development, interop, deployment, and API reference.\\n\\n## Test plan\\n- [ ] Review rendered markdown formatting and links.\\n\\n\\n---\\n\\n> [!NOTE]\\n\",\n \"files\": [\n \"docs/API_REFERENCE.md\",\n \"docs/ARCHITECTURE.md\",\n \"docs/CORE_CONCEPTS.md\",\n \"docs/DEPLOYMENT_GUIDE.md\",\n \"docs/INTEROP_GUIDE.md\",\n \"docs/PLUGIN_DEVELOPMENT.md\",\n \"packages/interop/README.md\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(cli): always use 'latest' for @elizaos deps in created projects\",\n \"prNumber\": 6362,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\n- Fixes issue where `elizaos create` fails when CLI is linked from monorepo because packages with version like `1.7.2-alpha.0` couldn't be found on npm\\n- Both build-time and runtime scripts now use `'latest'` for `@elizaos/*` de\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/cli/src/scripts/copy-templates.ts\",\n \"packages/cli/src/utils/copy-template.ts\",\n \"packages/cli/tests/integration/local-development.test.ts\",\n \"packages/cli/tests/utils/copy-template.test.ts\",\n \".github/workflows/cli-tests.yml\",\n \"packages/cli/bunfig.toml\",\n \"packages/cli/tests/commands/update.test.ts\",\n \"packages/cli/tests/test-timeouts.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(cli): validate directory path in ensureDir to prevent ENOENT error\",\n \"prNumber\": 6379,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"This PR adds validation to the `ensureDir` function to prevent unclear ENOENT errors when an empty directory path is provided.\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nWhen `ensureDir` was called with an empty string or whitespace-only path, it would attempt to execut\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/cli/src/utils/get-config.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(server): emit MESSAGE_SENT event after sending to central server\",\n \"prNumber\": 6378,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"This PR fixes #5216 - EventType.MESSAGE_SENT event not being emitted when agent responses are sent to the central server API.\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nThe `sendAgentResponseToBus` function in `packages/server/src/services/message.ts` sends agent respon\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/server/src/services/message.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"docs: add environment variables documentation\",\n \"prNumber\": 6377,\n \"type\": \"docs\",\n \"body\": \"This PR adds comprehensive documentation for server environment variables, addressing #5716.\\n\\n## Summary\\n\\nAdded `docs/environment-variables.md` with detailed documentation for:\\n- `ELIZA_SERVER_AUTH_TOKEN` - API authentication for securing e\",\n \"files\": [\n \"docs/environment-variables.md\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(cli): load .env files in agent commands for authentication\",\n \"prNumber\": 6376,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"This PR fixes #5707 - an issue where `elizaos agent` commands would fail when connecting to a remote server that uses `ELIZA_SERVER_AUTH_TOKEN`.\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nWhen running `elizaos agent list` (or other agent commands) against a remote serve\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/cli/src/commands/agent/utils/validation.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"V2.0.0: dynamic execution engine (test if context is going to blown)\",\n \"prNumber\": 6384,\n \"type\": \"tests\",\n \"body\": \"Redo #6113 for 2.0.0, first pass\\n\\n\\n---\\n\\n> [!NOTE]\\n> Introduces a validation-aware, schema-driven prompt execution path and applies it across runtimes and message flows.\\n> \\n> - Adds `dynamic_prompt_exec_from_state`/`dy\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/python/elizaos/runtime.py\",\n \"packages/python/elizaos/services/message_service.py\",\n \"packages/python/elizaos/types/__init__.py\",\n \"packages/python/elizaos/types/state.py\",\n \"packages/rust/src/runtime.rs\",\n \"packages/rust/src/services/message_service.rs\",\n \"packages/rust/src/types/mod.rs\",\n \"packages/rust/src/types/state.rs\",\n \"packages/rust/src/types/streaming.rs\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/runtime.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/services/message.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/types/runtime.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/types/state.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/types/streaming.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/utils/streaming.ts\",\n \"bun.lock\",\n \"package.json\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"V2.0.0: fixed avatar example and elevenlabs plugin\",\n \"prNumber\": 6387,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"# Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\nFixes ElevenLabs API integration issues in `examples/avatar` (formerly `vrm` example) and consolidates the project structure.