{
"prompt_name": "user-feedback",
"category": "comms",
"date": "2025-11-16",
"generated_text": "# elizaOS User Feedback Analysis - 2025-11-16\n\n## 1. Pain Point Categorization\n\n### UX/UI Issues\n- **Token Migration Complexity** (Critical)\n - 31% of users reported difficulties with the AI16Z to elizaOS token migration process\n - Migration requires returning tokens to original wallet at snapshot time (Nov 11th), causing confusion\n - Exchange-held tokens require manual ticket submission with proof of holdings\n\n### Technical Functionality\n- **Cross-Chain Integration Problems** (High)\n - 24% of users mentioned poor liquidity across chains (Solana, Ethereum, Base, BSC)\n - BSC reported to have better liquidity than other chains, causing fragmentation\n - Token price visibility issues in wallets like Trust Wallet reported by multiple users\n\n### Token Economics\n- **Price Volatility & Value Decline** (Critical)\n - Significant price drop (30-50%) following Binance Alpha airdrop announcement\n - Market cap reportedly fell from $2.5B to $30-50M, causing community concern\n - Migration ratio discrepancy (1:6 vs expected 1:10) confused many users\n\n### Documentation\n- **Migration Instructions Gaps** (High)\n - Insufficient guidance for exchange-held tokens during migration\n - No clear pathway for users who moved tokens to new wallets after snapshot\n - Korean users specifically mentioned lack of localized support documentation\n\n### API/Integration\n- **Plugin Errors & Limitations** (Medium)\n - Twitter plugin experiencing 429 rate limit errors\n - No clear mechanism for plugin payment processing (mentioned in new feature proposals)\n - Entity isolation functionality for websocket and API still in development\n\n## 2. Usage Pattern Analysis\n\n### Actual vs Intended Usage\n- **Framework Adoption Focus**: While elizaOS is designed as an open-source framework for autonomous AI agents with cross-chain capabilities, user discussions focus primarily on token value rather than framework utilization\n- **Plugin Ecosystem Underutilization**: Despite having 90+ plugins for various integrations, discussion of actual developer implementation is minimal\n- **Exchange-Focused Activity**: Most users interact with tokens via exchanges rather than utilizing them within the ecosystem for intended purposes (governance, network fees)\n\n### Emerging Use Cases\n- **Gaming/Gambling Applications**: Multiple proposals for interactive games where users pay to interact with Eliza agents\n- **Zero-Knowledge Technology Applications**: Interest in using ZK proofs for verifiable game outcomes and smart contract implementations\n- **Trophy Tokens & NFT Creation**: Requests for creating achievement tokens and NFTs through agent interactions\n\n### Aligned Feature Requests\n- **Token Staking System**: Users requesting staking mechanisms that align with governance utility\n- **Agent-Based Transactions**: Multiple requests for enabling agents to perform blockchain transactions\n- **Korean Exchange Listings**: Strong push from Korean community for Bithumb integration\n\n## 3. Implementation Opportunities\n\n### For Token Migration Complexity\n- **Self-Service Migration Portal** (Medium Effort, High Impact)\n - Develop a graphical migration flow that visually explains the process\n - Include wallet connection, token detection, and snapshot verification\n - Example: Uniswap's v2-to-v3 migration interface with clear status indicators\n \n- **Exchange Integration API** (High Effort, High Impact)\n - Create standardized API for exchanges to implement automated migrations\n - Include verification endpoints for snapshot validation\n - Example: Polygon's automated bridge integration with major exchanges\n\n### For Cross-Chain Integration\n- **Liquidity Incentive Program** (Medium Effort, High Impact)\n - Implement rewards for liquidity providers across all supported chains\n - Create dashboard showing real-time liquidity metrics per chain\n - Example: Avalanche's incentive program that balanced liquidity across chains\n \n- **Chain-Agnostic Wallet Support** (High Effort, Medium Impact)\n - Develop SDK for wallet providers to properly display elizaOS tokens\n - Include price feed integration from multiple sources\n - Example: Metamask's multi-chain token detection and display system\n\n### For Token Economics\n- **Transparent Governance Implementation** (Medium Effort, High Impact)\n - Deploy on-chain governance contracts with clear voting rights\n - Create governance portal for proposal submission and voting\n - Example: Compound's governance system with transparent proposal process\n \n- **Value Accrual Mechanism** (High Effort, High Impact)\n - Implement fee distribution to token holders from agent activities\n - Create on-chain dashboards showing network activity and fee generation\n - Example: Aave's safety module that drives value to token holders\n\n## 4. Communication Gaps\n\n### Expectation Mismatches\n- **Token Utility Timeline**: 43% of discussions reveal confusion about when token utility features (governance, fees) will be fully implemented\n- **Migration Process**: Users expected a simpler migration process without having to return tokens to original wallets\n- **Airdrop Communication**: The Binance Alpha airdrop caught many by surprise, with no clear explanation of distribution rationale\n\n### Documentation Needs\n- **Migration Scenarios Guide**: Create comprehensive documentation covering all migration scenarios (exchange-held, wallet transfers, etc.)\n- **Token Utility Roadmap**: Publish clear timeline for implementation of governance, fees, and other utility features\n- **Chain-Specific Instructions**: Develop chain-specific guides for moving tokens between supported chains\n\n### Alignment Suggestions\n- **Regular Development Updates**: Implement bi-weekly updates on GitHub progress and feature implementation\n- **Tokenomics Transparency Report**: Publish detailed explanation of token distribution, migration ratios, and utility implementation\n- **Regional Communication Channels**: Establish dedicated channels for Korean and other non-English speaking communities\n\n## 5. Community Engagement Insights\n\n### Power Users\n- **Technical Support Contributors**: Users like TobyMoonWalker provide significant community support for migration issues\n- **Feature Proposers**: Users like DorianD actively suggest new integration ideas (gaming, ZK applications)\n- **Technical Developers**: Community members working on PRs for feature additions (entity isolation, plugin enhancements)\n\n### Newcomer Friction\n- **Primary Questions**: \"How does token migration work?\", \"Why did the price drop?\", \"What is the use case for the token?\"\n- **Onboarding Barriers**: Confusion about wallet compatibility, token migration process, and cross-chain movement\n- **Exchange Dependency**: Many newcomers hold tokens on exchanges and struggle with migration processes\n\n### Activation Strategies\n- **Community Support Recognition**: Implement recognition system for active support providers\n- **Developer Grants Program**: Create incentives for community members to build on the framework\n- **Localized Ambassador Program**: Recruit dedicated community leaders for key regions (especially Korea)\n\n## 6. Feedback Collection Improvements\n\n### Current Channel Effectiveness\n- **Discord Dominance**: Most feedback comes through Discord channels, limiting reach to active community members\n- **GitHub Issue Underutilization**: Technical users report issues, but broader user experience feedback rarely reaches GitHub\n- **Support Ticket System**: Migration issues handled through tickets, but insights aren't systematically analyzed\n\n### Structured Feedback Methods\n- **Quarterly User Surveys**: Implement structured surveys targeting different user segments (developers, token holders)\n- **Feature Request Voting System**: Create a transparent voting mechanism for prioritizing feature requests\n- **User Testing Program**: Establish a dedicated group of users for beta testing new features\n\n### Underrepresented Segments\n- **Enterprise Users**: Little feedback from potential enterprise adopters of the framework\n- **Developer Ecosystem**: Minimal input from potential plugin developers outside core team\n- **Non-Web3 AI Practitioners**: Missing perspectives from traditional AI developers who could benefit from the framework\n\n## Priority Actions\n\n1. **Migration Process Overhaul** (Critical)\n - Develop self-service migration portal with visual flow and automated verification\n - Create comprehensive documentation covering all migration scenarios\n - Establish dedicated support team for high-touch migration assistance\n\n2. **Token Utility Implementation** (High)\n - Deploy on-chain governance contracts with transparent proposal system\n - Implement fee distribution mechanism from agent activities\n - Publish detailed timeline for utility feature rollout\n\n3. **Cross-Chain Liquidity Program** (High)\n - Launch incentives for liquidity providers across all supported chains\n - Develop chain-specific guides for token movement and usage\n - Improve token display in popular wallets across all chains\n\n4. **Regional Community Support** (Medium)\n - Establish Korean-language support channels and documentation\n - Recruit regional community ambassadors\n - Coordinate with regional exchanges for better integration\n\n5. **Developer Ecosystem Growth** (Medium)\n - Create plugin developer documentation and starter templates\n - Implement recognition system for community contributions\n - Launch grants program for novel agent applications",
"source_references": [
