{
  "prompt_name": "user-feedback",
  "category": "comms",
  "date": "2026-02-22",
  "generated_text": "## User Feedback Analysis \u2014 2026-02-22 (covering feedback observed through 2026-02-19 to 2026-02-21)\n\n### Data snapshot (what this report is based on)\n- **Discord (Feb 19\u201321):** recurring questions on versioning (v2.0.0), database setup (pglite vs Neon), token migration/contract confusion, ElizaCloud UI bugs, and unclear feature/pricing semantics.\n- **GitHub (month to date, Feb 1\u2013Mar 1 window):** **41 new issues**, **35 PRs (18 merged)**, **34 contributors**. Notable open issues include:\n  - **#6486** URL messages trigger **duplicate LLM calls** (cost + UX impact)\n  - **#6490** need **custom OpenAI-compatible endpoint URL**\n- **Important context:** v2.0.0 is publicly recommended in Discord, but documentation is lagging behind that recommendation.\n\n---\n\n## 1) Pain Point Categorization (top recurring friction areas)\n\n> Frequency is inferred from repeated questions/topics across Discord days + the \u201ctop issues\u201d surfaced in GitHub summaries. Severity is estimated by impact on ability to ship or cost/risk.\n\n### 1. Documentation \u2014 **v2.0.0 is recommended, but \u201chow to use it\u201d is unclear** (High frequency, High severity)\n**Observed**\n- Users were told **\u201cv2.0.0 branch is recommended\u201d** while also being warned it has **less documentation** (BinaryCookies thread; reinforced by Odilitime).\n- This creates a classic \u201cnew default without a paved path.\u201d\n\n**Who it affects most**\n- New builders trying to pick a stable base and follow guides.\n\n---\n\n### 2. Technical Functionality \u2014 **Database selection is environment-driven, but there\u2019s no migration story** (Medium frequency, High severity)\n**Observed**\n- plugin-sql supports **pglite and Neon Postgres** via env vars, but **\u201cwon\u2019t migrate data automatically\u201d** (BinaryCookies Q&A).\n- Users want to combine local dev (pglite) with hosted (Neon) without losing state.\n\n**Who it affects most**\n- Builders moving from prototype \u2192 hosted deployments.\n\n---\n\n### 3. UX/UI \u2014 **ElizaCloud dashboard usability bugs (scroll + API explorer) + misleading test tool error** (Medium frequency, High severity)\n**Observed (from hands-on testing feedback by DorianD)**\n- Broken mousepad scrolling on API explorer and other pages; scrollbar hard to see.\n- \u201cSend request\u201d test returns **\u201capi key is required\u201d** even when a key appears present.\n- Questions about what **\u201cuse a different key\u201d** does and whether it\u2019s BYOK.\n\n**Who it affects most**\n- Users evaluating ElizaCloud and attempting first API calls.\n\n---\n\n### 4. Integration \u2014 **Provider/config flexibility gaps (custom OpenAI endpoint; BYOK semantics unclear)** (Medium frequency, Medium\u2013High severity)\n**Observed**\n- GitHub **#6490** requests a configurable **OpenAI endpoint URL** to support OpenAI-compatible providers (e.g., SiliconFlow).\n- Discord questions about \u201cuse a different key\u201d suggest users expect an **OpenRouter-like BYOK model routing** experience.\n\n**Who it affects most**\n- Teams standardizing on OpenAI-compatible APIs and wanting vendor optionality.\n\n---\n\n### 5. Technical Functionality / Reliability \u2014 **Unexpected language output / localization drift** (Low frequency, Medium severity)\n**Observed**\n- Report: an OpenClaw agent \u201cunexpectedly started responding in Korean\u201d (DorianD). Even if OpenClaw-specific, users will attribute this to the agent stack and configuration expectations.\n\n**Who it affects most**\n- Builders demoing agents publicly; risk of \u201cit\u2019s broken\u201d perception.\n\n---\n\n### 6. Community / Communication \u2014 **Token migration + contract confusion + \u201cwhat is deprecated\u201d messaging** (High frequency, High severity)\n**Observed**\n- Repeated confusion between **$ai16z / $ai6z vs $elizaos**, contract addresses, migration deadlines, and \u201cis token mintable?\u201d concerns (Feb 19\u201321 threads).\n- Clear statement from Odilitime: **ai16z is effectively deprecated/dead coin**, migration **1:6** (and funding allocation **1:4** mentioned), liquidity split across chains\u2014yet users keep asking, indicating discoverability gaps.\n\n**Who it affects most**\n- Newcomers entering via crypto/community angle rather than developer docs.\n\n---\n\n### 7. Community / Onboarding \u2014 **Fragmented support surfaces (public coders channel feels \u201cquiet\u201d; separate dev Discord is non-obvious)** (Medium frequency, Medium severity)\n**Observed**\n- NintyNine noted low activity; Bill Ding explained there\u2019s a separate developer Discord.\n- This creates a \u201cghost town\u201d effect in the most obvious help channel.\n\n**Who it affects most**\n- New developers seeking real-time help.\n\n---\n\n## 2) Usage Pattern Analysis (actual vs intended usage)\n\n### What users are actually doing\n1. **Building crypto-native agents first (trading/wallet/DeFi, multi-chain)**\n   - \u201cSpartan\u201d positioned as **agentic wallet with trading capabilities**; DegenAI holders access open-source trader.\n   - Plugin ecosystem proposals include **token swaps via x402 payments**, trust/discovery layers (MoltBridge), and multiple exchange/trading plugins (from monthly contributor summaries).\n\n2. **Using ElizaOS as a plugin+connector platform**\n   - Users evaluate ElizaOS vs OpenClaw by connectors/reliability (\u201cnot self-configuring,\u201d \u201cmore connectors,\u201d \u201cbetter benchmarks\u201d).\n\n3. **Rapid experimentation / demo-driven adoption**\n   - \u201cHanging plaza\u201d is promoted as a live demo of agents in social spaces (learning via experience rather than docs).\n\n### Mismatches vs intended/desired usage\n- Users are being directed to **v2.0.0** (future direction) while the **onboarding path remains optimized for older assumptions** (docs, examples, and operational guidance lag behind).\n- ElizaCloud is being evaluated as a \u201cproductized API platform,\u201d but current UX bugs undermine first-run success.\n\n### Emerging / unexpected use cases to watch\n- **\u201cTrustless vs Trusted Agentic Intelligence (TAI)\u201d** framing suggests a near-term need for:\n  - sandboxing, policy boundaries, and verifiable execution/auditing\n- **Censorship-resistant gaming** mentioned as an opportunity: likely requires low-latency loops, deterministic-ish action execution, and robust planningMode controls.\n\n### Feature requests that align with real usage\n- **BYOK + multi-provider endpoints** (OpenAI-compatible URL support; clear key-switching semantics)\n- **DB migration tooling** (pglite \u2192 Neon)\n- **ElizaCloud API explorer reliability + pricing transparency** (per-model prices visible)\n\n---\n\n## 3) Implementation Opportunities (solutions per major pain point)\n\nBelow, each opportunity includes **2\u20133 implementable fixes**, prioritized by **impact vs difficulty**, plus examples from similar ecosystems.\n\n### A) v2.0.0 \u201crecommended but under-documented\u201d\n**1) Ship a v2 \u201cGolden Path\u201d quickstart (High impact, Medium difficulty)**\n- Add one canonical path: *create agent \u2192 choose DB \u2192 run locally \u2192 deploy*.\n- Include exact env var sets for pglite vs Neon, and a minimal plugin example.\n- **Comparable approach:** Next.js \u201cApp Router\u201d adoption\u2014docs pivoted to a single recommended default with migration notes.\n\n**2) Versioned docs with a prominent selector + deprecation banner (High impact, Low\u2013Medium difficulty)**\n- A docs toggle: **v1 (legacy)** / **v2 (recommended)** with clear warnings and links.\n- **Comparable approach:** Kubernetes versioned documentation and Terraform provider version pinning guidance.\n\n**3) Add \u201cdoctor\u201d command in CLI for v2 projects (Medium impact, Medium difficulty)**\n- `elizaos doctor` checks runtime, plugin versions, env vars, DB connectivity, and suggests fixes.\n- **Comparable approach:** `flutter doctor`, `brew doctor`.\n\n---\n\n### B) Database choice without migration (pglite \u2194 Neon)\n**1) Provide an official export/import utility (High impact, Medium difficulty)**\n- `elizaos db export` (pglite \u2192 SQL/JSON) and `elizaos db import` (to Neon/Postgres).\n- Include memory tables + indices guidance.\n- **Comparable approach:** Prisma migrate + `pg_dump`-style workflows wrapped in DX-friendly commands.\n\n**2) Add an opt-in \u201cdual-write then cutover\u201d mode (Medium impact, Higher difficulty)**\n- For a limited set of tables (messages/memory), write to both stores temporarily to validate.\n- **Comparable approach:** Stripe / large SaaS migration playbooks; LaunchDarkly-style progressive cutovers.\n\n**3) Document a \u201cdev/prod DB pattern\u201d explicitly (Medium impact, Low difficulty)**\n- A short guide: pglite for local, Neon for prod, with a checklist for switching safely.\n\n---\n\n### C) ElizaCloud dashboard UX bugs + API explorer failing\n**1) Fix scrolling + scrollbar visibility regressions (High impact, Low difficulty)**\n- Treat as P0 because it blocks basic navigation/testing.\n- Add automated UI smoke tests for scroll containers.\n\n**2) Make API explorer \u201cSend request\u201d validate auth state client-side (High impact, Medium difficulty)**\n- If API key is present but backend rejects, show:\n  - which key is used\n  - where it was sourced from (session/env/selected key)\n  - exact missing header or field\n- **Comparable approach:** Postman / Swagger UI show request headers and auth injection clearly.\n\n**3) Add an in-product \u201cReport a bug\u201d capture bundle (Medium impact, Medium difficulty)**\n- One click exports: page URL, browser, console errors, request ID, auth mode (redacted), and last API call details.\n\n---\n\n### D) BYOK + OpenAI-compatible endpoint flexibility\n**1) Implement `baseURL` / custom endpoint for OpenAI provider (High impact, Low\u2013Medium difficulty)**\n- Directly addresses GitHub **#6490**.\n- Support env var + config file, and ensure it works across TS/Python/Rust in v2.\n\n**2) Clarify and standardize \u201cuse a different key\u201d semantics (High impact, Low difficulty)**\n- Rename in UI to \u201cBring your own key (BYOK)\u201d if that\u2019s the intent.\n- Show supported providers and limitations.\n\n**3) Add \u201cprovider routing\u201d presets (Medium impact, Medium difficulty)**\n- Presets like \u201cOpenRouter-style\u201d or \u201cOpenAI-compatible\u201d with clear required fields.\n\n**Comparable approach:** LangChain\u2019s provider abstraction + LiteLLM\u2019s unified proxy model routing.\n\n---\n\n### E) Unexpected language output (localization drift)\n**1) Add explicit language constraints + diagnostics in agent settings (Medium impact, Low difficulty)**\n- A `preferred_language` (or locale) setting displayed in config + runtime logs.\n\n**2) Add a \u201cwhy did you answer in X?\u201d trace (Medium impact, Medium difficulty)**\n- Capture whether the trigger was:\n  - system prompt\n  - user message language\n  - memory contamination\n  - model auto-detect\n\n**Comparable approach:** Rasa and other conversational stacks log NLU language detection and policy decisions.\n\n---\n\n### F) Migration + token/contract confusion (community-facing but high impact)\n**1) Publish a single canonical \u201cToken & Migration\u201d page linked everywhere (High impact, Low difficulty)**\n- Include: contract addresses, \u201cai16z status: deprecated,\u201d migration ratio, deadlines, FAQs (mintability, chain validity).\n- Pin it in Discord + link in bot auto-replies.\n\n**2) Add a Discord \u201cmigration helper\u201d bot command (Medium impact, Medium difficulty)**\n- `/contract`, `/migration`, `/deadline`, `/chains`, `/faq mintable`\n- Reduces repeated manual responses.\n\n**3) Clarify chain validity questions (e.g., \u201cBNB and Solana both valid?\u201d) (Medium impact, Low difficulty)**\n- A simple table by asset \u2192 chain \u2192 contract \u2192 status.\n\n**Comparable approach:** Arbitrum/Optimism ecosystems maintain canonical contract registries and pinned FAQs.\n\n---\n\n### G) Fragmented support surfaces (dev Discord vs public)\n**1) Add an onboarding message that routes people to the right place (High impact, Low difficulty)**\n- In `#coders`, auto-message: \u201cFor active dev help join X\u201d + link + how to get access.\n\n**2) Weekly \u201coffice hours\u201d in the public server (Medium impact, Low difficulty)**\n- Reduces the \u201cquiet channel\u201d perception and captures beginner questions live.\n\n**3) Create a single \u201cStart Here (Builders)\u201d hub channel (Medium impact, Medium difficulty)**\n- Curate: version choice, quickstart, DB choice, plugin registry, cloud status.\n\n---\n\n## 4) Communication Gaps (expectations vs reality)\n\n### Recurring expectation mismatches\n- **\u201cRecommended version\u201d vs \u201cdocumented version\u201d**\n  - Users hear \u201cuse v2.0.0\u201d but then can\u2019t find matching docs/examples.\n\n- **ElizaCloud as a polished product vs current beta UX**\n  - Broken scrolling + API explorer auth errors make the platform feel unreliable, even if backend is fine.\n\n- **BYOK expectations**\n  - The UI phrase \u201cuse a different key\u201d leads users to assume OpenRouter-like BYOK routing and per-model billing transparency.\n\n- **Migration clarity**\n  - Even after clear Discord explanations, repeated questions show the information is not discoverable enough (needs canonical docs + pinned posts + bot answers).\n\n### Documentation/onboarding gaps indicated by repeated questions\n- \u201cWhich version is most stable?\u201d\n- \u201cHow do I use pglite and Neon together?\u201d\n- \u201cIs there still a live Eliza agent that answers questions about the latest codebase?\u201d (unanswered)\n- \u201cCan we deploy dApps to Solana seeker?\u201d (unanswered)\n- \u201cBNB and Solana\u2014are both valid?\u201d (asked twice)\n\n### Specific improvements to align expectations\n- Add a **public status page** or pinned \u201cWhat\u2019s live today\u201d for: Babylon access, ElizaCloud readiness, known issues.\n- Publish a **compatibility matrix**:\n  - v1 vs v2 features\n  - supported DBs\n  - supported providers + BYOK behavior\n  - deployment targets\n\n---\n\n## 5) Community Engagement Insights\n\n### Power users and their needs (and how to leverage them)\n- **Odilitime (engineering lead, high-touch support in Discord):**\n  - Needs: fewer repeated FAQs; scalable support mechanisms (docs, bot commands).\n  - Opportunity: convert answers into canonical docs automatically (see feedback collection section).\n\n- **King Nebuluz (Erlang \u201cunbreakable agents\u201d proposal; Polymarket agent):**\n  - Needs: clear integration pathway (contribution guidelines, plugin/runtime interfaces, evaluation criteria).\n  - Opportunity: formalize a \u201cCore integrations incubator\u201d for experimental runtimes (Erlang, etc.).\n\n- **DorianD (hands-on product tester; reports UI bugs and odd agent behavior):**\n  - Needs: bug reporting pipeline that captures repro + environment automatically.\n  - Opportunity: recruit as \u201cbeta QA captain\u201d with a checklist and direct issue filing.\n\n- **BinaryCookies (new builder asking correct setup questions):**\n  - Needs: quickstart + DB/migration guidance.\n  - Opportunity: ensure the first 60 minutes experience is smooth; these users become repeat contributors if unblocked.\n\n### Common newcomer questions indicating onboarding friction\n- Version selection, database setup, how to contact leadership, where updates are posted, contract addresses/migration.\n\n### Converting passive users into contributors\n- Add \u201c**good first issue**\u201d labels tied to the exact pain points:\n  - docs: v2 quickstart, BYOK explanation\n  - cloud: scroll fix verification, API explorer auth UX\n- Provide a \u201c**plugin submission kit**\u201d (template + CI checks) since plugin ecosystem growth is strong.