\\r\\n\\r\\n# Risks\\r\\n\\r\\nLow. Changes are isolated to the `examples/avatar` directory and the `plugin-elevenl\",\n \"files\": [\n \"examples/avatar/README.md\",\n \"examples/avatar/index.html\",\n \"examples/avatar/src/App.tsx\",\n \"examples/vrm/src/App.tsx\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/README.md\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/README.md\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/src/eliza_plugin_elevenlabs/types.py\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/tests/conftest.py\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/tests/test_types.py\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/README.md\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/src/services/elevenlabs_service.rs\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/src/types.rs\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/tests/integration_tests.rs\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/tests/tts_integration.rs\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/README.md\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/package.json\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/src/index.browser.ts\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/src/index.ts\",\n \"plugins/plugin-s3-storage/README.md\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(plugin-bootstrap): add null check for runtime.providers\",\n \"prNumber\": 6473,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\n- **Fix**: Add null check for `runtime.providers` in `providersProvider`\\n- **Impact**: Prevents `TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'filter')`\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nWhen `runtime.providers` is `null` or `undefined`, the c\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/providers.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix: add null checks to Object.entries calls in settings utilities\",\n \"prNumber\": 6471,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\nThis PR adds defensive null/undefined checks before Object.entries() calls in the @elizaos/core package's settings utilities to prevent runtime errors.\\n\\n## Changes\\n\\n### packages/core/src/settings.ts\\n\\nAdded null/undefined guards \",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/core/src/settings.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"chore(examples-art): v2 update dependencies, training pipeline, and tests for 2048 game\",\n \"prNumber\": 6461,\n \"type\": \"tests\",\n \"body\": \"# Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\nRelated to ART (Agentic Reinforcement Training) example improvements for v2.0.0\\r\\n\\r\\n# Risks\\r\\n\\r\\nLow. Changes are isolated to the `examples/art` directory and root `.gitignore`. Only adds new dependencies, enhances existing fun\",\n \"files\": [\n \".gitignore\",\n \"examples/art/.gitignore\",\n \"examples/art/README.md\",\n \"examples/art/elizaos_art/games/game_2048/__init__.py\",\n \"examples/art/elizaos_art/games/game_2048/cli.py\",\n \"examples/art/elizaos_art/trainer.py\",\n \"examples/art/pyproject.toml\",\n \"examples/art/tests/test_games.py\",\n \"examples/art/tests/test_integration.py\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"feat(core): add request context for per-user entity settings\",\n \"prNumber\": 6457,\n \"type\": \"feature\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n- Adds `RequestContext` using AsyncLocalStorage to propagate per-request entity settings\\n- Enables runtime methods to access the originating entity context without explicit parameter passing\\n- Includes helper methods: `withEntity\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/core/src/__tests__/request-context.test.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/__tests__/runtime-request-context.test.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/index.node.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/index.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/request-context.node.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/request-context.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/runtime.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"chore(deps): bump the cargo group across 3 directories with 3 updates\",\n \"prNumber\": 6479,\n \"type\": \"other\",\n \"body\": \"Bumps the cargo group with 1 update in the /packages/computeruse directory: [bytes](https://github.com/tokio-rs/bytes).\\nBumps the cargo group with 1 update in the /packages/rust directory: [bytes](https://github.com/tokio-rs/bytes).\\nBumps t\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/computeruse/Cargo.lock\",\n \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-cli/Cargo.toml\",\n \"packages/rust/Cargo.lock\",\n \"packages/sweagent/rust/Cargo.lock\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"chore(deps): bump the npm_and_yarn group across 3 directories with 3 updates\",\n \"prNumber\": 6478,\n \"type\": \"other\",\n \"body\": \"Bumps the npm_and_yarn group with 1 update in the /packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent directory: [@modelcontextprotocol/sdk](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk).\\nBumps the npm_and_yarn group with 1 update \",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/package-lock.json\",\n \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/package.json\",\n \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/tests/integration/package-lock.json\",\n \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/tests/integration/package.json\",\n \"packages/computeruse/examples/mcp-client-elicitation/package-lock.json\",\n \"packages/computeruse/examples/mcp-client-elicitation/package.json\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"feat(plugin-bootstrap): comprehensive optimization and robustness imp\u2026\",\n \"prNumber\": 6476,\n \"type\": \"feature\",\n \"body\": \"\u2026rovements\\r\\n\\r\\nThis commit merges critical performance optimizations, caching improvements, and robustness enhancements while preserving type safety improvements from upstream.\\r\\n\\r\\n## New Features\\r\\n- Added plugin initialization banner with co\",\n \"files\": [\n \"bun.lock\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/banner.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/evaluators/reflection.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/index.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/actionState.