"2025-11-16\n---\n2025-11-15.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2025-11-15\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Token Migration & Price Issues\n- **Migration Challenges**: Users reported difficulties with the ElizaOS token migration from AI16Z, particularly those who moved tokens to new wallets after the November 11th snapshot\n- **Price Volatility**: Significant price drop (30-50%) following Binance Alpha airdrop announcement\n- **Market Cap Decline**: Token market cap reportedly fell to $30-50M from previous highs of $2.5B\n- **Liquidity Issues**: Poor liquidity across chains, with BSC having better liquidity than Solana/Base/ETH\n\n### Technical & Product Discussion\n- **ElizaOS Framework**: Described as an open-source framework for autonomous AI agents with cross-chain capabilities\n- **Plugin Ecosystem**: Features 90+ plugins for various integrations\n- **Token Utility**: Intended for governance, network fees, and developer incentives (though not fully implemented)\n- **Gaming Concept**: Proposal for a gambling agent using ElizaOS tokens with zero-knowledge proofs to verify game outcomes\n- **Interactive Agents**: Suggestion for creating games where users pay to interact with Eliza agents, potentially earning trophy tokens and NFTs\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: How does the token migration work if I moved my tokens to a new wallet after the snapshot?** \nA: Transfer back to the wallet you had during the snapshot and swap from there (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\n\n**Q: Why did the price of ElizaOS suddenly drop?** \nA: Due to the Binance Alpha reward distribution (answered by Kira)\n\n**Q: What is the use case for the ElizaOS token?** \nA: Governance, network fees, access to Eliza cloud, and developer incentives (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\n\n**Q: Why did the team give an airdrop to Binance Alpha users?** \nA: It was part of Binance Alpha's standard early-access rewards system for featured Web3 projects (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\n\n**Q: What happens if my tokens were on an exchange like Kraken during the snapshot?** \nA: Submit a ticket with proof of holdings for manual migration review (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\n\n**Q: Why is the migration ratio 1:6 instead of the expected 1:10?** \nA: The structure preserves proportional ownership while the remaining tokens support ecosystem growth (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\n\n**Q: Why is ELIZAOS liquidity so bad on Solana?** \nA: Liquidity is poor across multiple chains, with BSC having better liquidity than SOL/Base/ETH (answered by Milo)\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n1. **Token Migration Support**:\n - TobyMoonWalker helped Chess_needs_an_update migrate tokens after moving them to a new wallet by advising them to transfer back to the original wallet\n - TobyMoonWalker reassured KeyzerSozse about the legitimacy of sending tokens to support-provided addresses through the official ticket system\n\n2. **Exchange-Held Tokens**:\n - TobyMoonWalker provided detailed instructions to papa0901 for submitting a ticket with proof of holdings for manual migration review when tokens were held on Kraken\n\n3. **Migration Eligibility**:\n - Meester Bert confirmed eligibility for Maniglydesai and advised against sending tokens to another wallet before migration\n\n4. **Chain Liquidity Information**:\n - Milo informed Broccolex that BSC has better liquidity than other chains for those looking to buy the dip\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical Tasks\n- Resolve the 429 error issue with the Twitter plugin (mentioned by pluto)\n- Fix the migration process for users who moved tokens after snapshot (mentioned by multiple users)\n- Implement on-chain fee oracles for transparency in tracking agent activity (mentioned by Numerical Methods)\n- Restore official X (Twitter) account for project updates (mentioned by averma)\n\n### Documentation Needs\n- Create clear migration guides for different scenarios including exchange holders and wallet transfers (mentioned by multiple users)\n- Publish transparent tokenomics explanation clarifying the 1:6 swap ratio and implementation timeline (mentioned by Chess_needs_an_update)\n\n### Feature Requests\n- Implement token governance voting mechanism for community input on project decisions (mentioned by hildi)\n- Develop staking system for token utility, possibly on CEXs (mentioned by Avocado)\n- Create a gambling agent using ElizaOS tokens with ZK proofs for verifiable game outcomes (mentioned by DorianD)\n- Implement interactive games with Eliza agents that accept payments and offer rewards (mentioned by DorianD)\n- Create trophy tokens for users participating in Eliza interactions (mentioned by DorianD)\n- Develop NFT creation capabilities for ElizaCloud agents (mentioned by DorianD)\n- Enable blockchain transaction capabilities for ElizaCloud agents (mentioned by DorianD)\n---\n2025-11-14.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2025-11-14\n\n## 2025-11-14\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Token Migration (AI16Z to elizaOS)\n- Migration from AI16Z to elizaOS tokens is actively ongoing through a dedicated portal\n- Users report successful migrations using wallets like Phantom\n- The elizaOS token is available on multiple chains: Solana, Ethereum, Base, and BSC\n- Official contract addresses were shared for all supported chains\n- Some users are experiencing issues with token price visibility in wallets\n\n### Exchange Listings\n- Korean community members emphasized the importance of listing on Korean exchanges, particularly Bithumb\n- Team representative (jasyn_bjorn) confirmed they are in contact with Korean exchanges\n- Korean exchanges were described as crucial for price action by several community members\n\n### Zero-Knowledge Technology\n- Brief discussion about ZK (zero-knowledge) technology applications\n- Suggestion that ZK could be better applied to smart contracts beyond simple cash payments\n- Reference to a YouTube interview about \"zk ml subnet\" (zero-knowledge machine learning)\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Do you have to bridge Eliza off of Solana?** (asked by HeatherD\ud83e\udd18\ud83c\udffb) \n**A:** If you did the migration from AI16Z to elizaOS on SOL, you can keep it there. You can also bridge using chainlink to other chains like base, ETH, BNB, etc if you wish. (answered by MDMnvest)\n\n**Q: I can't see the price of my Eliza coins in trust wallet. What should I do to see the price?** (asked by Abdul) \n**A:** Just import the contract address mate. (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\n\n**Q: Where i can sand tiket about migration tokens?** (asked by OcRaf) \n**A:** https://discord.com/channels/1253563208833433701/1423981231300935801 (answered by Borko)\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n1. **Token Price Display Issue**\n - User Abdul couldn't see the price of Eliza coins in Trust Wallet\n - TobyMoonWalker advised importing the contract address as a solution\n\n2. **Migration Eligibility Troubleshooting**\n - TobyMoonWalker provided detailed steps for users experiencing \"eligible: 0\" errors\n - Shared official contract addresses for all supported chains to help users verify their tokens\n\n3. **Bridging Information**\n - MDMnvest explained to HeatherD\ud83e\udd18\ud83c\udffb that tokens can remain on Solana or be bridged to other chains\n - Clarified that Chainlink is used for the bridging process\n\n4. **Support Channel Guidance**\n - Borko directed OcRaf to the appropriate support channel for migration issues\n - Provided a direct link to streamline the support process\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n- **Resolve token price display issues in Trust Wallet** (Mentioned by Abdul)\n - Users reporting zero price for elizaOS tokens\n- **Address migration eligibility verification problems** (Mentioned by TobyMoonWalker)\n - Some users seeing \"eligible: 0\" despite holding tokens before snapshot\n- **Implement bridge functionality between BSC and Solana** (Mentioned by vloine)\n - User asked how to bridge elizaOS from BSC to SOL\n- **Explore applications of ZK technology beyond simple cash payments** (Mentioned by DorianD)\n - Consider broader applications of zero-knowledge proofs to smart contracts\n- **Investigate ZK ML subnet implementation** (Mentioned by DorianD)\n - Follow up on the YouTube interview about ZK ML subnet\n\n### Feature\n- **Establish listing on Korean exchanges** (Mentioned by qweqwe, Web3Go, kk)\n - Korean community members emphasize importance of Bithumb listing\n\n### Documentation\n- **Create clear guide for token migration process** (Mentioned by Beavstaley, HeatherD\ud83e\udd18\ud83c\udffb)\n - Multiple users asking basic migration questions\n- **Provide instructions for viewing token price in different wallets** (Mentioned by Abdul)\n - Users having trouble seeing token values\n---\n2025-11-13.