\n\n---\n\n## 6) Feedback Collection Improvements\n\n### Current channel effectiveness\n- **Discord** captures real-time confusion and early UX bugs, but information is ephemeral and repeated.\n- **GitHub issues** capture actionable technical items (e.g., #6486, #6490) but miss context from Discord threads unless manually copied.\n- Fragmentation: dev discussion split across servers creates \u201cquiet channel\u201d misconceptions and lost questions.\n\n### Improvements for more structured, actionable feedback\n1. **Discord \u2192 GitHub bridge for tagged bug reports (High impact, Medium difficulty)**\n   - A bot workflow: react with \ud83d\udc1b \u2192 prompts for repro steps \u2192 creates GitHub issue draft.\n\n2. **Standardized ElizaCloud bug template (High impact, Low difficulty)**\n   - Required: browser, OS, page URL, expected/actual, screenshot, request ID.\n\n3. **Monthly \u201cTop friction\u201d pulse survey for builders (Medium impact, Low difficulty)**\n   - 5 questions: version used, biggest blocker, DB choice, provider choice, cloud vs self-hosted.\n\n### Underrepresented segments (missing feedback)\n- **Non-crypto developers** using WhatsApp/Gmail/N8N-style automations (not showing up in Discord discussions sampled here).\n- **Enterprise/self-host operators** (deployment, observability, governance concerns).\n- **Frontend builders** beyond the single tester report\u2014need broader validation of ElizaCloud UX issues.\n\n---\n\n## Prioritized High-Impact Actions (next 2\u20134 weeks)\n1. **Publish a v2.0.0 \u201cGolden Path\u201d quickstart + versioned docs selector** (unblocks the highest-leverage onboarding confusion).\n2. **Fix ElizaCloud API explorer blockers (scroll + \u201capi key required\u201d false negative) and add visible request/auth introspection** (restores trust in first-run product experience).\n3. **Implement OpenAI provider custom `baseURL` (GitHub #6490) + explicitly document BYOK semantics in Cloud** (aligns with real usage: multi-provider routing).\n4. **Ship a minimal pglite \u2194 Postgres (Neon) export/import migration utility** (enables dev\u2192prod transitions without data loss).\n5. **Create canonical \u201cToken & Migration\u201d FAQ page + Discord bot commands (/contract, /migration)** (reduces repeated high-noise questions and support load).",
  "source_references": [
    "2026-02-22\n---\n2026-02-21.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-21\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Project Vision & Positioning\n\nThe community engaged in significant discussion about ElizaOS's mission and value proposition. **Odilitime** provided comprehensive clarification on the project's direction, emphasizing that ElizaOS aims to democratize AI agent capabilities for everyday users rather than focusing on short-term profits. The project powers many crypto agents with battle-tested open source code and has evolved from a Solana-only platform to a multi-chain infrastructure.\n\nA major clarification addressed the migration from ai16z to elizaOS, which occurred at a 1:6 ratio (with 1:4 allocated for funding). Odilitime confirmed that ai16z is effectively deprecated, with liquidity now split across multiple chains under the elizaOS umbrella.\n\n### Technical Development & Architecture\n\n**King Nebuluz** shared progress on building unbreakable agents using Erlang (github.com/nebuluzno/scr), offering the code for potential ElizaOS integration. Odilitime reviewed the implementation positively, noting it surpassed previous Erlang projects examined by the team.\n\n**BinaryCookies** initiated important technical discussions about version stability and database configuration. The community confirmed that v2.0.0 branch is now the recommended version despite having less documentation, as it represents the project's future direction.\n\nDatabase architecture was clarified: the plugin-sql supports both pglite and Neon Postgres, using environment variables to determine which database to use, though automatic data migration between them is not currently supported.\n\n### Future Development Directions\n\n**digitalalchemy** predicted an interesting evolution where clawd bot will prove trustless while Eliza becomes \"Trusted Agentic Intelligence (TAI)\" within months. The community discussed the challenges of building proactive viral agents while maintaining security through sandboxing.\n\n### Spartan Wallet & DegenAI\n\nThe Spartan agentic wallet was explained as having trading capabilities, with DegenAI holders receiving access to the open-source trader\u2014described as a combination of trading bot functionality with LLM intelligence. Odilitime shared personal conviction in the DegenAI project, noting he sold his entire elizaOS bags and bought back, but never sold his degen bags.\n\n### Market Commentary & Gaming Opportunities\n\n**DorianD** drew parallels between current crypto market cycles and historical tech industry periods, comparing the mid-2020s crypto market to the 2014-2016 crypto period and the 2001-2003 tech downturn. DorianD also highlighted opportunities in censorship-resistant gaming.\n\n### Community Activity\n\n**KingRon** announced completing their first agent build and inquired about deploying dApps to Solana seeker. **Bill Ding** clarified that a separate developer Discord exists for technical discussions, explaining the relatively low activity in the public coders channel.\n\n### Technical Issues\n\n**DorianD** reported an unusual bug where their openclaw agent unexpectedly started responding in Korean, indicating potential localization or configuration issues requiring investigation.\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Which version of ElizaOS is most stable currently?**  \nA: v2.0.0 branch is recommended, though it has less documentation but represents the project's direction (answered by Odilitime)\n\n**Q: How can I use both pglite and Neon cloud database together?**  \nA: plugin-sql supports both and uses the postgres credentials env var to decide which to use, but won't migrate data automatically (answered by Odilitime)\n\n**Q: Why should I invest in elizaOS?**  \nA: If you want short-term money, probably shouldn't. If you want to support open source builders ensuring everyday people have same capabilities as big companies, this is the place. Code powers many crypto agents with battle-tested open source (answered by Odilitime)\n\n**Q: What is Spartan?**  \nA: Spartan is the agentic wallet with trading capabilities. DegenAI holders have access to the trader which is open source - a potluck of trading bot combined with LLM intelligence (answered by Odilitime)\n\n**Q: Is ai16z still tradeable or only eliza?**  \nA: ai16z is a dead coin for all intents and purposes. Migrated to elizaOS with 1:6 ratio, using 1:4 for funding and splitting liquidity across multiple chains (answered by Odilitime)\n\n**Q: Do you expect DegenAI to do better than ElizaOS token?**  \nA: Hired into team degen and felt better to bet on myself/my team. Sold entire elizaOS bags and bought back, but never sold degen bags (answered by Odilitime)\n\n**Q: Can we deploy dApps to Solana seeker?**  \nA: Unanswered (asked by KingRon)\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**Odilitime helped BinaryCookies** with version selection guidance, recommending the v2.0.0 branch as the future direction despite less documentation, helping a new builder get started on the right path.\n\n**Odilitime helped BinaryCookies** configure database options, explaining that plugin-sql supports both pglite and Neon Postgres via environment variables, though data won't auto-migrate between them.\n\n**Odilitime helped PKScouser** understand the ElizaOS value proposition by providing comprehensive explanation of the project mission, Spartan wallet functionality, migration from ai16z, and positioning as open source infrastructure rather than a short-term investment vehicle.\n\n**Skinny advised PKScouser** against sourcing investment thesis from Discord, recommending building an agent to gain deeper insights into the platform's capabilities.\n\n**Odilitime reviewed King Nebuluz's** Erlang-based unbreakable agents code, providing positive feedback and noting it was better than previous Erlang projects examined.\n\n**Bill Ding helped NintyNine** understand the low channel activity by informing them that there's a separate dev Discord for technical discussions.\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n\n- **Review and potentially integrate github.com/nebuluzno/scr unbreakable agents code into ElizaOS** - Mentioned by King Nebuluz\n- **Investigate openclaw agent unexpectedly writing in Korean** - Mentioned by DorianD\n- **Complete Polymarket agent development** - Mentioned by King Nebuluz\n- **Investigate dApp deployment capabilities to Solana seeker** - Mentioned by KingRon\n\n### Documentation\n\n- **Improve documentation for v2.0.0 branch as it becomes the recommended version** - Mentioned by Odilitime\n\n### Feature\n\n- **Develop clawd bot as trustless system while Eliza becomes Trusted Agentic Intelligence (TAI)** - Mentioned by digitalalchemy\n- **Explore censorship-resistant gaming opportunities** - Mentioned by DorianD\n---\n2026-02-20.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-20\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Product Updates & Releases\n\n**Babylon Waitlist Opening**\n- Babylon platform is now accessible to the top 5,000 users on the waitlist, addressing community concerns about product delivery timelines following recent incidents with Autofun and Twitter issues\n\n### ElizaCloud Platform Issues\n\n**Critical UI/UX Bugs Identified**\n- Multiple scrolling functionality issues discovered on ElizaCloud dashboard\n- API explorer page (https://www.elizacloud.ai/dashboard/api-explorer) has broken mousepad scrolling, requiring manual use of a hard-to-see scrollbar\n- Similar scrolling problems affect other dashboard pages\n- \"Send request\" test feature returns \"api key is required\" error despite API key appearing to be present\n\n**Feature Clarity Needed**\n- Questions raised about the \"use a different key\" feature and whether it supports BYOK (Bring Your Own Key) functionality similar to OpenRouter\n- Pricing transparency concerns - users requesting per-model price breakdown in the dashboard\n\n### Communication & Community Management\n\n**Leadership Communication Strategy**\n- Shaw's update distribution clarified: AI/development content posted on Twitter, crypto-related updates shared on Farcaster\n- Community members need to monitor both platforms for complete information\n- Standard contact method for Shaw is using @ mentions in Discord\n\n**Partnership Relations**\n- Weak communications identified as causing unnecessary negative sentiment from influential partner groups\n\n### Developer Community Activity\n\n**Developer Availability**\n- Multiple developers posted availability for project work\n- Expertise areas mentioned: Web3 infrastructure, backend services, security checks, and UX design\n- General development services offered to the community\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Is there a way to get in contact with Shaw here?**\n- A: You can try and @ him, that's what others do *(answered by Odilitime)*\n\n**Q: Where does Shaw post updates?**\n- A: Shaw posts AI/dev content on Twitter and crypto content on Farcaster - need to follow both platforms *(answered by Odilitime)*\n\n**Q: What's the status of Babylon?**\n- A: Babylon is now open to the top 5,000 users on the waitlist *(answered by Odilitime)*\n\n### Unanswered Questions\n\n- Is there still a live Eliza agent that can answer questions about the most recent ElizaOS codebase? *(asked by DorianD)*\n- Does \"use a different key\" mean users can enter their own API keys (like OpenAI key for gpt-4o) similar to OpenRouter BYOK? *(asked by DorianD)*\n- For Milady, we have BNB and Solana - are both valid? *(asked by alex_wukar, asked twice)*\n- How many users still need to migrate? *(asked by Odilitime)*\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**Bug Reporting Process**\n- **Helper:** Odilitime\n- **Helpee:** DorianD\n- **Context:** DorianD conducted informal testing of ElizaCloud dashboard and identified multiple UI/UX issues\n- **Resolution:** Odilitime acknowledged the bug reports and forwarded them to the development team\n\n**Contacting Leadership**\n- **Helper:** Odilitime\n- **Helpee:** k1kkoS\n- **Context:** User needed to contact Shaw\n- **Resolution:** Suggested using @ mentions as the standard method\n\n**Product Updates Clarification**\n- **Helper:** Odilitime\n- **Helpee:** Community (Thanos\ud83d\udca8 and others)\n- **Context:** Concerns about product delivery and communication following recent incidents\n- **Resolution:** Clarified Babylon waitlist status and explained Shaw's multi-platform communication strategy\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n\n- **Fix scrolling functionality on ElizaCloud API explorer page** - mousepad scrolling broken, scrollbar hard to see\n  - *Mentioned by: DorianD*\n\n- **Fix \"send request\" test feature** - currently returning \"api key is required\" error when API key appears to be present\n  - *Mentioned by: DorianD*\n\n- **Complete migration process** for remaining users\n  - *Mentioned by: Odilitime*\n\n### Documentation\n\n- **Add price breakdown per model** in ElizaCloud dashboard for pricing transparency\n  - *Mentioned by: DorianD*\n\n- **Clarify functionality of \"use a different key\" feature** - document whether it supports BYOK (Bring Your Own Key)\n  - *Mentioned by: DorianD*\n\n- **Provide clarity on Milady token validity** across BNB and Solana chains\n  - *Mentioned by: alex_wukar*\n\n### Communication\n\n- **Improve partner communications** to reduce unnecessary negative sentiment from influential groups\n  - *Identified in: \ud83e\udd47-partners channel*\n---\n2026-02-19.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-19\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Token Clarification and Migration Issues\n\nA significant portion of discussion centered on confusion between $ai6z and $elizaos tokens. While initially confirmed as the same by community members, Odilitime clarified they are **different contracts** with ai16z worth significantly less than ElizaOS. Multiple users requested the ElizaOS contract address and were directed to the appropriate channel. Concerns were raised about:\n\n- Users who missed the migration deadline seeking options to still migrate\n- Token mintability questions remaining unanswered\n- The rebrand from ai16z to ElizaOS losing \"memetic value\" by switching to a \"non-memetic ticker\" (noted by DorianD)\n\n### Technical Positioning and Comparisons\n\n**ElizaOS vs OpenClaw:** When asked about differences, Odilitime provided concrete technical advantages:\n- ElizaOS performs better on benchmarks\n- Has more connectors available\n- More reliable due to not being self-configuring\n\nThis represents an important technical positioning statement for the project.\n\n### Community Engagement and Demonstrations\n\n- **Babylon Discord Demo:** Odilitime promoted \"the hanging plaza\" as the best current demonstration of agents in action, directing new users interested in learning about agents in human digital spaces\n- **Verification Milestone:** ElizaBAO announced ElizaOS received a golden checkmark verification\n- **Hackathon Entry:** The Milady team submitted an entry on BSC that was shared for community voting\n\n### Market Context and Community Concerns\n\nDiscussion acknowledged the broader crypto winter context, with most assets down 99%. Community members expressed concerns about:\n- Perceived lack of marketing follow-through after autofun issues\n- Questions about ElizaCloud status\n- General market performance of the token\n\n### Project Updates\n\n- **Cultanime Team:** Confirmed to be doing very well when asked about their status\n- **Building Interest:** intrepid expressed interest in building, though no specific project details were discussed\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Is $ai6z and $elizaos the same token?