# elizaOS Discord - 2026-03-07

## Overall Discussion Highlights

### Token Economics and Community Concerns

The primary focus of discussions centered on significant community anxiety regarding the ELIZAOS token's market performance. Multiple community members (gby, Rainman, g, elizasib) voiced frustration about the token reaching new all-time lows and questioned the team's commitment to the project. The sentiment reflected concerns about perceived lack of progress despite previous shipping timelines.

Odilitime, representing the team, addressed these concerns by clarifying ongoing development efforts, including active work on airdrops for token holders and promotion of ecosystem builders. A key clarification was made distinguishing between "the team" and Shaw regarding token holdings and selling activity.

### Project Development Status

**Milady Token Clarification:** Despite community speculation, Odilitime confirmed that no legitimate Milady token has been launched yet. Boj/acc made cryptic statements suggesting the official token will launch on AVAX chain rather than BSC or SOL.

**Infrastructure:** Cloud infrastructure was reported to be functioning well.

**Spartan Degen AI:** Development continues on this component, with Odilitime confirming ongoing work in response to status inquiries.

### Strategic Discussions

Thanos💨 raised questions about capital allocation strategy, specifically why the team doesn't implement buybacks during periods of price depression. This suggestion remained unanswered but represents a community desire for more active token economics management.

### Community Engagement

The discussion revealed tension between long-term holders seeking greater transparency and team members defending ongoing development efforts despite challenging market conditions. Concerns were raised about missed 2025 shipping deadlines (now in March), lack of marketing efforts, and reduced Discord activity.

### Minimal Technical Activity

The 💬-coders channel showed minimal activity, with only a brief outreach message from wizardev regarding cryptocurrency experience, indicating limited technical collaboration during this period.

## Key Questions & Answers

**Q: Which Milady token is the legit one?**  
**A:** There is no legit Milady token yet (answered by Odilitime)

**Q: Why does it feel like the team has lost interest in the token?**  
**A:** The team is still building, working on airdrops for holders and promoting builders; market is down and FUD is up (answered by Odilitime)

**Q: What about Spartan Degen AI?**  
**A:** Still working on him (answered by Odilitime)

### Unanswered Questions

- Is the team interested in OTC investment? (asked by KOL Nicky)
- Why doesn't the team do buybacks when prices are depressed? (asked by Thanos💨)
- Why does Shaw hold 2.6%? (asked by g)

## Community Help & Collaboration

**Milady Token Confusion**  
Helper: Odilitime | Helpee: g  
Odilitime clarified confusion about the legitimate Milady token, confirming that no legitimate version exists yet despite community speculation.

**Team Commitment Concerns**  
Helper: Odilitime | Helpee: Community  
Addressed widespread concerns about team selling and commitment by clarifying the distinction between team actions and Shaw's individual holdings, and confirmed ongoing building efforts.

**Project Status Update**  
Helper: Odilitime | Helpee: Quaser M  
Provided status confirmation on Spartan Degen AI development in response to community inquiry.

## Action Items

### Technical
- **Complete airdrops for token holders** - Mentioned by Odilitime
- **Continue development on Spartan Degen AI** - Mentioned by Odilitime
- **Implement buyback program during price depression** - Mentioned by Thanos💨

### Documentation
- **Clarify official Milady token status and launch plans** - Mentioned by g
- **Provide transparency on Shaw's token holdings and role** - Mentioned by g

### Feature
- No specific feature requests were documented beyond the buyback program suggestion

---

*Note: This summary reflects a period of community concern and limited technical activity, with most discussion focused on token economics, transparency, and project timeline concerns rather than technical development or implementation details.*