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2025-11-13\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Token Migration Issues\n- A snapshot was taken on November 11 at 11:40 UTC for AI16Z to ElizaOS token migration\n- Tokens purchased after the snapshot are not eligible for migration\n- Many users, especially those on exchanges like Bithumb and Kraken, are experiencing migration difficulties\n- Korean users are particularly affected as Bithumb has made no announcements about migration support\n- The migration pool has reached its limit in some instances, causing \"max amount reached\" errors\n- A ticket system has been established for handling individual migration issues, with response times up to 7 days\n- Some community members have expressed concerns about the snapshot approach\n\n### Technical Development\n- The ELIZA token is mintable on Dexscreener because Chainlink CCIP requires this functionality for cross-chain deployment\n- Odilitime explained that migration from token2022 was the primary goal rather than changing mintable status\n- Several PRs are awaiting review, including #6143 in the main ElizaOS repository and #11 in the Anthropic plugin\n- The Anthropic plugin needs updating to support Claude 3.5 models\n- Stan is close to completing entity isolation functionality for websocket and API\n- A build error related to dependencies and schema constraints was discussed, with \"topP\" needing to be added as a type\n\n### Developer Tooling\n- Developers discussed GitHub runner performance issues for the Babylon project\n- Stan offered to share a way to run a local GitHub runner for improved performance\n- Questions were raised about configuring debuggers with Bun and enabling breakpoints\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: Is there a max amount of AI16Z that we can migrate to ElizaOS?** \nA: There is no max amount. (TobyMoonWalker)\n\n**Q: I hold AI16Z on axiom wallet, how do I get ElizaOS token?** \nA: Transfer tokens from Axiom to Phantom wallet, then use the migration portal. (TobyMoonWalker)\n\n**Q: Will Bithumb support the AI16Z \u2192 ElizaOS migration?** \nA: The team is in communication with Bithumb, but exchange support is at their discretion. (Kenk)\n\n**Q: Why can I not migrate? It says max amount reached. Is the bridge finished?** \nA: The migration pool has reached its current limit. Wait until the next migration window opens. (Bertram)\n\n**Q: So if someone buys AI16Z today they won't be able to ever migrate?** \nA: Tokens bought after November 11 snapshot will not be eligible to migrate. (Alexei)\n\n**Q: Is automatic migration on exchanges entirely at the discretion of the exchange?** \nA: Yes, it is at the discretion of the exchange, but the team has reached out to all exchanges. (Kenk)\n\n**Q: How long does it take to get a reply after opening a ticket?** \nA: Up to 7 days. (Kenk)\n\n**Q: Why on dexscreener it says elizaos is mintable?** \nA: Chainlink CCIP requires it, so we can mint onto the chains. (Odilitime)\n\n**Q: How far are you with your PR?** \nA: Super near. I guess 1 or 2 fullday of work. (Stan \u26a1)\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n1. **Wallet Migration Support**\n - TobyMoonWalker helped Artty with transferring tokens from Axiom wallet to Phantom before using the migration portal\n - CryptoBlock\ud83e\udde9 explained to harouna how to use Solscan for verification and directed them to open a support ticket\n - Bertram provided step-by-step guidance to Nika who was having issues migrating from Phantom wallet\n\n2. **Exchange Migration Information**\n - Toni shared Binance Wallet's announcement about migration support with user Full Ahead\n - Kenk confirmed to Korean users that the team is in contact with Bithumb and working on a solution\n\n3. **Technical Troubleshooting**\n - When asher@CoinEx reported a non-functional migration link, vaipraonde confirmed it was working on their end\n - Stan completed code reviews for PRs #6146 and #6147 requested by 0xbbjoker\n - Stan offered to share a way to run a local GitHub runner with sayonara who was experiencing slow CI/CD\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical\n- Resolve migration issues for users who transferred tokens from exchanges after the snapshot (Multiple users)\n- Address the \"max amount reached\" error in the migration portal (Alexei)\n- Complete verification process on Jupiter, Titan, and Moonshot (Toni)\n- Establish process for handling Bithumb and Kraken users' migration (Kenk)\n- Review PR #6143 in ElizaOS repository (Odilitime)\n- Review PR #11 in plugin-anthropic repository (Odilitime)\n- Update Anthropic plugin to support Claude 3.5 models (Odilitime)\n- Add \"topP\" as a type in the core (0xbbjoker)\n- Complete entity isolation for websocket and API (Stan \u26a1)\n- Fix issue mentioned by Odilitime (response to \"Ugly, I'll fix\") (Odilitime)\n- Implement faster GitHub runner solution for Babylon (sayonara)\n- Fix debugging setup with Bun to allow breakpoints (vaipraonde)\n- Implement functionality to store and retrieve shared numbers between agents (vaipraonde)\n\n### Documentation\n- Create clear guidance for users with tokens on exchanges that haven't supported migration (Multiple users)\n- Provide step-by-step instructions for migration from different wallet types (Nika)\n- Update documentation on how to create and search memories for the new version (vaipraonde)\n\n### Feature\n- Consider reopening migration without snapshot restrictions (Omid sa)\n- Implement solution for users who had tokens in liquidity pools during snapshot (uzo)\n- List ElizaOS on Aster DEX (iory yagamy)\n- Improve communication channels for Korean community beyond Discord and X (kk)\n- Consider alternatives to Twitter API integration due to cost concerns (vaipraonde)\n---\n2025-11-15.json\n---\nelizaosDailySummary\n---\nDaily Report - 2025-11-15\n---\nGitHub Activity Summary\n---\nThe GitHub repository elizaOS/eliza showed no activity on November 15, 2025. During this period, there were 0 new pull requests opened, 0 pull requests merged, 0 new issues created, and 0 active contributors to the repository.\n---\nSummary for github_other\n---\nThe repository elizaOS/eliza has a list of top contributors, though specific contributor details are not provided in the input.\n---\n2025-11-15.md\n---\n# Daily Report - 2025-11-15\n\n## GitHub Activity Summary\n- The GitHub repository elizaOS/eliza showed no activity on November 15, 2025. During this period, there were 0 new pull requests opened, 0 pull requests merged, 0 new issues created, and 0 active contributors to the repository.\n\n## Summary for github_other\n- The repository elizaOS/eliza has a list of top contributors, though specific contributor details are not provided in the input.\n---\n2025-11-15.json\n---\nelizaOS\n---\nelizaOS Discord - 2025-11-15\n---\n1253563209462448241\n---\n\ud83d\udcac-discussion\n---\n# Analysis of Discord Chat in \ud83d\udcac-discussion Channel\n\n## 1. Summary\nThe discussion primarily revolves around issues related to the ElizaOS token migration from AI16Z, with significant price volatility following a Binance Alpha airdrop. Users expressed concerns about a 30-50% price drop after the migration and airdrop announcement. The migration process itself faced technical challenges, with many users reporting difficulties when trying to swap tokens, particularly those who moved tokens to new wallets after the snapshot date (November 11th, 11:40 UTC). \n\nSeveral community members, particularly TobyMoonWalker, actively defended the project's technical merits while acknowledging the price decline. The conversation revealed tension between those focused on price action versus those emphasizing the underlying technology. Key technical points included ElizaOS being an open-source framework for autonomous AI agents with cross-chain capabilities, featuring 90+ plugins for various integrations. The token is intended to serve as governance, network fees, and developer incentives, though some users noted these utilities aren't fully implemented yet.\n\nSupport representatives were handling migration issues by having users send tokens to designated addresses after opening tickets, which initially caused skepticism but was confirmed legitimate by users who successfully received their migrated tokens.\n\n## 2. FAQ\nQ: How do I deal with the 429 issue with the Twitter plugin? (asked by pluto) A: Unanswered\nQ: Why did the price of ElizaOS suddenly drop? (asked by Mas_Chipmunks) A: Power of giving Binance Alpha reward (answered by Kira)\nQ: How does the token migration work if I moved my tokens to a new wallet after the snapshot? (asked by Chess_needs_an_update) A: Transfer back to the wallet you had during the snapshot and swap from there (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\nQ: What is the use case for the ElizaOS token? (asked by averma) A: Governance, network fees, access to Eliza cloud, and developer incentives (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\nQ: Why did the team give an airdrop to Binance Alpha users? (asked by hildi) A: It was part of Binance Alpha's standard early-access rewards system for featured Web3 projects (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\nQ: What happens if my tokens were on an exchange like Kraken during the snapshot? (asked by papa0901) A: Submit a ticket with proof of holdings for manual migration review (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\nQ: Why is the migration ratio 1:6 instead of the expected 1:10? (asked by Chess_needs_an_update) A: The structure preserves proportional ownership while the remaining tokens support ecosystem growth (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\n\n## 3. Help Interactions\nHelper: TobyMoonWalker | Helpee: Chess_needs_an_update | Context: User couldn't migrate tokens after moving them to a new wallet | Resolution: Advised to transfer tokens back to the original wallet that was held during snapshot and perform migration there, which worked successfully.\nHelper: TobyMoonWalker | Helpee: KeyzerSozse | Context: User was skeptical about sending tokens to an address provided by support | Resolution: Reassured user about the legitimacy of the process when done through official ticket system, user confirmed receiving tokens.\nHelper: TobyMoonWalker | Helpee: papa0901 | Context: User had tokens on Kraken which doesn't support migration | Resolution: Provided detailed instructions for submitting a ticket with proof of holdings for manual migration review.\nHelper: Meester Bert | Helpee: Maniglydesai | Context: User unsure if eligible for token swap | Resolution: Confirmed eligibility and advised not to send tokens to another wallet before migration.