**\nA: No, they are different contracts with ai16z worth significantly less (Odilitime)\n\n**Q: How is this different from OpenClaw?**\nA: ElizaOS performs better on benchmarks, has more connectors, and is more reliable since it's not self-configuring (Odilitime)\n\n**Q: Can I have the contract address of ElizaOS?**\nA: Users were directed to check the appropriate channel for contract information (MDMnvest)\n\n**Q: Is the Cultanime team doing well?**\nA: They're doing very well (Odilitime)\n\n### Unanswered Questions\n\n- Why is Ai16z coin pumping if the new migrated coin is ElizaOS?\n- Why is the token mintable?\n- Is there any way to migrate ai16z after missing the deadline?\n- What happened to the promised marketing and ElizaCloud after autofun issues?\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**Token Information Assistance:**\n- MDMnvest helped multiple users (Yoree, NintyNine) by directing them to appropriate channels for contract addresses and official social media handles\n- Maxx Truant and Farzeen arif initially attempted to help Drizello with token confusion (later corrected by Odilitime)\n\n**Technical Guidance:**\n- Odilitime provided comprehensive help to C0rrupt1 on technical differences between ElizaOS and OpenClaw\n- Odilitime welcomed AIKO444 (new user) and directed them to the Babylon Discord demo for learning about agents\n\n**Resource Sharing:**\n- Odilitime helped Quaser M find Shaw's statement by providing links to relevant channels and fixupx posts\n- dEXploarer shared Twitter/X content, with Wes requesting permission to use it as background imagery\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n- Building interest expressed but needs clarification on specific project or scope (intrepid)\n- Address token migration process for users who missed the deadline (J\u00fcju)\n- Clarify token mintability concerns for ElizaOS (Yoree)\n\n### Documentation\n- Update contract address information in the designated channel for easier access (MDMnvest)\n\n### Feature\n- Address marketing and ElizaCloud roadmap questions raised by community (Thanos\ud83d\udca8)\n\n---\n\n*Note: This summary reflects discussions from the \ud83d\udcac-coders and \ud83d\udcac-discussion channels on February 19, 2026.*\n---\n2026-02-21.json\n---\nelizaosDailySummary\n---\nDaily Report - 2026-02-21\n---\nElizaOS Community Updates and Technical Discussions - February 21, 2026\n---\nCommunity members discussed the current state of crypto markets, with DorianD comparing the mid-2020s period to the 2014-2016 crypto downturn and the 2001-2003 tech period. In the coders channel, KingRon celebrated building their first agent, calling the project legitimate. There was discussion about deploying dApps to Solana seeker and opportunities in censorship-resistant gaming. Community members noted the channel seemed quieter than usual, with some wondering if there was a separate dev discord.\n---\nhttps://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1301363808421543988\n---\nhttps://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1300025221834739744\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/elizaos-media/img_1179_dde1e01a.jpg\n---\nOdilitime, the head of engineering, provided extensive clarification about the ElizaOS ecosystem. He explained that ai16z has been migrated to elizaOS and is now a dead coin. The migration involved a 1:6 ratio with 1:4 used for funding and liquidity split across multiple chains instead of solely Solana. He clarified that ElizaOS is an agent framework that makes foundational models do more than they can on their own, similar to how OpenClaw operates. Odilitime revealed he invested approximately 10k in ElizaOS, 20k in DegenAI, and 8k in Cult token for the anime project. He emphasized betting on his team at DegenAI where he was hired, never selling those bags while having sold and rebought ElizaOS bags.\n---\nhttps://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1253563209462448241\n---\nTechnical discussions included guidance on using the v2.0.0 branch as the recommended version despite less documentation. Odilitime explained that plugin-sql supports both pglite and neon cloud databases, using environment variables for postgres credentials to decide which to use. A developer reported their openclaw agent started writing in Korean unexpectedly. New community members asked about investment rationale, with Odilitime explaining the project focuses on supporting open source builders to give everyday people the same capabilities as big companies, noting their code powers many agents especially in crypto with secure battle-tested open source code.\n---\nhttps://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1253563209462448241\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/posters/1771722511680-hx6ipe.png\n---\nOdilitime detailed Spartan as an agentic wallet with trading capabilities, where DegenAI holders have access to the open source trader. He described it as a combination of trading bot potluck with LLM intelligence, allowing developers to review research and add their own contributions. He is now the lead developer on the project. The team is working on DeFi stacks after proving the framework's social capabilities. Odilitime expressed mixed feelings about Labs leadership, sometimes questioning their direction while other times feeling blessed by the team.\n---\nhttps://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1253563209462448241\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/posters/1771722527416-aql38l.jpg\n---\ndiscordrawdata\n---\nElizaOS Plugin Ecosystem Expansion - February 21, 2026\n---\nOn February 21, 2026, the ElizaOS project experienced significant activity in expanding its plugin ecosystem. Two new plugin proposals were submitted: the @elizaos/plugin-xproof plugin and the micronoise-eliza-plugin, which enables token swaps via x402 payments. Additionally, ongoing discussions continued regarding the integration of MoltBridge as a Trust and Discovery Layer for ElizaOS. The MoltBridge integration proposal requires continued community input, particularly concerning the benefits it would provide for Eliza agents and the onboarding program for founding agents. A recent update confirmed that MoltBridge is now live and detailed its capabilities and advantages for the Eliza agent ecosystem.\n---\nhttps://elizaos.github.io/api/summaries/overall/day/2026-02-21.json\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/posters/1771722549733-i1gs9s.png\n---\nmiscellaneous\n---\n2026-02-21.md\n---\n## Community Updates and Technical Discussions\n\n### Market and Community Activity\n\n- DorianD compared the current mid-2020s crypto market period to the 2014-2016 crypto downturn and the 2001-2003 tech period\n- KingRon celebrated building their first agent in the coders channel\n- Community members discussed deploying dApps to Solana seeker and opportunities in censorship-resistant gaming\n\n### ElizaOS Ecosystem Clarification\n\n- Odilitime, head of engineering, confirmed that ai16z has been migrated to elizaOS and is now a dead coin\n- The migration involved a 1:6 ratio with 1:4 used for funding and liquidity split across multiple chains instead of solely Solana\n- ElizaOS was defined as an agent framework that makes foundational models do more than they can on their own, similar to OpenClaw\n- Odilitime disclosed personal investments: approximately 10k in ElizaOS, 20k in DegenAI, and 8k in Cult token for the anime project\n- Odilitime emphasized betting on his team at DegenAI where he was hired\n\n### Technical Developments\n\n- The v2.0.0 branch was identified as the recommended version\n- Plugin-sql was confirmed to support both pglite and neon cloud databases, using environment variables for postgres credentials\n- A developer reported their openclaw agent started writing in Korean unexpectedly\n- The project's code was noted to power many agents, especially in crypto with secure battle-tested open source code\n\n### Spartan Development\n\n- Odilitime detailed Spartan as an agentic wallet with trading capabilities\n- DegenAI holders have access to the open source trader\n- Spartan was described as a combination of trading bot potluck with LLM intelligence\n- Odilitime is now the lead developer on the Spartan project\n- The team is working on DeFi stacks after proving the framework's social capabilities\n\n## Plugin Ecosystem Expansion\n\n### New Plugin Submissions\n\n- The @elizaos/plugin-xproof plugin was submitted\n- The micronoise-eliza-plugin was submitted, enabling token swaps via x402 payments\n\n### MoltBridge Integration\n\n- Ongoing discussions continued regarding the integration of MoltBridge as a Trust and Discovery Layer for ElizaOS\n- MoltBridge is now live with detailed capabilities and advantages for the Eliza agent ecosystem\n---\n2026-02-21.json\n---\nelizaOS\n---\nelizaOS Discord - 2026-02-21\n---\n1301363808421543988\n---\n\ud83e\udd47-partners\n---\n# Analysis of Discord Channel \"\ud83e\udd47-partners\"\n\n## 1. Summary\n\nThis chat segment contains minimal substantive content. DorianD made a brief historical comparison between crypto market cycles and tech industry periods. They drew parallels between the mid-2020s crypto market and the 2014-2016 crypto period, comparing it to the 2001-2003 tech downturn. No technical discussions, implementations, decisions, or problem-solving occurred in this segment. The conversation appears to be casual market commentary rather than technical or development-focused discussion.\n\n## 2. FAQ\n\nNo meaningful technical questions or answers were present in this chat segment.\n\n## 3. Help Interactions\n\nNo help interactions occurred in this chat segment.\n\n## 4. Action Items\n\nNo action items were identified in this chat segment.\n---\n1300025221834739744\n---\n\ud83d\udcac-coders\n---\n# Discord Channel Analysis: \ud83d\udcac-coders\n\n## 1. Summary\n\nThis chat segment shows minimal technical discussion. KingRon announced completing their first agent build and inquired about deploying dApps to Solana seeker, though no response was provided. DorianD shared an Instagram link suggesting opportunities in censorship-resistant gaming. NintyNine noted low channel activity. Bill Ding clarified that there is a separate developer Discord, which explains the limited technical conversation in this channel. No concrete solutions, implementations, or technical decisions were discussed during this period.\n\n## 2. FAQ\n\nQ: Can we deploy dApps to Solana seeker? (asked by KingRon) A: Unanswered\n\n## 3. Help Interactions\n\nHelper: Bill Ding | Helpee: NintyNine | Context: Confusion about low channel activity | Resolution: Informed that there's a separate dev Discord for technical discussions\n\n## 4. Action Items\n\nType: Feature | Description: Investigate dApp deployment capabilities to Solana seeker | Mentioned By: KingRon\nType: Feature | Description: Explore censorship-resistant gaming opportunities | Mentioned By: DorianD\n---\n1253563209462448241\n---\n\ud83d\udcac-discussion\n---\n# Discord Channel Analysis: \ud83d\udcac-discussion\n\n## 1. Summary\n\nThe discussion centered on ElizaOS technical setup and project positioning. **BinaryCookies** sought guidance on version stability and database configuration. **Odilitime** recommended the v2.0.0 branch despite less documentation, as it represents the project's future direction. For database setup, Odilitime explained that plugin-sql supports both pglite and Neon Postgres, using environment variables to determine which to use, though data migration between them isn't automatic.\n\n**King Nebuluz** shared work on building unbreakable agents (github.com/nebuluzno/scr) using Erlang, offering the code for ElizaOS integration. Odilitime reviewed it positively, noting it was better than previous Erlang projects examined. King Nebuluz is developing a Polymarket agent before returning to contribute to ElizaOS.\n\n**DorianD** reported an unusual bug where their openclaw agent started responding in Korean unexpectedly.\n\nSignificant project clarification occurred when **PKScouser** inquired about investment rationale. Odilitime provided extensive context: ElizaOS powers many crypto agents with battle-tested open source code. The project migrated from ai16z to elizaOS (1:6 ratio, with 1:4 for funding), expanding from Solana-only to multi-chain. **Spartan** is the agentic wallet with trading capabilities, accessible to DegenAI holders. Odilitime emphasized the project's mission is democratizing AI agent capabilities for everyday users versus big companies, not short-term profits.\n\n**digitalalchemy** predicted clawd bot will prove trustless while Eliza becomes \"Trusted Agentic Intelligence (TAI)\" within months. The community discussed challenges of building proactive viral agents while maintaining security through sandboxing.\n\n## 2. FAQ\n\nQ: Which version of ElizaOS is most stable currently? (asked by BinaryCookies) A: v2.0.0 branch is recommended, though it has less documentation but represents the project's direction (answered by Odilitime)\n\nQ: How can I use both pglite and Neon cloud database together? (asked by BinaryCookies) A: plugin-sql supports both and uses the postgres credentials env var to decide which to use, but won't migrate data automatically (answered by Odilitime)\n\nQ: Why should I invest in elizaOS? (asked by PKScouser) A: If you want short-term money, probably shouldn't. If you want to support open source builders ensuring everyday people have same capabilities as big companies, this is the place. Code powers many crypto agents with battle-tested open source (answered by Odilitime)\n\nQ: What is Spartan? (asked by PKScouser) A: Spartan is the agentic wallet with trading capabilities. DegenAI holders have access to the trader which is open source - a potluck of trading bot combined with LLM intelligence (answered by Odilitime)\n\nQ: Is ai16z still tradeable or only eliza? (asked by PKScouser) A: ai16z is a dead coin for all intents and purposes. Migrated to elizaOS with 1:6 ratio, using 1:4 for funding and splitting liquidity across multiple chains (answered by Odilitime)\n\nQ: Is elizaOS a meme coin? (asked by PKScouser) A: Not directly answered, but context suggests it's positioned as a utility/infrastructure token rather than meme coin (answered by Odilitime)\n\nQ: Do you expect DegenAI to do better than ElizaOS token? (asked by BhnInvestor) A: Hired into team degen and felt better to bet on myself/my team. Sold entire elizaOS bags and bought back, but never sold degen bags (answered by Odilitime)\n\n## 3. Help Interactions\n\nHelper: Odilitime | Helpee: BinaryCookies | Context: New builder needed guidance on which ElizaOS version to use | Resolution: Recommended v2.0.0 branch as the future direction despite less documentation\n\nHelper: Odilitime | Helpee: BinaryCookies | Context: Needed to configure both pglite and Neon Postgres databases | Resolution: Explained plugin-sql supports both via env vars, though data won't auto-migrate\n\nHelper: Odilitime | Helpee: PKScouser | Context: New community member seeking understanding of ElizaOS value proposition and project structure | Resolution: Provided comprehensive explanation of project mission, Spartan wallet, migration from ai16z, and positioning as open source infrastructure\n\nHelper: Skinny | Helpee: PKScouser | Context: Seeking investment thesis from Discord | Resolution: Advised against sourcing investment thesis from Discord, recommended building an agent to gain insights\n\nHelper: Odilitime | Helpee: King Nebuluz | Context: Shared Erlang-based unbreakable agents code for potential ElizaOS integration | Resolution: Reviewed the code positively, noted it was better than previous Erlang projects\n\n## 4. Action Items\n\nType: Technical | Description: Review and potentially integrate github.com/nebuluzno/scr unbreakable agents code into ElizaOS | Mentioned By: King Nebuluz\n\nType: Technical | Description: Investigate openclaw agent unexpectedly writing in Korean | Mentioned By: DorianD\n\nType: Technical | Description: Complete Polymarket agent development | Mentioned By: King Nebuluz\n\nType: Documentation | Description: Improve documentation for v2.0.0 branch as it becomes the recommended version | Mentioned By: Odilitime\n\nType: Feature | Description: Develop clawd bot as trustless system while Eliza becomes Trusted Agentic Intelligence (TAI) | Mentioned By: digitalalchemy\n---\n2026-02-21.