{ "prompt_name": "user-feedback", "category": "comms", "date": "2026-02-21", "generated_text": "## User Feedback Analysis \u2014 2026-02-21\n\n### 1) Pain Point Categorization (Top recurring 5\u20137)\n\n**Dataset note (quantification basis):** ~18 distinct user-reported concerns/questions across Discord (Feb 18\u201320) + GitHub issues (Feb). Percentages below are approximate share of distinct concerns.\n\n#### A. UX/UI (\u224817\u201322% of concerns; high severity for Cloud usability)\n- **Broken scrolling in ElizaCloud dashboard (especially API Explorer)**: mousepad scrolling fails; users must drag a barely-visible scrollbar. (Reported by **DorianD**)\n- **Low discoverability of critical UI controls**: \u201chard-to-see scrollbar\u201d implies poor contrast/affordance and blocks basic navigation.\n\n#### B. Technical Functionality (\u224828\u201333%; high severity due to \u201cit doesn\u2019t work\u201d failures)\n- **API Explorer \u201cSend request\u201d fails with `api key is required` even when key appears present** (ElizaCloud). (Reported by **DorianD**)\n- **Duplicate LLM calls when message contains a URL (webapp)** causing duplicated output and ~2x cost. (GitHub issue **#6486** by **thewoweffect**, still open)\n- **Media handling regressions in Cloud chat pipeline** (image content stripped) \u2014 fixed/closed, but indicates fragility in message conversion layers. (GitHub issue **#6494**, closed)\n\n#### C. Documentation (\u224828\u201333%; medium-to-high severity because it blocks onboarding + increases support load)\n- **BYOK ambiguity (\u201cuse a different key\u201d)**: users can\u2019t tell if this supports OpenAI/OpenRouter-style bring-your-own-key. (Asked by **DorianD**, unanswered)\n- **Pricing transparency gaps**: request for **per-model price breakdown in-dashboard** to understand costs. (Requested by **DorianD**)\n- **Token/chain clarity requests**: users repeatedly asked whether **Milady on BNB vs Solana** are both valid. (Asked twice by **alex_wukar**, unanswered)\n- **Contract address discoverability**: repeated requests for ElizaOS contract address suggest information is not surfaced well. (Feb 19 thread)\n\n#### D. Community / Support Process (\u224817\u201322%; high severity for trust + retention)\n- **No clear support/ticket path for high-stakes issues (migration/coins)**: user fears losing coins during migration and doesn\u2019t know where to go; guidance was \u201cpost publicly,\u201d not a resolution workflow. (Raised by **shepa777**; response by **Kenk**)\n- **No formal \u201ccollab proposal\u201d intake**: users ask where to open a proposal ticket; told \u201cno ticket system.\u201d (Q by **YoungOldman**, A by **Kenk**)\n\n#### E. Communication (\u224822\u201328%; high severity due to reputational impact)\n- **Fragmented leadership updates**: Shaw posts AI/dev updates on Twitter and crypto updates on Farcaster; users must monitor both to stay informed. (Explained by **Odilitime**)\n- **Partner communications called out as weak** causing \u201cunnecessary negative sentiment\u201d among influential partner groups. (\ud83e\udd47-partners channel)\n- **Expectation mismatch post-incidents (Autofun/Twitter)**: users explicitly ask what happened to promised marketing/lawsuit and broader follow-through. (Feb 20 general discussion)\n\n#### F. Integration (\u224811\u201317%; medium severity, high leverage for adoption)\n- **Custom OpenAI endpoint not supported** (blocks OpenAI-compatible providers like SiliconFlow). (GitHub issue **#6490**, open)\n- **BYOK expectations** in Cloud UI align with broader ecosystem patterns (OpenRouter), but behavior is unclear and possibly unsupported.\n\n#### G. Performance / Cost Control (\u224811\u201317%; high severity when it doubles cost)\n- **URL-triggered duplicate calls** directly increases LLM spend and degrades UX. (Issue **#6486**)\n- Repeated cost sensitivity signals: dashboard pricing breakdown request + duplication bug + scenario \u201cCost Evaluator\u201d work in repo history indicate users are actively managing spend.\n\n---\n\n### 2) Usage Pattern Analysis (Actual vs intended use)\n\n**Observed \u201cactual usage\u201d patterns**\n- **ElizaCloud as an API-first experimentation surface**: users treat the Cloud dashboard/API Explorer like Postman/Swagger for quick validation (e.g., \u201cSend request\u201d testing), and failures here are \u201chard blockers.\u201d\n- **Plugin ecosystem as the primary extension mechanism**: repeated guidance to \u201cbuild a plugin\u201d for service integrations; developers actively discuss plugin compatibility and workflow automation (milady assistant, n8n workflows).\n- **Agents used for crypto/security and on-chain workflows**: rugpull detection live testing (Solana), chain/token validation questions, and on-chain identity work (SAID) show strong Web3-first adoption.\n- **Community expects \u201clive agents\u201d to demonstrate capabilities**: users ask if there is still a live Eliza agent that can answer questions about the latest codebase\u2014suggesting demos/support agents are a major discovery/onboarding channel.\n\n**Emerging / unexpected use cases**\n- **Real-time risk detection systems** (Vlt9\u2019s rugpull detector) as a flagship \u201cagent utility\u201d narrative: detection \u201c~2 hours before crashes\u201d is the kind of concrete win users can rally around and replicate.\n- **Agentic workflow orchestration**: discussions around \u201cAgentic AI-to-workflow integration\u201d and n8n plugin fixes indicate users want robust automation, not just chat.\n\n**Feature requests aligned with observed patterns**\n- **BYOK + custom endpoints**: matches how builders assemble stacks across multiple providers.\n- **Cost transparency**: per-model prices in UI + cost evaluator tooling aligns with experimentation and budget control.\n- **Multi-agent coordination / cross-instance communication**: matches power-user needs for orchestrated systems (mentioned in dev progress discussions).\n\n---\n\n### 3) Implementation Opportunities (Concrete solutions per major pain point)\n\n#### 1) ElizaCloud dashboard scrolling + UI affordance issues (UX/UI)\n**Solutions**\n1. **Fix scroll container + event handling (high impact / low-to-medium effort)** \n - Audit CSS overflow containers and pointer/trackpad wheel listeners on `/dashboard/api-explorer`. \n - Add automated UI regression tests for scroll (Playwright/Cypress: wheel, trackpad emulation).\n2. **Make scrollbar visible and accessible (high impact / low effort)** \n - Increase contrast, width on hover, and ensure OS-level scrollbars are respected. \n - Add \u201cScroll to section\u201d anchors or sticky navigation in API Explorer.\n3. **Add an in-app \u201cReport a UI bug\u201d capture (medium impact / low effort)** \n - Attach page URL, browser, viewport, and a screenshot prompt.\n\n**Comparable approaches**\n- Many API consoles (e.g., Swagger UI / Redoc deployments) avoid nested scrolling regions; they keep a single main scroll container to prevent trackpad capture bugs.\n\n#### 2) \u201cSend request\u201d returning `api key is required` despite key present (Technical Functionality)\n**Solutions**\n1. **Instrument request building + display the effective auth state (high impact / medium effort)** \n - Show \u201cAuth: using key ending in \u20261234\u201d and which header is sent (e.g., `Authorization: Bearer` vs `x-api-key`). \n - Log a client-side diagnostic event when request is blocked/401.\n2. **Add a \u201cTest authentication\u201d endpoint + UI check (high impact / low effort)** \n - One-click: validates current key, returns account/org + permissions. \n3. **Add contract tests between UI and gateway (medium impact / medium effort)** \n - Prevent UI showing a key \u201cpresent\u201d while backend expects a different storage location/field.\n\n**Comparable approaches**\n- Postman/Insomnia-style consoles surface \u201cAuth mode\u201d explicitly and warn when a variable is unset.\n\n#### 3) BYOK ambiguity + custom endpoint requests (Documentation + Integration)\n**Solutions**\n1. **Document BYOK behavior directly in the UI (high impact / low effort)** \n - Tooltip next to \u201cuse a different key\u201d: what providers are supported, how keys are stored, security model, and what features change (billing, rate limits, logging).\n2. **Implement provider config: `baseURL` for OpenAI-compatible endpoints (high impact / medium effort)** \n - Address GitHub **#6490** with a standard \u201cOpenAI-compatible\u201d mode (`OPENAI_BASE_URL`). \n3. **Align Cloud UI wording with actual capability (high impact / low effort)** \n - If BYOK isn\u2019t supported yet, rename control to avoid OpenRouter-like expectation (e.g., \u201cSwitch ElizaCloud key\u201d vs \u201cUse your own key\u201d).\n\n**Comparable approaches**\n- OpenRouter and many OSS clients (e.g., OpenAI-compatible SDK wrappers) standardize on `baseURL`/`apiBase` configs.\n\n#### 4) Pricing transparency gaps (Documentation / UX)\n**Solutions**\n1. **Add per-model pricing table in dashboard (high impact / low effort)** \n - Include input/output token rates, last updated timestamp, and billing source of truth.\n2. **Add an estimated-cost preview in API Explorer (medium impact / medium effort)** \n - Show \u201cestimated tokens/cost\u201d after response (ties into cost sensitivity signals).\n3. **Expose pricing via a versioned endpoint (medium impact / low effort)** \n - Enables community tools and reduces repeated questions.\n\n**Comparable approaches**\n- Cloud platforms (e.g., Vercel, Render) reduce billing confusion by showing unit pricing next to usage graphs and API calls.\n\n#### 5) Migration + token confusion + \u201clost coins\u201d fear (Community + Documentation)\n**Solutions**\n1. **Create a single \u201cMigration & Token Canonical Info\u201d page (high impact / low effort)** \n - What token is what, contract addresses, deadlines, post-deadline options, and common scams. \n2. **Add a dedicated support intake for migration issues (high impact / medium effort)** \n - Simple form \u2192 generates a tracking ID; publish SLA expectations. \n3. **Pinned Discord message + bot command (high impact / low effort)** \n - `/contract`, `/migration`, `/milady-chain` commands reduce repeat Qs.\n\n**Comparable approaches**\n- Many crypto projects reduce support chaos with a pinned \u201cofficial contracts + migration steps\u201d message plus an automated bot command and a single canonical webpage.\n\n#### 6) Communication fragmentation (Communication)\n**Solutions**\n1. **Weekly \u201csingle source of truth\u201d changelog in Discord + website (high impact / low effort)** \n - Auto-aggregate Twitter/Farcaster updates into one post (even if originals remain separate).\n2. **Partner update cadence + point-of-contact map (high impact / medium effort)** \n - A lightweight \u201cpartner newsletter\u201d and a clear escalation path prevents negative sentiment spirals.\n3. **Roadmap reality check: explicitly label what\u2019s shipped vs planned (medium impact / low effort)** \n - Reduces \u201cpromised marketing/lawsuit\u201d confusion by separating speculation from commitments.\n\n**Comparable approaches**\n- OSS projects often run \u201cweekly ship notes\u201d (Kubernetes-style summaries) and keep one canonical roadmap page.\n\n---\n\n### 4) Communication Gaps (Expectations vs reality)\n\n- **BYOK expectation vs unclear implementation**: users interpret \u201cuse a different key\u201d as OpenRouter-style BYOK; lack of answer suggests mismatch or missing docs.\n- **Where updates happen**: having to monitor both Twitter and Farcaster is a repeated friction point; users miss updates and assume \u201cno updates.\u201d\n- **Support expectations**: users with migration fear expect a private/support workflow; being told to \u201cpost publicly\u201d increases anxiety and reduces trust.\n- **\u201cLive agent\u201d expectation**: users look for an always-available agent that answers questions about the latest codebase; absence (or unclear presence) becomes an onboarding gap.\n\n**Targeted documentation/onboarding improvements**\n- Add a **\u201cStart here\u201d support map**: Bugs (GitHub), Cloud issues (form/Linear/Jira), migration/token (dedicated page + intake), partnerships (named channel + POC).\n- Add a **Cloud API Explorer help panel**: auth modes, BYOK explanation, pricing link, and \u201cknown issues\u201d banner.\n\n---\n\n### 5) Community Engagement Insights\n\n**Power users / high-signal contributors and their needs**\n- **DorianD**: performs exploratory QA on ElizaCloud; needs a clear bug reporting path, faster acknowledgment loops, and visibility into fixes.\n- **Odilitime**: acting as primary community responder; needs tooling (macros, bot commands, pinned canon) to reduce repetitive support.\n- **Vlt9**: shipping real-world agent utility (rugpull detection) and documentation; needs a distribution path (case study, repo template, integration guide) to turn it into an ecosystem reference.\n- **Kenk**: provides process guidance (plugins, posting publicly); would benefit from a formalized \u201chow to collaborate\u201d doc to point users to.\n\n**Common newcomer questions indicating onboarding friction**\n- Contract addresses / token identity confusion ($ai6z vs $elizaos)\n- Migration deadline and recovery options\n- \u201cWhere do I contact Shaw / where are updates?\u201d\n- \u201cIs there a ticket system for collabs/support?\u201d\n\n**Converting passive users into contributors**\n- Create a **\u201cCloud QA program\u201d**: lightweight template + recognition for reproducible bug reports (DorianD-like behavior).\n- Publish **plugin bounties** (small, well-scoped) and label GitHub issues \u201cgood first plugin.\u201d\n- Host a short weekly **office hours** session focused on (1) Cloud issues triage, (2) plugin help, (3) migration support.\n\n---\n\n### 6) Feedback Collection Improvements\n\n**Current channel effectiveness**\n- **Discord** is generating many high-value signals, but issues get **left unanswered** (BYOK, Milady chain validity, live agent availability).\n- **GitHub issues** capture technical bugs/feature requests well (duplicate calls, custom endpoint), but many user-facing Cloud issues are reported only in Discord.