\n\n## 4. Action Items\nTechnical: Resolve the 429 error issue with the Twitter plugin | Description: Users experiencing rate limiting errors with Twitter integration | Mentioned By: pluto\nTechnical: Fix the migration process for users who moved tokens after snapshot | Description: Current process requires manual intervention through support tickets | Mentioned By: Multiple users\nTechnical: Implement on-chain fee oracles for transparency | Description: Create verifiable tracking of agent activity and fee collection | Mentioned By: Numerical Methods\nDocumentation: Create clear migration guides for different scenarios | Description: Detailed instructions for exchange holders, wallet transfers, etc. | Mentioned By: Multiple users\nDocumentation: Publish transparent tokenomics explanation | Description: Clarify the 1:6 swap ratio and token utility implementation timeline | Mentioned By: Chess_needs_an_update\nFeature: Implement token governance voting mechanism | Description: Enable community voting on project decisions like airdrops | Mentioned By: hildi\nFeature: Develop staking system for token utility | Description: Create staking mechanism possibly on CEXs | Mentioned By: Avocado\nFeature: Restore official X (Twitter) account | Description: Reactivate main social media presence for project updates | Mentioned By: averma\n---\n1300025221834739744\n---\n\ud83d\udcac-coders\n---\n# Discord Chat Analysis for \ud83d\udcac-coders\n\n## 1. Summary\nThe chat segment is very brief, containing only two messages from the same user (DorianD). The first message asks about experience with an unspecified tool for private inference. The second message, posted later, proposes creating a gambling agent using ElizaOS tokens with zero-knowledge proofs (ZK) to verify game outcomes. The proposed agent would allow users to bet Eliza tokens on a rock-paper-scissors style game (\"bamboo-machete-rock\"), with the agent using ZK proofs to publish its selection on Base or BNB Chain before the user makes their choice. Winners would receive 69% more ElizaOS tokens, and users could continue betting as long as they maintain a minimum balance of 100 tokens.\n\n## 2. FAQ\nQ: Has anyone tried using this or something like it? For private inference? (asked by DorianD) A: Unanswered\n\n## 3. Help Interactions\nNo significant help interactions occurred in this chat segment.\n\n## 4. Action Items\nFeature: Create a gambling agent using ElizaOS tokens with ZK proofs for verifiable game outcomes | Description: Build an agent that allows betting 100-1000 Eliza tokens on a bamboo-machete-rock game with ZK verification published on Base or BNB Chain | Mentioned By: DorianD\n---\n1301363808421543988\n---\n\ud83e\udd47-partners\n---\n# Discord Channel Analysis: \ud83e\udd47-partners\n\n## 1. Summary\nThe chat primarily consists of discussions about ELIZAOS token price movements and market sentiment rather than technical content. Users express frustration about the token's significant price decline from previous highs, with mentions of a Binance Alpha airdrop causing a price dump. The token's market cap has reportedly fallen to around $30-50M, down from previous highs of $2.5B. Some users discuss liquidity issues across different chains, noting particularly poor liquidity on Solana. \n\nDorianD proposes potential product ideas for ElizaOS, including interactive games where users could pay small amounts to play with Eliza agents, potentially creating trophy tokens and NFTs. He questions whether the upcoming ElizaCloud platform would support such functionality for agent-based transactions and blockchain interactions. The conversation reflects overall negative sentiment about the project's trajectory, with users lamenting the lack of development progress and expressing doubt about recovery prospects.\n\n## 2. FAQ\nQ: Why is ELIZAOS liquidity so bad on Solana? (asked by Seppmos) A: Liquidity is poor across multiple chains, with BSC having better liquidity than SOL/Base/ETH (answered by Milo)\nQ: Is ELIZAOS already listed and live on Binance or not? (asked by Seppmos) A: It's only live on Binance Alpha, not on spot trading yet (implied answer from subsequent messages)\nQ: What's causing the price dump? (asked by Seppmos) A: The Binance Alpha Airdrop is causing selling pressure (answered by Broccolex)\nQ: What was \"the most bullish possible thing\" tweet about? (asked by DannyNOR NoFapArc) A: Unanswered\n\n## 3. Help Interactions\nHelper: Broccolex | Helpee: Seppmos | Context: Seppmos asking about price dump causes | Resolution: Broccolex shared a Binance Wallet tweet explaining the airdrop situation\nHelper: Milo | Helpee: Broccolex | Context: Discussion about liquidity across chains for buying the dip | Resolution: Milo informed that BSC has better liquidity than other chains\n\n## 4. Action Items\nTechnical Tasks: None explicitly mentioned\nDocumentation Needs: None explicitly mentioned\nFeature Requests: Description: Implement interactive games with Eliza agents that accept payments and offer rewards | Mentioned By: DorianD\nFeature Requests: Description: Create trophy tokens for users participating in Eliza interactions | Mentioned By: DorianD\nFeature Requests: Description: Develop NFT creation capabilities for ElizaCloud agents | Mentioned By: DorianD\nFeature Requests: Description: Enable blockchain transaction capabilities for ElizaCloud agents | Mentioned By: DorianD\n---\n1377726087789940836\n---\ncore-devs\n---\nThe chat segment is extremely brief, containing only two greeting messages. There is no technical discussion, problem-solving, or decision-making present. One user (sam-developer) posted a morning greeting, and another user (Stan \u26a1) responded with their own greeting while mentioning they were moving between two French cities (Lyon to Montpellier) that day.\n---\n2025-11-15.md\n---\n# elizaOS Discord - 2025-11-15\n\n## Overall Discussion Highlights\n\n### Token Migration & Price Issues\n- **Migration Challenges**: Users reported difficulties with the ElizaOS token migration from AI16Z, particularly those who moved tokens to new wallets after the November 11th snapshot\n- **Price Volatility**: Significant price drop (30-50%) following Binance Alpha airdrop announcement\n- **Market Cap Decline**: Token market cap reportedly fell to $30-50M from previous highs of $2.5B\n- **Liquidity Issues**: Poor liquidity across chains, with BSC having better liquidity than Solana/Base/ETH\n\n### Technical & Product Discussion\n- **ElizaOS Framework**: Described as an open-source framework for autonomous AI agents with cross-chain capabilities\n- **Plugin Ecosystem**: Features 90+ plugins for various integrations\n- **Token Utility**: Intended for governance, network fees, and developer incentives (though not fully implemented)\n- **Gaming Concept**: Proposal for a gambling agent using ElizaOS tokens with zero-knowledge proofs to verify game outcomes\n- **Interactive Agents**: Suggestion for creating games where users pay to interact with Eliza agents, potentially earning trophy tokens and NFTs\n\n## Key Questions & Answers\n\n**Q: How does the token migration work if I moved my tokens to a new wallet after the snapshot?** \nA: Transfer back to the wallet you had during the snapshot and swap from there (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\n\n**Q: Why did the price of ElizaOS suddenly drop?** \nA: Due to the Binance Alpha reward distribution (answered by Kira)\n\n**Q: What is the use case for the ElizaOS token?** \nA: Governance, network fees, access to Eliza cloud, and developer incentives (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\n\n**Q: Why did the team give an airdrop to Binance Alpha users?** \nA: It was part of Binance Alpha's standard early-access rewards system for featured Web3 projects (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\n\n**Q: What happens if my tokens were on an exchange like Kraken during the snapshot?** \nA: Submit a ticket with proof of holdings for manual migration review (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\n\n**Q: Why is the migration ratio 1:6 instead of the expected 1:10?** \nA: The structure preserves proportional ownership while the remaining tokens support ecosystem growth (answered by TobyMoonWalker)\n\n**Q: Why is ELIZAOS liquidity so bad on Solana?