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-21\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Project Vision & Positioning\n\nThe community engaged in significant discussion about ElizaOS's mission and value proposition. **Odilitime** provided comprehensive clarification on the project's direction, emphasizing that ElizaOS aims to democratize AI agent capabilities for everyday users rather than focusing on short-term profits. The project powers many crypto agents with battle-tested open source code and has evolved from a Solana-only platform to a multi-chain infrastructure.\n\nA major clarification addressed the migration from ai16z to elizaOS, which occurred at a 1:6 ratio (with 1:4 allocated for funding). Odilitime confirmed that ai16z is effectively deprecated, with liquidity now split across multiple chains under the elizaOS umbrella.\n\n### Technical Development & Architecture\n\n**King Nebuluz** shared progress on building unbreakable agents using Erlang (github.com/nebuluzno/scr), offering the code for potential ElizaOS integration. Odilitime reviewed the implementation positively, noting it surpassed previous Erlang projects examined by the team.\n\n**BinaryCookies** initiated important technical discussions about version stability and database configuration. The community confirmed that v2.0.0 branch is now the recommended version despite having less documentation, as it represents the project's future direction.\n\nDatabase architecture was clarified: the plugin-sql supports both pglite and Neon Postgres, using environment variables to determine which database to use, though automatic data migration between them is not currently supported.\n\n### Future Development Directions\n\n**digitalalchemy** predicted an interesting evolution where clawd bot will prove trustless while Eliza becomes \"Trusted Agentic Intelligence (TAI)\" within months. The community discussed the challenges of building proactive viral agents while maintaining security through sandboxing.\n\n### Spartan Wallet & DegenAI\n\nThe Spartan agentic wallet was explained as having trading capabilities, with DegenAI holders receiving access to the open-source trader\u2014described as a combination of trading bot functionality with LLM intelligence. Odilitime shared personal conviction in the DegenAI project, noting he sold his entire elizaOS bags and bought back, but never sold his degen bags.\n\n### Market Commentary & Gaming Opportunities\n\n**DorianD** drew parallels between current crypto market cycles and historical tech industry periods, comparing the mid-2020s crypto market to the 2014-2016 crypto period and the 2001-2003 tech downturn. DorianD also highlighted opportunities in censorship-resistant gaming.\n\n### Community Activity\n\n**KingRon** announced completing their first agent build and inquired about deploying dApps to Solana seeker. **Bill Ding** clarified that a separate developer Discord exists for technical discussions, explaining the relatively low activity in the public coders channel.\n\n### Technical Issues\n\n**DorianD** reported an unusual bug where their openclaw agent unexpectedly started responding in Korean, indicating potential localization or configuration issues requiring investigation.\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Which version of ElizaOS is most stable currently?**  \nA: v2.0.0 branch is recommended, though it has less documentation but represents the project's direction (answered by Odilitime)\n\n**Q: How can I use both pglite and Neon cloud database together?**  \nA: plugin-sql supports both and uses the postgres credentials env var to decide which to use, but won't migrate data automatically (answered by Odilitime)\n\n**Q: Why should I invest in elizaOS?**  \nA: If you want short-term money, probably shouldn't. If you want to support open source builders ensuring everyday people have same capabilities as big companies, this is the place. Code powers many crypto agents with battle-tested open source (answered by Odilitime)\n\n**Q: What is Spartan?**  \nA: Spartan is the agentic wallet with trading capabilities. DegenAI holders have access to the trader which is open source - a potluck of trading bot combined with LLM intelligence (answered by Odilitime)\n\n**Q: Is ai16z still tradeable or only eliza?**  \nA: ai16z is a dead coin for all intents and purposes. Migrated to elizaOS with 1:6 ratio, using 1:4 for funding and splitting liquidity across multiple chains (answered by Odilitime)\n\n**Q: Do you expect DegenAI to do better than ElizaOS token?**  \nA: Hired into team degen and felt better to bet on myself/my team. Sold entire elizaOS bags and bought back, but never sold degen bags (answered by Odilitime)\n\n**Q: Can we deploy dApps to Solana seeker?**  \nA: Unanswered (asked by KingRon)\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**Odilitime helped BinaryCookies** with version selection guidance, recommending the v2.0.0 branch as the future direction despite less documentation, helping a new builder get started on the right path.\n\n**Odilitime helped BinaryCookies** configure database options, explaining that plugin-sql supports both pglite and Neon Postgres via environment variables, though data won't auto-migrate between them.\n\n**Odilitime helped PKScouser** understand the ElizaOS value proposition by providing comprehensive explanation of the project mission, Spartan wallet functionality, migration from ai16z, and positioning as open source infrastructure rather than a short-term investment vehicle.\n\n**Skinny advised PKScouser** against sourcing investment thesis from Discord, recommending building an agent to gain deeper insights into the platform's capabilities.\n\n**Odilitime reviewed King Nebuluz's** Erlang-based unbreakable agents code, providing positive feedback and noting it was better than previous Erlang projects examined.\n\n**Bill Ding helped NintyNine** understand the low channel activity by informing them that there's a separate dev Discord for technical discussions.\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n\n- **Review and potentially integrate github.com/nebuluzno/scr unbreakable agents code into ElizaOS** - Mentioned by King Nebuluz\n- **Investigate openclaw agent unexpectedly writing in Korean** - Mentioned by DorianD\n- **Complete Polymarket agent development** - Mentioned by King Nebuluz\n- **Investigate dApp deployment capabilities to Solana seeker** - Mentioned by KingRon\n\n### Documentation\n\n- **Improve documentation for v2.0.0 branch as it becomes the recommended version** - Mentioned by Odilitime\n\n### Feature\n\n- **Develop clawd bot as trustless system while Eliza becomes Trusted Agentic Intelligence (TAI)** - Mentioned by digitalalchemy\n- **Explore censorship-resistant gaming opportunities** - Mentioned by DorianD\n---\n2026-02-22.md\n---\nFile not found\n---\n2026-02-15.md\n---\n# Overall Project Weekly Summary (Feb 15 - 21, 2026)\n\nThis week, ElizaOS entered a high-velocity phase as it prepared for its official beta launch. The team successfully cleared a massive backlog of technical hurdles while simultaneously expanding the framework's reach into everyday communication tools like WhatsApp and Gmail. By combining core infrastructure upgrades with new decentralized identity features, the project is positioning itself as a robust, secure, and highly adaptable home for the next generation of AI agents.\n\n## Executive Summary\nElizaOS shifted its focus toward a major beta release, prioritizing user onboarding and platform stability. The project achieved significant milestones by integrating popular messaging and productivity apps and launching new on-chain identity tools for agents on the Solana blockchain.\n\n### Key Strategic Initiatives & Outcomes\n\n**Preparing for the Beta Launch and Beyond**\n*Goal: To ensure the platform is stable, user-friendly, and ready for its first 100 official testers.*\n*   The team cleared dozens of functional blockers in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), including fixing dashboard bugs and removing restrictive text limits to improve the user experience.\n*   A new \"Profile Plugin\" was proposed in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) to automatically build user profiles from social media, making it easier for new users to get started immediately.\n*   Efforts are underway in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) to refine the AI's personality, aiming for a more direct and engaging conversational style for the launch.\n\n**Expanding Agent Reach and Utility**\n*Goal: To allow AI agents to work across more platforms and handle more complex tasks.*\n*   Major integrations were finalized for WhatsApp, Gmail, and the N8N workflow engine in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), allowing agents to communicate and automate tasks where users already work.\n*   The [elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow) repository added a new \"control panel\" (REST API), giving developers a way to manage complex workflows directly without needing to use natural language.\n*   The plugin registry in [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry) saw a surge in new tools, particularly for Web3 and financial data exchanges.\n\n**Strengthening Security and Decentralization**\n*Goal: To give agents a verifiable identity and ensure the system remains secure as it grows.*\n*   The project introduced the SAID Protocol in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) and [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry), which gives agents a \"digital passport\" on the Solana blockchain for secure, verifiable actions.\n*   A security audit was completed for the Model Context Protocol in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), ensuring that as agents share information, they do so safely.\n\n**Improving System Health and Maintenance**\n*Goal: To keep the project's \"engine\" running smoothly and make it easier for community members to contribute.*\n*   A major database overhaul was started in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) to make the system faster and more reliable for the long term.\n*   Critical fixes to the automated review system in [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry) ensured that outside contributors can have their work checked and merged more quickly.\n*   Routine but essential security updates were performed across the documentation site in [elizaos/elizaos.github.io](https://github.com/elizaos/elizaos.github.io) to keep the project's public face secure.\n\n### Cross-Repository Coordination\n*   **Unified Identity Standards**: The implementation of the SAID Protocol required synchronized work between the core framework [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) and the [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry) to ensure agents can use their new on-chain identities across all plugins.\n*   **Workflow Automation**: The N8N workflow integration involved coordinated updates in the core repository [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) and the specific [elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow) repo to provide a seamless experience for managing complex AI tasks.\n*   **Automated Maintenance**: The team successfully fixed \"Renovate\" (an automated update tool) in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), which now helps keep dependencies across the entire ecosystem up to date automatically.\n\n## Repository Spotlights\n\n### elizaos/eliza\n*   Initiated a major database refactor ([#6509](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6509)) to improve long-term system architecture.\n*   Integrated the SAID Protocol for on-chain Solana identity ([#6510](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6510)), enabling verifiable agent signatures.\n*   Finalized major integrations for WhatsApp ([#6401](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6401)), Gmail ([#6404](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6404)), and N8N ([#6429](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6429)).\n*   Resolved critical automated update issues ([#6488](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6488)) and enabled multi-language dependency management ([#6506](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6506), [#6507](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6507)).\n*   Added support for the Opus 4.5 model ([#6368](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6368)) and Chain-of-Thought reasoning ([#6294](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6294)).\n\n### elizaos-plugins/registry\n*   Expanded the ecosystem with new plugins including `@elizaos/plugin-said` ([#264](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/264)) and several exchange-related tools ([#261](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/261), [#262](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/262)).\n*   Fixed a high-priority issue where the automated review system was blocking new contributions ([#259](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/issues/259)).\n*   Improved support for external contributors by fixing the review process for forked repositories ([#260](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/260)).\n\n### elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow\n*   Launched a comprehensive REST API for direct workflow management and monitoring ([#16](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow/pull/16)).\n*   Fixed a critical bug in how the AI handles workflow properties, ensuring stability even when the AI provides incomplete data ([#18](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow/pull/18)).\n\n### elizaos-plugins/plugin-ollama\n*   Identified and began investigating a community-reported issue regarding embedding failures on Linux environments ([#17](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-ollama/issues/17)).\n\n### elizaos/elizaos.github.io\n*   Maintained project health through routine dependency synchronization and version updates ([#242](https://github.com/elizaos/elizaos.github.io/pull/242)).\n---\n2026-02-01.md\n---\nNo activity recorded for 2026-02-01.\n---\n{\n  \"interval\": {\n    \"intervalStart\": \"2026-02-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n    \"intervalEnd\": \"2026-03-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n    \"intervalType\": \"month\"\n  },\n  \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n  \"overview\": \"From 2026-02-01 to 2026-03-01, elizaos/eliza had 35 new PRs (18 merged), 41 new issues, and 34 active contributors.