\n\n**Improvements for more structured, actionable feedback**\n1. **Add an ElizaCloud in-app feedback widget** (page + screenshot + category + severity). \n2. **Create Discord-to-issue bridging**: a bot command that converts a message into a GitHub issue with a template. \n3. **Standardize templates**:\n - Cloud bug report template (browser, OS, repro, expected/actual)\n - Migration support template (wallet, chain, tx hash, deadline context)\n\n**Underrepresented segments**\n- Non-Web3 builders (SaaS/enterprise) are largely absent in this snapshot; their needs (SSO, audit logs, compliance, stability SLAs) may be under-collected.\n- Less-technical users: confusion suggests many are not comfortable self-triaging; current channels assume high context.\n\n---\n\n## Prioritized High-Impact Actions (Next 2\u20134 weeks)\n\n1. **Fix ElizaCloud API Explorer blockers**: scrolling + `api key is required` send-test bug (highest impact, stops adoption immediately). \n2. **Publish canonical \u201cCloud Auth & BYOK\u201d + \u201cPricing per model\u201d in-dashboard** (cuts repeated questions and aligns expectations). \n3. **Create a migration/token single source of truth + support intake** (reduces fear, prevents reputational damage, lowers Discord load). \n4. **Unify communications into a weekly digest posted in Discord + website** (reduces \u201cno updates\u201d perception; helps partners). \n5. **Ship OpenAI-compatible `baseURL` support (GitHub #6490) and prioritize the URL-duplicate-call bug (#6486)** (high leverage for builders and cost control).", "source_references": [ "2026-02-21\n---\n2026-02-20.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-20\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Product Updates & Releases\n\n**Babylon Waitlist Opening**\n- Babylon platform is now accessible to the top 5,000 users on the waitlist, addressing community concerns about product delivery timelines following recent incidents with Autofun and Twitter issues\n\n### ElizaCloud Platform Issues\n\n**Critical UI/UX Bugs Identified**\n- Multiple scrolling functionality issues discovered on ElizaCloud dashboard\n- API explorer page (https://www.elizacloud.ai/dashboard/api-explorer) has broken mousepad scrolling, requiring manual use of a hard-to-see scrollbar\n- Similar scrolling problems affect other dashboard pages\n- \"Send request\" test feature returns \"api key is required\" error despite API key appearing to be present\n\n**Feature Clarity Needed**\n- Questions raised about the \"use a different key\" feature and whether it supports BYOK (Bring Your Own Key) functionality similar to OpenRouter\n- Pricing transparency concerns - users requesting per-model price breakdown in the dashboard\n\n### Communication & Community Management\n\n**Leadership Communication Strategy**\n- Shaw's update distribution clarified: AI/development content posted on Twitter, crypto-related updates shared on Farcaster\n- Community members need to monitor both platforms for complete information\n- Standard contact method for Shaw is using @ mentions in Discord\n\n**Partnership Relations**\n- Weak communications identified as causing unnecessary negative sentiment from influential partner groups\n\n### Developer Community Activity\n\n**Developer Availability**\n- Multiple developers posted availability for project work\n- Expertise areas mentioned: Web3 infrastructure, backend services, security checks, and UX design\n- General development services offered to the community\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Is there a way to get in contact with Shaw here?**\n- A: You can try and @ him, that's what others do *(answered by Odilitime)*\n\n**Q: Where does Shaw post updates?**\n- A: Shaw posts AI/dev content on Twitter and crypto content on Farcaster - need to follow both platforms *(answered by Odilitime)*\n\n**Q: What's the status of Babylon?**\n- A: Babylon is now open to the top 5,000 users on the waitlist *(answered by Odilitime)*\n\n### Unanswered Questions\n\n- Is there still a live Eliza agent that can answer questions about the most recent ElizaOS codebase? *(asked by DorianD)*\n- Does \"use a different key\" mean users can enter their own API keys (like OpenAI key for gpt-4o) similar to OpenRouter BYOK? *(asked by DorianD)*\n- For Milady, we have BNB and Solana - are both valid? *(asked by alex_wukar, asked twice)*\n- How many users still need to migrate? *(asked by Odilitime)*\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**Bug Reporting Process**\n- **Helper:** Odilitime\n- **Helpee:** DorianD\n- **Context:** DorianD conducted informal testing of ElizaCloud dashboard and identified multiple UI/UX issues\n- **Resolution:** Odilitime acknowledged the bug reports and forwarded them to the development team\n\n**Contacting Leadership**\n- **Helper:** Odilitime\n- **Helpee:** k1kkoS\n- **Context:** User needed to contact Shaw\n- **Resolution:** Suggested using @ mentions as the standard method\n\n**Product Updates Clarification**\n- **Helper:** Odilitime\n- **Helpee:** Community (Thanos\ud83d\udca8 and others)\n- **Context:** Concerns about product delivery and communication following recent incidents\n- **Resolution:** Clarified Babylon waitlist status and explained Shaw's multi-platform communication strategy\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n\n- **Fix scrolling functionality on ElizaCloud API explorer page** - mousepad scrolling broken, scrollbar hard to see\n - *Mentioned by: DorianD*\n\n- **Fix \"send request\" test feature** - currently returning \"api key is required\" error when API key appears to be present\n - *Mentioned by: DorianD*\n\n- **Complete migration process** for remaining users\n - *Mentioned by: Odilitime*\n\n### Documentation\n\n- **Add price breakdown per model** in ElizaCloud dashboard for pricing transparency\n - *Mentioned by: DorianD*\n\n- **Clarify functionality of \"use a different key\" feature** - document whether it supports BYOK (Bring Your Own Key)\n - *Mentioned by: DorianD*\n\n- **Provide clarity on Milady token validity** across BNB and Solana chains\n - *Mentioned by: alex_wukar*\n\n### Communication\n\n- **Improve partner communications** to reduce unnecessary negative sentiment from influential groups\n - *Identified in: \ud83e\udd47-partners channel*\n---\n2026-02-19.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-19\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Token Clarification and Migration Issues\n\nA significant portion of discussion centered on confusion between $ai6z and $elizaos tokens. While initially confirmed as the same by community members, Odilitime clarified they are **different contracts** with ai16z worth significantly less than ElizaOS. Multiple users requested the ElizaOS contract address and were directed to the appropriate channel. Concerns were raised about:\n\n- Users who missed the migration deadline seeking options to still migrate\n- Token mintability questions remaining unanswered\n- The rebrand from ai16z to ElizaOS losing \"memetic value\" by switching to a \"non-memetic ticker\" (noted by DorianD)\n\n### Technical Positioning and Comparisons\n\n**ElizaOS vs OpenClaw:** When asked about differences, Odilitime provided concrete technical advantages:\n- ElizaOS performs better on benchmarks\n- Has more connectors available\n- More reliable due to not being self-configuring\n\nThis represents an important technical positioning statement for the project.\n\n### Community Engagement and Demonstrations\n\n- **Babylon Discord Demo:** Odilitime promoted \"the hanging plaza\" as the best current demonstration of agents in action, directing new users interested in learning about agents in human digital spaces\n- **Verification Milestone:** ElizaBAO announced ElizaOS received a golden checkmark verification\n- **Hackathon Entry:** The Milady team submitted an entry on BSC that was shared for community voting\n\n### Market Context and Community Concerns\n\nDiscussion acknowledged the broader crypto winter context, with most assets down 99%. Community members expressed concerns about:\n- Perceived lack of marketing follow-through after autofun issues\n- Questions about ElizaCloud status\n- General market performance of the token\n\n### Project Updates\n\n- **Cultanime Team:** Confirmed to be doing very well when asked about their status\n- **Building Interest:** intrepid expressed interest in building, though no specific project details were discussed\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Is $ai6z and $elizaos the same token?**\nA: No, they are different contracts with ai16z worth significantly less (Odilitime)\n\n**Q: How is this different from OpenClaw?**\nA: ElizaOS performs better on benchmarks, has more connectors, and is more reliable since it's not self-configuring (Odilitime)\n\n**Q: Can I have the contract address of ElizaOS?**\nA: Users were directed to check the appropriate channel for contract information (MDMnvest)\n\n**Q: Is the Cultanime team doing well?**\nA: They're doing very well (Odilitime)\n\n### Unanswered Questions\n\n- Why is Ai16z coin pumping if the new migrated coin is ElizaOS?\n- Why is the token mintable?\n- Is there any way to migrate ai16z after missing the deadline?\n- What happened to the promised marketing and ElizaCloud after autofun issues?\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**Token Information Assistance:**\n- MDMnvest helped multiple users (Yoree, NintyNine) by directing them to appropriate channels for contract addresses and official social media handles\n- Maxx Truant and Farzeen arif initially attempted to help Drizello with token confusion (later corrected by Odilitime)\n\n**Technical Guidance:**\n- Odilitime provided comprehensive help to C0rrupt1 on technical differences between ElizaOS and OpenClaw\n- Odilitime welcomed AIKO444 (new user) and directed them to the Babylon Discord demo for learning about agents\n\n**Resource Sharing:**\n- Odilitime helped Quaser M find Shaw's statement by providing links to relevant channels and fixupx posts\n- dEXploarer shared Twitter/X content, with Wes requesting permission to use it as background imagery\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n- Building interest expressed but needs clarification on specific project or scope (intrepid)\n- Address token migration process for users who missed the deadline (J\u00fcju)\n- Clarify token mintability concerns for ElizaOS (Yoree)\n\n### Documentation\n- Update contract address information in the designated channel for easier access (MDMnvest)\n\n### Feature\n- Address marketing and ElizaCloud roadmap questions raised by community (Thanos\ud83d\udca8)\n\n---\n\n*Note: This summary reflects discussions from the \ud83d\udcac-coders and \ud83d\udcac-discussion channels on February 19, 2026.*\n---\n2026-02-18.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-18\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Development & Technical Integration\n\n**AI Workflow and Plugin Architecture**\nThe development community focused on expanding ElizaOS capabilities through plugin integration and workflow automation. **aicodeflow** initiated discussions around MVP development for Agentic AI-to-workflow integration, seeking collaborators for this development stage. **DigitalDiva** explored plugin compatibility for the milady personal AI assistant project, with **Odilitime** confirming that elizaos plugins can be integrated if they have a next branch available. **Kenk** directed developers to the official plugin creation guide at docs.elizaos.ai/guides/create-a-plugin for those wanting to build services for the ElizaOS ecosystem.\n\n**Mobile and Documentation Tools**\n**jin** announced improvements to mobile support for elizaos.news, enhancing accessibility for the community. **Stan** proposed adopting the HackMD MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration tool for team-wide collaborative note-taking and documentation, aiming to eliminate copy-pasting and facilitate easier sharing among team members.\n\n### Security & Risk Detection\n\n**Solana Rugpull Detection System**\n**Vlt9** reported significant success with their latest live testing system, which successfully identified two major Solana rugpulls approximately 2 hours before their crashes. The system flagged DARKTRUMP as High-Risk while still trading at peak value, and also detected the NVIDIA token rugpull. Full documentation of these test results has been added to their docs, with test keys offered to interested community members.\n\n### Business Development & Partnerships\n\n**Grant Applications and Event Participation**\n**ElizaBAO** shared important business updates, including meetings with Solana Foundation and SuperteamMYR, and announced that Clawlana submitted a Solana Grant application. Regarding EthDenver attendance, **Odilitime** and **ElizaBAO** confirmed that Shaw is participating in ETHBuilder talks at the event. **JP | ChainPatrol** offered to connect via Telegram for coordination.\n\n### Community Projects\n\n**Silverizer23** discussed a Pumpfun Hackathon project's potential impact on the Eliza ecosystem on Solana, while **ElizaBAO** shared promotional links for BSC-related projects.\n\n### User Support Issues\n\n**shepa777** raised concerns about losing coins during a token migration process and sought help finding proper support channels. **Kenk** redirected the inquiry to be posted publicly in the channel rather than through DMs, though the specific migration issue remained unresolved, highlighting a potential gap in support infrastructure.\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: For the milady personal AI assistant, can I use elizaos plugins with that?** \nA: If they have a next branch, yes (answered by **Odilitime**)\n\n**Q: Is your team attending EthDenver this week?** \nA: Shaw is attending and joined the ETHBuilder talk (answered by **Odilitime** and **ElizaBAO**)\n\n**Q: Where to open the collab proposal ticket?** \nA: There is no ticket system for this; if it's a service, build a plugin instead (answered by **Kenk**)\n\n### Unanswered Questions\n\n- Is anyone interested in MVP development or preparing for the Agentic AI-to-workflow integration stage? (asked by **aicodeflow**)\n- Which person should I approach for an AMA collab proposal? (asked by **YoungOldman**)\n- Is there any way to help me with coin migration? I don't want to lose my coins. (asked by **shepa777**)\n- Still interested in a test key for rugpull detection system? (asked by **Vlt9**)\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**Plugin Compatibility Guidance** \n**Odilitime** helped **DigitalDiva** understand plugin compatibility requirements for the milady personal AI assistant project, confirming that elizaos plugins can be used if they have a next branch available.