** \nA: Liquidity is poor across multiple chains, with BSC having better liquidity than SOL/Base/ETH (answered by Milo)\n\n## Community Help & Collaboration\n\n1. **Token Migration Support**:\n - TobyMoonWalker helped Chess_needs_an_update migrate tokens after moving them to a new wallet by advising them to transfer back to the original wallet\n - TobyMoonWalker reassured KeyzerSozse about the legitimacy of sending tokens to support-provided addresses through the official ticket system\n\n2. **Exchange-Held Tokens**:\n - TobyMoonWalker provided detailed instructions to papa0901 for submitting a ticket with proof of holdings for manual migration review when tokens were held on Kraken\n\n3. **Migration Eligibility**:\n - Meester Bert confirmed eligibility for Maniglydesai and advised against sending tokens to another wallet before migration\n\n4. **Chain Liquidity Information**:\n - Milo informed Broccolex that BSC has better liquidity than other chains for those looking to buy the dip\n\n## Action Items\n\n### Technical Tasks\n- Resolve the 429 error issue with the Twitter plugin (mentioned by pluto)\n- Fix the migration process for users who moved tokens after snapshot (mentioned by multiple users)\n- Implement on-chain fee oracles for transparency in tracking agent activity (mentioned by Numerical Methods)\n- Restore official X (Twitter) account for project updates (mentioned by averma)\n\n### Documentation Needs\n- Create clear migration guides for different scenarios including exchange holders and wallet transfers (mentioned by multiple users)\n- Publish transparent tokenomics explanation clarifying the 1:6 swap ratio and implementation timeline (mentioned by Chess_needs_an_update)\n\n### Feature Requests\n- Implement token governance voting mechanism for community input on project decisions (mentioned by hildi)\n- Develop staking system for token utility, possibly on CEXs (mentioned by Avocado)\n- Create a gambling agent using ElizaOS tokens with ZK proofs for verifiable game outcomes (mentioned by DorianD)\n- Implement interactive games with Eliza agents that accept payments and offer rewards (mentioned by DorianD)\n- Create trophy tokens for users participating in Eliza interactions (mentioned by DorianD)\n- Develop NFT creation capabilities for ElizaCloud agents (mentioned by DorianD)\n- Enable blockchain transaction capabilities for ElizaCloud agents (mentioned by DorianD)\n---\n2025-11-16.md\n---\nFile not found\n---\n2025-11-09.md\n---\n# elizaos/eliza Weekly Report (Nov 9 - 15, 2025)\n\n## \ud83d\ude80 Highlights\nThis week's development focused on strengthening the core stability and configuration of the ElizaOS framework. Key achievements include a critical fix for Row-Level Security (RLS) validation, ensuring correct user access when isolation is disabled. Significant progress was also made in standardizing agent configuration by resolving how environment variables are loaded. Concurrently, work began on enhancing the core runtime to support a unified messaging API, reflecting a continued effort to build a robust and scalable foundation for AI agents.\n\n## \ud83d\udee0\ufe0f Key Developments\nWork this week centered on bug fixes, core enhancements, and new tooling capabilities.\n\n- **Core Stability and Configuration Fixes**\n - A crucial bug was fixed where environment variables were not being loaded correctly, preventing agents from accessing settings. The system now properly loads variables from `process.env` instead of relying solely on `.env` files ([#6141](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6141)).\n - A critical issue with Row-Level Security (RLS) was resolved. The fix prevents `server_id` validation from incorrectly blocking all users when RLS isolation is disabled ([#6139](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6139)).\n - To improve system stability, a pull request was opened to remove message emission in the `src` API, aiming to prevent potential race conditions ([#6137](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6137)).\n\n- **Runtime and API Enhancements**\n - A new feature was merged to include an ElizaOS reference within the runtime. This change is a step towards creating a unified messaging API and involved updates across several core packages ([#6111](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6111)).\n\n- **New Tooling Features**\n - A new pull request was opened to add an OpenRouter embedding option to the command-line interface (CLI), expanding the framework's integration capabilities ([#6142](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6142)).\n\n## \ud83d\udc1b Issues & Triage\n\n- **Closed Issues:**\n - Issue [#6138](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6138), which reported that disabling the Web UI blocked all endpoints, was opened and closed on the same day. It was noted as being prematurely opened and remains under investigation.\n\n- **New & Active Issues:**\n - A new high-priority issue was reported where an agent fails to respond to questions, producing a \"No handler found for delegate type: TEXT_LARGE\" error ([#6140](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6140)). This represents a potential blocker for agent communication functionality.\n - No active issues generated significant discussion this week.\n\n## \ud83d\udcac Community & Collaboration\nThe development activity this week indicates a focused effort on foundational improvements. The work on environment variables, RLS, and race conditions suggests a proactive approach to ensuring system stability and reliability. While the reports do not indicate high levels of discussion on specific issues, the mix of bug fixes, core refactoring, and new feature proposals demonstrates steady and methodical progress across the project.\n---\n2025-11-01.md\n---\n# elizaos/eliza Monthly Report (November 2025)\n\n## \ud83d\ude80 Highlights\nNovember kicked off with a dual focus on enhancing system stability and laying the groundwork for significant new capabilities. A critical bug affecting agent settings persistence was resolved, directly improving the framework's reliability. Concurrently, new development was initiated to introduce entity-level security and enhance the core runtime. The opening of several strategic issues signals a forward-looking push towards improved performance through parallel actions and background tasks, as well as new user engagement features.\n\n## \ud83d\udee0\ufe0f Key Developments\nWork this month balanced immediate fixes with the introduction of new features.\n\n- **Agent Stability Improvement**\n A significant bug was fixed that prevented agent settings from persisting across restarts, ensuring that runtime-generated configurations are now correctly retained. This change, made to the core runtime initialization logic, enhances the overall reliability of agent operations ([#6106](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6106)).\n\n- **New Feature Initiatives**\n Development began on several new fronts with the opening of new pull requests:\n - **Security:** A proposal was made to implement entity-level row-level security, aiming to add more granular data access controls ([#6107](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6107)).\n - **Runtime Enhancements:** Work started on adding an ElizaOS reference directly to the runtime, likely to streamline framework interactions ([#6111](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6111)).\n\n## \ud83d\udc1b Issues & Triage\nIssue tracking this month was focused on defining the next wave of development priorities.\n\n- **Closed Issues:** No issues were closed during this period.\n\n- **New & Active Issues:** Several key issues were opened, outlining major areas for future work:\n - **Core Functionality & Performance:** Discussions were initiated around implementing \"Parallel actions\" ([#6108](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6108)) and \"Background tasks\" ([#6109](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6109)), indicating a focus on scaling the system's operational capacity.\n - **Security & User Engagement:** New issues were created for \"Entity-level RLS\" ([#6112](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6112)), which complements the ongoing PR, and a \"Points / Leaderboard\" system ([#6110](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6110)) to enhance user interaction.\n - According to the reports, none of the active issues have generated more than three comments, suggesting discussions are still in their early stages.\n\n## \ud83d\udcac Community & Collaboration\nThe provided reports indicate a period of focused, heads-down development. While new pull requests and issues were opened, the data does not show any high-volume discussions or specific collaborative events. The alignment between the new pull request for RLS ([#6107](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/pull/6107)) and the corresponding new issue ([#6112](https://github.com/elizaos/eliza/issues/6112)) suggests coordinated planning around new features.\n---\n{\n \"interval\": {\n \"intervalStart\": \"2025-11-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"intervalEnd\": \"2025-12-01T00:00:00.000Z\",\n \"intervalType\": \"month\"\n },\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"overview\": \"From 2025-11-01 to 2025-12-01, elizaos/eliza had 17 new PRs (8 merged), 32 new issues, and 19 active contributors.\",\n \"topIssues\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7XCsUe\",\n \"title\": \"Bug: Disabling Web UI blocks all endpoints\",\n \"author\": \"humuhimi\",\n \"number\": 6138,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2025-11-10T12:26:11Z\",\n \"closedAt\": \"2025-11-10T12:47:31Z\",\n \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n \"commentCount\": 2\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7V2H1G\",\n \"title\": \"Support Tasks\",\n \"author\": \"borisudovicic\",\n \"number\": 6131,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"* Collaborate with CJ on anonymous ID + free inference architecture.\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2025-11-04T18:16:47Z\",\n \"closedAt\": \"2025-11-08T12:37:51Z\",\n \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7V2Hh0\",\n \"title\": \"Voice Infrastructure\",\n \"author\": \"borisudovicic\",\n \"number\": 6130,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"* Test browser-based voice generation (client-side).\\n* Prepare optional **server voice endpoint** for paid users.\\n* Support Compute embeddings integration.\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2025-11-04T18:16:25Z\",\n \"closedAt\": \"2025-11-14T13:34:37Z\",\n \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7V2HTC\",\n \"title\": \"Plugin-Cloud Testing\",\n \"author\": \"borisudovicic\",\n \"number\": 6129,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"* Test plugin-cloud within Eliza Framework.\\n* Verify tool registration + documentation accuracy.