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/actions.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/anxiety.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/attachments.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/character.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/choice.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/entities.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/evaluators.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/index.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/plugin-info.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/recentMessages.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/relationships.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/roles.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/settings.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/shared-cache.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/world.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"feat: ActionFilterService \u2014 vector search + BM25 reranking for action/provider filtering\",\n \"prNumber\": 6475,\n \"type\": \"feature\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\n- Adds `ActionFilterService` that dynamically filters which actions are shown to the LLM based on relevance, reducing prompt bloat from 200+ actions to ~15 relevant ones\\n- Two-tier ranking: vector search (cosine similarity on em\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/typescript/src/__tests__/action-filter.test.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/bootstrap/index.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/bootstrap/providers/actions.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/runtime.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/services/action-filter.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/services/bm25.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/services/cosine-similarity.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/types/plugin.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"chore(changelog): remove references\",\n \"prNumber\": 6495,\n \"type\": \"other\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\r\\n- remove all references from `CHANGELOG.md`\\r\\n\\r\\n## Testing\\r\\n- not run (content-only change)\\r\\n\",\n \"files\": [\n \"CHANGELOG.md\"\n ]\n }\n ],\n \"topContributors\": [\n {\n \"username\": \"standujar\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16385918?u=718bdcd1585be8447bdfffb8c11ce249baa7532d&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 482.7223594214491,\n \"prScore\": 477.3223594214491,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 5,\n \"commentScore\": 0.4,\n \"summary\": \"standujar: Focused on enhancing the stability and functionality of the n8n-workflow plugin, notably improving multi-step loop control by introducing the awaitingUserInput flag in PR #13. They addressed critical integration issues by ensuring cloud compatibility through state management updates in PR #12 and standardizing success status reporting across all action callbacks in PR #11 (+388/-40 lines). Additionally, they streamlined the development lifecycle by automating node crawling in the publish workflow (PR #10) and integrating the plugin into the project's tracked repositories. Their work this month primarily centered on bug fixes and feature development for workflow automation, with a strong emphasis on code reliability and CI/CD improvements.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"odilitime\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16395496?u=c9bac48e632aae594a0d85aaf9e9c9c69b674d8b&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 348.29516101795406,\n \"prScore\": 348.29516101795406,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"odilitime: Focused on enhancing core system stability and performance within the elizaos/eliza repository, most notably through a comprehensive optimization of the bootstrap plugin in PR #6476 (+2,119/-823 lines). This significant contribution involved modifying 30 files to implement robust architectural improvements and feature enhancements. Additionally, they addressed critical resource management by submitting a fix for a memory leak in the bootstrap cache via PR #6477. Their work this month demonstrates a balanced focus on large-scale feature optimization and essential bug fixing to ensure long-term system reliability.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"lalalune\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/18633264?u=e2e906c3712c2506ebfa98df01c2cfdc50050b30&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 326.03058181605707,\n \"prScore\": 325.25258181605705,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.7779999999999999,\n \"summary\": \"lalalune: Focused on expanding core infrastructure and cross-chain capabilities, notably implementing a multi-provider RPC system in elizaos-plugins/plugin-evm (#25) and cloud proxy routing for Solana services (#26). They delivered a significant architectural enhancement with the ActionFilterService in elizaos/eliza (#6475), which introduced vector search and BM25 reranking to improve action selection. Their work involved a massive scale of code modifications across over 4,500 files, signaling a deep involvement in systemic refactors and next-generation multi-language support. Overall, their contributions centered on infrastructure scalability, authentication frameworks, and enhancing the developer experience through CLI and documentation improvements.