\n\n**Plugin Development Direction** \n**Kenk** assisted **YoungOldman** by clarifying the process for collaboration proposals, explaining that there is no formal ticket system and directing service-related integrations to the plugin development pathway, though this didn't fully address the AMA collaboration request.\n\n**Support Channel Redirection** \n**Kenk** guided **shepa777** to post migration concerns publicly in the channel rather than through DMs, though the specific technical issue remained unresolved.\n\n**Test Key Offers** \n**Vlt9** offered test keys for their rugpull detection system to interested community members, promoting collaborative testing and validation.\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n\n- **MVP development for Agentic AI-to-workflow integration** - Mentioned by **aicodeflow**\n- **Mobile support improvements implemented for elizaos.news** - Mentioned by **jin**\n- **Test key distribution for rugpull detection system** - Mentioned by **Vlt9**\n\n### Documentation\n\n- **Full report added to docs for Solana rugpull detection test results (DARKTRUMP and NVIDIA)** - Mentioned by **Vlt9**\n- **Plugin creation guide available at docs.elizaos.ai/guides/create-a-plugin for service integrations** - Mentioned by **Kenk**\n\n### Feature\n\n- **Evaluate and potentially adopt HackMD MCP tool for team-wide collaborative note-taking and documentation** - Mentioned by **Stan**\n- **Need proper support ticket system for coin migration and user issues** - Mentioned by **shepa777**\n---\n2026-02-20.json\n---\nelizaosDailySummary\n---\nDaily Report - 2026-02-20\n---\nElizaOS Project Status and Community Discussions - February 20, 2026\n---\nCommunity members engaged in extensive discussions about the ElizaOS token and project direction. Key concerns raised included the token's poor performance following the migration from ai16z to elizaOS, with users noting the loss of the original memetic branding around a VC fund led by KOL clones. The tribute model where new agents gave 5-10% to the DAO was discontinued after receiving tokens that couldn't be effectively traded or utilized. DorianD identified three major weaknesses: lack of live agents on social media enabling meaningful stack interaction, communication failures resulting in negative sentiment from influential groups, and insufficient investor excitement due to unclear token utility. The team acknowledged these challenges, with Odilitime stating that if you're here, it's for the long term because recovery will take time. There was consensus that 2026 is a building year with no expectation of major gains. Users suggested that recovery depends on ElizaCloud gaining users and the Jeju network becoming operational, though current agent numbers are insufficient for profitability. The importance of maintaining best-in-class services with well-documented APIs was emphasized, similar to how Clanker and Bankr agents have succeeded.\n---\nhttps://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1301363808421543988\n---\nUsers reported multiple technical issues with ElizaCloud platform. DorianD identified scrolling problems on the API explorer page where mousepad scrolling was broken and users had to manually drag the barely visible scrollbar. The API testing functionality showed errors stating api key is required for this endpoint when attempting to send test requests, despite an API key appearing to be present in the interface. Users requested clearer pricing breakdowns per model and clarification on whether the use a different key option allows bringing your own keys from providers like OpenAI similar to OpenRouter. Odilitime confirmed receiving the bug reports and forwarded them to the development team. A user also inquired about whether there was still a live Eliza agent available to answer questions about the most recent ElizaOS codebase.\n---\nhttps://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1300025221834739744\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/elizaos-media/screenshot_2026-02-20_at_20-34-12_9b449ff8.png\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/elizaos-media/screenshot_2026-02-20_at_20-36-29_c9f16963.png\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/elizaos-media/screenshot_2026-02-20_at_20-40-23_bc05cc74.png\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/elizaos-media/screenshot_2026-02-20_at_20-44-11_6525c137.png\n---\nGeneral community discussions included criticism of Shaw's communication approach, with one user expressing frustration about the lack of updates following the Elon Musk Twitter ban incident and questioning what happened with the promised lawsuit and marketing push after Autofun went down. The user argued Shaw is too influential to act naive and his actions have consequences for token holders. Odilitime responded that the team is still pushing out promised products, with Babylon now open to the top 5000 on the waitlist, and noted Shaw has given updates on Twitter. He clarified that Shaw posts AI and dev content on Twitter while crypto content goes on Farcaster as he tries to drive more people to that platform. A developer offered services for anyone with project ideas or active projects in progress. Odilitime also asked how many community members still needed to complete their migration.\n---\nhttps://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1253563209462448241\n---\nhttps://cdn.elizaos.news/posters/1771635910467-1w0wxb.jpg\n---\ndiscordrawdata\n---\nElizaOS Development Progress - February 20, 2026\n---\nOn February 20, 2026, ElizaOS made significant progress across multiple areas. The platform completed core enhancements including adding Discord as a fourth messaging option on the main landing site and establishing baseline product metrics for beta launch tracking. Active development work includes a new chatbot widget called 'Vera - Virtually Ever After' in the vea-chatbot module, strict typing refactoring for the logger runtime, and dependency updates across four packages in three directories. A critical fix addresses AI node multi-step confabulation issues in the n8n workflow plugin. The community has initiated discussions on inter-agent coordination and cross-instance communication patterns for multi-agent scenarios, along with proposed enhancements for both Twitter and Google MCPs that reference related pull requests in eliza-cloud-v2.\n---\nhttps://elizaos.github.io/api/summaries/overall/day/2026-02-20.json\n---\nmiscellaneous\n---\n2026-02-20.md\n---\n# ElizaOS Daily Report - February 20, 2026\n\n## Project Status and Community Discussions\n\n### Token and Project Direction\n\nCommunity members engaged in extensive discussions about the ElizaOS token and project direction. Key concerns were raised about the token's performance following the migration from ai16z to elizaOS, with users noting the loss of the original memetic branding around a VC fund led by KOL clones. The tribute model where new agents gave 5-10% to the DAO was discontinued after receiving tokens that couldn't be effectively traded or utilized.\n\nDorianD identified three major weaknesses:\n- Lack of live agents on social media enabling meaningful stack interaction\n- Communication failures resulting in negative sentiment from influential groups\n- Insufficient investor excitement due to unclear token utility\n\nThe team acknowledged these challenges, with Odilitime stating that recovery will take time. There was consensus that 2026 is a building year. Users noted that recovery depends on ElizaCloud gaining users and the Jeju network becoming operational.\n\n### Platform Updates\n\n- Babylon is now open to the top 5000 on the waitlist\n- Shaw posts AI and dev content on Twitter while crypto content goes on Farcaster\n- The team continues pushing out promised products\n\n## Technical Issues Reported\n\n### ElizaCloud Platform\n\nDorianD identified several technical issues:\n- Scrolling problems on the API explorer page where mousepad scrolling was broken\n- API testing functionality showed errors stating \"api key is required for this endpoint\" when attempting to send test requests\n- Users requested clearer pricing breakdowns per model\n- Questions raised about the \"use a different key\" option for bringing your own keys from providers\n\nOdilitime confirmed receiving the bug reports and forwarded them to the development team.\n\n## Development Progress\n\n### Core Enhancements Completed\n\n- Added Discord as a fourth messaging option on the main landing site\n- Established baseline product metrics for beta launch tracking\n\n### Active Development Work\n\n- New chatbot widget called 'Vera - Virtually Ever After' in the vea-chatbot module\n- Strict typing refactoring for the logger runtime\n- Dependency updates across four packages in three directories\n- Critical fix addressing AI node multi-step confabulation issues in the n8n workflow plugin\n\n### Community Initiatives\n\n- Discussions initiated on inter-agent coordination and cross-instance communication patterns for multi-agent scenarios\n- Proposed enhancements for both Twitter and Google MCPs that reference related pull requests in eliza-cloud-v2\n---\n2026-02-20.json\n---\nelizaOS\n---\nelizaOS Discord - 2026-02-20\n---\n1301363808421543988\n---\n\ud83e\udd47-partners\n---\nWeak communications causing unnecessary negative sentiment from influential groups\n---\n1300025221834739744\n---\n\ud83d\udcac-coders\n---\n# Discord Channel Analysis: \ud83d\udcac-coders\n\n## 1. Summary\n\nThe chat segment contains minimal technical discussion, primarily consisting of casual conversation and bug reporting for ElizaCloud. DorianD conducted informal testing of the ElizaCloud dashboard and API explorer, identifying several UI/UX issues. The main technical problems reported include: broken scrolling functionality on the API explorer page (https://www.elizacloud.ai/dashboard/api-explorer) requiring manual use of a hard-to-see scrollbar, similar mousepad scrolling issues on other pages, and a non-functional \"send request\" test feature that returns an \"api key is required\" error despite an API key appearing to be present. DorianD also raised questions about pricing transparency and the \"use a different key\" feature, questioning whether it supports BYOK (Bring Your Own Key) similar to OpenRouter. Odilitime acknowledged the bug reports and forwarded them to the development team. The conversation also included two off-topic messages from KingRon and Wes about non-technical matters. No code implementations, architectural decisions, or problem-solving solutions were discussed in this segment.\n\n## 2. FAQ\n\nQ: Is there still some live Eliza agent that can answer questions about the most recent ElizaOS codebase? (asked by DorianD) A: Unanswered\n\nQ: What's the best way to report bugs for Cloud? (asked by DorianD) A: Odilitime forwarded the reported issues to the team (answered by Odilitime)\n\nQ: Does \"use a different key\" mean that if user picked gpt-4o that we can enter in an OpenAI key similar to OpenRouter BYOK? (asked by DorianD) A: Unanswered\n\n## 3. Help Interactions\n\nHelper: Odilitime | Helpee: DorianD | Context: Bug reporting process for ElizaCloud scrolling issues | Resolution: Forwarded the bug reports to the development team\n\n## 4. Action Items\n\nType: Technical | Description: Fix scrolling functionality on ElizaCloud API explorer page - mousepad scrolling broken, scrollbar hard to see | Mentioned By: DorianD\n\nType: Technical | Description: Fix \"send request\" test feature returning \"api key is required\" error when API key appears to be present | Mentioned By: DorianD\n\nType: Documentation | Description: Add price breakdown per model in ElizaCloud dashboard | Mentioned By: DorianD\n\nType: Documentation | Description: Clarify functionality of \"use a different key\" feature and whether it supports BYOK | Mentioned By: DorianD\n---\n1377726087789940836\n---\ncore-devs\n---\n# Discord Chat Analysis - core-devs Channel\n\n## 1. Summary\n\nThe chat transcript provided contains no substantive content - only two empty timestamp entries from user Odilitime at 20:06. There are no technical discussions, decisions, problem-solving activities, solutions, or implementations to analyze. The channel appears to have had no active conversation during this captured timeframe.\n\n## 2. FAQ\n\nNo questions were asked or answered in this chat segment.\n\n## 3. Help Interactions\n\nNo help interactions occurred in this chat segment.\n\n## 4. Action Items\n\nNo action items were identified in this chat segment.\n---\n1253563209462448241\n---\n\ud83d\udcac-discussion\n---\n# Discord Channel Analysis: \ud83d\udcac-discussion\n\n## 1. Summary\n\nThe discussion channel showed minimal technical content, primarily consisting of community management questions and general conversation. \n\nThe most substantive technical exchange involved **Odilitime** providing project updates, confirming that Babylon is now open to the top 5000 users on the waitlist. This was in response to community concerns about product delivery timelines following the Autofun incident and Twitter issues with Eliza labs.\n\n**k1kkoS** inquired about contacting Shaw, with **Odilitime** suggesting using @ mentions as the standard approach. Odilitime also clarified Shaw's communication strategy: AI/dev content is posted on Twitter while crypto-related updates are shared on Farcaster, requiring followers to monitor both platforms.\n\n**alex_wukar** asked twice about Milady token validity on BNB and Solana chains but received no response.\n\nTwo developers (**! Alex !** and **Donhill**) posted availability for project work. ! Alex ! offered general development services, while Donhill specifically mentioned expertise in Web3 infrastructure, backend services, security checks, and UX design. **Boj/acc** sarcastically responded that there were no projects, though this appears to be humor rather than factual.\n\n**Odilitime** conducted an informal poll asking how many users still need to migrate (context unclear from transcript).\n\nThe channel contained significant off-topic content including introductions, bot spam complaints, and heated community debate about project leadership that didn't yield technical outcomes.