\",\n  \"topIssues\": [\n    {\n      \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7FcGAc\",\n      \"title\": \"feat(scenarios): Add Cost Evaluator\",\n      \"author\": \"monilpat\",\n      \"number\": 5759,\n      \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n      \"body\": \"# feat(scenarios): Add Cost Evaluator\\n\\nLinks: [Issue #5726](https://github.com/elizaOS/eliza/issues/5726)\\n\\n## Summary\\nIntroduce an evaluator that asserts the estimated dollar cost of LLM usage per step. Cost is derived from token counts and a model price table.\\n\\n## Goals\\n- Estimate cost (USD) for each step from recorded token metrics\\n- Allow thresholds (`max_cost_usd`) to fail expensive runs\\n- Support multiple models within a single step\\n\\n## Acceptance Criteria\\n1. New evaluator type `llm_cost`\\n2. Price table configurable via env or default map\\n3. Evaluator passes if total step cost <= `max_cost_usd`\\n4. Detailed message with model breakdown and total\\n\\n## Schema Changes\\nEdit `packages/cli/src/commands/scenario/src/schema.ts`:\\n\\n```ts\\nconst LlmCostEvaluationSchema = BaseEvaluationSchema.extend({\\n  type: z.literal('llm_cost'),\\n  max_cost_usd: z.number(),\\n});\\n```\\n\\n## Pricing Source\\nAdd a small utility `packages/cli/src/commands/scenario/src/pricing.ts`:\\n\\n```ts\\nexport type ModelPricing = {\\n  inputPer1K: number;    // USD per 1000 input tokens\\n  outputPer1K: number;   // USD per 1000 output tokens\\n};\\n\\nexport const DEFAULT_MODEL_PRICING: Record<string, ModelPricing> = {\\n  TEXT_SMALL: { inputPer1K: 0.15, outputPer1K: 0.60 },\\n  TEXT_LARGE: { inputPer1K: 0.50, outputPer1K: 1.50 },\\n  OBJECT_SMALL: { inputPer1K: 0.50, outputPer1K: 1.50 },\\n};\\n\\nexport function getPricing(modelType: string, overrides?: Record<string, ModelPricing>): ModelPricing | null {\\n  const table = overrides ?? DEFAULT_MODEL_PRICING;\\n  return table[modelType] ?? null;\\n}\\n```\\n\\nAllow overrides via `SCENARIO_MODEL_PRICING` env (JSON string) in a follow-up.\\n\\n## Evaluation Implementation\\nAdd to `EvaluationEngine`:\\n\\n```ts\\nclass LlmCostEvaluator implements Evaluator {\\n  async evaluate(params: EvaluationSchema, runResult: ExecutionResult): Promise<EvaluationResult> {\\n    if (params.type !== 'llm_cost') throw new Error('Mismatched evaluator');\\n    const llm = runResult.metrics?.llm ?? [];\\n    if (!llm.length) return { success: false, message: 'No LLM metrics found for cost calculation' };\\n\\n    const pricingOverrides = process.env.SCENARIO_MODEL_PRICING ? JSON.parse(process.env.SCENARIO_MODEL_PRICING) : undefined;\\n    let total = 0;\\n    for (const m of llm) {\\n      const pricing = getPricing(m.modelType, pricingOverrides);\\n      if (!pricing) continue;\\n      const inTok = m.promptTokens ?? 0;\\n      const outTok = m.completionTokens ?? 0;\\n      total += (inTok / 1000) * pricing.inputPer1K + (outTok / 1000) * pricing.outputPer1K;\\n    }\\n\\n    const success = total <= params.max_cost_usd;\\n    return { success, message: `Estimated cost: $${total.toFixed(4)} (limit $${params.max_cost_usd.toFixed(4)})` };\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\nRegister:\\n\\n```ts\\nthis.register('llm_cost', new LlmCostEvaluator());\\n```\\n\\n## Example Usage\\n\\n```yaml\\nevaluations:\\n  - type: llm_cost\\n    max_cost_usd: 0.05\\n```\\n\\n## Tests\\n- Unit: price math with multiple model records\\n- Integration: with token_count metrics present and absent\\n\\n## Notes\\nThis builds on the Token Count evaluator and shared metrics capture. It complements mocking enhancements described in [Issue #5726](https://github.com/elizaOS/eliza/issues/5726).\\n\\n\\n\",\n      \"createdAt\": \"2025-08-12T04:27:23Z\",\n      \"closedAt\": \"2026-02-12T22:43:04Z\",\n      \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n      \"commentCount\": 1\n    },\n    {\n      \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7nsf3_\",\n      \"title\": \"[Agent] Eliza Character File & Prompt Engineering\",\n      \"author\": \"borisudovicic\",\n      \"number\": 6447,\n      \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n      \"body\": \"## Description\\n\\nImprove Eliza's character file and prompts based on initial testing feedback.\\n\\n## Background\\n\\nBoris (Feb 2): \\\"I've talked to Eliza only a little bit, just to test her out. I think she'll definitely need some edits in her character file, some more prompt engineering. She's a good start so far, but there's definitely stuff we're gonna have to work on. It'll be iterative.\\\"\\n\\n## Acceptance Criteria\\n\\n- [ ] Review current character file responses\\n- [ ] Identify areas needing improvement\\n- [ ] Update character file with better prompts\\n- [ ] Add message examples (Ben has PRs for this)\\n- [ ] Test with Sonnet model\\n- [ ] Iterate based on user feedback\\n\\n## Technical Notes\\n\\nBen mentioned:\\n\\n* Currently using a different model, switching to Sonnet\\n* Two PRs coming that add message examples and change model to Sonnet\\n* \\\"Huge difference in price between Sonnet and \\\\[current model\\\\]\\\"\\n\\nBoris mentioned Sonnet 5 coming out soon - good timing to test on Eliza if cheaper.\\n\\n## Priority\\n\\n**P2 - Iterative improvement**\",\n      \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-02T17:48:44Z\",\n      \"closedAt\": \"2026-02-16T21:52:18Z\",\n      \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n      \"commentCount\": 1\n    },\n    {\n      \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7pWP6K\",\n      \"title\": \"[Bug] URL in message triggers duplicate LLM calls - processed as both text and attachment (webapp)\",\n      \"author\": \"thewoweffect\",\n      \"number\": 6486,\n      \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n      \"body\": \"## Description\\nWhen a user sends a message containing a URL, ElizaOS processes it twice:\\n1. As text content \u2192 generates response\\n2. As attachment (metadata/preview) \u2192 generates second response\\n\\nBoth responses are sent through the same SSE stream before the `done` event, resulting in duplicated text in the final response.\\n\\n## Steps to Reproduce\\n1. Start ElizaOS with webapp\\n2. Send a message containing a URL (e.g., \\\"Check this: https://example.com\\\")\\n3. Observe the response\\n\\n## Expected Behavior\\nURL should be processed once, generating a single response.\\n\\n## Actual Behavior\\nTwo identical (or near-identical) responses are generated and streamed as one message, doubling token usage and producing duplicated output.\\n\\n## Impact\\n- 2x LLM API calls per message with URL\\n- Doubled token costs\\n- Poor UX with duplicated responses\\n- Forces workarounds on client side\\n\\n## Environment\\n- ElizaOS version: [your version]\\n- Client: webapp\\n\\n## Suggested Fix\\nEnsure URL is processed either as text OR as attachment, not both. The decision should happen in the message processing flow before LLM calls.\\n\",\n      \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-09T07:36:55Z\",\n      \"closedAt\": null,\n      \"state\": \"OPEN\",\n      \"commentCount\": 1\n    },\n    {\n      \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7plYW-\",\n      \"title\": \"Feature Request: Support custom OpenAI endpoint URL for OpenAI provider\",\n      \"author\": \"coolRoger\",\n      \"number\": 6490,\n      \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n      \"body\": \"## Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.\\nThe current OpenAI provider does **not support configuring a custom OpenAI endpoint URL**, which makes it impossible to use OpenAI-compatible third-party services (e.g., SiliconFlow). These services follow the OpenAI API format but require pointing to their own endpoint URLs instead of the official OpenAI endpoint.\\n\\n## Describe the solution you'd like\\nAdd a **configurable `openai endpoint url` field/parameter** to the OpenAI provider, so users can manually specify the API endpoint URL when using OpenAI-compatible services.\\n\\n## Describe alternatives you've considered\\n- Switching to a dedicated provider for SiliconFlow: Not ideal, as it breaks the unified OpenAI-compatible usage pattern.\\n- Hardcoding the endpoint: Not flexible for different OpenAI-compatible providers.\\n\\n## Additional context\\nMany cloud / inference providers (SiliconFlow, etc.) provide OpenAI-compatible APIs, only differing in the endpoint URL. Supporting custom endpoints will greatly improve the compatibility and flexibility of the OpenAI provider.\",\n      \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-10T00:57:25Z\",\n      \"closedAt\": null,\n      \"state\": \"OPEN\",\n      \"commentCount\": 1\n    },\n    {\n      \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7qLiWA\",\n      \"title\": \"Image content stripped from LLM requests in cloud chat\",\n      \"author\": \"borisudovicic\",\n      \"number\": 6494,\n      \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n      \"body\": \"## Issue is inside: `/api/v1/chat/completions`. `convertToUIMessages`\\n\\n<img src=\\\"https://uploads.linear.app/186bdefa-3633-464a-80cd-6e86fe765a5c/592b6402-12d4-4503-b4fe-e84247fdb8b0/fa8afcf1-1cd5-491a-a22f-cebfaa4e4173?signature=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJwYXRoIjoiLzE4NmJkZWZhLTM2MzMtNDY0YS04MGNkLTZlODZmZTc2NWE1Yy81OTJiNjQwMi0xMmQ0LTQ1MDMtYjRmZS1lODQyNDdmZGI4YjAvZmE4YWZjZjEtMWNkNS00OTFhLWEyMmYtY2ViZmFhNGU0MTczIiwiaWF0IjoxNzcwODQ3Nzk4LCJleHAiOjE4MDI0MTgzNTh9.fY0P5p8D6VCObJxnpXm_sKNq_fV8qWtM2DMAMjtJs2A \\\" alt=\\\"Screenshot 2026-02-11 at 23.09.52.png\\\" width=\\\"862\\\" data-linear-height=\\\"433\\\" />\",\n      \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-11T22:08:25Z\",\n      \"closedAt\": \"2026-02-16T21:51:50Z\",\n      \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n      \"commentCount\": 1\n    }\n  ],\n  \"topPRs\": [\n    {\n      \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs68XpPS\",\n      \"title\": \"V2.0.0\",\n      \"author\": \"lalalune\",\n      \"number\": 6351,\n      \"body\": \"This is  a working branch of elizaOS v2.0.0\\r\\n\\r\\nCritically, this removes app, server, CLI and all non-essentials. Instead, we focus on runtime in Rust, Typescript, with critical plugins ported as well\",\n      \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n      \"createdAt\": \"2026-01-09T17:06:10Z\",\n      \"mergedAt\": null,\n      \"additions\": 2384715,\n      \"deletions\": 298813\n    },\n    {\n      \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7CUyZi\",\n      \"title\": \"feat: next generation multi-language Eliza with Rust, Python and TypeScript support\",\n      \"author\": \"lalalune\",\n      \"number\": 6485,\n      \"body\": \"This is the next version of eliza\\r\\n\\r\\nRust, python and typescript\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\n# Major Updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Add complete Python and Rust core packages, extending Eliza to these languages\\r\\n- Add Python and Rust native versions of popular plugins\\r\\n- Remove default application, client and server infrastructure\\r\\n- Add examples for all major frameworks\\r\\n- Bootstrap is integrated into core, enabled with basicCapabilities by default and optionally extendedCapabiltiies\\r\\n- Core plugins are also rust, python and typescript\\r\\n- Comes with a WIP code agent\\r\\n\\r\\n# Minor updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Agents can now respond without needing a roomId or worldId\\r\\n- Initial message memory is created inside the message handler service (was confusing and not that way)\\r\\n- Can running planningMode true or false, on false skips planning and calls single action (good for games and simple agents)\\r\\n- Actions can have arguments, and can be called with arguments. This way they can be called like tools without needing a separate step\\r\\n\\r\\nTODO\\r\\n- LLM mode -- can be SMALL, LARGE or DEFAULT -- SMALL and LARGE override the LLM small or large so all use the small or all use the large\\r\\n- checkShouldRespond defaults to true but can be turned off for ChatGPT mode\",\n      \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n      \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-08T18:44:21Z\",\n      \"mergedAt\": null,\n      \"additions\": 649890,\n      \"deletions\": 303180\n    },\n    {\n      \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7EjIkM\",\n      \"title\": \"feat: add SAID Protocol on-chain Solana identity for ElizaOS agents\",\n      \"author\": \"kaiclawd\",\n      \"number\": 6510,\n      \"body\": \"## What this does\\n\\nEvery new agent created via `elizaos create` now automatically gets a free on-chain identity on [SAID Protocol](https://saidprotocol.com) \u2014 Solana AI Identity.\\n\\n## Changes\\n\\n- `packages/elizaos/src/utils/said.ts` \u2014 new module: Ed25519 keypair generation (pure Node `crypto`, zero new dependencies) + SAID registration via REST API\\n- `packages/elizaos/src/commands/create.ts` \u2014 registers agent with SAID after project creation, saves wallet, displays profile URL\\n\\n## What happens on `elizaos create`\\n\\n```\\n\u2728 Project created successfully!\\n\\n\u26a1 SAID Protocol identity created\\n  Wallet: 7xKXtg2CW87d97TXJSDpbD5jBkheTqA83TZRuJosgAs\\n  Profile: https://saidprotocol.com/agents/7xKXtg2CW87d97TXJSDpbD5jBkheTqA83TZRuJosgAs\\n\\n  Key saved to .said-wallet.json (add to .gitignore!)\\n```\\n\\n## Why\\n\\n- **Free** \u2014 off-chain pending registration, no SOL required\\n- **Zero new dependencies** \u2014 uses Node's built-in `crypto` module for Ed25519 keypair generation\\n- **Non-breaking** \u2014 fully opt-out, errors are silently caught, never crashes\\n- **Discoverable** \u2014 agent appears in the public SAID agent directory at [saidprotocol.com/agents](https://saidprotocol.com/agents)\\n- **On-chain upgrade available** \u2014 ~0.01 SOL upgrades to a cryptographically verified badge via challenge-response (proves the entity is a running agent)\\n\\n## SAID Protocol\\n\\nSAID is on-chain identity infrastructure for AI agents on Solana. Think of it as a universal agent passport \u2014 verifiable identity, reputation scores, skill listings, and agent-to-agent discovery.\\n\\n[saidprotocol.com](https://saidprotocol.com) | [Docs](https://saidprotocol.com/docs.html)\",\n      \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n      \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-18T08:01:49Z\",\n      \"mergedAt\": null,\n      \"additions\": 648299,\n      \"deletions\": 302354\n    },\n    {\n      \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7FPjL6\",\n      \"title\": \"refactor(core): strict typing for logger runtime\",\n      \"author\": \"Fankouzu\",\n      \"number\": 6519,\n      \"body\": \"This PR improves code quality by replacing  type usage in the logger module with proper  typing. This helps in maintaining type safety across the core package.