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"greptile-apps\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 245.34,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 243,\n \"commentScore\": 2.34,\n \"summary\": \"greptile-apps: Focused exclusively on providing feedback and technical oversight through 28 reviews and 5 pull request comments. Despite no direct code changes or merged pull requests this month, they maintained a high level of engagement in the review process to ensure code quality across the codebase. Their primary impact was centered on collaborative peer review and providing detailed commentary on open contributions.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"0xbbjoker\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54844437?u=90fe1762420de6ad493a1c1582f1f70c0d87d8e2&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 157.03108022381605,\n \"prScore\": 155.03108022381605,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"0xbbjoker: Focused on maintenance and stability by addressing technical debt through targeted bugfix work. They contributed a single commit that modified three files, resulting in a balanced set of nine additions and eight deletions. This activity reflects a precise approach to resolving existing issues within the codebase. Their primary focus for the month was dedicated entirely to bugfix efforts across various file types.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"h1-hunt\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/260165794?u=73efc04d5c05a1af9903686d9bb90265cc06ab45&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 135.1498814312321,\n \"prScore\": 121.2118814312321,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 13.5,\n \"commentScore\": 0.43799999999999994,\n \"summary\": \"h1-hunt: Focused on expanding ecosystem capabilities through the development of new integrations, contributing over 1,400 lines of code across several open feature pull requests. Their primary impact involved introducing the Signet plugin for onchain advertising (#6491) and the Mint Club V2 plugin for bonding curve token trading (#6497, #6498). Additionally, they supported the development cycle by providing three technical reviews on active pull requests. Their work this month centered on a balanced mix of feature implementation and bugfixes, with a heavy emphasis on configuration and core code for decentralized finance and advertising plugins.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"anchapin\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6326294?u=2864a5f885294da5b54b95865b6bf6b82781e688&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 72.99868671293827,\n \"prScore\": 72.99868671293827,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"anchapin: Focused on enhancing system stability by implementing defensive programming patterns across the elizaos/eliza codebase. They successfully merged two key bugfix PRs, including #6471 and #6473, which introduced critical null and undefined checks to prevent runtime errors in the settings utility and bootstrap plugin. Their work this month was primarily dedicated to bugfix activities, with a significant portion of their technical contributions involving configuration and code refinements to ensure more robust data handling.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"kaiclawd\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/257877415?u=2c8763bb75f5fd07b37a1939903a8b557dd7a46f&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 59.475878208526346,\n \"prScore\": 59.475878208526346,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"kaiclawd: Focused on expanding ecosystem integrations by initiating the addition of the SAID Protocol on-chain Solana identity to the platform. They currently have two open pull requests, elizaos/eliza #6510 and elizaos-plugins/registry #264, which aim to implement this protocol and register the corresponding plugin. Their primary focus this month has been on identity management and Solana-based protocol integration.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"borisudovicic\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/31806472?u=8935f4d43fd7e4eb9bf5ff92d54d4d2f8ac8a786&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 56,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 56,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"borisudovicic: Focused on driving the architectural roadmap and infrastructure readiness for the Eliza App MVP launch, creating 31 issues to coordinate critical tasks across cloud integrations and user experience. They played a key role in defining infrastructure requirements for Telegram and Discord deployments (#6425, #6424), secrets management (#6410), and the implementation of a multi-tenant serverless architecture (#6415). Their contributions also spanned essential product milestones, including the rollout of OAuth providers (#6437), billing system integration (#6445), and performance optimizations to address cold start latency (#6450). Overall, their activity centered on high-level project management, infrastructure provisioning, and security auditing to ensure a stable pre-launch environment.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"buzzbysolcex\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/259807261?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 51.42425149251019,\n \"prScore\": 50.78625149251019,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.6379999999999999,\n \"summary\": \"buzzbysolcex: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's integration capabilities by initiating the registration of new plugins within the elizaos-plugins/registry. They opened three pull requests to add the @elizaos/plugin-buzz-bd and @buzzbd/plugin-solcex-bd packages (#261, #262, #263), facilitating the inclusion of the SolCex Exchange BD plugin. Their activity this month was centered on configuration management and ecosystem expansion through these registry submissions.