\n\n## 2. FAQ\n\nQ: Is there a way to get in contact with Shaw here? (asked by k1kkoS) A: You can try and @ him, that's what others do (answered by Odilitime)\n\nQ: For Milady, we have BNB and Solana. Both are valid? (asked by alex_wukar) A: Unanswered\n\nQ: Does anyone have a project idea or an active project in progress? (asked by ! Alex !) A: No projects here, you must be in the wrong place (answered by Boj/acc)\n\nQ: How many here still need to migrate? (asked by Odilitime) A: Unanswered\n\nQ: Is anyone building Web3 infra and needs a dev for backend services, security checks, and clean UX? (asked by Donhill) A: Unanswered\n\n## 3. Help Interactions\n\nHelper: Odilitime | Helpee: k1kkoS | Context: Needed to contact Shaw | Resolution: Suggested using @ mentions as the standard method\n\nHelper: Odilitime | Helpee: Community (Thanos\ud83d\udca8) | Context: Concerns about product delivery and updates | Resolution: Clarified that Babylon is now open to top 5000 on waitlist and Shaw provides updates on Twitter\n\nHelper: Odilitime | Helpee: Community | Context: Confusion about where to find Shaw's updates | Resolution: Explained Shaw posts AI/dev content on Twitter and crypto content on Farcaster\n\n## 4. Action Items\n\nType: Documentation | Description: Need clarity on Milady token validity across BNB and Solana chains | Mentioned By: alex_wukar\n\nType: Technical | Description: Complete migration process for remaining users | Mentioned By: Odilitime\n---\n2026-02-20.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2026-02-20\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Product Updates & Releases\n\n**Babylon Waitlist Opening**\n- Babylon platform is now accessible to the top 5,000 users on the waitlist, addressing community concerns about product delivery timelines following recent incidents with Autofun and Twitter issues\n\n### ElizaCloud Platform Issues\n\n**Critical UI/UX Bugs Identified**\n- Multiple scrolling functionality issues discovered on ElizaCloud dashboard\n- API explorer page (https://www.elizacloud.ai/dashboard/api-explorer) has broken mousepad scrolling, requiring manual use of a hard-to-see scrollbar\n- Similar scrolling problems affect other dashboard pages\n- \"Send request\" test feature returns \"api key is required\" error despite API key appearing to be present\n\n**Feature Clarity Needed**\n- Questions raised about the \"use a different key\" feature and whether it supports BYOK (Bring Your Own Key) functionality similar to OpenRouter\n- Pricing transparency concerns - users requesting per-model price breakdown in the dashboard\n\n### Communication & Community Management\n\n**Leadership Communication Strategy**\n- Shaw's update distribution clarified: AI/development content posted on Twitter, crypto-related updates shared on Farcaster\n- Community members need to monitor both platforms for complete information\n- Standard contact method for Shaw is using @ mentions in Discord\n\n**Partnership Relations**\n- Weak communications identified as causing unnecessary negative sentiment from influential partner groups\n\n### Developer Community Activity\n\n**Developer Availability**\n- Multiple developers posted availability for project work\n- Expertise areas mentioned: Web3 infrastructure, backend services, security checks, and UX design\n- General development services offered to the community\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Is there a way to get in contact with Shaw here?**\n- A: You can try and @ him, that's what others do *(answered by Odilitime)*\n\n**Q: Where does Shaw post updates?**\n- A: Shaw posts AI/dev content on Twitter and crypto content on Farcaster - need to follow both platforms *(answered by Odilitime)*\n\n**Q: What's the status of Babylon?**\n- A: Babylon is now open to the top 5,000 users on the waitlist *(answered by Odilitime)*\n\n### Unanswered Questions\n\n- Is there still a live Eliza agent that can answer questions about the most recent ElizaOS codebase? *(asked by DorianD)*\n- Does \"use a different key\" mean users can enter their own API keys (like OpenAI key for gpt-4o) similar to OpenRouter BYOK? *(asked by DorianD)*\n- For Milady, we have BNB and Solana - are both valid? *(asked by alex_wukar, asked twice)*\n- How many users still need to migrate? *(asked by Odilitime)*\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n**Bug Reporting Process**\n- **Helper:** Odilitime\n- **Helpee:** DorianD\n- **Context:** DorianD conducted informal testing of ElizaCloud dashboard and identified multiple UI/UX issues\n- **Resolution:** Odilitime acknowledged the bug reports and forwarded them to the development team\n\n**Contacting Leadership**\n- **Helper:** Odilitime\n- **Helpee:** k1kkoS\n- **Context:** User needed to contact Shaw\n- **Resolution:** Suggested using @ mentions as the standard method\n\n**Product Updates Clarification**\n- **Helper:** Odilitime\n- **Helpee:** Community (Thanos\ud83d\udca8 and others)\n- **Context:** Concerns about product delivery and communication following recent incidents\n- **Resolution:** Clarified Babylon waitlist status and explained Shaw's multi-platform communication strategy\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n\n- **Fix scrolling functionality on ElizaCloud API explorer page** - mousepad scrolling broken, scrollbar hard to see\n - *Mentioned by: DorianD*\n\n- **Fix \"send request\" test feature** - currently returning \"api key is required\" error when API key appears to be present\n - *Mentioned by: DorianD*\n\n- **Complete migration process** for remaining users\n - *Mentioned by: Odilitime*\n\n### Documentation\n\n- **Add price breakdown per model** in ElizaCloud dashboard for pricing transparency\n - *Mentioned by: DorianD*\n\n- **Clarify functionality of \"use a different key\" feature** - document whether it supports BYOK (Bring Your Own Key)\n - *Mentioned by: DorianD*\n\n- **Provide clarity on Milady token validity** across BNB and Solana chains\n - *Mentioned by: alex_wukar*\n\n### Communication\n\n- **Improve partner communications** to reduce unnecessary negative sentiment from influential groups\n - *Identified in: \ud83e\udd47-partners channel*\n---\n2026-02-21.md\n---\nFile not found\n---\n2026-02-15.md\n---\n# Overall Project Weekly Summary (Feb 15 - 21, 2026)\n\nThis week, ElizaOS entered a high-velocity phase as it prepared for its official beta launch. The team successfully cleared a massive backlog of technical hurdles while simultaneously expanding the framework's reach into everyday communication tools like WhatsApp and Gmail. By combining core infrastructure upgrades with new decentralized identity features, the project is positioning itself as a robust, secure, and highly adaptable home for the next generation of AI agents.\n\n## Executive Summary\nElizaOS shifted its focus toward a major beta release, prioritizing user onboarding and platform stability. The project achieved significant milestones by integrating popular messaging and productivity apps and launching new on-chain identity tools for agents on the Solana blockchain.\n\n### Key Strategic Initiatives & Outcomes\n\n**Preparing for the Beta Launch and Beyond**\n*Goal: To ensure the platform is stable, user-friendly, and ready for its first 100 official testers.*\n* The team cleared dozens of functional blockers in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), including fixing dashboard bugs and removing restrictive text limits to improve the user experience.\n* A new \"Profile Plugin\" was proposed in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) to automatically build user profiles from social media, making it easier for new users to get started immediately.\n* Efforts are underway in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) to refine the AI's personality, aiming for a more direct and engaging conversational style for the launch.\n\n**Expanding Agent Reach and Utility**\n*Goal: To allow AI agents to work across more platforms and handle more complex tasks.*\n* Major integrations were finalized for WhatsApp, Gmail, and the N8N workflow engine in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), allowing agents to communicate and automate tasks where users already work.\n* The [elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow) repository added a new \"control panel\" (REST API), giving developers a way to manage complex workflows directly without needing to use natural language.\n* The plugin registry in [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry) saw a surge in new tools, particularly for Web3 and financial data exchanges.\n\n**Strengthening Security and Decentralization**\n*Goal: To give agents a verifiable identity and ensure the system remains secure as it grows.*\n* The project introduced the SAID Protocol in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) and [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry), which gives agents a \"digital passport\" on the Solana blockchain for secure, verifiable actions.\n* A security audit was completed for the Model Context Protocol in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), ensuring that as agents share information, they do so safely.\n\n**Improving System Health and Maintenance**\n*Goal: To keep the project's \"engine\" running smoothly and make it easier for community members to contribute.*\n* A major database overhaul was started in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) to make the system faster and more reliable for the long term.\n* Critical fixes to the automated review system in [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry) ensured that outside contributors can have their work checked and merged more quickly.\n* Routine but essential security updates were performed across the documentation site in [elizaos/elizaos.github.io](https://github.com/elizaos/elizaos.github.io) to keep the project's public face secure.\n\n### Cross-Repository Coordination\n* **Unified Identity Standards**: The implementation of the SAID Protocol required synchronized work between the core framework [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) and the [elizaos-plugins/registry](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry) to ensure agents can use their new on-chain identities across all plugins.\n* **Workflow Automation**: The N8N workflow integration involved coordinated updates in the core repository [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza) and the specific [elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow) repo to provide a seamless experience for managing complex AI tasks.\n* **Automated Maintenance**: The team successfully fixed \"Renovate\" (an automated update tool) in [elizaos/eliza](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza), which now helps keep dependencies across the entire ecosystem up to date automatically.\n\n## Repository Spotlights\n\n### elizaos/eliza\n* Initiated a major database refactor ([#6509](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6509)) to improve long-term system architecture.\n* Integrated the SAID Protocol for on-chain Solana identity ([#6510](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6510)), enabling verifiable agent signatures.\n* Finalized major integrations for WhatsApp ([#6401](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6401)), Gmail ([#6404](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6404)), and N8N ([#6429](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6429)).\n* Resolved critical automated update issues ([#6488](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6488)) and enabled multi-language dependency management ([#6506](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6506), [#6507](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6507)).\n* Added support for the Opus 4.5 model ([#6368](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6368)) and Chain-of-Thought reasoning ([#6294](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6294)).\n\n### elizaos-plugins/registry\n* Expanded the ecosystem with new plugins including `@elizaos/plugin-said` ([#264](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/264)) and several exchange-related tools ([#261](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/261), [#262](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/262)).\n* Fixed a high-priority issue where the automated review system was blocking new contributions ([#259](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/issues/259)).\n* Improved support for external contributors by fixing the review process for forked repositories ([#260](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/registry/pull/260)).\n\n### elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow\n* Launched a comprehensive REST API for direct workflow management and monitoring ([#16](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow/pull/16)).\n* Fixed a critical bug in how the AI handles workflow properties, ensuring stability even when the AI provides incomplete data ([#18](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-n8n-workflow/pull/18)).\n\n### elizaos-plugins/plugin-ollama\n* Identified and began investigating a community-reported issue regarding embedding failures on Linux environments ([#17](https://github.com/elizaos-plugins/plugin-ollama/issues/17)).\n\n### elizaos/elizaos.github.io\n* Maintained project health through routine dependency synchronization and version updates ([#242](https://github.com/elizaos/elizaos.github.io/pull/242)).\n---\n2026-02-01.md\n---\nNo activity recorded for 2026-02-01.\n---\n{\n \"interval\": {\n \"intervalStart\": \"2026-02-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"intervalEnd\": \"2026-03-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"intervalType\": \"month\"\n },\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"overview\": \"From 2026-02-01 to 2026-03-01, elizaos/eliza had 35 new PRs (18 merged), 41 new issues, and 34 active contributors.\",\n \"topIssues\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7FcGAc\",\n \"title\": \"feat(scenarios): Add Cost Evaluator\",\n \"author\": \"monilpat\",\n \"number\": 5759,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"# feat(scenarios): Add Cost Evaluator\\n\\nLinks: [Issue #5726](https://github.com/elizaOS/eliza/issues/5726)\\n\\n## Summary\\nIntroduce an evaluator that asserts the estimated dollar cost of LLM usage per step. Cost is derived from token counts and a model price table.