\",\n      \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n      \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-20T19:25:50Z\",\n      \"mergedAt\": null,\n      \"additions\": 648170,\n      \"deletions\": 302354\n    },\n    {\n      \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7CJoKo\",\n      \"title\": \"next\",\n      \"author\": \"lalalune\",\n      \"number\": 6474,\n      \"body\": \"This is the next version of eliza\\r\\n\\r\\nRust, python and typescript\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\n# Major Updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Add complete Python and Rust core packages, extending Eliza to these languages\\r\\n- Add Python and Rust native versions of popular plugins\\r\\n- Remove default application, client and server infrastructure\\r\\n- Add examples for all major frameworks\\r\\n- Bootstrap is integrated into core, enabled with basicCapabilities by default and optionally extendedCapabiltiies\\r\\n- Core plugins are also rust, python and typescript\\r\\n- Comes with a WIP code agent\\r\\n\\r\\n# Minor updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Agents can now respond without needing a roomId or worldId\\r\\n- Initial message memory is created inside the message handler service (was confusing and not that way)\\r\\n- Can running planningMode true or false, on false skips planning and calls single action (good for games and simple agents)\\r\\n- Actions can have arguments, and can be called with arguments. This way they can be called like tools without needing a separate step\\r\\n\\r\\nTODO\\r\\n- LLM mode -- can be SMALL, LARGE or DEFAULT -- SMALL and LARGE override the LLM small or large so all use the small or all use the large\\r\\n- checkShouldRespond defaults to true but can be turned off for ChatGPT mode\",\n      \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n      \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-07T08:00:35Z\",\n      \"mergedAt\": null,\n      \"additions\": 591239,\n      \"deletions\": 282388\n    }\n  ],\n  \"codeChanges\": {\n    \"additions\": 18576,\n    \"deletions\": 3807,\n    \"files\": 160,\n    \"commitCount\": 136\n  },\n  \"completedItems\": [\n    {\n      \"title\": \"feat(auth): implement JWT authentication and user management\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6200,\n      \"type\": \"feature\",\n      \"body\": \"## Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\n- Data isolation / multi-entity support\\r\\n- External JWT provider integration (Privy, Auth0, Clerk, Supabase, Google, Embbeded)\\r\\n\\r\\n## Risks\\r\\n\\r\\n**Low**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Requires `ENABLE_DATA_ISOLATION=true` to activate JWT auth mode\\r\\n\\r\\n#\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \".github/workflows/client-cypress-tests.yml\",\n        \"packages/client/cypress/e2e/auth/01-auth-flow.cy.ts\",\n        \"packages/client/cypress/e2e/auth/02-protected-features.cy.ts\",\n        \"packages/client/src/App.tsx\",\n        \"packages/client/src/components/ProtectedRoute.tsx\",\n        \"packages/client/src/components/ai-elements/response.tsx\",\n        \"packages/client/src/components/app-sidebar.tsx\",\n        \"packages/client/src/components/auth-dialog.tsx\",\n        \"packages/client/src/components/connection-error-banner.tsx\",\n        \"packages/client/src/components/connection-status.tsx\",\n        \"packages/client/src/components/group-card.tsx\",\n        \"packages/client/src/components/group-panel.tsx\",\n        \"packages/client/src/context/AuthContext.tsx\",\n        \"packages/client/src/context/ConnectionContext.tsx\",\n        \"packages/client/src/context/ServerConfigContext.tsx\",\n        \"packages/client/src/hooks/use-query-hooks.ts\",\n        \"packages/client/src/hooks/use-socket-chat.ts\",\n        \"packages/client/src/index.css\",\n        \"packages/client/src/lib/api-client-config.ts\",\n        \"packages/client/src/lib/auth-utils.ts\",\n        \"packages/client/src/lib/socketio-manager.ts\",\n        \"packages/client/src/routes/chat.tsx\",\n        \"packages/client/src/routes/group.tsx\",\n        \"packages/client/src/routes/home.tsx\",\n        \"packages/config/src/eslint/eslint.config.base.js\",\n        \"packages/core/src/database.ts\",\n        \"packages/core/src/runtime.ts\",\n        \"packages/core/src/types/database.ts\",\n        \"packages/core/src/types/index.ts\",\n        \"packages/core/src/types/user.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-sql/src/base.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-sql/src/schema/index.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-sql/src/schema/user.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/__tests__/integration/jwt-workflow.test.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/__tests__/test-utils/jwt-helper.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/api/auth/credentials.test.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/middleware/auth-middleware-chain.test.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/middleware/auth-middleware.test.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/middleware/jwtMiddleware.test.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/ed25519-verifier.test.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/factory.test.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/jwks-verifier.test.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/secret-verifier.test.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/socketio/authentication.test.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/api/agents/logs.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/api/agents/runs.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/api/auth/credentials.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/api/auth/index.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/api/index.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/api/memory/agents.ts\",\n        \"packages/server/src/index.ts\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"docs: core documentation guides\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6356,\n      \"type\": \"docs\",\n      \"body\": \"## Summary\\n- Adds core documentation pages: architecture, core concepts, plugin development, interop, deployment, and API reference.\\n\\n## Test plan\\n- [ ] Review rendered markdown formatting and links.\\n\\n<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->\\n---\\n\\n> [!NOTE]\\n\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"docs/API_REFERENCE.md\",\n        \"docs/ARCHITECTURE.md\",\n        \"docs/CORE_CONCEPTS.md\",\n        \"docs/DEPLOYMENT_GUIDE.md\",\n        \"docs/INTEROP_GUIDE.md\",\n        \"docs/PLUGIN_DEVELOPMENT.md\",\n        \"packages/interop/README.md\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"fix(cli): always use 'latest' for @elizaos deps in created projects\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6362,\n      \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n      \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\n- Fixes issue where `elizaos create` fails when CLI is linked from monorepo because packages with version like `1.7.2-alpha.0` couldn't be found on npm\\n- Both build-time and runtime scripts now use `'latest'` for `@elizaos/*` de\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"packages/cli/src/scripts/copy-templates.ts\",\n        \"packages/cli/src/utils/copy-template.ts\",\n        \"packages/cli/tests/integration/local-development.test.ts\",\n        \"packages/cli/tests/utils/copy-template.test.ts\",\n        \".github/workflows/cli-tests.yml\",\n        \"packages/cli/bunfig.toml\",\n        \"packages/cli/tests/commands/update.test.ts\",\n        \"packages/cli/tests/test-timeouts.ts\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"fix(cli): validate directory path in ensureDir to prevent ENOENT error\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6379,\n      \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n      \"body\": \"This PR adds validation to the `ensureDir` function to prevent unclear ENOENT errors when an empty directory path is provided.\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nWhen `ensureDir` was called with an empty string or whitespace-only path, it would attempt to execut\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"packages/cli/src/utils/get-config.ts\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"fix(server): emit MESSAGE_SENT event after sending to central server\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6378,\n      \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n      \"body\": \"This PR fixes #5216 - EventType.MESSAGE_SENT event not being emitted when agent responses are sent to the central server API.\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nThe `sendAgentResponseToBus` function in `packages/server/src/services/message.ts` sends agent respon\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"packages/server/src/services/message.ts\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"docs: add environment variables documentation\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6377,\n      \"type\": \"docs\",\n      \"body\": \"This PR adds comprehensive documentation for server environment variables, addressing #5716.\\n\\n## Summary\\n\\nAdded `docs/environment-variables.md` with detailed documentation for:\\n- `ELIZA_SERVER_AUTH_TOKEN` - API authentication for securing e\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"docs/environment-variables.md\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"fix(cli): load .env files in agent commands for authentication\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6376,\n      \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n      \"body\": \"This PR fixes #5707 - an issue where `elizaos agent` commands would fail when connecting to a remote server that uses `ELIZA_SERVER_AUTH_TOKEN`.\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nWhen running `elizaos agent list` (or other agent commands) against a remote serve\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"packages/cli/src/commands/agent/utils/validation.ts\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"V2.0.0: dynamic execution engine (test if context is going to blown)\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6384,\n      \"type\": \"tests\",\n      \"body\": \"Redo #6113 for 2.0.0, first pass\\n\\n<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->\\n---\\n\\n> [!NOTE]\\n> Introduces a validation-aware, schema-driven prompt execution path and applies it across runtimes and message flows.\\n> \\n> - Adds `dynamic_prompt_exec_from_state`/`dy\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"packages/python/elizaos/runtime.py\",\n        \"packages/python/elizaos/services/message_service.py\",\n        \"packages/python/elizaos/types/__init__.py\",\n        \"packages/python/elizaos/types/state.py\",\n        \"packages/rust/src/runtime.rs\",\n        \"packages/rust/src/services/message_service.rs\",\n        \"packages/rust/src/types/mod.rs\",\n        \"packages/rust/src/types/state.rs\",\n        \"packages/rust/src/types/streaming.rs\",\n        \"packages/typescript/src/runtime.ts\",\n        \"packages/typescript/src/services/message.ts\",\n        \"packages/typescript/src/types/runtime.ts\",\n        \"packages/typescript/src/types/state.ts\",\n        \"packages/typescript/src/types/streaming.ts\",\n        \"packages/typescript/src/utils/streaming.ts\",\n        \"bun.lock\",\n        \"package.json\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"V2.0.0: fixed avatar example and elevenlabs plugin\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6387,\n      \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n      \"body\": \"# Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\nFixes ElevenLabs API integration issues in `examples/avatar` (formerly `vrm` example) and consolidates the project structure.\\r\\n\\r\\n# Risks\\r\\n\\r\\nLow. Changes are isolated to the `examples/avatar` directory and the `plugin-elevenl\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"examples/avatar/README.md\",\n        \"examples/avatar/index.html\",\n        \"examples/avatar/src/App.tsx\",\n        \"examples/vrm/src/App.tsx\",\n        \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/README.md\",\n        \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/README.md\",\n        \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/src/eliza_plugin_elevenlabs/types.py\",\n        \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/tests/conftest.py\",\n        \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/tests/test_types.py\",\n        \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/README.md\",\n        \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/src/services/elevenlabs_service.rs\",\n        \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/src/types.rs\",\n        \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/tests/integration_tests.rs\",\n        \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/tests/tts_integration.rs\",\n        \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/README.md\",\n        \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/package.json\",\n        \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/src/index.browser.ts\",\n        \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/src/index.ts\",\n        \"plugins/plugin-s3-storage/README.md\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"fix(plugin-bootstrap): add null check for runtime.providers\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6473,\n      \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n      \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\n- **Fix**: Add null check for `runtime.providers` in `providersProvider`\\n- **Impact**: Prevents `TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'filter')`\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nWhen `runtime.providers` is `null` or `undefined`, the c\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/providers.ts\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"fix: add null checks to Object.entries calls in settings utilities\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6471,\n      \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n      \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\nThis PR adds defensive null/undefined checks before Object.entries() calls in the @elizaos/core package's settings utilities to prevent runtime errors.\\n\\n## Changes\\n\\n### packages/core/src/settings.ts\\n\\nAdded null/undefined guards \",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"packages/core/src/settings.ts\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"chore(examples-art): v2 update dependencies, training pipeline, and tests for 2048 game\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6461,\n      \"type\": \"tests\",\n      \"body\": \"# Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\nRelated to ART (Agentic Reinforcement Training) example improvements for v2.0.0\\r\\n\\r\\n# Risks\\r\\n\\r\\nLow. Changes are isolated to the `examples/art` directory and root `.gitignore`. Only adds new dependencies, enhances existing fun\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \".gitignore\",\n        \"examples/art/.gitignore\",\n        \"examples/art/README.md\",\n        \"examples/art/elizaos_art/games/game_2048/__init__.py\",\n        \"examples/art/elizaos_art/games/game_2048/cli.py\",\n        \"examples/art/elizaos_art/trainer.py\",\n        \"examples/art/pyproject.toml\",\n        \"examples/art/tests/test_games.py\",\n        \"examples/art/tests/test_integration.py\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"feat(core): add request context for per-user entity settings\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6457,\n      \"type\": \"feature\",\n      \"body\": \"## Summary\\n- Adds `RequestContext` using AsyncLocalStorage to propagate per-request entity settings\\n- Enables runtime methods to access the originating entity context without explicit parameter passing\\n- Includes helper methods: `withEntity\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"packages/core/src/__tests__/request-context.test.ts\",\n        \"packages/core/src/__tests__/runtime-request-context.test.ts\",\n        \"packages/core/src/index.node.ts\",\n        \"packages/core/src/index.ts\",\n        \"packages/core/src/request-context.node.ts\",\n        \"packages/core/src/request-context.ts\",\n        \"packages/core/src/runtime.ts\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"chore(deps): bump the cargo group across 3 directories with 3 updates\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6479,\n      \"type\": \"other\",\n      \"body\": \"Bumps the cargo group with 1 update in the /packages/computeruse directory: [bytes](https://github.com/tokio-rs/bytes).