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"yaooooooooooooooo\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/62118705?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 43.5437738965761,\n \"prScore\": 43.5437738965761,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"yaooooooooooooooo: Focused on expanding ecosystem capabilities by introducing the plugin-scout for x402 trust intelligence and transactions in elizaos/eliza (#6513). This substantial feature addition involved over 5,000 lines of new code across 42 files, demonstrating a significant investment in both core functionality and comprehensive testing. Their work this month was entirely dedicated to feature development, with a balanced emphasis on implementing new code and ensuring its reliability through extensive test coverage.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"decentralize-dfw\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/115695363?u=858e729376e39f7d94ec1907637812ec3b9ca575&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 43.5437738965761,\n \"prScore\": 43.5437738965761,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"decentralize-dfw: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's conversational capabilities by initiating the integration of the Vera (Virtually Ever After) chatbot. This effort is currently centered on the development of a new feature within the elizaos/eliza repository, as seen in the open pull request #6515. Their primary focus this month has been on the initial implementation and configuration of this specialized chatbot interface.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"2-A-M\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/96268540?u=b7d92c0e2a91af580d09eeae862eef576955ab8a&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 36.63501911726088,\n \"prScore\": 36.63501911726088,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"2-A-M: Focused on critical bug fixes and feature enhancements within the Twitter plugin, notably resolving an authentication retry loop and implementing media upload capabilities via PR #48. This substantial contribution involved modifying 12 files and adding over 5,200 lines of code, demonstrating a high level of effort in stabilizing and expanding the plugin's core functionality. The work was completed efficiently with a 10-hour turnaround time to merge, ensuring immediate impact on the repository's reliability. Their primary focus this month was entirely dedicated to bugfix work and technical improvements within the elizaos-plugins/plugin-twitter codebase.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"hanzlamateen\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10975502?u=53f23921078d9a27d96751373bb44f4bd2d58bf4&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 34.39669771918965,\n \"prScore\": 34.39669771918965,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"hanzlamateen: Focused on infrastructure and dependency management within the elizaos/eliza repository, notably executing a significant update to the v2 dependencies and training pipeline in PR #6461. This extensive effort involved modifying over 7,000 files, signaling a major synchronization of the project's codebase and build environment. Their work demonstrated a balanced technical approach, incorporating bug fixes, refactoring, and test updates to ensure system stability. Overall, their contributions this month centered on large-scale maintenance and foundational improvements to the project's examples and training architecture.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"Fankouzu\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8297296?u=bfe40f2d2a88d01f2092e44db726b11c0608b657&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 34.0207738965761,\n \"prScore\": 34.0207738965761,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"Fankouzu: Focused on enhancing codebase reliability by initiating a refactor for strict typing within the logger runtime in elizaos/eliza (#6519). This ongoing work aims to improve type safety and developer experience within the core system. Their primary focus this month was centered on core infrastructure and logging architecture.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"bytes0xcr6\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/102038261?u=45bcd82b0f6cc2f6c6f8db5bdc01949b3afe7560&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 23.546573590279973,\n \"prScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 9,\n \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n \"summary\": \"bytes0xcr6: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's capabilities by integrating transaction validation services through the addition of the @proofgate/eliza-plugin to the registry via PR #254. In addition to this feature work, they contributed to the development process by providing two code reviews and engaging in technical discussions on pull requests. Their activity this month was centered on configuration management and enhancing plugin availability within the elizaos-plugins repository.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"erdGeclaw\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258411179?u=4607f14fd9d7eb4b4e6d2c26964d37b47937a49c&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 22.034212794122055,\n \"prScore\": 22.034212794122055,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"erdGeclaw: Focused on expanding ecosystem integrations by initiating the addition of the Base L2 smart money signals plugin to the registry. This contribution, currently tracked in open PR #253, aims to integrate @erdgecrawl/plugin-base-signals into the elizaos-plugins repository. Their primary focus this month has been on enhancing signal-based functionality within the Base L2 environment.