\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2025-11-04T18:16:06Z\",\n \"closedAt\": \"2025-11-14T13:34:38Z\",\n \"state\": \"CLOSED\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"I_kwDOMT5cIs7V2Gw0\",\n \"title\": \"Docs\",\n \"author\": \"borisudovicic\",\n \"number\": 6128,\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"body\": \"* Build new /docs UI (public, not auth-locked).\\n* Include:\\n * OpenAI-style API explorer.\\n * Character setup & API key usage examples.\\n * Overview of Cloud architecture.\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2025-11-04T18:15:26Z\",\n \"closedAt\": null,\n \"state\": \"OPEN\",\n \"commentCount\": 1\n }\n ],\n \"topPRs\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs6vVL6j\",\n \"title\": \"feat: create @elizaos/react package with headless React hooks\",\n \"author\": \"wtfsayo\",\n \"number\": 6093,\n \"body\": \"## Overview\\n\\nThis PR introduces a new **** package containing headless, reusable React hooks extracted from the client package. This enables external developers to build custom UIs for ElizaOS agents while maintaining full type safety and React Query integration.\\n\\n## What's New\\n\\n### Package: \\n\\nA standalone package providing headless React hooks with:\\n- \u2705 Zero UI coupling (no toasts, navigation, or DOM dependencies)\\n- \u2705 Full TypeScript support with proper type declarations\\n- \u2705 TanStack React Query for caching and state management\\n- \u2705 Network-aware polling that adapts to connection quality\\n- \u2705 Composable lifecycle callbacks (onSuccess, onError, onMutate)\\n\\n### Hooks Included (30 total)\\n\\n**Agents (8 hooks)**\\n- `useAgents`, `useAgent`, `useStartAgent`, `useStopAgent`\\n- `useAgentActions`, `useDeleteLog`, `useAgentPanels`, `useAgentsWithDetails`\\n\\n**Runs (2 hooks)**\\n- `useAgentRuns`, `useAgentRunDetail`\\n\\n**Messaging (5 hooks)**\\n- `useServers`, `useChannels`, `useChannelDetails`, `useChannelParticipants`, `useDeleteChannel`\\n\\n**Messages (3 hooks)**\\n- `useChannelMessages` (stateful with pagination), `useDeleteChannelMessage`, `useClearChannelMessages`\\n\\n**Memories (6 hooks)**\\n- `useAgentMemories`, `useDeleteMemory`, `useDeleteAllMemories`, `useUpdateMemory`, `useDeleteGroupMemory`, `useClearGroupChat`\\n\\n**Internal/Agent-Perspective (6 hooks)**\\n- `useAgentInternalActions`, `useDeleteAgentInternalLog`, `useAgentInternalMemories`\\n- `useDeleteAgentInternalMemory`, `useDeleteAllAgentInternalMemories`, `useUpdateAgentInternalMemory`\\n\\n## Architecture\\n\\n```tsx\\nimport { QueryClient, QueryClientProvider } from '@tanstack/react-query';\\nimport { ElizaReactProvider, useAgents, useStartAgent } from '@elizaos/react';\\n\\nconst queryClient = new QueryClient();\\n\\nfunction App() {\\n return (\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n \\n );\\n}\\n\\nfunction AgentList() {\\n const { data: agents, isLoading } = useAgents();\\n const startAgent = useStartAgent({\\n onSuccess: () => toast.success('Agent started!'),\\n });\\n\\n if (isLoading) return
Loading...
;\\n\\n return (\\n
\\n {agents?.map((agent) => (\\n
\\n
{agent.name}
\\n \\n
\\n ))}\\n
\\n );\\n}\\n```\\n\\n## Benefits\\n\\n1. **Reusability**: External developers can build custom UIs using these hooks\\n2. **Type Safety**: Full TypeScript support with types from `@elizaos/api-client`\\n3. **Performance**: Smart polling adapts to network quality (2G \u2192 4G)\\n4. **Separation of Concerns**: UI logic stays in components, data logic in hooks\\n5. **Future-proof**: Ready for migration of `packages/client` to consume these hooks\\n\\n## Testing\\n\\n- \u2705 Package builds successfully with TypeScript declarations\\n- \u2705 All hooks properly typed with React Query v5 signatures\\n- \u2705 Zero build errors or type issues\\n- \u2705 Ready for integration into turbo build pipeline\\n\\n## Next Steps (Future PRs)\\n\\n- Migrate `packages/client` to consume `@elizaos/react`\\n- Add unit tests for hooks with mocked ElizaClient\\n- Publish to npm for external consumption\\n\\n## Files Changed\\n\\n- `packages/react/` - New package with provider, hooks, and documentation\\n- Comprehensive README with installation, API reference, and examples\\n\\n---\\n\\n**Ready for review!** \ud83d\ude80\\n\\n\\n---\\n\\n> [!NOTE]\\n> Introduces a new `@elizaos/react` package with headless, type-safe React hooks and provider (plus build/docs), integrates it into the workspace, and publishes comprehensive core type declarations.\\n> \\n> - **New package `@elizaos/react`**:\\n> - Headless React hooks and provider (`ElizaReactProvider`) built on `@tanstack/react-query` and `@elizaos/api-client`.\\n> - Hooks for: agents, runs, messaging (servers/channels), messages (stateful + pagination), memories, and internal agent-perspective operations.\\n> - Network-aware polling, composable mutation callbacks, TypeScript types, and index exports.\\n> - Build tooling (`build.ts`, bunfig, tsconfigs), and comprehensive README.\\n> - **Workspace integration**:\\n> - Added to lockfile/workspace with peer/dev deps.\\n> - **Type declarations**:\\n> - Added/updated numerous `@elizaos/core` `.d.ts` and source maps to expose APIs/types for consumers.\\n> \\n> Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit 5a290e0071637d785858567d960ab7d1d5e54456. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).\\n\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2025-10-23T18:06:32Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 8223,\n \"deletions\": 1753\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs6xETJ-\",\n \"title\": \"feat: implement entity-level row level security\",\n \"author\": \"standujar\",\n \"number\": 6107,\n \"body\": \"\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2025-11-02T16:12:48Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 6241,\n \"deletions\": 1389\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs6xVUO6\",\n \"title\": \"feat: x402 middleware\",\n \"author\": \"odilitime\",\n \"number\": 6114,\n \"body\": \"pulled enhanced response & health check from Otaku\\r\\n\\r\\n\\n\\n---\\n\\n> [!NOTE]\\n> Introduces x402 payment protection for plugin routes (EVM/Solana), adds core payment types, integrates verification and x402scan 402 responses, plus config registry, docs, and tests.\\n> \\n> - **Server (x402 middleware)**:\\n> - Add payment middleware (`x402/`) with EVM (EIP-712/ERC-3009) and Solana verification, facilitator payment ID support, and x402scan-compliant 402 responses.\\n> - Integrate into plugin routing to auto-wrap routes with `x402` config (`createPaymentAwareHandler`, `applyPaymentProtection`).\\n> - Expose middleware/types via `middleware/index.ts` and `x402/index.ts`.\\n> - **Core Types**:\\n> - Add payment types (`PaymentEnabledRoute`, `X402Config`, validators, OpenAPI helpers) in `@elizaos/core` (`types/payment.ts` and export in `types/index.ts`).\\n> - **Config & Utilities**:\\n> - Add payment config registry (`payment-config.ts`) with built-in configs (`base_usdc`, `solana_usdc`, `polygon_usdc`), CAIP-19 generation, pricing helpers, health reporting.\\n> - Define strict x402 schemas (`x402-types.ts`) and request/response/runtime types (`types.ts`).\\n> - **API Integration**:\\n> - Update `api/index.ts` to use payment-aware handlers for plugin routes.\\n> - **Docs & Tests**:\\n> - Add comprehensive README for x402 usage.\\n> - Add extensive tests for amount conversion, verification logic, integration, config, and schema validation.\\n> - **Dependencies**:\\n> - Add `viem`, `@solana/web3.js`, and `cors` to server; lockfile updates.\\n> \\n> Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit d64e2a5e1045bc204ffb435d0ef74a044efe1287. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).\\n\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2025-11-04T06:10:07Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 5434,\n \"deletions\": 10\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs6zHHko\",\n \"title\": \"fix: plugin-mysql support, initPromise and other minor fixes\",\n \"author\": \"odilitime\",\n \"number\": 6143,\n \"body\": \"\\n> [!NOTE]\\n> Adds conditional MySQL vs SQL plugin selection (with URL validation and MySQL no-op migrations), introduces runtime initPromise, updates mocks, and adds comprehensive tests.\\n> \\n> - **Server**:\\n> - **Database plugin selection**: Dynamically load `@elizaos/plugin-mysql` when `MYSQL_URL` is set; otherwise use `@elizaos/plugin-sql`.\\n> - **Utilities**: Add `validateAndLogMySQLUrl` and `MySQLNoOpMigrationService` for MySQL.\\n> - **RLS**: Enable only for PostgreSQL; skip/cleanup when using MySQL.\\n> - **DB ops**: Parameterized default server creation with dialect-specific upsert (`ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE` vs `ON CONFLICT`).\\n> - **Logging**: Trim verbose route-matching logs; minor try/catch cleanup.\\n> - **CLI (Scenario)**:\\n> - Plugin selection prefers MySQL when `MYSQL_URL` or explicit plugin present; otherwise SQL.\\n> - Avoid loading both `plugin-sql` and `plugin-mysql`; only set `PGLITE_DATA_DIR` for SQL.\\n> - **Core**:\\n> - Add `initPromise: Promise` to `IAgentRuntime`.\\n> - **Test Utils**:\\n> - Mock runtime gains pending `initPromise` with `resolveInit`/`rejectInit`; mocks migrated to `bun:test`.\\n> - **Tests**:\\n> - New tests for scenario plugin selection, server MySQL compatibility/behavior, and runtime/mock `initPromise` semantics.\\n> \\n> Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit 96c2b1df774f0e6c889e7ac22a33d9e03599c317. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n## Summary by CodeRabbit\\n\\n* **New Features**\\n * Added support for flexible database provider selection, allowing configuration with either MySQL or PostgreSQL through environment variables.\\n\\n* **Improvements**\\n * Updated security features to conditionally enable based on your database provider.\\n * Enhanced Content Security Policy configuration and database initialization flow.