\\nBumps the cargo group with 1 update in the /packages/rust directory: [bytes](https://github.com/tokio-rs/bytes).\\nBumps t\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"packages/computeruse/Cargo.lock\",\n        \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-cli/Cargo.toml\",\n        \"packages/rust/Cargo.lock\",\n        \"packages/sweagent/rust/Cargo.lock\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"chore(deps): bump the npm_and_yarn group across 3 directories with 3 updates\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6478,\n      \"type\": \"other\",\n      \"body\": \"Bumps the npm_and_yarn group with 1 update in the /packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent directory: [@modelcontextprotocol/sdk](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk).\\nBumps the npm_and_yarn group with 1 update \",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/package-lock.json\",\n        \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/package.json\",\n        \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/tests/integration/package-lock.json\",\n        \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/tests/integration/package.json\",\n        \"packages/computeruse/examples/mcp-client-elicitation/package-lock.json\",\n        \"packages/computeruse/examples/mcp-client-elicitation/package.json\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"feat(plugin-bootstrap): comprehensive optimization and robustness imp\u2026\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6476,\n      \"type\": \"feature\",\n      \"body\": \"\u2026rovements\\r\\n\\r\\nThis commit merges critical performance optimizations, caching improvements, and robustness enhancements while preserving type safety improvements from upstream.\\r\\n\\r\\n## New Features\\r\\n- Added plugin initialization banner with co\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"bun.lock\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/banner.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/evaluators/reflection.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/index.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/actionState.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/actions.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/anxiety.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/attachments.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/character.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/choice.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/entities.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/evaluators.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/index.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/plugin-info.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/recentMessages.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/relationships.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/roles.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/settings.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/shared-cache.ts\",\n        \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/world.ts\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"feat: ActionFilterService \u2014 vector search + BM25 reranking for action/provider filtering\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6475,\n      \"type\": \"feature\",\n      \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\n- Adds `ActionFilterService` that dynamically filters which actions are shown to the LLM based on relevance, reducing prompt bloat from 200+ actions to ~15 relevant ones\\n- Two-tier ranking: vector search (cosine similarity on em\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"packages/typescript/src/__tests__/action-filter.test.ts\",\n        \"packages/typescript/src/bootstrap/index.ts\",\n        \"packages/typescript/src/bootstrap/providers/actions.ts\",\n        \"packages/typescript/src/runtime.ts\",\n        \"packages/typescript/src/services/action-filter.ts\",\n        \"packages/typescript/src/services/bm25.ts\",\n        \"packages/typescript/src/services/cosine-similarity.ts\",\n        \"packages/typescript/src/types/plugin.ts\"\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"title\": \"chore(changelog): remove references\",\n      \"prNumber\": 6495,\n      \"type\": \"other\",\n      \"body\": \"## Summary\\r\\n- remove all references from `CHANGELOG.md`\\r\\n\\r\\n## Testing\\r\\n- not run (content-only change)\\r\\n\",\n      \"files\": [\n        \"CHANGELOG.md\"\n      ]\n    }\n  ],\n  \"topContributors\": [\n    {\n      \"username\": \"standujar\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16385918?u=718bdcd1585be8447bdfffb8c11ce249baa7532d&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 439.178585524873,\n      \"prScore\": 433.778585524873,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 5,\n      \"commentScore\": 0.4,\n      \"summary\": \"standujar: Focused on enhancing the stability and functionality of the n8n-workflow plugin, notably improving multi-step loop control by introducing the awaitingUserInput flag in PR #13. They addressed critical integration issues by ensuring cloud compatibility through state management updates in PR #12 and standardizing success status reporting across all action callbacks in PR #11 (+388/-40 lines). Additionally, they streamlined the development lifecycle by automating node crawling in the publish workflow (PR #10) and integrating the plugin into the project's tracked repositories. Their work this month primarily centered on bug fixes and feature development for workflow automation, with a strong emphasis on code reliability and CI/CD improvements.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"odilitime\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16395496?u=c9bac48e632aae594a0d85aaf9e9c9c69b674d8b&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 348.29516101795406,\n      \"prScore\": 348.29516101795406,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"odilitime: Focused on enhancing core system stability and performance within the elizaos/eliza repository, most notably through a comprehensive optimization of the bootstrap plugin in PR #6476 (+2,119/-823 lines). This significant contribution involved modifying 30 files to implement robust architectural improvements and feature enhancements. Additionally, they addressed critical resource management by submitting a fix for a memory leak in the bootstrap cache via PR #6477. Their work this month demonstrates a balanced focus on large-scale feature optimization and essential bug fixing to ensure long-term system reliability.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"lalalune\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/18633264?u=e2e906c3712c2506ebfa98df01c2cfdc50050b30&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 326.03058181605707,\n      \"prScore\": 325.25258181605705,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0.7779999999999999,\n      \"summary\": \"lalalune: Focused on expanding core infrastructure and cross-chain capabilities, notably implementing a multi-provider RPC system in elizaos-plugins/plugin-evm (#25) and cloud proxy routing for Solana services (#26). They delivered a significant architectural enhancement with the ActionFilterService in elizaos/eliza (#6475), which introduced vector search and BM25 reranking to improve action selection. Their work involved a massive scale of code modifications across over 4,500 files, signaling a deep involvement in systemic refactors and next-generation multi-language support. Overall, their contributions centered on infrastructure scalability, authentication frameworks, and enhancing the developer experience through CLI and documentation improvements.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"greptile-apps\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 231.84,\n      \"prScore\": 0,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 229.5,\n      \"commentScore\": 2.34,\n      \"summary\": \"greptile-apps: Focused exclusively on providing feedback and technical oversight through 28 reviews and 5 pull request comments. Despite no direct code changes or merged pull requests this month, they maintained a high level of engagement in the review process to ensure code quality across the codebase. Their primary impact was centered on collaborative peer review and providing detailed commentary on open contributions.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"0xbbjoker\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54844437?u=90fe1762420de6ad493a1c1582f1f70c0d87d8e2&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 157.03108022381605,\n      \"prScore\": 155.03108022381605,\n      \"issueScore\": 2,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"0xbbjoker: Focused on maintenance and stability by addressing technical debt through targeted bugfix work. They contributed a single commit that modified three files, resulting in a balanced set of nine additions and eight deletions. This activity reflects a precise approach to resolving existing issues within the codebase. Their primary focus for the month was dedicated entirely to bugfix efforts across various file types.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"h1-hunt\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/260165794?u=73efc04d5c05a1af9903686d9bb90265cc06ab45&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 135.1498814312321,\n      \"prScore\": 121.2118814312321,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 13.5,\n      \"commentScore\": 0.43799999999999994,\n      \"summary\": \"h1-hunt: Focused on expanding ecosystem capabilities through the development of new integrations, contributing over 1,400 lines of code across several open feature pull requests. Their primary impact involved introducing the Signet plugin for onchain advertising (#6491) and the Mint Club V2 plugin for bonding curve token trading (#6497, #6498). Additionally, they supported the development cycle by providing three technical reviews on active pull requests. Their work this month centered on a balanced mix of feature implementation and bugfixes, with a heavy emphasis on configuration and core code for decentralized finance and advertising plugins.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"anchapin\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6326294?u=2864a5f885294da5b54b95865b6bf6b82781e688&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 72.99868671293827,\n      \"prScore\": 72.99868671293827,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"anchapin: Focused on enhancing system stability by implementing defensive programming patterns across the elizaos/eliza codebase. They successfully merged two key bugfix PRs, including #6471 and #6473, which introduced critical null and undefined checks to prevent runtime errors in the settings utility and bootstrap plugin. Their work this month was primarily dedicated to bugfix activities, with a significant portion of their technical contributions involving configuration and code refinements to ensure more robust data handling.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"kaiclawd\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/257877415?u=2c8763bb75f5fd07b37a1939903a8b557dd7a46f&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 59.475878208526346,\n      \"prScore\": 59.475878208526346,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": null\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"borisudovicic\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/31806472?u=8935f4d43fd7e4eb9bf5ff92d54d4d2f8ac8a786&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 56,\n      \"prScore\": 0,\n      \"issueScore\": 56,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"borisudovicic: Focused on driving the architectural roadmap and infrastructure readiness for the Eliza App MVP launch, creating 31 issues to coordinate critical tasks across cloud integrations and user experience. They played a key role in defining infrastructure requirements for Telegram and Discord deployments (#6425, #6424), secrets management (#6410), and the implementation of a multi-tenant serverless architecture (#6415). Their contributions also spanned essential product milestones, including the rollout of OAuth providers (#6437), billing system integration (#6445), and performance optimizations to address cold start latency (#6450). Overall, their activity centered on high-level project management, infrastructure provisioning, and security auditing to ensure a stable pre-launch environment.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"buzzbysolcex\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/259807261?v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 51.22425149251019,\n      \"prScore\": 50.78625149251019,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0.43799999999999994,\n      \"summary\": null\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"yaooooooooooooooo\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/62118705?v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 43.5437738965761,\n      \"prScore\": 43.5437738965761,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": null\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"decentralize-dfw\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/115695363?u=858e729376e39f7d94ec1907637812ec3b9ca575&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 43.5437738965761,\n      \"prScore\": 43.5437738965761,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": null\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"2-A-M\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/96268540?u=b7d92c0e2a91af580d09eeae862eef576955ab8a&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 36.63501911726088,\n      \"prScore\": 36.63501911726088,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"2-A-M: Focused on critical bug fixes and feature enhancements within the Twitter plugin, notably resolving an authentication retry loop and implementing media upload capabilities via PR #48. This substantial contribution involved modifying 12 files and adding over 5,200 lines of code, demonstrating a high level of effort in stabilizing and expanding the plugin's core functionality. The work was completed efficiently with a 10-hour turnaround time to merge, ensuring immediate impact on the repository's reliability. Their primary focus this month was entirely dedicated to bugfix work and technical improvements within the elizaos-plugins/plugin-twitter codebase.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"hanzlamateen\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10975502?u=53f23921078d9a27d96751373bb44f4bd2d58bf4&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 34.39669771918965,\n      \"prScore\": 34.39669771918965,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"hanzlamateen: Focused on infrastructure and dependency management within the elizaos/eliza repository, notably executing a significant update to the v2 dependencies and training pipeline in PR #6461. This extensive effort involved modifying over 7,000 files, signaling a major synchronization of the project's codebase and build environment. Their work demonstrated a balanced technical approach, incorporating bug fixes, refactoring, and test updates to ensure system stability. Overall, their contributions this month centered on large-scale maintenance and foundational improvements to the project's examples and training architecture.