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"mcp97\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/15067321?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 21.901026915173976,\n \"prScore\": 21.901026915173976,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"mcp97: Focused on documentation maintenance and repository cleanup within the elizaos/eliza codebase. Their primary contribution involved streamlining the project's history by removing unnecessary references in the changelog via PR #6495. This work resulted in the modification of four files, demonstrating a clear focus on documentation accuracy and administrative consistency.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"kamiyo-ai\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/197570892?u=0d1ee66bdde083d3cfa339f7b2dfc1c2e8fee2fd&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 21.18304826901074,\n \"prScore\": 20.64304826901074,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.54,\n \"summary\": \"kamiyo-ai: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's capabilities by initiating the integration of a new plugin into the registry. They submitted a configuration update to add the kamiyo-trust plugin via PR #258 in the elizaos-plugins/registry repository. Their primary focus this month was on ecosystem expansion and plugin registration.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"agentfirstlabs\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/263147801?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 14.397598690831078,\n \"prScore\": 14.397598690831078,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"agentfirstlabs: Focused on enhancing developer resources and security documentation by contributing a new safety guide for the Base Network wallet. This work, currently in an open pull request for elizaos/eliza (#6523), introduces a diagnostic framework to help users navigate x402 errors. Their activity this month was dedicated entirely to improving project documentation and user safety protocols.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"arthur-orderly\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258538952?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n \"prScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"arthur-orderly: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's trading capabilities by integrating the Arthur DEX plugin into the registry. They successfully merged PR #256 in elizaos-plugins/registry, which enables Orderly Network perpetual trading functionality. This contribution highlights a primary focus on ecosystem configuration and the integration of decentralized exchange services.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"0xKairo\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258482051?u=1b8329700a063d57382def591660e68809952a16&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n \"prScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"0xKairo: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's integration capabilities by successfully registering a new plugin for AI agent transaction guarantees. They facilitated the addition of the @proofgate/eliza-plugin via PR #257 in the elizaos-plugins/registry repository. This contribution highlights a primary focus on feature work and configuration management to enhance the platform's utility.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"ATHLSolutions\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6761719?u=3517709343c7ed9e4e80cd95304fff0c357e58e0&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 14,\n \"prScore\": 14,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"ATHLSolutions: No activity this month.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"dontonon\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/22495678?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 13.234147180559946,\n \"prScore\": 13.234147180559946,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"dontonon: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's financial capabilities by initiating the integration of the micronoise-eliza-plugin. This work, currently tracked in open PR #265 within the elizaos-plugins/registry, aims to enable token swapping via x402 payments. Their primary focus this month has been on enhancing plugin availability for decentralized payment processing.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"10inchdev\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/226776904?u=f8556423cfa0bd4464d64395c6c0d526050ba553&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 12.874147180559946,\n \"prScore\": 12.874147180559946,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"10inchdev: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's service offerings by integrating the MoltBazaar plugin into the registry. They successfully merged PR #255, which adds the AI Agent Job Marketplace on Base to the elizaos-plugins/registry. This contribution involved precise configuration updates to ensure the new marketplace is properly indexed and accessible. Their primary focus this month was on ecosystem expansion through configuration management.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"a692570\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/182830946?u=fbc711137880cd843fea4b3b9f00013d07d40fd6&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 10.997573590279972,\n \"prScore\": 10.997573590279972,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"a692570: Focused on expanding the project's documentation by initiating a new integration guide for ClawdTalk voice calling. This work is currently captured in open PR #6489 within the elizaos/eliza repository. Their primary focus this month has been on enhancing developer resources and supporting third-party voice service integrations.