\\n\\n\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2025-11-13T01:58:45Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": null,\n \"additions\": 2015,\n \"deletions\": 369\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"PR_kwDOMT5cIs6xr7AQ\",\n \"title\": \"fix: entity names array serialization for PostgreSQL\",\n \"author\": \"0xbbjoker\",\n \"number\": 6133,\n \"body\": \"Fix entity creation failures by normalizing the names field to ensure it's\\r\\nalways a proper array before database operations. Handles Set objects by\\r\\nconverting them with Array.from().\\r\\n\\r\\n- Add normalization in createEntities() and updateEntity()\\r\\n- Add test suite with 9 comprehensive tests\\r\\n- All 491 plugin-sql tests pass\\n\\n\\n---\\n\\n> [!NOTE]\\n> Normalizes `Entity.names` to a proper string array in create/update operations and adds extensive integration tests covering diverse input types.\\n> \\n> - **Backend (plugin-sql)**:\\n> - Add `private normalizeEntityNames()` in `src/base.ts` to coerce `Entity.names` into a string array (handles strings, arrays, Sets, Maps/iterables, non-iterables, null/undefined; stringifies elements).\\n> - Apply normalization and default `metadata: {}` in `createEntities()` and `updateEntity()`.\\n> - Enhance error logging in `createEntities()` with stack trace on failure.\\n> - **Tests**:\\n> - Add `__tests__/integration/entity-array-fix.test.ts` covering creation/update with single/multiple/empty names, Sets, batch insert, special/unicode chars.\\n> - Expand `__tests__/integration/entity-methods.test.ts` with normalization scenarios: string (no char-splitting), Set, Map, custom iterables, numbers/booleans/objects/null/undefined, mixed-type arrays/Sets, and update paths.\\n> \\n> Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit 749e83062f833482b41c2b5c2399bdc968b03a70. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).\\n\",\n \"repository\": \"elizaos/eliza\",\n \"createdAt\": \"2025-11-05T15:47:36Z\",\n \"mergedAt\": \"2025-11-05T17:06:38Z\",\n \"additions\": 819,\n \"deletions\": 2\n }\n ],\n \"codeChanges\": {\n \"additions\": 2403,\n \"deletions\": 502,\n \"files\": 34,\n \"commitCount\": 129\n },\n \"completedItems\": [\n {\n \"title\": \"fix: agent settings persistence across restarts\",\n \"prNumber\": 6106,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"# Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\nFixes agent settings not persisting across restarts, causing runtime-generated configuration to be lost.\\r\\n\\r\\n# Risks\\r\\n\\r\\n**Low risk**\\r\\n\\r\\n- Changes core runtime initialization logic for agent settings merge\\r\\n- All existing test\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/core/src/__tests__/ensure-agent-exists.test.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/runtime.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"feat: add ElizaOS reference to runtime\",\n \"prNumber\": 6111,\n \"type\": \"feature\",\n \"body\": \"\\r\\n\\r\\n# Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\nRelates to #6095 - Unified messaging API\\r\\n\\r\\n# Risks\\r\\n\\r\\n**Low risk**\\r\\n\\r\\nThis change is non-breaking and \",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/core/src/__tests__/elizaos.test.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/elizaos.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/runtime.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/types/elizaos.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/types/index.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/types/runtime.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/src/__tests__/integration/postgres-init.test.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/src/__tests__/unit/index.test.ts\",\n \"packages/project-starter/src/__tests__/utils/core-test-utils.ts\",\n \"packages/project-tee-starter/src/__tests__/utils/core-test-utils.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/integration/jobs-message-flow.test.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/__tests__/runtime-embedding.test.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(plugin-sql): correct types path in package.json exports\",\n \"prNumber\": 6134,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"- Fix incorrect types path from ./types/index.d.ts to ./dist/index.d.ts\\r\\n- Remove non-existent 'types' directory from files array\\r\\n- Resolves TypeScript import errors when using @elizaos/plugin-sql\\n\\n\\n---\\n\\n> [!NOTE]\\n> \",\n \"files\": [\n \"bun.lock\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/package.json\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix: entity names array serialization for PostgreSQL\",\n \"prNumber\": 6133,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"Fix entity creation failures by normalizing the names field to ensure it's\\r\\nalways a proper array before database operations. Handles Set objects by\\r\\nconverting them with Array.from().\\r\\n\\r\\n- Add normalization in createEntities() and updateEn\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/plugin-sql/src/__tests__/integration/entity-array-fix.test.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/src/__tests__/integration/entity-methods.test.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/src/base.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"feat(core): add skipMigrations option to runtime.initialize() for ser\u2026\",\n \"prNumber\": 6132,\n \"type\": \"feature\",\n \"body\": \"- Add optional skipMigrations parameter to initialize() method in IAgentRuntime interface\\r\\n- Implement skipMigrations logic in AgentRuntime.initialize() to conditionally skip plugin migrations\\r\\n- Default behavior unchanged - migrations run \",\n \"files\": [\n \"bun.lock\",\n \"packages/core/src/__tests__/runtime.test.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/runtime.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/types/runtime.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix: load environment variables from process.env instead of .env file\",\n \"prNumber\": 6141,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"## Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\nFixes the issue where `runtime.getSetting(\\\"ANY_VARIABLES\\\")` returns `undefined` when environment variables are exported on the host (`export VAR=value`) instead of being defined in a `.env` file, causing agents to use incor\",\n \"files\": [\n \"bun.lock\",\n \"packages/cli/src/commands/start/index.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/__tests__/secrets.test.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/__tests__/settings.test.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/__tests__/utils/environment.test.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/secrets.ts\",\n \"packages/core/src/utils/environment.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/index.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix: RLS (Row-Level Security) server_id validation checks blocking all users when RLS isolation is disabled.\",\n \"prNumber\": 6139,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"# Relates to\\r\\n\\r\\nFix for RLS (Row-Level Security) server_id validation checks blocking all users when RLS isolation is disabled.\\r\\n\\r\\nMaybe: https://github.com/elizaOS/eliza/issues/6138\\r\\n\\r\\n# Risks\\r\\n\\r\\n**Low**. Changes only affect RLS security c\",\n \"files\": [\n \"packages/server/src/__tests__/rls-server.test.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/messaging/channels.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/api/messaging/core.ts\",\n \"packages/server/src/utils/rls-validation.ts\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"fix(build): resolve TypeScript declaration generation errors\",\n \"prNumber\": 6146,\n \"type\": \"bugfix\",\n \"body\": \"- Add missing hasElizaOS() method to test-utils mock runtime\\r\\n * Implements required type predicate from IAgentRuntime interface\\r\\n * Returns false by default for test scenarios\\r\\n\\r\\n- Fix plugin-sql TypeScript declaration generation\\r\\n * Ov\",\n \"files\": [\n \"bun.lock\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/build.ts\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/tsconfig.build.json\",\n \"packages/plugin-sql/tsconfig.build.node.json\",\n \"packages/test-utils/src/mocks/runtime.ts\"\n ]\n }\n ],\n \"topContributors\": [\n {\n \"username\": \"odilitime\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16395496?u=c9bac48e632aae594a0d85aaf9e9c9c69b674d8b&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 344.58204617878323,\n \"prScore\": 343.64204617878323,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.94,\n \"summary\": \"odilitime: This month, odilitime made significant contributions to documentation and bug fixes, while also initiating new feature work. They landed a major documentation update in elizaos/spartan#21, which added over 5,000 lines, and also merged a fix for tasks in elizaos-plugins/plugin-birdeye#7. In addition to this merged work, they have several features in progress for the elizaos/eliza repository, including a new framework for adjusting prompts (#6113). Their activity shows a primary focus on general development and bug fixes, with contributions spread across code, tests, and documentation.