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"Fankouzu\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8297296?u=bfe40f2d2a88d01f2092e44db726b11c0608b657&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 34.0207738965761,\n      \"prScore\": 34.0207738965761,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": null\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"bytes0xcr6\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/102038261?u=45bcd82b0f6cc2f6c6f8db5bdc01949b3afe7560&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 23.546573590279973,\n      \"prScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 9,\n      \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n      \"summary\": \"bytes0xcr6: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's capabilities by integrating transaction validation services through the addition of the @proofgate/eliza-plugin to the registry via PR #254. In addition to this feature work, they contributed to the development process by providing two code reviews and engaging in technical discussions on pull requests. Their activity this month was centered on configuration management and enhancing plugin availability within the elizaos-plugins repository.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"erdGeclaw\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258411179?u=4607f14fd9d7eb4b4e6d2c26964d37b47937a49c&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 22.034212794122055,\n      \"prScore\": 22.034212794122055,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"erdGeclaw: Focused on expanding ecosystem integrations by initiating the addition of the Base L2 smart money signals plugin to the registry. This contribution, currently tracked in open PR #253, aims to integrate @erdgecrawl/plugin-base-signals into the elizaos-plugins repository. Their primary focus this month has been on enhancing signal-based functionality within the Base L2 environment.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"mcp97\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/15067321?v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 21.901026915173976,\n      \"prScore\": 21.901026915173976,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"mcp97: Focused on documentation maintenance and repository cleanup within the elizaos/eliza codebase. Their primary contribution involved streamlining the project's history by removing unnecessary references in the changelog via PR #6495. This work resulted in the modification of four files, demonstrating a clear focus on documentation accuracy and administrative consistency.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"kamiyo-ai\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/197570892?u=0d1ee66bdde083d3cfa339f7b2dfc1c2e8fee2fd&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 21.18304826901074,\n      \"prScore\": 20.64304826901074,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0.54,\n      \"summary\": \"kamiyo-ai: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's capabilities by initiating the integration of a new plugin into the registry. They submitted a configuration update to add the kamiyo-trust plugin via PR #258 in the elizaos-plugins/registry repository. Their primary focus this month was on ecosystem expansion and plugin registration.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"arthur-orderly\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258538952?v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n      \"prScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"arthur-orderly: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's trading capabilities by integrating the Arthur DEX plugin into the registry. They successfully merged PR #256 in elizaos-plugins/registry, which enables Orderly Network perpetual trading functionality. This contribution highlights a primary focus on ecosystem configuration and the integration of decentralized exchange services.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"0xKairo\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258482051?u=1b8329700a063d57382def591660e68809952a16&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n      \"prScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"0xKairo: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's integration capabilities by successfully registering a new plugin for AI agent transaction guarantees. They facilitated the addition of the @proofgate/eliza-plugin via PR #257 in the elizaos-plugins/registry repository. This contribution highlights a primary focus on feature work and configuration management to enhance the platform's utility.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"ATHLSolutions\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6761719?u=3517709343c7ed9e4e80cd95304fff0c357e58e0&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 14,\n      \"prScore\": 14,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"ATHLSolutions: No activity this month.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"dontonon\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/22495678?v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 13.234147180559946,\n      \"prScore\": 13.234147180559946,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": null\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"10inchdev\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/226776904?u=f8556423cfa0bd4464d64395c6c0d526050ba553&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 12.874147180559946,\n      \"prScore\": 12.874147180559946,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"10inchdev: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's service offerings by integrating the MoltBazaar plugin into the registry. They successfully merged PR #255, which adds the AI Agent Job Marketplace on Base to the elizaos-plugins/registry. This contribution involved precise configuration updates to ensure the new marketplace is properly indexed and accessible. Their primary focus this month was on ecosystem expansion through configuration management.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"a692570\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/182830946?u=fbc711137880cd843fea4b3b9f00013d07d40fd6&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 10.997573590279972,\n      \"prScore\": 10.997573590279972,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"a692570: Focused on expanding the project's documentation by initiating a new integration guide for ClawdTalk voice calling. This work is currently captured in open PR #6489 within the elizaos/eliza repository. Their primary focus this month has been on enhancing developer resources and supporting third-party voice service integrations.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"lawyered0\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4802498?u=f45773fb7440d77e5c12ea1560122dd6d26632eb&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 10.40435169073515,\n      \"prScore\": 10.40435169073515,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"lawyered0: Focused on improving the robustness of trust evaluation processing by addressing a bug in the elizaos-plugins/plugin-trust repository. They authored PR #1 to handle plain-text trust evaluation requests, contributing 46 lines of code and associated tests to ensure reliable input parsing. This work demonstrates a clear focus on bugfix stability and test coverage within the plugin's core logic.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"puncar-dev\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/72890404?v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 8,\n      \"prScore\": 0,\n      \"issueScore\": 8,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"puncar-dev: Focused on architectural planning and feature proposals for the elizaos/eliza repository by opening four strategic issues. They outlined a comprehensive whitelisting and leaderboard system (#6469), a community-driven news injection system (#6466), and a feedback mechanism for NPC prompts (#6465). Additionally, they proposed optimizations for AI model usage during the coding process (#6467), demonstrating a primary focus on system design and community engagement features.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"jasonxkensei\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/260305565?u=b17387a9077530191e297ff256d49d9a14c47194&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 6.557573590279973,\n      \"prScore\": 6.557573590279973,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": null\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"samarth30\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/48334430?u=1fc119a6c2deb8cf60448b4c8961cb21dc69baeb&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 4,\n      \"prScore\": 0,\n      \"issueScore\": 4,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": null\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"aite550659-max\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258900948?v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 4,\n      \"prScore\": 0,\n      \"issueScore\": 4,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"aite550659-max: Focused on proposing architectural enhancements for the elizaos/eliza repository by initiating the integration of a Verifiable Audit Trail Plugin (VAL). They documented this new feature through the creation of two open issues (#6499, #6500) to outline the plugin's implementation. Their primary focus this month was on defining the requirements for verifiable auditing within the ecosystem.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"thewoweffect\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/113222443?u=cb21d15b0ce815d0f68167f2eca236aad6c64598&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 2.3000000000000003,\n      \"prScore\": 0,\n      \"issueScore\": 2.1,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n      \"summary\": \"thewoweffect: Focused on identifying and documenting system inefficiencies within the elizaos/eliza repository. They notably reported a bug regarding duplicate LLM calls triggered by URLs in messages (#6486) and engaged in the subsequent discussion to help resolve the issue. Their primary focus this month was on improving application reliability through bug reporting and issue triage.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"saoirse102345-blip\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258542122?v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 2,\n      \"prScore\": 0,\n      \"issueScore\": 2,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"saoirse102345-blip: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's capabilities by proposing a new architectural direction for financial transactions. They initiated a feature request for a Payment Infrastructure Plugin to enable agent-to-agent and agent-to-user payments within the elizaos/eliza repository (#6443). This contribution highlights a strategic focus on developing core utility and financial interoperability for the platform.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"rookdaemon\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258400181?u=f806b5798e056f9384e53da900fdcd3d7bc24c14&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 2,\n      \"prScore\": 0,\n      \"issueScore\": 2,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": null\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"mbatini\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/34915878?v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 2,\n      \"prScore\": 0,\n      \"issueScore\": 2,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": null\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"fiv3fingers\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/59544796?u=58c2849a3bd9087a4d2e0a5d31ba3cba75babfd6&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 2,\n      \"prScore\": 0,\n      \"issueScore\": 2,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"fiv3fingers: Focused on expanding the security capabilities of the platform by proposing the integration of a new audit module. They initiated this effort by opening issue #6468 in elizaos/eliza to advocate for the addition of an EVM audit module. Their primary focus this month was on architectural planning and security enhancements within the EVM ecosystem.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"coolRoger\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/33861624?u=ae40d02de875befc512751127f1082a22b464264&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 2,\n      \"prScore\": 0,\n      \"issueScore\": 2,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"coolRoger: Focused on expanding integration flexibility by identifying a need for custom OpenAI endpoint support. They initiated a feature request in elizaos/eliza (#6490) to allow for greater configuration options within the OpenAI provider. Their primary focus this month was on architectural feedback and enhancing the extensibility of the platform's API connections.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"basedmereum\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/223933470?v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 2,\n      \"prScore\": 0,\n      \"issueScore\": 2,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"basedmereum: Focused on expanding ecosystem capabilities by proposing the integration of the SOLPRISM plugin for verifiable AI reasoning on Solana. This contribution was initiated through the creation of issue #6454 in the elizaos/eliza repository. Their primary focus this month was on architectural planning for blockchain-based AI verification.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"JKHeadley\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12631935?u=e1a3e2005973fbf5526f5dccd04b6310e2476946&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 2,\n      \"prScore\": 0,\n      \"issueScore\": 2,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0,\n      \"summary\": \"JKHeadley: Focused on ecosystem expansion and strategic integration by proposing the MoltBridge Trust & Discovery Layer as an enhancement for the Eliza framework. This contribution, detailed in issue elizaos/eliza#6501, outlines a path for improving discovery and trust mechanisms within the project. Their primary focus this month was on architectural planning and integration proposals.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"username\": \"tdnupe3\",\n      \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/25161668?u=94680b6bcbcfce954c7a9dd09d667a3919953041&v=4\",\n      \"totalScore\": 0.2,\n      \"prScore\": 0,\n      \"issueScore\": 0,\n      \"reviewScore\": 0,\n      \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n      \"summary\": null\n    }\n  ],\n  \"newPRs\": 35,\n  \"mergedPRs\": 18,\n  \"newIssues\": 41,\n  \"closedIssues\": 65,\n  \"activeContributors\": 34\n}\n---\n2026-02-22T08:46:59.278327+00:00Z\n---\n2026-02-22\n---\nelizaOS/knowledge\n---\nelizaOS\n---\nknowledge\n---\nai_news_elizaos_discord_md_2026-02-21\n---\nai_news_elizaos_discord_md_2026-02-20\n---\nai_news_elizaos_discord_md_2026-02-19\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_json_2026-02-21\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_md_2026-02-21\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_discord_json_2026-02-21\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_discord_md_2026-02-21\n---\ngithub_summaries_week_latest_2026-02-15.md\n---\ngithub_summaries_month_latest_2026-02-01.md\n---\ngithub_summaries_daily_2026-02-22"
  ]
}