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"lawyered0\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4802498?u=f45773fb7440d77e5c12ea1560122dd6d26632eb&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 10.40435169073515,\n \"prScore\": 10.40435169073515,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"lawyered0: Focused on improving the robustness of trust evaluation processing by addressing a bug in the elizaos-plugins/plugin-trust repository. They authored PR #1 to handle plain-text trust evaluation requests, contributing 46 lines of code and associated tests to ensure reliable input parsing. This work demonstrates a clear focus on bugfix stability and test coverage within the plugin's core logic.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"puncar-dev\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/72890404?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 8,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 8,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"puncar-dev: Focused on architectural planning and feature proposals for the elizaos/eliza repository by opening four strategic issues. They outlined a comprehensive whitelisting and leaderboard system (#6469), a community-driven news injection system (#6466), and a feedback mechanism for NPC prompts (#6465). Additionally, they proposed optimizations for AI model usage during the coding process (#6467), demonstrating a primary focus on system design and community engagement features.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"jasonxkensei\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/260305565?u=b17387a9077530191e297ff256d49d9a14c47194&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 6.557573590279973,\n \"prScore\": 6.557573590279973,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"jasonxkensei: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's capabilities by initiating the integration of a new plugin. They opened a pull request in elizaos-plugins/registry (#266) to add the @elizaos/plugin-xproof package. Their activity this month was centered on configuration updates to support this new feature.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"samarth30\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/48334430?u=1fc119a6c2deb8cf60448b4c8961cb21dc69baeb&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 4,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 4,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"samarth30: Focused on identifying architectural improvements for the elizaos/eliza repository by proposing enhancements for external integrations. They initiated discussions on expanding platform capabilities through the creation of two new issues regarding Google MCP enhancements (#6517) and Twitter MCP enhancements (#6516). Their primary focus this month was on the strategic planning and feature definition for Model Context Protocol (MCP) implementations.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"aite550659-max\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258900948?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 4,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 4,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"aite550659-max: Focused on proposing architectural enhancements for the elizaos/eliza repository by initiating the integration of a Verifiable Audit Trail Plugin (VAL). They documented this new feature through the creation of two open issues (#6499, #6500) to outline the plugin's implementation. Their primary focus this month was on defining the requirements for verifiable auditing within the ecosystem.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"thewoweffect\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/113222443?u=cb21d15b0ce815d0f68167f2eca236aad6c64598&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2.3000000000000003,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2.1,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n \"summary\": \"thewoweffect: Focused on identifying and documenting system inefficiencies within the elizaos/eliza repository. They notably reported a bug regarding duplicate LLM calls triggered by URLs in messages (#6486) and engaged in the subsequent discussion to help resolve the issue. Their primary focus this month was on improving application reliability through bug reporting and issue triage.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"saoirse102345-blip\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258542122?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"saoirse102345-blip: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's capabilities by proposing a new architectural direction for financial transactions. They initiated a feature request for a Payment Infrastructure Plugin to enable agent-to-agent and agent-to-user payments within the elizaos/eliza repository (#6443). This contribution highlights a strategic focus on developing core utility and financial interoperability for the platform.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"rookdaemon\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258400181?u=f806b5798e056f9384e53da900fdcd3d7bc24c14&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"rookdaemon: Focused on architectural improvements for agent scalability by initiating a discussion on inter-agent coordination. They proposed a framework for cross-instance communication in elizaos/eliza (#6514) to enhance how separate agent instances interact. Their primary focus this month was on high-level system design and multi-agent orchestration.