\\n\\n## Goals\\n- Estimate cost (USD) for each step from recorded token metrics\\n- Allow thresholds (`max_cost_usd`) to fail expensive runs\\n- Support multiple models within a single step\\n\\n## Acceptance Criteria\\n1. New evaluator type `llm_cost`\\n2. Price table configurable via env or default map\\n3. Evaluator passes if total step cost <= `max_cost_usd`\\n4. Detailed message with model breakdown and total\\n\\n## Schema Changes\\nEdit `packages/cli/src/commands/scenario/src/schema.ts`:\\n\\n```ts\\nconst LlmCostEvaluationSchema = BaseEvaluationSchema.extend({\\n type: z.literal('llm_cost'),\\n max_cost_usd: z.number(),\\n});\\n```\\n\\n## Pricing Source\\nAdd a small utility `packages/cli/src/commands/scenario/src/pricing.ts`:\\n\\n```ts\\nexport type ModelPricing = {\\n inputPer1K: number; // USD per 1000 input tokens\\n outputPer1K: number; // USD per 1000 output tokens\\n};\\n\\nexport const DEFAULT_MODEL_PRICING: Record = {\\n TEXT_SMALL: { inputPer1K: 0.15, outputPer1K: 0.60 },\\n TEXT_LARGE: { inputPer1K: 0.50, outputPer1K: 1.50 },\\n OBJECT_SMALL: { inputPer1K: 0.50, outputPer1K: 1.50 },\\n};\\n\\nexport function getPricing(modelType: string, overrides?: Record): ModelPricing | null {\\n const table = overrides ?? DEFAULT_MODEL_PRICING;\\n return table[modelType] ?? null;\\n}\\n```\\n\\nAllow overrides via `SCENARIO_MODEL_PRICING` env (JSON string) in a follow-up.\\n\\n## Evaluation Implementation\\nAdd to `EvaluationEngine`:\\n\\n```ts\\nclass LlmCostEvaluator implements Evaluator {\\n async evaluate(params: EvaluationSchema, runResult: ExecutionResult): Promise {\\n if (params.type !== 'llm_cost') throw new Error('Mismatched evaluator');\\n const llm = runResult.metrics?.llm ?? [];\\n if (!llm.length) return { success: false, message: 'No LLM metrics found for cost calculation' };\\n\\n const pricingOverrides = process.env.SCENARIO_MODEL_PRICING ? JSON.parse(process.env.SCENARIO_MODEL_PRICING) : undefined;\\n let total = 0;\\n for (const m of llm) {\\n const pricing = getPricing(m.modelType, pricingOverrides);\\n if (!pricing) continue;\\n const inTok = m.promptTokens ?? 0;\\n const outTok = m.completionTokens ?? 0;\\n total += (inTok / 1000) * pricing.inputPer1K + (outTok / 1000) * pricing.outputPer1K;\\n }\\n\\n const success = total <= params.max_cost_usd;\\n return { success, message: `Estimated cost: $${total.toFixed(4)} (limit $${params.max_cost_usd.toFixed(4)})` };\\n }\\n}\\n```\\n\\nRegister:\\n\\n```ts\\nthis.register('llm_cost', new LlmCostEvaluator());\\n```\\n\\n## Example Usage\\n\\n```yaml\\nevaluations:\\n - type: llm_cost\\n max_cost_usd: 0.05\\n```\\n\\n## Tests\\n- Unit: price math with multiple model records\\n- Integration: with token_count metrics present and absent\\n\\n## Notes\\nThis builds on the Token Count evaluator and shared metrics capture. It complements mocking enhancements described in [Issue #5726](https://github.com/elizaOS/eliza/issues/5726).\\n\\n\\n\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2025-08-12T04:27:23Z\",\n \"closedAt\": \"2026-02-12T22:43:04Z\",\n \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7nsf3_\",\n \"title\": \"[Agent] Eliza Character File & Prompt Engineering\",\n \"author\": \"borisudovicic\",\n \"number\": 6447,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"## Description\\n\\nImprove Eliza's character file and prompts based on initial testing feedback.\\n\\n## Background\\n\\nBoris (Feb 2): \\\"I've talked to Eliza only a little bit, just to test her out. I think she'll definitely need some edits in her character file, some more prompt engineering. She's a good start so far, but there's definitely stuff we're gonna have to work on. It'll be iterative.\\\"\\n\\n## Acceptance Criteria\\n\\n- [ ] Review current character file responses\\n- [ ] Identify areas needing improvement\\n- [ ] Update character file with better prompts\\n- [ ] Add message examples (Ben has PRs for this)\\n- [ ] Test with Sonnet model\\n- [ ] Iterate based on user feedback\\n\\n## Technical Notes\\n\\nBen mentioned:\\n\\n* Currently using a different model, switching to Sonnet\\n* Two PRs coming that add message examples and change model to Sonnet\\n* \\\"Huge difference in price between Sonnet and \\\\[current model\\\\]\\\"\\n\\nBoris mentioned Sonnet 5 coming out soon - good timing to test on Eliza if cheaper.\\n\\n## Priority\\n\\n**P2 - Iterative improvement**\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-02T17:48:44Z\",\n \"closedAt\": \"2026-02-16T21:52:18Z\",\n \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7pWP6K\",\n \"title\": \"[Bug] URL in message triggers duplicate LLM calls - processed as both text and attachment (webapp)\",\n \"author\": \"thewoweffect\",\n \"number\": 6486,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"## Description\\nWhen a user sends a message containing a URL, ElizaOS processes it twice:\\n1. As text content \u2192 generates response\\n2. As attachment (metadata/preview) \u2192 generates second response\\n\\nBoth responses are sent through the same SSE stream before the `done` event, resulting in duplicated text in the final response.\\n\\n## Steps to Reproduce\\n1. Start ElizaOS with webapp\\n2. Send a message containing a URL (e.g., \\\"Check this: https://example.com\\\")\\n3. Observe the response\\n\\n## Expected Behavior\\nURL should be processed once, generating a single response.\\n\\n## Actual Behavior\\nTwo identical (or near-identical) responses are generated and streamed as one message, doubling token usage and producing duplicated output.\\n\\n## Impact\\n- 2x LLM API calls per message with URL\\n- Doubled token costs\\n- Poor UX with duplicated responses\\n- Forces workarounds on client side\\n\\n## Environment\\n- ElizaOS version: [your version]\\n- Client: webapp\\n\\n## Suggested Fix\\nEnsure URL is processed either as text OR as attachment, not both. The decision should happen in the message processing flow before LLM calls.\\n\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-09T07:36:55Z\",\n \"closedAt\": null,\n \"state\": \"OPEN\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7plYW-\",\n \"title\": \"Feature Request: Support custom OpenAI endpoint URL for OpenAI provider\",\n \"author\": \"coolRoger\",\n \"number\": 6490,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"## Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.\\nThe current OpenAI provider does **not support configuring a custom OpenAI endpoint URL**, which makes it impossible to use OpenAI-compatible third-party services (e.g., SiliconFlow). These services follow the OpenAI API format but require pointing to their own endpoint URLs instead of the official OpenAI endpoint.\\n\\n## Describe the solution you'd like\\nAdd a **configurable `openai endpoint url` field/parameter** to the OpenAI provider, so users can manually specify the API endpoint URL when using OpenAI-compatible services.\\n\\n## Describe alternatives you've considered\\n- Switching to a dedicated provider for SiliconFlow: Not ideal, as it breaks the unified OpenAI-compatible usage pattern.\\n- Hardcoding the endpoint: Not flexible for different OpenAI-compatible providers.\\n\\n## Additional context\\nMany cloud / inference providers (SiliconFlow, etc.) provide OpenAI-compatible APIs, only differing in the endpoint URL. Supporting custom endpoints will greatly improve the compatibility and flexibility of the OpenAI provider.\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-10T00:57:25Z\",\n \"closedAt\": null,\n \"state\": \"OPEN\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7qLiWA\",\n \"title\": \"Image content stripped from LLM requests in cloud chat\",\n \"author\": \"borisudovicic\",\n \"number\": 6494,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"## Issue is inside: `/api/v1/chat/completions`. `convertToUIMessages`\\n\\n\\\"Screenshot\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-11T22:08:25Z\",\n \"closedAt\": \"2026-02-16T21:51:50Z\",\n \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n }\n ],\n \"topPRs\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs68XpPS\",\n \"title\": \"V2.0.0\",\n \"author\": \"lalalune\",\n \"number\": 6351,\n \"body\": \"This is a working branch of elizaOS v2.0.0\\r\\n\\r\\nCritically, this removes app, server, CLI and all non-essentials. Instead, we focus on runtime in Rust, Typescript, with critical plugins ported as well\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-01-09T17:06:10Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 2384715,\n \"deletions\": 298813\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7CUyZi\",\n \"title\": \"feat: next generation multi-language Eliza with Rust, Python and TypeScript support\",\n \"author\": \"lalalune\",\n \"number\": 6485,\n \"body\": \"This is the next version of eliza\\r\\n\\r\\nRust, python and typescript\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\n# Major Updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Add complete Python and Rust core packages, extending Eliza to these languages\\r\\n- Add Python and Rust native versions of popular plugins\\r\\n- Remove default application, client and server infrastructure\\r\\n- Add examples for all major frameworks\\r\\n- Bootstrap is integrated into core, enabled with basicCapabilities by default and optionally extendedCapabiltiies\\r\\n- Core plugins are also rust, python and typescript\\r\\n- Comes with a WIP code agent\\r\\n\\r\\n# Minor updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Agents can now respond without needing a roomId or worldId\\r\\n- Initial message memory is created inside the message handler service (was confusing and not that way)\\r\\n- Can running planningMode true or false, on false skips planning and calls single action (good for games and simple agents)\\r\\n- Actions can have arguments, and can be called with arguments. This way they can be called like tools without needing a separate step\\r\\n\\r\\nTODO\\r\\n- LLM mode -- can be SMALL, LARGE or DEFAULT -- SMALL and LARGE override the LLM small or large so all use the small or all use the large\\r\\n- checkShouldRespond defaults to true but can be turned off for ChatGPT mode\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-08T18:44:21Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 649890,\n \"deletions\": 303180\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7EjIkM\",\n \"title\": \"feat: add SAID Protocol on-chain Solana identity for ElizaOS agents\",\n \"author\": \"kaiclawd\",\n \"number\": 6510,\n \"body\": \"## What this does\\n\\nEvery new agent created via `elizaos create` now automatically gets a free on-chain identity on [SAID Protocol](https://saidprotocol.com) \u2014 Solana AI Identity.\\n\\n## Changes\\n\\n- `packages/elizaos/src/utils/said.ts` \u2014 new module: Ed25519 keypair generation (pure Node `crypto`, zero new dependencies) + SAID registration via REST API\\n- `packages/elizaos/src/commands/create.ts` \u2014 registers agent with SAID after project creation, saves wallet, displays profile URL\\n\\n## What happens on `elizaos create`\\n\\n```\\n\u2728 Project created successfully!\\n\\n\u26a1 SAID Protocol identity created\\n Wallet: 7xKXtg2CW87d97TXJSDpbD5jBkheTqA83TZRuJosgAs\\n Profile: https://saidprotocol.com/agents/7xKXtg2CW87d97TXJSDpbD5jBkheTqA83TZRuJosgAs\\n\\n Key saved to .said-wallet.json (add to .gitignore!)\\n```\\n\\n## Why\\n\\n- **Free** \u2014 off-chain pending registration, no SOL required\\n- **Zero new dependencies** \u2014 uses Node's built-in `crypto` module for Ed25519 keypair generation\\n- **Non-breaking** \u2014 fully opt-out, errors are silently caught, never crashes\\n- **Discoverable** \u2014 agent appears in the public SAID agent directory at [saidprotocol.com/agents](https://saidprotocol.com/agents)\\n- **On-chain upgrade available** \u2014 ~0.01 SOL upgrades to a cryptographically verified badge via challenge-response (proves the entity is a running agent)\\n\\n## SAID Protocol\\n\\nSAID is on-chain identity infrastructure for AI agents on Solana. Think of it as a universal agent passport \u2014 verifiable identity, reputation scores, skill listings, and agent-to-agent discovery.\\n\\n[saidprotocol.com](https://saidprotocol.com) | [Docs](https://saidprotocol.com/docs.html)\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-18T08:01:49Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 648299,\n \"deletions\": 302354\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7FPjL6\",\n \"title\": \"refactor(core): strict typing for logger runtime\",\n \"author\": \"Fankouzu\",\n \"number\": 6519,\n \"body\": \"This PR improves code quality by replacing type usage in the logger module with proper typing. This helps in maintaining type safety across the core package.\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-20T19:25:50Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 648170,\n \"deletions\": 302354\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs7CJoKo\",\n \"title\": \"next\",\n \"author\": \"lalalune\",\n \"number\": 6474,\n \"body\": \"This is the next version of eliza\\r\\n\\r\\nRust, python and typescript\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\n# Major Updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Add complete Python and Rust core packages, extending Eliza to these languages\\r\\n- Add Python and Rust native versions of popular plugins\\r\\n- Remove default application, client and server infrastructure\\r\\n- Add examples for all major frameworks\\r\\n- Bootstrap is integrated into core, enabled with basicCapabilities by default and optionally extendedCapabiltiies\\r\\n- Core plugins are also rust, python and typescript\\r\\n- Comes with a WIP code agent\\r\\n\\r\\n# Minor updates\\r\\n\\r\\n- Agents can now respond without needing a roomId or worldId\\r\\n- Initial message memory is created inside the message handler service (was confusing and not that way)\\r\\n- Can running planningMode true or false, on false skips planning and calls single action (good for games and simple agents)\\r\\n- Actions can have arguments, and can be called with arguments. This way they can be called like tools without needing a separate step\\r\\n\\r\\nTODO\\r\\n- LLM mode -- can be SMALL, LARGE or DEFAULT -- SMALL and LARGE override the LLM small or large so all use the small or all use the large\\r\\n- checkShouldRespond defaults to true but can be turned off for ChatGPT mode\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2026-02-07T08:00:35Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 591239,\n \"deletions\": 282388\n }\n ],\n \"codeChanges\": {\n \"additions\": 18576,\n \"deletions\": 3807,\n \"files\": 160,\n \"commitCount\": 136\n },\n \"completedItems\": [\n {\n \"title\": \"feat(auth): implement JWT authentication and user management\",\n \"prNumber\": 6200,\n \"type\": \"feature\",\n \"body\": \"## Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\n- Data isolation / multi-entity support\\r\\n- External JWT provider integration (Privy, Auth0, Clerk, Supabase, Google, Embbeded)\\r\\n\\r\\n## Risks\\r\\n\\r\\n**Low**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Requires `ENABLE_DATA_ISOLATION=true` to activate JWT auth mode\\r\\n\\r\\n#\",\n \"files\": [\n \".github/workflows/client-cypress-tests.yml\",\n \"packages/client/cypress/e2e/auth/01-auth-flow.cy.ts\",\n \"packages/client/cypress/e2e/auth/02-protected-features.cy.