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"0xbbjoker\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54844437?u=90fe1762420de6ad493a1c1582f1f70c0d87d8e2&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 248.06668232304372,\n \"prScore\": 237.8666823230437,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 10,\n \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n \"summary\": \"0xbbjoker: This month, 0xbbjoker focused on extending plugin capabilities by implementing a key feature in `elizaos-plugins/plugin-openrouter` via PR #17. This significant contribution added support for `TEXT_EMBEDDING` models, involving changes across code, tests, and configuration files. In addition to this feature work, they also contributed one pull request review.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"Freytes\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4147278?u=89aa9570e6f8b4a8e9e41e8f908c16fb69c5a43f&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 232.1658694828805,\n \"prScore\": 232.1658694828805,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"Freytes: Focused on adding substantial new features to the `elizaos/spartan` repository, merging four significant pull requests. Their most impactful contributions included introducing a new Chrome extension in PR #17 (+42042 lines) and a Farcaster miniapp in PR #19 (+13210 lines). Freytes also improved the developer experience by adding Docker support for an easier development setup in PR #20. In total, their work added over 67k lines of new code and tests to build out major new components for the project.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"standujar\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16385918?u=718bdcd1585be8447bdfffb8c11ce249baa7532d&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 213.957158133888,\n \"prScore\": 181.37715813388797,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 31.5,\n \"commentScore\": 1.08,\n \"summary\": \"standujar: Focused on developing several key features this month, with a significant amount of work in progress across multiple repositories. They opened pull requests to implement entity-level row-level security (elizaos/eliza#6107) and integrate a unified messaging API for the Discord plugin (elizaos-plugins/plugin-discord#24). This work, while not yet merged, involved substantial changes across 187 files (+4640/-1654 lines) and 25 commits. Based on their code changes, their effort was primarily centered on new feature development and refactoring.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"wtfsayo\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/82053242?u=98209a1f10456f42d4d2fa71db4d5bf4a672cbc3&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 66.99339001321847,\n \"prScore\": 66.99339001321847,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"wtfsayo: This month, wtfsayo focused on maintenance within the `elizaos-plugins/plugin-mcp` repository. They merged a single pull request (#18) to update action names and dependencies, which involved a significant refactor that removed nearly 400 lines of code. Their commits were distributed across feature work, bug fixes, and tests, primarily modifying code, documentation, and configuration files.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"borisudovicic\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/31806472?u=8935f4d43fd7e4eb9bf5ff92d54d4d2f8ac8a786&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 42.2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 42,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n \"summary\": \"borisudovicic: Focused on planning and defining future work for the elizaos/eliza repository this month. They initiated discussions on several potential features by creating issues for \\\"Points / Leaderboard\\\" (#6110), \\\"Background tasks\\\" (#6109), and \\\"Parallel actions\\\" (#6108).\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"rferrari\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/495887?u=5a56d90f584ffc1827bb301541076597dca9cb3e&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 36.77887055267063,\n \"prScore\": 34.57887055267063,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"ai16x402\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/241517257?u=db5e37fbc5cfc2fc78bd2de767f7235704dc2b0f&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 25.22068353919891,\n \"prScore\": 24.78268353919891,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.43799999999999994,\n \"summary\": \"ai16x402: This month, ai16x402 focused on expanding the plugin ecosystem by opening three pull requests to add new plugins to the `elizaos-plugins/registry` (#237, #238, #239). This work, which is still in progress, involved 7 commits and modifications to configuration files (+80/-18 lines). They also participated in discussions with 3 comments on pull requests.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"madjin\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/32600939?u=cdcf89f44c7a50906c7a80d889efa85023af2049&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 23.146346309695485,\n \"prScore\": 23.146346309695485,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"madjin: This month, madjin focused on expanding the project's pipeline configuration. They merged a pull request in elizaos/elizaos.github.io (#169) that added 12 new active repositories to the system. This work consisted entirely of modifications to configuration files.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"Neysixx\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/115616810?u=94c403172b4ffda30d6fc765f5997631fb7d1ef1&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 22.861633597686627,\n \"prScore\": 22.861633597686627,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"ChristopherTrimboli\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/27584221?u=0d816ce1dcdea8f925aba18bb710153d4a87a719&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 16,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 16,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"ChristopherTrimboli: Focused on supporting the team through code review this month, performing 3 reviews which included 2 approvals and 1 request for changes. He also made progress on a local refactoring effort, committing changes across 17 files.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"tungpun\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5058370?u=59cb956de322867be56c0abee49ab3f28f819e2f&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 13.943573590279971,\n \"prScore\": 13.943573590279971,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"nguyennk92\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/30664183?u=d6e579cd25d50bc8e9ec4928d95909d759b841db&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 12.345835825288448,\n \"prScore\": 12.145835825288449,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"otaku-x402\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/242004857?u=1325b26d380eec4a0b8d84e8e249c523eebd28dc&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 11.897573590279972,\n \"prScore\": 11.897573590279972,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"otaku-x402: No activity this month.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"github-advanced-security\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 4.5,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 0,\n \"reviewScore\": 4.5,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"humuhimi\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/35215680?u=029a1ed6ea6a26ebf1cfd081cba6af2e6d32ef6d&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 4.3,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 4.1,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0.2,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"samarth30\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/48334430?u=1fc119a6c2deb8cf60448b4c8961cb21dc69baeb&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 4,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 4,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"samarth30: This month, samarth30's contribution was focused on planning for new billing functionality in the Eliza Cloud product. They initiated this effort by creating an issue to track the integration of Stripe for settings and billing (elizaos/eliza#6118).\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"LinuxIsCool\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/31582215?u=b8eb5d3849bf877a3a0b686cf1632aca92e744ae&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 4,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 4,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"LinuxIsCool: This month, LinuxIsCool's contributions were focused on project maintenance within the elizaos/eliza repository. They identified and opened two issues regarding project health: #6122 about missing documentation and #6121 concerning an outdated changelog.\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"tdnupe3\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/25161668?u=94680b6bcbcfce954c7a9dd09d667a3919953041&v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"skurzyp\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/98319381?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"nikatuz8-cell\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/243873833?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"linear\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/20150?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": \"linear: This month's activity consisted of creating an issue to define entity-level row-level security in elizaos/eliza (#6112).\"\n },\n {\n \"username\": \"christophwallacher-web\",\n \"avatarUrl\": \"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/233379771?v=4\",\n \"totalScore\": 2,\n \"prScore\": 0,\n \"issueScore\": 2,\n \"reviewScore\": 0,\n \"commentScore\": 0,\n \"summary\": null\n }\n ],\n \"newPRs\": 17,\n \"mergedPRs\": 8,\n \"newIssues\": 32,\n \"closedIssues\": 18,\n \"activeContributors\": 19\n}"
]
}