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"mbatini\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/34915878?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"mbatini: Focused on identifying and reporting integration issues within the elizaos-plugins ecosystem. They documented a technical hurdle regarding embedding errors in the Ollama plugin via issue #17. Their primary focus this month was on troubleshooting and improving the reliability of the elizaos-plugins/plugin-ollama repository.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"fiv3fingers\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/59544796?u=58c2849a3bd9087a4d2e0a5d31ba3cba75babfd6&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"fiv3fingers: Focused on expanding the security capabilities of the platform by proposing the integration of a new audit module. They initiated this effort by opening issue #6468 in elizaos/eliza to advocate for the addition of an EVM audit module. Their primary focus this month was on architectural planning and security enhancements within the EVM ecosystem.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"coolRoger\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/33861624?u=ae40d02de875befc512751127f1082a22b464264&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"coolRoger: Focused on expanding integration flexibility by identifying a need for custom OpenAI endpoint support. They initiated a feature request in elizaos/eliza (#6490) to allow for greater configuration options within the OpenAI provider. Their primary focus this month was on architectural feedback and enhancing the extensibility of the platform's API connections.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"basedmereum\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/223933470?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"basedmereum: Focused on expanding ecosystem capabilities by proposing the integration of the SOLPRISM plugin for verifiable AI reasoning on Solana. This contribution was initiated through the creation of issue #6454 in the elizaos/eliza repository. Their primary focus this month was on architectural planning for blockchain-based AI verification.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"JKHeadley\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12631935?u=e1a3e2005973fbf5526f5dccd04b6310e2476946&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"JKHeadley: Focused on ecosystem expansion and strategic integration by proposing the MoltBridge Trust & Discovery Layer as an enhancement for the Eliza framework. This contribution, detailed in issue elizaos/eliza#6501, outlines a path for improving discovery and trust mechanisms within the project. Their primary focus this month was on architectural planning and integration proposals.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"tdnupe3\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/25161668?u=94680b6bcbcfce954c7a9dd09d667a3919953041&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 0.2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n \"summary\": null\n }\n ],\n \"newPRs\": 38,\n \"mergedPRs\": 18,\n \"newIssues\": 41,\n \"closedIssues\": 65,\n \"activeContributors\": 35\n}\n---\n[\"greptile-apps_day_2026-02-21\", \"greptile-apps\", \"day\", \"2026-02-21\", \"greptile-apps: No activity today.\", \"2026-02-22T23:20:16.266Z\"]\n[\"odilitime_day_2026-02-21\", \"odilitime\", \"day\", \"2026-02-21\", \"odilitime: Focused on feature work, modifying 13 files with a net addition of 327 lines of code in a single commit.\", \"2026-02-22T23:20:16.514Z\"]\n[\"jasonxkensei_day_2026-02-21\", \"jasonxkensei\", \"day\", \"2026-02-21\", \"jasonxkensei: Focused on expanding plugin capabilities by opening a new feature PR in elizaos-plugins/registry#266 to add `@elizaos/plugin-xproof`.\", \"2026-02-22T23:20:16.527Z\"]\n[\"dontonon_day_2026-02-21\", \"dontonon\", \"day\", \"2026-02-21\", \"dontonon: Focused on expanding plugin capabilities by opening PR elizaos-plugins/registry#265 to add a micronoise-eliza-plugin for token swaps via x402 payments.\", \"2026-02-22T23:20:16.568Z\"]\n[\"dependabot[bot]_day_2026-02-22\", \"dependabot[bot]\", \"day\", \"2026-02-22\", \"dependabot[bot]: No activity today.\", \"2026-02-22T23:20:16.335Z\"]\n[\"greptile-apps_day_2026-02-22\", \"greptile-apps\", \"day\", \"2026-02-22\", \"greptile-apps: No activity today.\", \"2026-02-22T23:20:16.369Z\"]\n[\"standujar_day_2026-02-22\", \"standujar\", \"day\", \"2026-02-22\", \"standujar: Focused on feature work, opening a significant PR in elizaos/eliza (#6521) to align RLS isolation with v1 patterns, which involved modifying 16 files with substantial changes across both code and tests.\", \"2026-02-22T23:20:16.719Z\"]\n[\"agentfirstlabs_day_2026-02-22\", \"agentfirstlabs\", \"day\", \"2026-02-22\", \"agentfirstlabs: Focused on documentation, contributing a new safety guide to elizaos/eliza via PR #6523, which involved modifying 1 file with 29 additions.\", \"2026-02-22T23:20:16.545Z\"]\n---\n2026-02-27T08:48:55.904334+00:00Z\n---\n2026-02-27\n---\nelizaOS/knowledge\n---\nelizaOS\n---\nknowledge\n---\nai_news_elizaos_discord_md_2026-02-26\n---\nai_news_elizaos_discord_md_2026-02-25\n---\nai_news_elizaos_discord_md_2026-02-24\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_json_2026-02-26\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_md_2026-02-26\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_discord_json_2026-02-26\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_discord_md_2026-02-26\n---\ngithub_summaries_week_latest_2026-02-15.md\n---\ngithub_summaries_month_latest_2026-02-01.md\n---\ngithub_summaries_daily_2026-02-27" ] }