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/App.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/ProtectedRoute.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/ai-elements/response.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/app-sidebar.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/auth-dialog.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/connection-error-banner.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/connection-status.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/group-card.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/components/group-panel.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/context/AuthContext.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/context/ConnectionContext.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/context/ServerConfigContext.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/hooks/use-query-hooks.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/hooks/use-socket-chat.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/index.css\",\n \"packages/client/src/lib/api-client-config.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/lib/auth-utils.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/lib/socketio-manager.ts\",\n \"packages/client/src/routes/chat.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/routes/group.tsx\",\n \"packages/client/src/routes/home.tsx\",\n \"packages/config/src/eslint/eslint.config.base.js\",\n \"packages/core/src/database.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/runtime.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/types/database.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/types/index.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/types/user.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/src/base.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/src/schema/index.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/src/schema/user.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/integration/jwt-workflow.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/test-utils/jwt-helper.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/api/auth/credentials.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/middleware/auth-middleware-chain.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/middleware/auth-middleware.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/middleware/jwtMiddleware.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/ed25519-verifier.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/factory.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/jwks-verifier.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/services/jwt-verifiers/secret-verifier.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/unit/socketio/authentication.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/agents/logs.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/agents/runs.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/auth/credentials.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/auth/index.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/index.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/memory/agents.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/index.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"docs: core documentation guides\",\n \"prNumber\": 6356,\n \"type\": \"docs\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n- Adds core documentation pages: architecture, core concepts, plugin development, interop, deployment, and API reference.\\n\\n## Test plan\\n- [ ] Review rendered markdown formatting and links.\\n\\n\\n---\\n\\n> [!NOTE]\\n\",\n \"files\": [\n \"docs/API_REFERENCE.md\",\n \"docs/ARCHITECTURE.md\",\n \"docs/CORE_CONCEPTS.md\",\n \"docs/DEPLOYMENT_GUIDE.md\",\n \"docs/INTEROP_GUIDE.md\",\n \"docs/PLUGIN_DEVELOPMENT.md\",\n \"packages/interop/README.md\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(cli): always use 'latest' for @elizaos deps in created projects\",\n \"prNumber\": 6362,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\n- Fixes issue where `elizaos create` fails when CLI is linked from monorepo because packages with version like `1.7.2-alpha.0` couldn't be found on npm\\n- Both build-time and runtime scripts now use `'latest'` for `@elizaos/*` de\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/cli/src/scripts/copy-templates.ts\",\n \"packages/cli/src/utils/copy-template.ts\",\n \"packages/cli/tests/integration/local-development.test.ts\",\n \"packages/cli/tests/utils/copy-template.test.ts\",\n \".github/workflows/cli-tests.yml\",\n \"packages/cli/bunfig.toml\",\n \"packages/cli/tests/commands/update.test.ts\",\n \"packages/cli/tests/test-timeouts.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(cli): validate directory path in ensureDir to prevent ENOENT error\",\n \"prNumber\": 6379,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"This PR adds validation to the `ensureDir` function to prevent unclear ENOENT errors when an empty directory path is provided.\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nWhen `ensureDir` was called with an empty string or whitespace-only path, it would attempt to execut\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/cli/src/utils/get-config.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(server): emit MESSAGE_SENT event after sending to central server\",\n \"prNumber\": 6378,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"This PR fixes #5216 - EventType.MESSAGE_SENT event not being emitted when agent responses are sent to the central server API.\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nThe `sendAgentResponseToBus` function in `packages/server/src/services/message.ts` sends agent respon\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/server/src/services/message.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"docs: add environment variables documentation\",\n \"prNumber\": 6377,\n \"type\": \"docs\",\n \"body\": \"This PR adds comprehensive documentation for server environment variables, addressing #5716.\\n\\n## Summary\\n\\nAdded `docs/environment-variables.md` with detailed documentation for:\\n- `ELIZA_SERVER_AUTH_TOKEN` - API authentication for securing e\",\n \"files\": [\n \"docs/environment-variables.md\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(cli): load .env files in agent commands for authentication\",\n \"prNumber\": 6376,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"This PR fixes #5707 - an issue where `elizaos agent` commands would fail when connecting to a remote server that uses `ELIZA_SERVER_AUTH_TOKEN`.\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nWhen running `elizaos agent list` (or other agent commands) against a remote serve\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/cli/src/commands/agent/utils/validation.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"V2.0.0: dynamic execution engine (test if context is going to blown)\",\n \"prNumber\": 6384,\n \"type\": \"tests\",\n \"body\": \"Redo #6113 for 2.0.0, first pass\\n\\n\\n---\\n\\n> [!NOTE]\\n> Introduces a validation-aware, schema-driven prompt execution path and applies it across runtimes and message flows.\\n> \\n> - Adds `dynamic_prompt_exec_from_state`/`dy\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/python/elizaos/runtime.py\",\n \"packages/python/elizaos/services/message_service.py\",\n \"packages/python/elizaos/types/__init__.py\",\n \"packages/python/elizaos/types/state.py\",\n \"packages/rust/src/runtime.rs\",\n \"packages/rust/src/services/message_service.rs\",\n \"packages/rust/src/types/mod.rs\",\n \"packages/rust/src/types/state.rs\",\n \"packages/rust/src/types/streaming.rs\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/runtime.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/services/message.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/types/runtime.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/types/state.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/types/streaming.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/utils/streaming.ts\",\n \"bun.lock\",\n \"package.json\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"V2.0.0: fixed avatar example and elevenlabs plugin\",\n \"prNumber\": 6387,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"# Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\nFixes ElevenLabs API integration issues in `examples/avatar` (formerly `vrm` example) and consolidates the project structure.\\r\\n\\r\\n# Risks\\r\\n\\r\\nLow. Changes are isolated to the `examples/avatar` directory and the `plugin-elevenl\",\n \"files\": [\n \"examples/avatar/README.md\",\n \"examples/avatar/index.html\",\n \"examples/avatar/src/App.tsx\",\n \"examples/vrm/src/App.tsx\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/README.md\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/README.md\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/src/eliza_plugin_elevenlabs/types.py\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/tests/conftest.py\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/python/tests/test_types.py\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/README.md\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/src/services/elevenlabs_service.rs\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/src/types.rs\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/tests/integration_tests.rs\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/rust/tests/tts_integration.rs\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/README.md\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/package.json\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/src/index.browser.ts\",\n \"plugins/plugin-elevenlabs/typescript/src/index.ts\",\n \"plugins/plugin-s3-storage/README.md\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(plugin-bootstrap): add null check for runtime.providers\",\n \"prNumber\": 6473,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\n- **Fix**: Add null check for `runtime.providers` in `providersProvider`\\n- **Impact**: Prevents `TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'filter')`\\n\\n## Problem\\n\\nWhen `runtime.providers` is `null` or `undefined`, the c\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/providers.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix: add null checks to Object.entries calls in settings utilities\",\n \"prNumber\": 6471,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\nThis PR adds defensive null/undefined checks before Object.entries() calls in the @elizaos/core package's settings utilities to prevent runtime errors.\\n\\n## Changes\\n\\n### packages/core/src/settings.ts\\n\\nAdded null/undefined guards \",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/core/src/settings.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"chore(examples-art): v2 update dependencies, training pipeline, and tests for 2048 game\",\n \"prNumber\": 6461,\n \"type\": \"tests\",\n \"body\": \"# Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\nRelated to ART (Agentic Reinforcement Training) example improvements for v2.0.0\\r\\n\\r\\n# Risks\\r\\n\\r\\nLow. Changes are isolated to the `examples/art` directory and root `.gitignore`. Only adds new dependencies, enhances existing fun\",\n \"files\": [\n \".gitignore\",\n \"examples/art/.gitignore\",\n \"examples/art/README.md\",\n \"examples/art/elizaos_art/games/game_2048/__init__.py\",\n \"examples/art/elizaos_art/games/game_2048/cli.py\",\n \"examples/art/elizaos_art/trainer.py\",\n \"examples/art/pyproject.toml\",\n \"examples/art/tests/test_games.py\",\n \"examples/art/tests/test_integration.py\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"feat(core): add request context for per-user entity settings\",\n \"prNumber\": 6457,\n \"type\": \"feature\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n- Adds `RequestContext` using AsyncLocalStorage to propagate per-request entity settings\\n- Enables runtime methods to access the originating entity context without explicit parameter passing\\n- Includes helper methods: `withEntity\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/core/src/__tests__/request-context.test.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/__tests__/runtime-request-context.test.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/index.node.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/index.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/request-context.node.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/request-context.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/runtime.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"chore(deps): bump the cargo group across 3 directories with 3 updates\",\n \"prNumber\": 6479,\n \"type\": \"other\",\n \"body\": \"Bumps the cargo group with 1 update in the /packages/computeruse directory: [bytes](https://github.com/tokio-rs/bytes).\\nBumps the cargo group with 1 update in the /packages/rust directory: [bytes](https://github.com/tokio-rs/bytes).\\nBumps t\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/computeruse/Cargo.lock\",\n \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-cli/Cargo.toml\",\n \"packages/rust/Cargo.lock\",\n \"packages/sweagent/rust/Cargo.lock\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"chore(deps): bump the npm_and_yarn group across 3 directories with 3 updates\",\n \"prNumber\": 6478,\n \"type\": \"other\",\n \"body\": \"Bumps the npm_and_yarn group with 1 update in the /packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent directory: [@modelcontextprotocol/sdk](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk).\\nBumps the npm_and_yarn group with 1 update \",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/package-lock.json\",\n \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/package.json\",\n \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/tests/integration/package-lock.json\",\n \"packages/computeruse/crates/computeruse-mcp-agent/tests/integration/package.json\",\n \"packages/computeruse/examples/mcp-client-elicitation/package-lock.json\",\n \"packages/computeruse/examples/mcp-client-elicitation/package.json\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"feat(plugin-bootstrap): comprehensive optimization and robustness imp\u2026\",\n \"prNumber\": 6476,\n \"type\": \"feature\",\n \"body\": \"\u2026rovements\\r\\n\\r\\nThis commit merges critical performance optimizations, caching improvements, and robustness enhancements while preserving type safety improvements from upstream.\\r\\n\\r\\n## New Features\\r\\n- Added plugin initialization banner with co\",\n \"files\": [\n \"bun.lock\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/banner.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/evaluators/reflection.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/index.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/actionState.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/actions.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/anxiety.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/attachments.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/character.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/choice.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/entities.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/evaluators.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/index.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/plugin-info.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/recentMessages.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/relationships.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/roles.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/settings.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/shared-cache.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-bootstrap/src/providers/world.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"feat: ActionFilterService \u2014 vector search + BM25 reranking for action/provider filtering\",\n \"prNumber\": 6475,\n \"type\": \"feature\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\n\\n- Adds `ActionFilterService` that dynamically filters which actions are shown to the LLM based on relevance, reducing prompt bloat from 200+ actions to ~15 relevant ones\\n- Two-tier ranking: vector search (cosine similarity on em\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/typescript/src/__tests__/action-filter.test.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/bootstrap/index.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/bootstrap/providers/actions.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/runtime.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/services/action-filter.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/services/bm25.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/services/cosine-similarity.ts\",\n \"packages/typescript/src/types/plugin.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"chore(changelog): remove references\",\n \"prNumber\": 6495,\n \"type\": \"other\",\n \"body\": \"## Summary\\r\\n- remove all references from `CHANGELOG.md`\\r\\n\\r\\n## Testing\\r\\n- not run (content-only change)\\r\\n\",\n \"files\": [\n \"CHANGELOG.md\"\n ]\n }\n ],\n \"topContributors\": [\n {\n \"username\": \"standujar\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16385918?u=718bdcd1585be8447bdfffb8c11ce249baa7532d&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 439.178585524873,\n \"prScore\": 433.778585524873,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 5,\n \"commentScore\": 0.4,\n \"summary\": \"standujar: Focused on enhancing the stability and functionality of the n8n-workflow plugin, notably improving multi-step loop control by introducing the awaitingUserInput flag in PR #13. They addressed critical integration issues by ensuring cloud compatibility through state management updates in PR #12 and standardizing success status reporting across all action callbacks in PR #11 (+388/-40 lines). Additionally, they streamlined the development lifecycle by automating node crawling in the publish workflow (PR #10) and integrating the plugin into the project's tracked repositories. Their work this month primarily centered on bug fixes and feature development for workflow automation, with a strong emphasis on code reliability and CI/CD improvements.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"odilitime\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16395496?u=c9bac48e632aae594a0d85aaf9e9c9c69b674d8b&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 348.29516101795406,\n \"prScore\": 348.29516101795406,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"odilitime: Focused on enhancing core system stability and performance within the elizaos/eliza repository, most notably through a comprehensive optimization of the bootstrap plugin in PR #6476 (+2,119/-823 lines). This significant contribution involved modifying 30 files to implement robust architectural improvements and feature enhancements. Additionally, they addressed critical resource management by submitting a fix for a memory leak in the bootstrap cache via PR #6477. Their work this month demonstrates a balanced focus on large-scale feature optimization and essential bug fixing to ensure long-term system reliability.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"lalalune\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/18633264?u=e2e906c3712c2506ebfa98df01c2cfdc50050b30&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 326.03058181605707,\n \"prScore\": 325.25258181605705,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.7779999999999999,\n \"summary\": \"lalalune: Focused on expanding core infrastructure and cross-chain capabilities, notably implementing a multi-provider RPC system in elizaos-plugins/plugin-evm (#25) and cloud proxy routing for Solana services (#26). They delivered a significant architectural enhancement with the ActionFilterService in elizaos/eliza (#6475), which introduced vector search and BM25 reranking to improve action selection. Their work involved a massive scale of code modifications across over 4,500 files, signaling a deep involvement in systemic refactors and next-generation multi-language support. Overall, their contributions centered on infrastructure scalability, authentication frameworks, and enhancing the developer experience through CLI and documentation improvements.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"greptile-apps\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 222.84,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 220.5,\n \"commentScore\": 2.34,\n \"summary\": \"greptile-apps: Focused exclusively on providing feedback and technical oversight through 28 reviews and 5 pull request comments. Despite no direct code changes or merged pull requests this month, they maintained a high level of engagement in the review process to ensure code quality across the codebase. Their primary impact was centered on collaborative peer review and providing detailed commentary on open contributions.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"0xbbjoker\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54844437?u=90fe1762420de6ad493a1c1582f1f70c0d87d8e2&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 157.03108022381605,\n \"prScore\": 155.03108022381605,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"0xbbjoker: Focused on maintenance and stability by addressing technical debt through targeted bugfix work. They contributed a single commit that modified three files, resulting in a balanced set of nine additions and eight deletions. This activity reflects a precise approach to resolving existing issues within the codebase. Their primary focus for the month was dedicated entirely to bugfix efforts across various file types.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"h1-hunt\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/260165794?u=73efc04d5c05a1af9903686d9bb90265cc06ab45&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 135.1498814312321,\n \"prScore\": 121.2118814312321,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 13.5,\n \"commentScore\": 0.43799999999999994,\n \"summary\": \"h1-hunt: Focused on expanding ecosystem capabilities through the development of new integrations, contributing over 1,400 lines of code across several open feature pull requests. Their primary impact involved introducing the Signet plugin for onchain advertising (#6491) and the Mint Club V2 plugin for bonding curve token trading (#6497, #6498). Additionally, they supported the development cycle by providing three technical reviews on active pull requests. Their work this month centered on a balanced mix of feature implementation and bugfixes, with a heavy emphasis on configuration and core code for decentralized finance and advertising plugins.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"anchapin\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6326294?u=2864a5f885294da5b54b95865b6bf6b82781e688&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 72.99868671293827,\n \"prScore\": 72.99868671293827,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"anchapin: Focused on enhancing system stability by implementing defensive programming patterns across the elizaos/eliza codebase. They successfully merged two key bugfix PRs, including #6471 and #6473, which introduced critical null and undefined checks to prevent runtime errors in the settings utility and bootstrap plugin. Their work this month was primarily dedicated to bugfix activities, with a significant portion of their technical contributions involving configuration and code refinements to ensure more robust data handling.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"kaiclawd\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/257877415?u=2c8763bb75f5fd07b37a1939903a8b557dd7a46f&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 59.475878208526346,\n \"prScore\": 59.475878208526346,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"borisudovicic\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/31806472?u=8935f4d43fd7e4eb9bf5ff92d54d4d2f8ac8a786&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 56,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 56,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"borisudovicic: Focused on driving the architectural roadmap and infrastructure readiness for the Eliza App MVP launch, creating 31 issues to coordinate critical tasks across cloud integrations and user experience. They played a key role in defining infrastructure requirements for Telegram and Discord deployments (#6425, #6424), secrets management (#6410), and the implementation of a multi-tenant serverless architecture (#6415). Their contributions also spanned essential product milestones, including the rollout of OAuth providers (#6437), billing system integration (#6445), and performance optimizations to address cold start latency (#6450). Overall, their activity centered on high-level project management, infrastructure provisioning, and security auditing to ensure a stable pre-launch environment.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"buzzbysolcex\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/259807261?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 51.22425149251019,\n \"prScore\": 50.78625149251019,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.43799999999999994,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"yaooooooooooooooo\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/62118705?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 43.5437738965761,\n \"prScore\": 43.5437738965761,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"decentralize-dfw\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/115695363?u=858e729376e39f7d94ec1907637812ec3b9ca575&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 43.5437738965761,\n \"prScore\": 43.5437738965761,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"2-A-M\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/96268540?u=b7d92c0e2a91af580d09eeae862eef576955ab8a&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 36.63501911726088,\n \"prScore\": 36.63501911726088,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"2-A-M: Focused on critical bug fixes and feature enhancements within the Twitter plugin, notably resolving an authentication retry loop and implementing media upload capabilities via PR #48. This substantial contribution involved modifying 12 files and adding over 5,200 lines of code, demonstrating a high level of effort in stabilizing and expanding the plugin's core functionality. The work was completed efficiently with a 10-hour turnaround time to merge, ensuring immediate impact on the repository's reliability. Their primary focus this month was entirely dedicated to bugfix work and technical improvements within the elizaos-plugins/plugin-twitter codebase.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"hanzlamateen\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10975502?u=53f23921078d9a27d96751373bb44f4bd2d58bf4&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 34.39669771918965,\n \"prScore\": 34.39669771918965,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"hanzlamateen: Focused on infrastructure and dependency management within the elizaos/eliza repository, notably executing a significant update to the v2 dependencies and training pipeline in PR #6461. This extensive effort involved modifying over 7,000 files, signaling a major synchronization of the project's codebase and build environment. Their work demonstrated a balanced technical approach, incorporating bug fixes, refactoring, and test updates to ensure system stability. Overall, their contributions this month centered on large-scale maintenance and foundational improvements to the project's examples and training architecture.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"Fankouzu\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8297296?u=bfe40f2d2a88d01f2092e44db726b11c0608b657&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 34.0207738965761,\n \"prScore\": 34.0207738965761,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"bytes0xcr6\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/102038261?u=45bcd82b0f6cc2f6c6f8db5bdc01949b3afe7560&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 23.546573590279973,\n \"prScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 9,\n \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n \"summary\": \"bytes0xcr6: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's capabilities by integrating transaction validation services through the addition of the @proofgate/eliza-plugin to the registry via PR #254. In addition to this feature work, they contributed to the development process by providing two code reviews and engaging in technical discussions on pull requests. Their activity this month was centered on configuration management and enhancing plugin availability within the elizaos-plugins repository.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"erdGeclaw\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258411179?u=4607f14fd9d7eb4b4e6d2c26964d37b47937a49c&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 22.034212794122055,\n \"prScore\": 22.034212794122055,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"erdGeclaw: Focused on expanding ecosystem integrations by initiating the addition of the Base L2 smart money signals plugin to the registry. This contribution, currently tracked in open PR #253, aims to integrate @erdgecrawl/plugin-base-signals into the elizaos-plugins repository. Their primary focus this month has been on enhancing signal-based functionality within the Base L2 environment.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"mcp97\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/15067321?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 21.901026915173976,\n \"prScore\": 21.901026915173976,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"mcp97: Focused on documentation maintenance and repository cleanup within the elizaos/eliza codebase. Their primary contribution involved streamlining the project's history by removing unnecessary references in the changelog via PR #6495. This work resulted in the modification of four files, demonstrating a clear focus on documentation accuracy and administrative consistency.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"kamiyo-ai\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/197570892?u=0d1ee66bdde083d3cfa339f7b2dfc1c2e8fee2fd&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 21.18304826901074,\n \"prScore\": 20.64304826901074,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.54,\n \"summary\": \"kamiyo-ai: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's capabilities by initiating the integration of a new plugin into the registry. They submitted a configuration update to add the kamiyo-trust plugin via PR #258 in the elizaos-plugins/registry repository. Their primary focus this month was on ecosystem expansion and plugin registration.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"arthur-orderly\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258538952?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n \"prScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"arthur-orderly: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's trading capabilities by integrating the Arthur DEX plugin into the registry. They successfully merged PR #256 in elizaos-plugins/registry, which enables Orderly Network perpetual trading functionality. This contribution highlights a primary focus on ecosystem configuration and the integration of decentralized exchange services.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"0xKairo\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258482051?u=1b8329700a063d57382def591660e68809952a16&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n \"prScore\": 14.346573590279972,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"0xKairo: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's integration capabilities by successfully registering a new plugin for AI agent transaction guarantees. They facilitated the addition of the @proofgate/eliza-plugin via PR #257 in the elizaos-plugins/registry repository. This contribution highlights a primary focus on feature work and configuration management to enhance the platform's utility.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"ATHLSolutions\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6761719?u=3517709343c7ed9e4e80cd95304fff0c357e58e0&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 14,\n \"prScore\": 14,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"ATHLSolutions: No activity this month.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"10inchdev\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/226776904?u=f8556423cfa0bd4464d64395c6c0d526050ba553&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 12.874147180559946,\n \"prScore\": 12.874147180559946,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"10inchdev: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's service offerings by integrating the MoltBazaar plugin into the registry. They successfully merged PR #255, which adds the AI Agent Job Marketplace on Base to the elizaos-plugins/registry. This contribution involved precise configuration updates to ensure the new marketplace is properly indexed and accessible. Their primary focus this month was on ecosystem expansion through configuration management.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"a692570\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/182830946?u=fbc711137880cd843fea4b3b9f00013d07d40fd6&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 10.997573590279972,\n \"prScore\": 10.997573590279972,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"a692570: Focused on expanding the project's documentation by initiating a new integration guide for ClawdTalk voice calling. This work is currently captured in open PR #6489 within the elizaos/eliza repository. Their primary focus this month has been on enhancing developer resources and supporting third-party voice service integrations.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"lawyered0\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4802498?u=f45773fb7440d77e5c12ea1560122dd6d26632eb&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 10.40435169073515,\n \"prScore\": 10.40435169073515,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"lawyered0: Focused on improving the robustness of trust evaluation processing by addressing a bug in the elizaos-plugins/plugin-trust repository. They authored PR #1 to handle plain-text trust evaluation requests, contributing 46 lines of code and associated tests to ensure reliable input parsing. This work demonstrates a clear focus on bugfix stability and test coverage within the plugin's core logic.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"puncar-dev\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/72890404?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 8,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 8,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"puncar-dev: Focused on architectural planning and feature proposals for the elizaos/eliza repository by opening four strategic issues. They outlined a comprehensive whitelisting and leaderboard system (#6469), a community-driven news injection system (#6466), and a feedback mechanism for NPC prompts (#6465). Additionally, they proposed optimizations for AI model usage during the coding process (#6467), demonstrating a primary focus on system design and community engagement features.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"samarth30\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/48334430?u=1fc119a6c2deb8cf60448b4c8961cb21dc69baeb&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 4,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 4,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"aite550659-max\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258900948?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 4,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 4,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"aite550659-max: Focused on proposing architectural enhancements for the elizaos/eliza repository by initiating the integration of a Verifiable Audit Trail Plugin (VAL). They documented this new feature through the creation of two open issues (#6499, #6500) to outline the plugin's implementation. Their primary focus this month was on defining the requirements for verifiable auditing within the ecosystem.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"thewoweffect\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/113222443?u=cb21d15b0ce815d0f68167f2eca236aad6c64598&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2.3000000000000003,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2.1,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n \"summary\": \"thewoweffect: Focused on identifying and documenting system inefficiencies within the elizaos/eliza repository. They notably reported a bug regarding duplicate LLM calls triggered by URLs in messages (#6486) and engaged in the subsequent discussion to help resolve the issue. Their primary focus this month was on improving application reliability through bug reporting and issue triage.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"saoirse102345-blip\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258542122?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"saoirse102345-blip: Focused on expanding the ecosystem's capabilities by proposing a new architectural direction for financial transactions. They initiated a feature request for a Payment Infrastructure Plugin to enable agent-to-agent and agent-to-user payments within the elizaos/eliza repository (#6443). This contribution highlights a strategic focus on developing core utility and financial interoperability for the platform.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"rookdaemon\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/258400181?u=f806b5798e056f9384e53da900fdcd3d7bc24c14&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"mbatini\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/34915878?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"fiv3fingers\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/59544796?u=58c2849a3bd9087a4d2e0a5d31ba3cba75babfd6&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"fiv3fingers: Focused on expanding the security capabilities of the platform by proposing the integration of a new audit module. They initiated this effort by opening issue #6468 in elizaos/eliza to advocate for the addition of an EVM audit module. Their primary focus this month was on architectural planning and security enhancements within the EVM ecosystem.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"coolRoger\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/33861624?u=ae40d02de875befc512751127f1082a22b464264&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"coolRoger: Focused on expanding integration flexibility by identifying a need for custom OpenAI endpoint support. They initiated a feature request in elizaos/eliza (#6490) to allow for greater configuration options within the OpenAI provider. Their primary focus this month was on architectural feedback and enhancing the extensibility of the platform's API connections.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"basedmereum\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/223933470?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"basedmereum: Focused on expanding ecosystem capabilities by proposing the integration of the SOLPRISM plugin for verifiable AI reasoning on Solana. This contribution was initiated through the creation of issue #6454 in the elizaos/eliza repository. Their primary focus this month was on architectural planning for blockchain-based AI verification.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"JKHeadley\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12631935?u=e1a3e2005973fbf5526f5dccd04b6310e2476946&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"JKHeadley: Focused on ecosystem expansion and strategic integration by proposing the MoltBridge Trust & Discovery Layer as an enhancement for the Eliza framework. This contribution, detailed in issue elizaos/eliza#6501, outlines a path for improving discovery and trust mechanisms within the project. Their primary focus this month was on architectural planning and integration proposals.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"tdnupe3\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/25161668?u=94680b6bcbcfce954c7a9dd09d667a3919953041&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 0.2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n \"summary\": null\n }\n ],\n \"newPRs\": 35,\n \"mergedPRs\": 18,\n \"newIssues\": 41,\n \"closedIssues\": 65,\n \"activeContributors\": 34\n}\n---\n[\"lalalune_day_2026-02-15\", \"lalalune\", \"day\", \"2026-02-15\", \"lalalune: Focused on feature work, making a single commit that modified 10 files with a net addition of 630 lines, indicating significant development.\", \"2026-02-15T23:19:57.297Z\"]\n[\"kamiyo-ai_day_2026-02-15\", \"kamiyo-ai\", \"day\", \"2026-02-15\", \"kamiyo-ai: Initiated work on a new plugin, opening PR elizaos-plugins/registry#258 to add \\\"plugin-kamiyo-trust\\\" and making a small configuration change.\", \"2026-02-15T23:19:57.083Z\"]\n[\"JKHeadley_day_2026-02-15\", \"JKHeadley\", \"day\", \"2026-02-15\", \"JKHeadley: Today, JKHeadley focused on strategic planning and integration, creating an issue in elizaos/eliza (#6501) to propose an \\\"Integration Proposal: MoltBridge Trust & Discovery Layer as E...\\\".\", \"2026-02-15T23:19:56.636Z\"]\n---\n2026-02-21T08:46:26.399961+00:00Z\n---\n2026-02-21\n---\nelizaOS/knowledge\n---\nelizaOS\n---\nknowledge\n---\nai_news_elizaos_discord_md_2026-02-20\n---\nai_news_elizaos_discord_md_2026-02-19\n---\nai_news_elizaos_discord_md_2026-02-18\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_json_2026-02-20\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_md_2026-02-20\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_discord_json_2026-02-20\n---\nai_news_elizaos_daily_discord_md_2026-02-20\n---\ngithub_summaries_week_latest_2026-02-15.md\n---\ngithub_summaries_month_latest_2026-02-01.md\n---\ngithub_summaries_daily_2026-02-21" ] }